Proving that $B(X,Y) $ is a Banach Space if $Y$ is.












2












$begingroup$


Let $B(X,Y)$ be the family of all bounded maps from $X$ to $Y,$ normed linear maps. Then, $B(X,Y) $ is a Banach Space if $Y$ is.



Remark: I've seen this question before $Y$ is a Banach space if $B(X,Y)$ is a Banach space, but it is the converse of my question statement.



MY TRIAL



Let $T_nin B(X,Y),;forall;nin Bbb{N} $ s.t. $T_nto T,;text{as};ntoinfty. $ So, $T_nin B(X,Y),;forall;nin Bbb{N} $ implies for each $xin X,;T_{n}(x)in Y.$ Since $Y$ is complete, $T_n(x)to T(x)in Y,;text{as};ntoinfty,;forall;xin X. $ i.e., $T:Xto Y. $



Also, $T_nin B(X,Y),;forall;nin Bbb{N} $ implies there exists $Kgeq 0,$ s.t. $forall;nin Bbb{N},;forall;xin X, $
begin{align} Vert T_n(x)Vert leq K Vert xVert. end{align}
As $ntoinfty,$
begin{align} limlimits_{nto infty}Vert T_n(x)Vert= Vert limlimits_{nto infty}T_n(x)Vert= Vert T(x)Vertleq K Vert xVert, end{align}
which implies $Tin B(X,Y)$ and hence, $ B(X,Y)$ is a Banach space.



Please, kindly check if I'm right or wrong. If it turns out that I'm wrong, kindly provide an alternative proof. Regards!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    Let $B(X,Y)$ be the family of all bounded maps from $X$ to $Y,$ normed linear maps. Then, $B(X,Y) $ is a Banach Space if $Y$ is.



    Remark: I've seen this question before $Y$ is a Banach space if $B(X,Y)$ is a Banach space, but it is the converse of my question statement.



    MY TRIAL



    Let $T_nin B(X,Y),;forall;nin Bbb{N} $ s.t. $T_nto T,;text{as};ntoinfty. $ So, $T_nin B(X,Y),;forall;nin Bbb{N} $ implies for each $xin X,;T_{n}(x)in Y.$ Since $Y$ is complete, $T_n(x)to T(x)in Y,;text{as};ntoinfty,;forall;xin X. $ i.e., $T:Xto Y. $



    Also, $T_nin B(X,Y),;forall;nin Bbb{N} $ implies there exists $Kgeq 0,$ s.t. $forall;nin Bbb{N},;forall;xin X, $
    begin{align} Vert T_n(x)Vert leq K Vert xVert. end{align}
    As $ntoinfty,$
    begin{align} limlimits_{nto infty}Vert T_n(x)Vert= Vert limlimits_{nto infty}T_n(x)Vert= Vert T(x)Vertleq K Vert xVert, end{align}
    which implies $Tin B(X,Y)$ and hence, $ B(X,Y)$ is a Banach space.



    Please, kindly check if I'm right or wrong. If it turns out that I'm wrong, kindly provide an alternative proof. Regards!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      Let $B(X,Y)$ be the family of all bounded maps from $X$ to $Y,$ normed linear maps. Then, $B(X,Y) $ is a Banach Space if $Y$ is.



      Remark: I've seen this question before $Y$ is a Banach space if $B(X,Y)$ is a Banach space, but it is the converse of my question statement.



      MY TRIAL



      Let $T_nin B(X,Y),;forall;nin Bbb{N} $ s.t. $T_nto T,;text{as};ntoinfty. $ So, $T_nin B(X,Y),;forall;nin Bbb{N} $ implies for each $xin X,;T_{n}(x)in Y.$ Since $Y$ is complete, $T_n(x)to T(x)in Y,;text{as};ntoinfty,;forall;xin X. $ i.e., $T:Xto Y. $



      Also, $T_nin B(X,Y),;forall;nin Bbb{N} $ implies there exists $Kgeq 0,$ s.t. $forall;nin Bbb{N},;forall;xin X, $
      begin{align} Vert T_n(x)Vert leq K Vert xVert. end{align}
      As $ntoinfty,$
      begin{align} limlimits_{nto infty}Vert T_n(x)Vert= Vert limlimits_{nto infty}T_n(x)Vert= Vert T(x)Vertleq K Vert xVert, end{align}
      which implies $Tin B(X,Y)$ and hence, $ B(X,Y)$ is a Banach space.



      Please, kindly check if I'm right or wrong. If it turns out that I'm wrong, kindly provide an alternative proof. Regards!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $B(X,Y)$ be the family of all bounded maps from $X$ to $Y,$ normed linear maps. Then, $B(X,Y) $ is a Banach Space if $Y$ is.



