Approximate normal operator using linear combination of orthogonal projections











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












For every bounded normal operator $N in mathcal{B(H)}$, and every $epsilon>0$, there is a set ${P_n}$ of pairwise commuting orthogonal projections with sum $I$(identity operator) and corresponding set ${lambda_n}$ in $mathbb{C}$ s.t $||N-sum_{n}lambda_nP_n|| < epsilon$.



I was thinking using functional calculus for normal operator to prove it, but I am still unclear how to start it. Furthermore, there is another similar problem: for a bounded normal operator T such that $0leq Tleq I$, find a sequence of pairwise commuting projections s.t $T=sum_n frac{1}{2^n}P_n$, there is hint for this problem: Let $P_1=chi_{(1/2,1]}, P_2=chi_{(1/4,1/2]cup(3/4,1]}, dots$. I am not sure how to solve those two problems and their connections.



Any help will be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • What is the functional calculus for you? For instance, if you already know that the smallest weak operator topology closed *-algebra containing $N$ is isometrically *-isomorphic to $L^infty$ of some measure space, then the two exercises boil down to approximating the identity function on the spectrum of $N$ by simple function.
    – Bartosz Malman
    Dec 5 at 18:31












  • @BartoszMalman I meant the continuous functional calculus for normal operator. Is it just by continuous functional calculus, then we just need to approximate the identity functions?
    –  apple
    Dec 5 at 19:44















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












For every bounded normal operator $N in mathcal{B(H)}$, and every $epsilon>0$, there is a set ${P_n}$ of pairwise commuting orthogonal projections with sum $I$(identity operator) and corresponding set ${lambda_n}$ in $mathbb{C}$ s.t $||N-sum_{n}lambda_nP_n|| < epsilon$.



I was thinking using functional calculus for normal operator to prove it, but I am still unclear how to start it. Furthermore, there is another similar problem: for a bounded normal operator T such that $0leq Tleq I$, find a sequence of pairwise commuting projections s.t $T=sum_n frac{1}{2^n}P_n$, there is hint for this problem: Let $P_1=chi_{(1/2,1]}, P_2=chi_{(1/4,1/2]cup(3/4,1]}, dots$. I am not sure how to solve those two problems and their connections.



Any help will be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • What is the functional calculus for you? For instance, if you already know that the smallest weak operator topology closed *-algebra containing $N$ is isometrically *-isomorphic to $L^infty$ of some measure space, then the two exercises boil down to approximating the identity function on the spectrum of $N$ by simple function.
    – Bartosz Malman
    Dec 5 at 18:31












  • @BartoszMalman I meant the continuous functional calculus for normal operator. Is it just by continuous functional calculus, then we just need to approximate the identity functions?
    –  apple
    Dec 5 at 19:44













up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





For every bounded normal operator $N in mathcal{B(H)}$, and every $epsilon>0$, there is a set ${P_n}$ of pairwise commuting orthogonal projections with sum $I$(identity operator) and corresponding set ${lambda_n}$ in $mathbb{C}$ s.t $||N-sum_{n}lambda_nP_n|| < epsilon$.



I was thinking using functional calculus for normal operator to prove it, but I am still unclear how to start it. Furthermore, there is another similar problem: for a bounded normal operator T such that $0leq Tleq I$, find a sequence of pairwise commuting projections s.t $T=sum_n frac{1}{2^n}P_n$, there is hint for this problem: Let $P_1=chi_{(1/2,1]}, P_2=chi_{(1/4,1/2]cup(3/4,1]}, dots$. I am not sure how to solve those two problems and their connections.



Any help will be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question













For every bounded normal operator $N in mathcal{B(H)}$, and every $epsilon>0$, there is a set ${P_n}$ of pairwise commuting orthogonal projections with sum $I$(identity operator) and corresponding set ${lambda_n}$ in $mathbb{C}$ s.t $||N-sum_{n}lambda_nP_n|| < epsilon$.



I was thinking using functional calculus for normal operator to prove it, but I am still unclear how to start it. Furthermore, there is another similar problem: for a bounded normal operator T such that $0leq Tleq I$, find a sequence of pairwise commuting projections s.t $T=sum_n frac{1}{2^n}P_n$, there is hint for this problem: Let $P_1=chi_{(1/2,1]}, P_2=chi_{(1/4,1/2]cup(3/4,1]}, dots$. I am not sure how to solve those two problems and their connections.



