Basic Spinning Top Prints Fail in Same Location
$begingroup$
My attempted prints on my Creative Ender3 of model:
https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:23686
The print uses support structures (generated by Ultimaker Cura) failed in the same location twice. It is printed in PLA (1.75 mm) first print at 200 °C, second print at 196 °C.
ender-3 troubleshooting
asked Dec 30 '18 at 6:28
hunterphunterp
1304
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My attempted prints on my Creative Ender3 of model:
https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:23686
The print uses support structures (generated by Ultimaker Cura) failed in the same location twice. It is printed in PLA (1.75 mm) first print at 200 °C, second print at 196 °C.
ender-3 troubleshooting
asked Dec 30 '18 at 6:28
hunterphunterp
1304
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My attempted prints on my Creative Ender3 of model:
https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:23686
The print uses support structures (generated by Ultimaker Cura) failed in the same location twice. It is printed in PLA (1.75 mm) first print at 200 °C, second print at 196 °C.
ender-3 troubleshooting
asked Dec 30 '18 at 6:28
hunterphunterp
1304
$endgroup$
My attempted prints on my Creative Ender3 of model:
https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:23686
The print uses support structures (generated by Ultimaker Cura) failed in the same location twice. It is printed in PLA (1.75 mm) first print at 200 °C, second print at 196 °C.
ender-3 troubleshooting
ender-3 troubleshooting
asked Dec 30 '18 at 6:28
hunterphunterp
1304
asked Dec 30 '18 at 6:28
hunterphunterp
1304
edited Dec 31 '18 at 1:46
hunterp
asked Dec 30 '18 at 6:28
hunterphunterp
1304
asked Dec 30 '18 at 6:28
hunterphunterp
1304
asked Dec 30 '18 at 6:28
hunterphunterp
1304
1304
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To me, it looks like your G-code induces an incomplete layer of support on the still standing piece, which later down leads to the print failing.
Re-slice the whole thing.
As a matter of fact, I would cut the model in its widest place and print both with the large face flat on the surface and glue the two pieces together after printing. That way I can achieve:
- no need for support material
- maximum adhesion
- no surface problems on the transition from the support to the print
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:24
TrishTrish
5,78421239
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Good advice to print this in 2 pieces, lots of supports are usually a pain for printing as the chances that something goes wrong increases significantly with the increasing amount of support.
$endgroup$
– 0scar
Dec 30 '18 at 13:25
$begingroup$
Thank you Trish!!! this is exactly the kind of help and wisdom I was looking for. And it lets me know that 3d printing is not some magic press a button process (yet ;-) ) Great answer, and thank you so much!!
$endgroup$
– hunterp
Dec 31 '18 at 1:46
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "640"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2f3dprinting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f7823%2fbasic-spinning-top-prints-fail-in-same-location%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To me, it looks like your G-code induces an incomplete layer of support on the still standing piece, which later down leads to the print failing.
Re-slice the whole thing.
As a matter of fact, I would cut the model in its widest place and print both with the large face flat on the surface and glue the two pieces together after printing. That way I can achieve:
- no need for support material
- maximum adhesion
- no surface problems on the transition from the support to the print
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:24
TrishTrish
5,78421239
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Good advice to print this in 2 pieces, lots of supports are usually a pain for printing as the chances that something goes wrong increases significantly with the increasing amount of support.
$endgroup$
– 0scar
Dec 30 '18 at 13:25
$begingroup$
Thank you Trish!!! this is exactly the kind of help and wisdom I was looking for. And it lets me know that 3d printing is not some magic press a button process (yet ;-) ) Great answer, and thank you so much!!
$endgroup$
– hunterp
Dec 31 '18 at 1:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To me, it looks like your G-code induces an incomplete layer of support on the still standing piece, which later down leads to the print failing.
Re-slice the whole thing.
As a matter of fact, I would cut the model in its widest place and print both with the large face flat on the surface and glue the two pieces together after printing. That way I can achieve:
- no need for support material
- maximum adhesion
- no surface problems on the transition from the support to the print
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:24
TrishTrish
5,78421239
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Good advice to print this in 2 pieces, lots of supports are usually a pain for printing as the chances that something goes wrong increases significantly with the increasing amount of support.
$endgroup$
– 0scar
Dec 30 '18 at 13:25
$begingroup$
Thank you Trish!!! this is exactly the kind of help and wisdom I was looking for. And it lets me know that 3d printing is not some magic press a button process (yet ;-) ) Great answer, and thank you so much!!
$endgroup$
– hunterp
Dec 31 '18 at 1:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To me, it looks like your G-code induces an incomplete layer of support on the still standing piece, which later down leads to the print failing.
Re-slice the whole thing.
As a matter of fact, I would cut the model in its widest place and print both with the large face flat on the surface and glue the two pieces together after printing. That way I can achieve:
- no need for support material
- maximum adhesion
- no surface problems on the transition from the support to the print
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:24
TrishTrish
5,78421239
$endgroup$
To me, it looks like your G-code induces an incomplete layer of support on the still standing piece, which later down leads to the print failing.
Re-slice the whole thing.
As a matter of fact, I would cut the model in its widest place and print both with the large face flat on the surface and glue the two pieces together after printing. That way I can achieve:
- no need for support material
- maximum adhesion
- no surface problems on the transition from the support to the print
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:24
TrishTrish
5,78421239
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:24
TrishTrish
5,78421239
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:24
TrishTrish
5,78421239
answered Dec 30 '18 at 10:24
TrishTrish
5,78421239
5,78421239
2
$begingroup$
Good advice to print this in 2 pieces, lots of supports are usually a pain for printing as the chances that something goes wrong increases significantly with the increasing amount of support.
$endgroup$
– 0scar
Dec 30 '18 at 13:25
$begingroup$
Thank you Trish!!! this is exactly the kind of help and wisdom I was looking for. And it lets me know that 3d printing is not some magic press a button process (yet ;-) ) Great answer, and thank you so much!!
$endgroup$
– hunterp
Dec 31 '18 at 1:46
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Good advice to print this in 2 pieces, lots of supports are usually a pain for printing as the chances that something goes wrong increases significantly with the increasing amount of support.
$endgroup$
– 0scar
Dec 30 '18 at 13:25
$begingroup$
Thank you Trish!!! this is exactly the kind of help and wisdom I was looking for. And it lets me know that 3d printing is not some magic press a button process (yet ;-) ) Great answer, and thank you so much!!
$endgroup$
– hunterp
Dec 31 '18 at 1:46
2
2
$begingroup$
Good advice to print this in 2 pieces, lots of supports are usually a pain for printing as the chances that something goes wrong increases significantly with the increasing amount of support.
$endgroup$
– 0scar
Dec 30 '18 at 13:25
$begingroup$
Good advice to print this in 2 pieces, lots of supports are usually a pain for printing as the chances that something goes wrong increases significantly with the increasing amount of support.
$endgroup$
– 0scar
Dec 30 '18 at 13:25
$begingroup$
Thank you Trish!!! this is exactly the kind of help and wisdom I was looking for. And it lets me know that 3d printing is not some magic press a button process (yet ;-) ) Great answer, and thank you so much!!
$endgroup$
– hunterp
Dec 31 '18 at 1:46
$begingroup$
Thank you Trish!!! this is exactly the kind of help and wisdom I was looking for. And it lets me know that 3d printing is not some magic press a button process (yet ;-) ) Great answer, and thank you so much!!
$endgroup$
– hunterp
Dec 31 '18 at 1:46
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to 3D Printing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2f3dprinting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f7823%2fbasic-spinning-top-prints-fail-in-same-location%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