      Remark: I've seen this question before $Y$ is a Banach space if $B(X,Y)$ is a Banach space, but it is the converse of my question statement.



      MY TRIAL



      Let $T_nin B(X,Y),;forall;nin Bbb{N} $ s.t. $T_nto T,;text{as};ntoinfty. $ So, $T_nin B(X,Y),;forall;nin Bbb{N} $ implies for each $xin X,;T_{n}(x)in Y.$ Since $Y$ is complete, $T_n(x)to T(x)in Y,;text{as};ntoinfty,;forall;xin X. $ i.e., $T:Xto Y. $



      Also, $T_nin B(X,Y),;forall;nin Bbb{N} $ implies there exists $Kgeq 0,$ s.t. $forall;nin Bbb{N},;forall;xin X, $
      begin{align} Vert T_n(x)Vert leq K Vert xVert. end{align}
      As $ntoinfty,$
      begin{align} limlimits_{nto infty}Vert T_n(x)Vert= Vert limlimits_{nto infty}T_n(x)Vert= Vert T(x)Vertleq K Vert xVert, end{align}
      which implies $Tin B(X,Y)$ and hence, $ B(X,Y)$ is a Banach space.



      Please, kindly check if I'm right or wrong. If it turns out that I'm wrong, kindly provide an alternative proof. Regards!







      functional-analysis banach-spaces normed-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 18 '18 at 13:57







      Omojola Micheal

















      asked Dec 18 '18 at 13:18









      Omojola MichealOmojola Micheal

      1,831324




      1,831324






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          What you want to show is that given any Cauchy sequence ${T_n}_{n=1}^{infty}$ in $B(X,Y)$ there exists a mapping $Tin B(X,Y)$ such that $|T_n-T|rightarrow 0$.



          You seem to show that if $|T_n-T|rightarrow 0$ then $Tin B(X,Y)$.



          You mention completeness of $Y$ to motivate that $T_n(x)rightarrow T(x)$ as $nrightarrow infty$ and that is indeed correct, to motivate it rigorously we have that for a fix $xin X$
          $$|T_n(x)-T_m(x)|leq |T_n-T_m||x|rightarrow 0$$
          as $n,mrightarrow infty$. Now completeness of $Y$ implies that $T_n(x)$ converges point wise and so we define $T:Xrightarrow Y$ by



          $$T(x) = lim_{nrightarrow infty}T_n(x).$$



          After that you want to show that $|T-T_n|rightarrow 0$. This follows from the fact that



          $$|(T-T_n)(x)| = lim_{mrightarrow infty}|(T_m-T_n)(x)|leq lim_{mrightarrow infty}|T_m-T_n||x|$$



          and therefore picking $n$ large enough so that $|T_m-T_n|<varepsilon$ if $m>n$ this shows that



          $$frac{|(T-T_n)(x)|}{|x|}<varepsilon$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            Credits to Olof Rubin. So, I post the full proof for future readers.



            Let ${T_n}_{n=1}^{infty}in B(X,Y)$, be a Cauchy sequence and $epsilon>0$ be given. Then, there exists $N$ s.t. forall $mgeq ngeq N,$
            $$ |T_n-T_m|<epsilon.$$
            Since $$ |T_n-T_m|=suplimits_{|x|leq 1}|T_n(x)-T_m(x)|,;;forall;m,nin Bbb{N},$$
            we have that
            $$ |T_n(x)-T_m(x)|leq|T_n-T_m|<epsilon,;;forall;mgeq ngeq N,;text{for each};xin X.$$



            This implies that $T_n(x)to T(x),;text{as};ntoinfty$, pointwise and since $Y$ is complete, $T(x)in Y$



            Fix $ngeq N$ and allow $mtoinfty.$ Then, for each $xin X,$
            $$ |T_n(x)-T(x)|leqepsilon.$$
            Taking $sup$ over $|x|leq 1,$ we have



            $$ |T_n-T|=suplimits_{|x|leq 1}|T_n(x)-T(x)|leqepsilon,;;forall ngeq N.$$
            Hence, $Tin B(X,Y)$ and we're done!






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045155%2fproving-that-bx-y-is-a-banach-space-if-y-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              What you want to show is that given any Cauchy sequence ${T_n}_{n=1}^{infty}$ in $B(X,Y)$ there exists a mapping $Tin B(X,Y)$ such that $|T_n-T|rightarrow 0$.



