Proving the sign map is a homomorphism
$begingroup$
Definition: A transposition is a 2-cycle permutation.
Definition: A permutation $sigma$ is called even if its decomposition into transpositions has even number of transpositions; analogously for odd permutations.
Now, coming to the question, how do I prove using this definition that the sign map $operatorname{sgn}colon S_nto{pm 1}$ assigning a permutation in the symmetric group $S_n$ to its sign (+1 if even, -1 if odd) is a homomorphism?
I know how to prove it using the definition of the sign map being the determinant of the $ntimes n$ permutation matrix associated to a permutation (in which case it is obvious since $operatorname{det}$ is multiplicative).
group-theory permutation-cycles
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Definition: A transposition is a 2-cycle permutation.
Definition: A permutation $sigma$ is called even if its decomposition into transpositions has even number of transpositions; analogously for odd permutations.
Now, coming to the question, how do I prove using this definition that the sign map $operatorname{sgn}colon S_nto{pm 1}$ assigning a permutation in the symmetric group $S_n$ to its sign (+1 if even, -1 if odd) is a homomorphism?
I know how to prove it using the definition of the sign map being the determinant of the $ntimes n$ permutation matrix associated to a permutation (in which case it is obvious since $operatorname{det}$ is multiplicative).
group-theory permutation-cycles
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Definition: A transposition is a 2-cycle permutation.
Definition: A permutation $sigma$ is called even if its decomposition into transpositions has even number of transpositions; analogously for odd permutations.
Now, coming to the question, how do I prove using this definition that the sign map $operatorname{sgn}colon S_nto{pm 1}$ assigning a permutation in the symmetric group $S_n$ to its sign (+1 if even, -1 if odd) is a homomorphism?
I know how to prove it using the definition of the sign map being the determinant of the $ntimes n$ permutation matrix associated to a permutation (in which case it is obvious since $operatorname{det}$ is multiplicative).
group-theory permutation-cycles
$endgroup$
Definition: A transposition is a 2-cycle permutation.
Definition: A permutation $sigma$ is called even if its decomposition into transpositions has even number of transpositions; analogously for odd permutations.
Now, coming to the question, how do I prove using this definition that the sign map $operatorname{sgn}colon S_nto{pm 1}$ assigning a permutation in the symmetric group $S_n$ to its sign (+1 if even, -1 if odd) is a homomorphism?
I know how to prove it using the definition of the sign map being the determinant of the $ntimes n$ permutation matrix associated to a permutation (in which case it is obvious since $operatorname{det}$ is multiplicative).
group-theory permutation-cycles
group-theory permutation-cycles
asked Dec 26 '18 at 17:21
learnerlearner
689416
689416
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If it enough to know that the parity of the number of transpositions which appear in a given decomposition does not depend of the specific decomposition.
Then if $sigma=t_1...t_n, sign(sigma)=(-1)^n$ this is well defined since the parity of $n$ does not depend of the composition. If $sigma'=t'_1....t'_{n'}, sign(sigma')=(-1)^{n'}$ and as $sigmasigma'=t_1....t_nt'_1...t'_{n'}, sign(sigmasigma')=(-1)^{n+n'}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I know that; I don't see how that answers my question.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 26 '18 at 17:28
$begingroup$
you see now how it answer ?
$endgroup$
– Tsemo Aristide
Dec 26 '18 at 17:30
$begingroup$
Yes, I do. And I feel quite silly that I didn't think of it myself. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 26 '18 at 17:32
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053122%2fproving-the-sign-map-is-a-homomorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If it enough to know that the parity of the number of transpositions which appear in a given decomposition does not depend of the specific decomposition.
Then if $sigma=t_1...t_n, sign(sigma)=(-1)^n$ this is well defined since the parity of $n$ does not depend of the composition. If $sigma'=t'_1....t'_{n'}, sign(sigma')=(-1)^{n'}$ and as $sigmasigma'=t_1....t_nt'_1...t'_{n'}, sign(sigmasigma')=(-1)^{n+n'}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I know that; I don't see how that answers my question.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 26 '18 at 17:28
$begingroup$
you see now how it answer ?
$endgroup$
– Tsemo Aristide
Dec 26 '18 at 17:30
$begingroup$
Yes, I do. And I feel quite silly that I didn't think of it myself. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 26 '18 at 17:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If it enough to know that the parity of the number of transpositions which appear in a given decomposition does not depend of the specific decomposition.
Then if $sigma=t_1...t_n, sign(sigma)=(-1)^n$ this is well defined since the parity of $n$ does not depend of the composition. If $sigma'=t'_1....t'_{n'}, sign(sigma')=(-1)^{n'}$ and as $sigmasigma'=t_1....t_nt'_1...t'_{n'}, sign(sigmasigma')=(-1)^{n+n'}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I know that; I don't see how that answers my question.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 26 '18 at 17:28
$begingroup$
you see now how it answer ?
$endgroup$
– Tsemo Aristide
Dec 26 '18 at 17:30
$begingroup$
Yes, I do. And I feel quite silly that I didn't think of it myself. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 26 '18 at 17:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If it enough to know that the parity of the number of transpositions which appear in a given decomposition does not depend of the specific decomposition.
Then if $sigma=t_1...t_n, sign(sigma)=(-1)^n$ this is well defined since the parity of $n$ does not depend of the composition. If $sigma'=t'_1....t'_{n'}, sign(sigma')=(-1)^{n'}$ and as $sigmasigma'=t_1....t_nt'_1...t'_{n'}, sign(sigmasigma')=(-1)^{n+n'}$.
$endgroup$
If it enough to know that the parity of the number of transpositions which appear in a given decomposition does not depend of the specific decomposition.
Then if $sigma=t_1...t_n, sign(sigma)=(-1)^n$ this is well defined since the parity of $n$ does not depend of the composition. If $sigma'=t'_1....t'_{n'}, sign(sigma')=(-1)^{n'}$ and as $sigmasigma'=t_1....t_nt'_1...t'_{n'}, sign(sigmasigma')=(-1)^{n+n'}$.
edited Dec 26 '18 at 17:29
answered Dec 26 '18 at 17:26
Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide
58.1k11445
58.1k11445
$begingroup$
I know that; I don't see how that answers my question.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 26 '18 at 17:28
$begingroup$
you see now how it answer ?
$endgroup$
– Tsemo Aristide
Dec 26 '18 at 17:30
$begingroup$
Yes, I do. And I feel quite silly that I didn't think of it myself. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 26 '18 at 17:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know that; I don't see how that answers my question.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 26 '18 at 17:28
$begingroup$
you see now how it answer ?
$endgroup$
– Tsemo Aristide
Dec 26 '18 at 17:30
$begingroup$
Yes, I do. And I feel quite silly that I didn't think of it myself. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 26 '18 at 17:32
$begingroup$
I know that; I don't see how that answers my question.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 26 '18 at 17:28
$begingroup$
I know that; I don't see how that answers my question.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 26 '18 at 17:28
$begingroup$
you see now how it answer ?
$endgroup$
– Tsemo Aristide
Dec 26 '18 at 17:30
$begingroup$
you see now how it answer ?
$endgroup$
– Tsemo Aristide
Dec 26 '18 at 17:30
$begingroup$
Yes, I do. And I feel quite silly that I didn't think of it myself. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 26 '18 at 17:32
$begingroup$
Yes, I do. And I feel quite silly that I didn't think of it myself. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 26 '18 at 17:32
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053122%2fproving-the-sign-map-is-a-homomorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown