Finding parameters for which the line lies in the plane
I tried to solve the following task:
A line L has equation: $frac{x-2}{p} = frac{y-q}{2}= z-1$, where $p,q in mathbb{R} $. A plane P has equation: $ x +y +3z = 9$. Given that line L lies in the plane P, find the value of $p$ and the value of $q$.
In order to find $p$ and $q$, I did following: I found the parametric form of the line: $x = t p +2$, $ y = 2t +q$, $ z= t+1$, where $t in mathbb{R}$ and then, I inserted these values in the equation of P. I got this:
$(tp +2) + (2t +q) + 3(t+1) = 9$ or
$q +tp + 5t = 4$
Can I just insert now 2 arbitrary real values of $t$ and then solve the system of two linear equations to find $p$ and $q$? Is that correct approach? Thanks in advance.
analytic-geometry plane-geometry
add a comment |
I tried to solve the following task:
A line L has equation: $frac{x-2}{p} = frac{y-q}{2}= z-1$, where $p,q in mathbb{R} $. A plane P has equation: $ x +y +3z = 9$. Given that line L lies in the plane P, find the value of $p$ and the value of $q$.
In order to find $p$ and $q$, I did following: I found the parametric form of the line: $x = t p +2$, $ y = 2t +q$, $ z= t+1$, where $t in mathbb{R}$ and then, I inserted these values in the equation of P. I got this:
$(tp +2) + (2t +q) + 3(t+1) = 9$ or
$q +tp + 5t = 4$
Can I just insert now 2 arbitrary real values of $t$ and then solve the system of two linear equations to find $p$ and $q$? Is that correct approach? Thanks in advance.
analytic-geometry plane-geometry
Isn't there more than one line having this equation that lie in the plane? Infinetly many maybe?
– Fareed AF
Dec 8 at 8:25
add a comment |
I tried to solve the following task:
A line L has equation: $frac{x-2}{p} = frac{y-q}{2}= z-1$, where $p,q in mathbb{R} $. A plane P has equation: $ x +y +3z = 9$. Given that line L lies in the plane P, find the value of $p$ and the value of $q$.
In order to find $p$ and $q$, I did following: I found the parametric form of the line: $x = t p +2$, $ y = 2t +q$, $ z= t+1$, where $t in mathbb{R}$ and then, I inserted these values in the equation of P. I got this:
$(tp +2) + (2t +q) + 3(t+1) = 9$ or
$q +tp + 5t = 4$
Can I just insert now 2 arbitrary real values of $t$ and then solve the system of two linear equations to find $p$ and $q$? Is that correct approach? Thanks in advance.
analytic-geometry plane-geometry
I tried to solve the following task:
A line L has equation: $frac{x-2}{p} = frac{y-q}{2}= z-1$, where $p,q in mathbb{R} $. A plane P has equation: $ x +y +3z = 9$. Given that line L lies in the plane P, find the value of $p$ and the value of $q$.
In order to find $p$ and $q$, I did following: I found the parametric form of the line: $x = t p +2$, $ y = 2t +q$, $ z= t+1$, where $t in mathbb{R}$ and then, I inserted these values in the equation of P. I got this:
$(tp +2) + (2t +q) + 3(t+1) = 9$ or
$q +tp + 5t = 4$
Can I just insert now 2 arbitrary real values of $t$ and then solve the system of two linear equations to find $p$ and $q$? Is that correct approach? Thanks in advance.
analytic-geometry plane-geometry
analytic-geometry plane-geometry
asked Dec 8 at 8:12
user121
273
273
Isn't there more than one line having this equation that lie in the plane? Infinetly many maybe?
– Fareed AF
Dec 8 at 8:25
add a comment |
Isn't there more than one line having this equation that lie in the plane? Infinetly many maybe?
– Fareed AF
Dec 8 at 8:25
Isn't there more than one line having this equation that lie in the plane? Infinetly many maybe?