              You seem to show that if $|T_n-T|rightarrow 0$ then $Tin B(X,Y)$.



              You mention completeness of $Y$ to motivate that $T_n(x)rightarrow T(x)$ as $nrightarrow infty$ and that is indeed correct, to motivate it rigorously we have that for a fix $xin X$
              $$|T_n(x)-T_m(x)|leq |T_n-T_m||x|rightarrow 0$$
              as $n,mrightarrow infty$. Now completeness of $Y$ implies that $T_n(x)$ converges point wise and so we define $T:Xrightarrow Y$ by



              $$T(x) = lim_{nrightarrow infty}T_n(x).$$



              After that you want to show that $|T-T_n|rightarrow 0$. This follows from the fact that



              $$|(T-T_n)(x)| = lim_{mrightarrow infty}|(T_m-T_n)(x)|leq lim_{mrightarrow infty}|T_m-T_n||x|$$



              and therefore picking $n$ large enough so that $|T_m-T_n|<varepsilon$ if $m>n$ this shows that



              $$frac{|(T-T_n)(x)|}{|x|}<varepsilon$$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                What you want to show is that given any Cauchy sequence ${T_n}_{n=1}^{infty}$ in $B(X,Y)$ there exists a mapping $Tin B(X,Y)$ such that $|T_n-T|rightarrow 0$.



                You seem to show that if $|T_n-T|rightarrow 0$ then $Tin B(X,Y)$.



                You mention completeness of $Y$ to motivate that $T_n(x)rightarrow T(x)$ as $nrightarrow infty$ and that is indeed correct, to motivate it rigorously we have that for a fix $xin X$
                $$|T_n(x)-T_m(x)|leq |T_n-T_m||x|rightarrow 0$$
                as $n,mrightarrow infty$. Now completeness of $Y$ implies that $T_n(x)$ converges point wise and so we define $T:Xrightarrow Y$ by



                $$T(x) = lim_{nrightarrow infty}T_n(x).$$



                After that you want to show that $|T-T_n|rightarrow 0$. This follows from the fact that



                $$|(T-T_n)(x)| = lim_{mrightarrow infty}|(T_m-T_n)(x)|leq lim_{mrightarrow infty}|T_m-T_n||x|$$



                and therefore picking $n$ large enough so that $|T_m-T_n|<varepsilon$ if $m>n$ this shows that



                $$frac{|(T-T_n)(x)|}{|x|}<varepsilon$$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  What you want to show is that given any Cauchy sequence ${T_n}_{n=1}^{infty}$ in $B(X,Y)$ there exists a mapping $Tin B(X,Y)$ such that $|T_n-T|rightarrow 0$.



                  You seem to show that if $|T_n-T|rightarrow 0$ then $Tin B(X,Y)$.



                  You mention completeness of $Y$ to motivate that $T_n(x)rightarrow T(x)$ as $nrightarrow infty$ and that is indeed correct, to motivate it rigorously we have that for a fix $xin X$
                  $$|T_n(x)-T_m(x)|leq |T_n-T_m||x|rightarrow 0$$
                  as $n,mrightarrow infty$. Now completeness of $Y$ implies that $T_n(x)$ converges point wise and so we define $T:Xrightarrow Y$ by



                  $$T(x) = lim_{nrightarrow infty}T_n(x).$$



                  After that you want to show that $|T-T_n|rightarrow 0$. This follows from the fact that



                  $$|(T-T_n)(x)| = lim_{mrightarrow infty}|(T_m-T_n)(x)|leq lim_{mrightarrow infty}|T_m-T_n||x|$$



                  and therefore picking $n$ large enough so that $|T_m-T_n|<varepsilon$ if $m>n$ this shows that



                  $$frac{|(T-T_n)(x)|}{|x|}<varepsilon$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  What you want to show is that given any Cauchy sequence ${T_n}_{n=1}^{infty}$ in $B(X,Y)$ there exists a mapping $Tin B(X,Y)$ such that $|T_n-T|rightarrow 0$.



                  You seem to show that if $|T_n-T|rightarrow 0$ then $Tin B(X,Y)$.