Any help will be appreciated.







functional-analysis operator-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 5 at 17:53









apple

467




467












  • What is the functional calculus for you? For instance, if you already know that the smallest weak operator topology closed *-algebra containing $N$ is isometrically *-isomorphic to $L^infty$ of some measure space, then the two exercises boil down to approximating the identity function on the spectrum of $N$ by simple function.
    – Bartosz Malman
    Dec 5 at 18:31












  • @BartoszMalman I meant the continuous functional calculus for normal operator. Is it just by continuous functional calculus, then we just need to approximate the identity functions?
    –  apple
    Dec 5 at 19:44


















  • What is the functional calculus for you? For instance, if you already know that the smallest weak operator topology closed *-algebra containing $N$ is isometrically *-isomorphic to $L^infty$ of some measure space, then the two exercises boil down to approximating the identity function on the spectrum of $N$ by simple function.
    – Bartosz Malman
    Dec 5 at 18:31












  • @BartoszMalman I meant the continuous functional calculus for normal operator. Is it just by continuous functional calculus, then we just need to approximate the identity functions?
    –  apple
    Dec 5 at 19:44
















What is the functional calculus for you? For instance, if you already know that the smallest weak operator topology closed *-algebra containing $N$ is isometrically *-isomorphic to $L^infty$ of some measure space, then the two exercises boil down to approximating the identity function on the spectrum of $N$ by simple function.
– Bartosz Malman
Dec 5 at 18:31






What is the functional calculus for you? For instance, if you already know that the smallest weak operator topology closed *-algebra containing $N$ is isometrically *-isomorphic to $L^infty$ of some measure space, then the two exercises boil down to approximating the identity function on the spectrum of $N$ by simple function.
– Bartosz Malman
Dec 5 at 18:31














@BartoszMalman I meant the continuous functional calculus for normal operator. Is it just by continuous functional calculus, then we just need to approximate the identity functions?
–  apple
Dec 5 at 19:44




@BartoszMalman I meant the continuous functional calculus for normal operator. Is it just by continuous functional calculus, then we just need to approximate the identity functions?
–  apple
Dec 5 at 19:44










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










Using compactness of $sigma(N)$, find a partition $sigma(N)=bigcup_{n=1}^k K_n$ with each $K_n$ measurable and contained in a ball of radius $varepsilon$. Now let $P_n=1_{K_n}(N)$, and $lambda_nin K_n$. Then
begin{align}
|N-sum_nlambda_nP_n|&=left|sum_n (NP_n-lambda_nP_n)right|
=max_n|NP_n-lambda_nP_n| \
&=max_nleft|int_{K_n}(lambda-lambda_n),dE(lambda) right|
leqmax_nvarepsilon|P_n|=varepsilon.
end{align}



For the second part, you use the identity
$$
t=sum_{n=1}^infty 2^{-n},1_{R_n}(t),=sum_{n=1}^n2^{-n},1_{{tgeq 1-2^{-n}}}(t).
$$

where $R_n={t: tgeqsum_{k=1}^n2^{-k}}$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • are you implicitly using the spectral theorem or continuous functional calculus for normal operators?
    –  apple
    Dec 5 at 19:45










  • Implicitly? I would say fairly explicitly.
    – Martin Argerami
    Dec 5 at 20:38











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027411%2fapproximate-normal-operator-using-linear-combination-of-orthogonal-projections%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote



accepted










Using compactness of $sigma(N)$, find a partition $sigma(N)=bigcup_{n=1}^k K_n$ with each $K_n$ measurable and contained in a ball of radius $varepsilon$. Now let $P_n=1_{K_n}(N)$, and $lambda_nin K_n$. Then
begin{align}
|N-sum_nlambda_nP_n|&=left|sum_n (NP_n-lambda_nP_n)right|
=max_n|NP_n-lambda_nP_n| \
&=max_nleft|int_{K_n}(lambda-lambda_n),dE(lambda) right|
leqmax_nvarepsilon|P_n|=varepsilon.
end{align}



For the second part, you use the identity
$$
t=sum_{n=1}^infty 2^{-n},1_{R_n}(t),=sum_{n=1}^n2^{-n},1_{{tgeq 1-2^{-n}}}(t).
$$

where $R_n={t: tgeqsum_{k=1}^n2^{-k}}$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • are you implicitly using the spectral theorem or continuous functional calculus for normal operators?
    –  apple
    Dec 5 at 19:45