– Fareed AF
Dec 8 at 8:25
Isn't there more than one line having this equation that lie in the plane? Infinetly many maybe?
– Fareed AF
Dec 8 at 8:25
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Yes, you may do that. You can also note more directly, by comparing the coefficients of $t$, that $p,q$ are real constants, so the only way $t(p+5)=4-q, forall tinBbb R$ is when $p=-5, q=4$.
Another way to find $p,q$ would be to note that $(2,q,1)$ is a point on the line and hence on the plane $implies 2+q+3=9implies q=4$. Also note that the line is parallel to the free vector $(p,2,1)$, that must be perpendicular to the normal of the plane in order for the line to lie in the plane $implies (p,2,1)cdot(1,1,3)=0implies p=-5$.
Great, thanks a lot!
– user121
Dec 8 at 9:34
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030819%2ffinding-parameters-for-which-the-line-lies-in-the-plane%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, you may do that. You can also note more directly, by comparing the coefficients of $t$, that $p,q$ are real constants, so the only way $t(p+5)=4-q, forall tinBbb R$ is when $p=-5, q=4$.
Another way to find $p,q$ would be to note that $(2,q,1)$ is a point on the line and hence on the plane $implies 2+q+3=9implies q=4$. Also note that the line is parallel to the free vector $(p,2,1)$, that must be perpendicular to the normal of the plane in order for the line to lie in the plane $implies (p,2,1)cdot(1,1,3)=0implies p=-5$.
Great, thanks a lot!
– user121
Dec 8 at 9:34
add a comment |
Yes, you may do that. You can also note more directly, by comparing the coefficients of $t$, that $p,q$ are real constants, so the only way $t(p+5)=4-q, forall tinBbb R$ is when $p=-5, q=4$.
Another way to find $p,q$ would be to note that $(2,q,1)$ is a point on the line and hence on the plane $implies 2+q+3=9implies q=4$. Also note that the line is parallel to the free vector $(p,2,1)$, that must be perpendicular to the normal of the plane in order for the line to lie in the plane $implies (p,2,1)cdot(1,1,3)=0implies p=-5$.
Great, thanks a lot!
– user121
Dec 8 at 9:34
add a comment |
Yes, you may do that. You can also note more directly, by comparing the coefficients of $t$, that $p,q$ are real constants, so the only way $t(p+5)=4-q, forall tinBbb R$ is when $p=-5, q=4$.
Another way to find $p,q$ would be to note that $(2,q,1)$ is a point on the line and hence on the plane $implies 2+q+3=9implies q=4$. Also note that the line is parallel to the free vector $(p,2,1)$, that must be perpendicular to the normal of the plane in order for the line to lie in the plane $implies (p,2,1)cdot(1,1,3)=0implies p=-5$.
Yes, you may do that. You can also note more directly, by comparing the coefficients of $t$, that $p,q$ are real constants, so the only way $t(p+5)=4-q, forall tinBbb R$ is when $p=-5, q=4$.
Another way to find $p,q$ would be to note that $(2,q,1)$ is a point on the line and hence on the plane $implies 2+q+3=9implies q=4$. Also note that the line is parallel to the free vector $(p,2,1)$, that must be perpendicular to the normal of the plane in order for the line to lie in the plane $implies (p,2,1)cdot(1,1,3)=0implies p=-5$.
edited Dec 8 at 9:30
answered Dec 8 at 9:22
Shubham Johri
3,861716
3,861716
Great, thanks a lot!
– user121
Dec 8 at 9:34
add a comment |
Great, thanks a lot!
– user121
Dec 8 at 9:34
Great, thanks a lot!
– user121
Dec 8 at 9:34
Great, thanks a lot!
– user121
Dec 8 at 9:34
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030819%2ffinding-parameters-for-which-the-line-lies-in-the-plane%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Isn't there more than one line having this equation that lie in the plane? Infinetly many maybe?
– Fareed AF
Dec 8 at 8:25