How would I go about proving that the language accepted by a regular expression is subset of the language...











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Recursive cases: Let A, B be arbitrary RegExps and Let C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$ be cfg(A) and cfg(B) where the properties of cfg can be defined as:




  • cfg($phi$) = the CFG with no productions

  • cfg($epsilon$) = the CFG with no productions

  • cfg(a) = the CFG with just the prouction s $to$ a for any a $in$ $sum$

  • cfg(AB) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$S$_{B}$

  • cfg(A$bigcup$B) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$ | S$_{B}$

  • cfg(A*) = C$_{A}$, S$toepsilon$ | S$_{A}$S$_{B}$


The goal: Prove that for any R $in$ RegExp, the language accepted by R is a subset of the language accepted by cfg(R).



For my base cases, I think I should probably make A, B be empty sets... but where do I go from there? I'm still really confused about the structure of induction proofs and what my inductive hypothesis should be.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Recursive cases: Let A, B be arbitrary RegExps and Let C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$ be cfg(A) and cfg(B) where the properties of cfg can be defined as:




    • cfg($phi$) = the CFG with no productions

    • cfg($epsilon$) = the CFG with no productions

    • cfg(a) = the CFG with just the prouction s $to$ a for any a $in$ $sum$

    • cfg(AB) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$S$_{B}$

    • cfg(A$bigcup$B) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$ | S$_{B}$

    • cfg(A*) = C$_{A}$, S$toepsilon$ | S$_{A}$S$_{B}$


    The goal: Prove that for any R $in$ RegExp, the language accepted by R is a subset of the language accepted by cfg(R).



    For my base cases, I think I should probably make A, B be empty sets... but where do I go from there? I'm still really confused about the structure of induction proofs and what my inductive hypothesis should be.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Recursive cases: Let A, B be arbitrary RegExps and Let C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$ be cfg(A) and cfg(B) where the properties of cfg can be defined as:




      • cfg($phi$) = the CFG with no productions

      • cfg($epsilon$) = the CFG with no productions

      • cfg(a) = the CFG with just the prouction s $to$ a for any a $in$ $sum$

      • cfg(AB) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$S$_{B}$

      • cfg(A$bigcup$B) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$ | S$_{B}$

      • cfg(A*) = C$_{A}$, S$toepsilon$ | S$_{A}$S$_{B}$


      The goal: Prove that for any R $in$ RegExp, the language accepted by R is a subset of the language accepted by cfg(R).



      For my base cases, I think I should probably make A, B be empty sets... but where do I go from there? I'm still really confused about the structure of induction proofs and what my inductive hypothesis should be.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Recursive cases: Let A, B be arbitrary RegExps and Let C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$ be cfg(A) and cfg(B) where the properties of cfg can be defined as:




      • cfg($phi$) = the CFG with no productions

      • cfg($epsilon$) = the CFG with no productions

      • cfg(a) = the CFG with just the prouction s $to$ a for any a $in$ $sum$

      • cfg(AB) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$S$_{B}$

      • cfg(A$bigcup$B) = C$_{A}$, C$_{B}$, S$to$S$_{A}$ | S$_{B}$

      • cfg(A*) = C$_{A}$, S$toepsilon$ | S$_{A}$S$_{B}$


      The goal: Prove that for any R $in$ RegExp, the language accepted by R is a subset of the language accepted by cfg(R).



      For my base cases, I think I should probably make A, B be empty sets... but where do I go from there? I'm still really confused about the structure of induction proofs and what my inductive hypothesis should be.







      discrete-mathematics proof-writing recursion context-free-grammar regular-expressions






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 6 at 1:01









      digiHarmonious

      211




      211



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027894%2fhow-would-i-go-about-proving-that-the-language-accepted-by-a-regular-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027894%2fhow-would-i-go-about-proving-that-the-language-accepted-by-a-regular-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Måne

          Storängen

          VLT Carioca