  • Implicitly? I would say fairly explicitly.
    – Martin Argerami
    Dec 5 at 20:38















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










Using compactness of $sigma(N)$, find a partition $sigma(N)=bigcup_{n=1}^k K_n$ with each $K_n$ measurable and contained in a ball of radius $varepsilon$. Now let $P_n=1_{K_n}(N)$, and $lambda_nin K_n$. Then
begin{align}
|N-sum_nlambda_nP_n|&=left|sum_n (NP_n-lambda_nP_n)right|
=max_n|NP_n-lambda_nP_n| \
&=max_nleft|int_{K_n}(lambda-lambda_n),dE(lambda) right|
leqmax_nvarepsilon|P_n|=varepsilon.
end{align}



For the second part, you use the identity
$$
t=sum_{n=1}^infty 2^{-n},1_{R_n}(t),=sum_{n=1}^n2^{-n},1_{{tgeq 1-2^{-n}}}(t).
$$

where $R_n={t: tgeqsum_{k=1}^n2^{-k}}$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • are you implicitly using the spectral theorem or continuous functional calculus for normal operators?
    –  apple
    Dec 5 at 19:45










  • Implicitly? I would say fairly explicitly.
    – Martin Argerami
    Dec 5 at 20:38













up vote
0
down vote



accepted







up vote
0
down vote



accepted






Using compactness of $sigma(N)$, find a partition $sigma(N)=bigcup_{n=1}^k K_n$ with each $K_n$ measurable and contained in a ball of radius $varepsilon$. Now let $P_n=1_{K_n}(N)$, and $lambda_nin K_n$. Then
begin{align}
|N-sum_nlambda_nP_n|&=left|sum_n (NP_n-lambda_nP_n)right|
=max_n|NP_n-lambda_nP_n| \
&=max_nleft|int_{K_n}(lambda-lambda_n),dE(lambda) right|
leqmax_nvarepsilon|P_n|=varepsilon.
end{align}



For the second part, you use the identity
$$
t=sum_{n=1}^infty 2^{-n},1_{R_n}(t),=sum_{n=1}^n2^{-n},1_{{tgeq 1-2^{-n}}}(t).
$$

where $R_n={t: tgeqsum_{k=1}^n2^{-k}}$.






share|cite|improve this answer












Using compactness of $sigma(N)$, find a partition $sigma(N)=bigcup_{n=1}^k K_n$ with each $K_n$ measurable and contained in a ball of radius $varepsilon$. Now let $P_n=1_{K_n}(N)$, and $lambda_nin K_n$. Then
begin{align}
|N-sum_nlambda_nP_n|&=left|sum_n (NP_n-lambda_nP_n)right|
=max_n|NP_n-lambda_nP_n| \
&=max_nleft|int_{K_n}(lambda-lambda_n),dE(lambda) right|
leqmax_nvarepsilon|P_n|=varepsilon.
end{align}



For the second part, you use the identity
$$
t=sum_{n=1}^infty 2^{-n},1_{R_n}(t),=sum_{n=1}^n2^{-n},1_{{tgeq 1-2^{-n}}}(t).
$$

where $R_n={t: tgeqsum_{k=1}^n2^{-k}}$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 5 at 19:14









Martin Argerami

123k1176174




123k1176174












  • are you implicitly using the spectral theorem or continuous functional calculus for normal operators?
    –  apple
    Dec 5 at 19:45










  • Implicitly? I would say fairly explicitly.
    – Martin Argerami
    Dec 5 at 20:38


















  • are you implicitly using the spectral theorem or continuous functional calculus for normal operators?
    –  apple
    Dec 5 at 19:45










  • Implicitly? I would say fairly explicitly.
    – Martin Argerami
    Dec 5 at 20:38
















are you implicitly using the spectral theorem or continuous functional calculus for normal operators?
–  apple
Dec 5 at 19:45




are you implicitly using the spectral theorem or continuous functional calculus for normal operators?
–  apple
Dec 5 at 19:45












Implicitly? I would say fairly explicitly.
– Martin Argerami
Dec 5 at 20:38




Implicitly? I would say fairly explicitly.
– Martin Argerami
Dec 5 at 20:38


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027411%2fapproximate-normal-operator-using-linear-combination-of-orthogonal-projections%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Måne

Storängen

VLT Carioca