Let $r$ be primitive root mod $p$. When $x$ goes from $1$ to $p-1$, then $r^x$ (mod $p$) goes through all the...












2














I'm trying to understand this situation. Why do the powers of primitive roots smaller than $p-1$ generate all DISTINCT elements in $mathbb{Z}_p$? I am aware about what Fermat's little theorem states and about the fact that $mathbb{Z}_p$ has $p-1$ elements in it. Just not sure how to prove that those elements are distinct and I'm having a struggle with finding proper texts about this.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • We define primitive root of $p$ to be a number whose order is $p-1$. Then you should be asking why/how at least one primitive root exists for every prime number..
    – rsadhvika
    Dec 8 at 8:17












  • You can try David Burton's Elementary Number Theory.
    – Brahadeesh
    Dec 8 at 8:25










  • Thank you, I will definetly check this one.
    – R. Jacks
    Dec 8 at 8:37
















2














I'm trying to understand this situation. Why do the powers of primitive roots smaller than $p-1$ generate all DISTINCT elements in $mathbb{Z}_p$? I am aware about what Fermat's little theorem states and about the fact that $mathbb{Z}_p$ has $p-1$ elements in it. Just not sure how to prove that those elements are distinct and I'm having a struggle with finding proper texts about this.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • We define primitive root of $p$ to be a number whose order is $p-1$. Then you should be asking why/how at least one primitive root exists for every prime number..
    – rsadhvika
    Dec 8 at 8:17












  • You can try David Burton's Elementary Number Theory.
    – Brahadeesh
    Dec 8 at 8:25










  • Thank you, I will definetly check this one.
    – R. Jacks
    Dec 8 at 8:37














2












2








2







I'm trying to understand this situation. Why do the powers of primitive roots smaller than $p-1$ generate all DISTINCT elements in $mathbb{Z}_p$? I am aware about what Fermat's little theorem states and about the fact that $mathbb{Z}_p$ has $p-1$ elements in it. Just not sure how to prove that those elements are distinct and I'm having a struggle with finding proper texts about this.










share|cite|improve this question















I'm trying to understand this situation. Why do the powers of primitive roots smaller than $p-1$ generate all DISTINCT elements in $mathbb{Z}_p$? I am aware about what Fermat's little theorem states and about the fact that $mathbb{Z}_p$ has $p-1$ elements in it. Just not sure how to prove that those elements are distinct and I'm having a struggle with finding proper texts about this.







abstract-algebra number-theory elementary-number-theory cryptography






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 8 at 8:25









Brahadeesh

6,11742360




6,11742360










asked Dec 8 at 8:10









R. Jacks

112




112












  • We define primitive root of $p$ to be a number whose order is $p-1$. Then you should be asking why/how at least one primitive root exists for every prime number..
    – rsadhvika
    Dec 8 at 8:17












  • You can try David Burton's Elementary Number Theory.
    – Brahadeesh
    Dec 8 at 8:25










  • Thank you, I will definetly check this one.
    – R. Jacks
    Dec 8 at 8:37


















  • We define primitive root of $p$ to be a number whose order is $p-1$. Then you should be asking why/how at least one primitive root exists for every prime number..
    – rsadhvika
    Dec 8 at 8:17












  • You can try David Burton's Elementary Number Theory.
    – Brahadeesh
    Dec 8 at 8:25










  • Thank you, I will definetly check this one.
    – R. Jacks
    Dec 8 at 8:37
















We define primitive root of $p$ to be a number whose order is $p-1$. Then you should be asking why/how at least one primitive root exists for every prime number..
– rsadhvika
Dec 8 at 8:17






We define primitive root of $p$ to be a number whose order is $p-1$. Then you should be asking why/how at least one primitive root exists for every prime number..
– rsadhvika
Dec 8 at 8:17














