Fastest path to cover area












0












$begingroup$


How do we determine the fastest path to cover an area using an object of some radius r? E.g. a machine that needs to spray a chemical onto a surface. I assume this is some kind of NP-hard problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    How do we determine the fastest path to cover an area using an object of some radius r? E.g. a machine that needs to spray a chemical onto a surface. I assume this is some kind of NP-hard problem.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      How do we determine the fastest path to cover an area using an object of some radius r? E.g. a machine that needs to spray a chemical onto a surface. I assume this is some kind of NP-hard problem.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      How do we determine the fastest path to cover an area using an object of some radius r? E.g. a machine that needs to spray a chemical onto a surface. I assume this is some kind of NP-hard problem.







      approximation np-complete






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 22 '18 at 14:34









      Paul Frost

      10.3k3933




      10.3k3933










      asked Sep 6 '13 at 12:58









      user93433user93433

      1




      1






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Seems to me that the total area painted is (roughly) the area of the brush times the length of the path. So, if two paths cover the same area, without overlaps, then they must have the same length. Time will be wasted if we have to lift the brush from the paper, though, so my argument only applies to continuous paths (with no lifts).



          This kind of problem arises in many NC (numerical control) applications, and has been well studied. For example, trying to mill a region with an NC cutter is somewhat the same problem as painting. Here's one paper on the subject.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485716%2ffastest-path-to-cover-area%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            Seems to me that the total area painted is (roughly) the area of the brush times the length of the path. So, if two paths cover the same area, without overlaps, then they must have the same length. Time will be wasted if we have to lift the brush from the paper, though, so my argument only applies to continuous paths (with no lifts).



            This kind of problem arises in many NC (numerical control) applications, and has been well studied. For example, trying to mill a region with an NC cutter is somewhat the same problem as painting. Here's one paper on the subject.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Seems to me that the total area painted is (roughly) the area of the brush times the length of the path. So, if two paths cover the same area, without overlaps, then they must have the same length. Time will be wasted if we have to lift the brush from the paper, though, so my argument only applies to continuous paths (with no lifts).



              This kind of problem arises in many NC (numerical control) applications, and has been well studied. For example, trying to mill a region with an NC cutter is somewhat the same problem as painting. Here's one paper on the subject.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Seems to me that the total area painted is (roughly) the area of the brush times the length of the path. So, if two paths cover the same area, without overlaps, then they must have the same length. Time will be wasted if we have to lift the brush from the paper, though, so my argument only applies to continuous paths (with no lifts).



                This kind of problem arises in many NC (numerical control) applications, and has been well studied. For example, trying to mill a region with an NC cutter is somewhat the same problem as painting. Here's one paper on the subject.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Seems to me that the total area painted is (roughly) the area of the brush times the length of the path. So, if two paths cover the same area, without overlaps, then they must have the same length. Time will be wasted if we have to lift the brush from the paper, though, so my argument only applies to continuous paths (with no lifts).



                This kind of problem arises in many NC (numerical control) applications, and has been well studied. For example, trying to mill a region with an NC cutter is somewhat the same problem as painting. Here's one paper on the subject.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Sep 6 '13 at 15:11

























                answered Sep 6 '13 at 14:21









                bubbabubba

                30.4k33086




                30.4k33086






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f485716%2ffastest-path-to-cover-area%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Måne

                    Storängen

                    VLT Carioca