You can try David Burton's Elementary Number Theory.
– Brahadeesh
Dec 8 at 8:25




You can try David Burton's Elementary Number Theory.
– Brahadeesh
Dec 8 at 8:25












Thank you, I will definetly check this one.
– R. Jacks
Dec 8 at 8:37




Thank you, I will definetly check this one.
– R. Jacks
Dec 8 at 8:37










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














Suppose $r^aequiv r^b pmod p $ for some $1leq a,bleq p-1$ . Since $(r^b,p)=1$,inverse of $r^b$ exists, say, $r^{-b}$. Multiplying the first equation by $r^{-b}$ will give us $r^{a-b}equiv 1 pmod p $. Since $r $ is a primitive root and $1leq a,bleq p-1$, the only possibility is $a=b $. Hence, $r^x pmod p$ produces distinct elements as $x$ varies from $1$ to $p-1$. Since there are $p-1$ distinct elements, these elements corresponds the elements of the set ${1,2,ldots,p-1} $.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Thank you! This was a big help.
    – R. Jacks
    Dec 9 at 11:59



















1














We have a group of order $p-1$ (the non-zero class mod $p$ under multiplication) and by definition a primitive root is an element of order $p-1$, so $x^{p-1} =1$ and $x^n neq 1$ for all $1 le n < p-1$ ($p-1$ is the minimal power that gives $1$). Distinctness is then simpel group theory:



If $x^r = x^s$ for some $1le s < r < p-1$ then $x^rcdot (x^s)^{-1} = x^{(r-s)}=1$ and as $1 le r-s < p-1$ this contradicts the minimality condition of the order. So all $x^r$ are distinct for $1 le r < p-1$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thank you! Got this one explained and now I can continue with existence.
    – R. Jacks
    Dec 9 at 11:59











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030817%2flet-r-be-primitive-root-mod-p-when-x-goes-from-1-to-p-1-then-rx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














Suppose $r^aequiv r^b pmod p $ for some $1leq a,bleq p-1$ . Since $(r^b,p)=1$,inverse of $r^b$ exists, say, $r^{-b}$. Multiplying the first equation by $r^{-b}$ will give us $r^{a-b}equiv 1 pmod p $. Since $r $ is a primitive root and $1leq a,bleq p-1$, the only possibility is $a=b $. Hence, $r^x pmod p$ produces distinct elements as $x$ varies from $1$ to $p-1$. Since there are $p-1$ distinct elements, these elements corresponds the elements of the set ${1,2,ldots,p-1} $.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Thank you! This was a big help.
    – R. Jacks
    Dec 9 at 11:59
















1














Suppose $r^aequiv r^b pmod p $ for some $1leq a,bleq p-1$ . Since $(r^b,p)=1$,inverse of $r^b$ exists, say, $r^{-b}$. Multiplying the first equation by $r^{-b}$ will give us $r^{a-b}equiv 1 pmod p $. Since $r $ is a primitive root and $1leq a,bleq p-1$, the only possibility is $a=b $. Hence, $r^x pmod p$ produces distinct elements as $x$ varies from $1$ to $p-1$. Since there are $p-1$ distinct elements, these elements corresponds the elements of the set ${1,2,ldots,p-1} $.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Thank you! This was a big help.
    – R. Jacks
    Dec 9 at 11:59














1












1








1






Suppose $r^aequiv r^b pmod p $ for some $1leq a,bleq p-1$ . Since $(r^b,p)=1$,inverse of $r^b$ exists, say, $r^{-b}$. Multiplying the first equation by $r^{-b}$ will give us $r^{a-b}equiv 1 pmod p $. Since $r $ is a primitive root and $1leq a,bleq p-1$, the only possibility is $a=b $. Hence, $r^x pmod p$ produces distinct elements as $x$ varies from $1$ to $p-1$. Since there are $p-1$ distinct elements, these elements corresponds the elements of the set ${1,2,ldots,p-1} $.






share|cite|improve this answer












Suppose $r^aequiv r^b pmod p $ for some $1leq a,bleq p-1$ . Since $(r^b,p)=1$,inverse of $r^b$ exists, say, $r^{-b}$. Multiplying the first equation by $r^{-b}$ will give us $r^{a-b}equiv 1 pmod p $. Since $r $ is a primitive root and $1leq a,bleq p-1$, the only possibility is $a=b $. Hence, $r^x pmod p$ produces distinct elements as $x$ varies from $1$ to $p-1$. Since there are $p-1$ distinct elements, these elements corresponds the elements of the set ${1,2,ldots,p-1} $.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 8 at 9:51









Thomas Shelby

1,242116




1,242116








  • 1




    Thank you! This was a big help.
    – R. Jacks
    Dec 9 at 11:59














  • 1




    Thank you! This was a big help.
    – R. Jacks
    Dec 9 at 11:59








1




1




Thank you! This was a big help.
– R. Jacks
Dec 9 at 11:59




Thank you! This was a big help.
– R. Jacks
Dec 9 at 11:59











1














We have a group of order $p-1$ (the non-zero class mod $p$ under multiplication) and by definition a primitive root is an element of order $p-1$, so $x^{p-1} =1$ and $x^n neq 1$ for all $1 le n < p-1$ ($p-1$ is the minimal power that gives $1$). Distinctness is then simpel group theory:



If $x^r = x^s$ for some $1le s < r < p-1$ then $x^rcdot (x^s)^{-1} = x^{(r-s)}=1$ and as $1 le r-s < p-1$ this contradicts the minimality condition of the order. So all $x^r$ are distinct for $1 le r < p-1$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thank you! Got this one explained and now I can continue with existence.
    – R. Jacks
    Dec 9 at 11:59
















1














We have a group of order $p-1$ (the non-zero class mod $p$ under multiplication) and by definition a primitive root is an element of order $p-1$, so $x^{p-1} =1$ and $x^n neq 1$ for all $1 le n < p-1$ ($p-1$ is the minimal power that gives $1$). Distinctness is then simpel group theory:



If $x^r = x^s$ for some $1le s < r < p-1$ then $x^rcdot (x^s)^{-1} = x^{(r-s)}=1$ and as $1 le r-s < p-1$ this contradicts the minimality condition of the order. So all $x^r$ are distinct for $1 le r < p-1$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thank you! Got this one explained and now I can continue with existence.
    – R. Jacks
    Dec 9 at 11:59














1












1








1






We have a group of order $p-1$ (the non-zero class mod $p$ under multiplication) and by definition a primitive root is an element of order $p-1$, so $x^{p-1} =1$ and $x^n neq 1$ for all $1 le n < p-1$ ($p-1$ is the minimal power that gives $1$). Distinctness is then simpel group theory:



If $x^r = x^s$ for some $1le s < r < p-1$ then $x^rcdot (x^s)^{-1} = x^{(r-s)}=1$ and as $1 le r-s < p-1$ this contradicts the minimality condition of the order. So all $x^r$ are distinct for $1 le r < p-1$.






share|cite|improve this answer












We have a group of order $p-1$ (the non-zero class mod $p$ under multiplication) and by definition a primitive root is an element of order $p-1$, so $x^{p-1} =1$ and $x^n neq 1$ for all $1 le n < p-1$ ($p-1$ is the minimal power that gives $1$). Distinctness is then simpel group theory:



If $x^r = x^s$ for some $1le s < r < p-1$ then $x^rcdot (x^s)^{-1} = x^{(r-s)}=1$ and as $1 le r-s < p-1$ this contradicts the minimality condition of the order. So all $x^r$ are distinct for $1 le r < p-1$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 8 at 22:44









Henno Brandsma

104k346113




104k346113












  • Thank you! Got this one explained and now I can continue with existence.
    – R. Jacks
    Dec 9 at 11:59


















  • Thank you! Got this one explained and now I can continue with existence.
    – R. Jacks
    Dec 9 at 11:59
















Thank you! Got this one explained and now I can continue with existence.
– R. Jacks
Dec 9 at 11:59




Thank you! Got this one explained and now I can continue with existence.
– R. Jacks
Dec 9 at 11:59


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030817%2flet-r-be-primitive-root-mod-p-when-x-goes-from-1-to-p-1-then-rx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Måne

Storängen

VLT Carioca