                  You mention completeness of $Y$ to motivate that $T_n(x)rightarrow T(x)$ as $nrightarrow infty$ and that is indeed correct, to motivate it rigorously we have that for a fix $xin X$
                  $$|T_n(x)-T_m(x)|leq |T_n-T_m||x|rightarrow 0$$
                  as $n,mrightarrow infty$. Now completeness of $Y$ implies that $T_n(x)$ converges point wise and so we define $T:Xrightarrow Y$ by



                  $$T(x) = lim_{nrightarrow infty}T_n(x).$$



                  After that you want to show that $|T-T_n|rightarrow 0$. This follows from the fact that



                  $$|(T-T_n)(x)| = lim_{mrightarrow infty}|(T_m-T_n)(x)|leq lim_{mrightarrow infty}|T_m-T_n||x|$$



                  and therefore picking $n$ large enough so that $|T_m-T_n|<varepsilon$ if $m>n$ this shows that



                  $$frac{|(T-T_n)(x)|}{|x|}<varepsilon$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Dec 18 '18 at 13:41

























                  answered Dec 18 '18 at 13:35









                  Olof RubinOlof Rubin

                  1,131316




                  1,131316























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      Credits to Olof Rubin. So, I post the full proof for future readers.



                      Let ${T_n}_{n=1}^{infty}in B(X,Y)$, be a Cauchy sequence and $epsilon>0$ be given. Then, there exists $N$ s.t. forall $mgeq ngeq N,$
                      $$ |T_n-T_m|<epsilon.$$
                      Since $$ |T_n-T_m|=suplimits_{|x|leq 1}|T_n(x)-T_m(x)|,;;forall;m,nin Bbb{N},$$
                      we have that
                      $$ |T_n(x)-T_m(x)|leq|T_n-T_m|<epsilon,;;forall;mgeq ngeq N,;text{for each};xin X.$$



                      This implies that $T_n(x)to T(x),;text{as};ntoinfty$, pointwise and since $Y$ is complete, $T(x)in Y$



                      Fix $ngeq N$ and allow $mtoinfty.$ Then, for each $xin X,$
                      $$ |T_n(x)-T(x)|leqepsilon.$$
                      Taking $sup$ over $|x|leq 1,$ we have



                      $$ |T_n-T|=suplimits_{|x|leq 1}|T_n(x)-T(x)|leqepsilon,;;forall ngeq N.$$
                      Hence, $Tin B(X,Y)$ and we're done!






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Credits to Olof Rubin. So, I post the full proof for future readers.



                        Let ${T_n}_{n=1}^{infty}in B(X,Y)$, be a Cauchy sequence and $epsilon>0$ be given. Then, there exists $N$ s.t. forall $mgeq ngeq N,$
                        $$ |T_n-T_m|<epsilon.$$
                        Since $$ |T_n-T_m|=suplimits_{|x|leq 1}|T_n(x)-T_m(x)|,;;forall;m,nin Bbb{N},$$
                        we have that
                        $$ |T_n(x)-T_m(x)|leq|T_n-T_m|<epsilon,;;forall;mgeq ngeq N,;text{for each};xin X.$$



                        This implies that $T_n(x)to T(x),;text{as};ntoinfty$, pointwise and since $Y$ is complete, $T(x)in Y$



                        Fix $ngeq N$ and allow $mtoinfty.$ Then, for each $xin X,$
                        $$ |T_n(x)-T(x)|leqepsilon.$$
                        Taking $sup$ over $|x|leq 1,$ we have



                        $$ |T_n-T|=suplimits_{|x|leq 1}|T_n(x)-T(x)|leqepsilon,;;forall ngeq N.$$
                        Hence, $Tin B(X,Y)$ and we're done!






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          Credits to Olof Rubin. So, I post the full proof for future readers.



                          Let ${T_n}_{n=1}^{infty}in B(X,Y)$, be a Cauchy sequence and $epsilon>0$ be given. Then, there exists $N$ s.t. forall $mgeq ngeq N,$
                          $$ |T_n-T_m|<epsilon.$$
                          Since $$ |T_n-T_m|=suplimits_{|x|leq 1}|T_n(x)-T_m(x)|,;;forall;m,nin Bbb{N},$$
                          we have that
                          $$ |T_n(x)-T_m(x)|leq|T_n-T_m|<epsilon,;;forall;mgeq ngeq N,;text{for each};xin X.$$



                          This implies that $T_n(x)to T(x),;text{as};ntoinfty$, pointwise and since $Y$ is complete, $T(x)in Y$



                          Fix $ngeq N$ and allow $mtoinfty.$ Then, for each $xin X,$
                          $$ |T_n(x)-T(x)|leqepsilon.$$
                          Taking $sup$ over $|x|leq 1,$ we have



                          $$ |T_n-T|=suplimits_{|x|leq 1}|T_n(x)-T(x)|leqepsilon,;;forall ngeq N.$$
                          Hence, $Tin B(X,Y)$ and we're done!






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Credits to Olof Rubin. So, I post the full proof for future readers.



                          Let ${T_n}_{n=1}^{infty}in B(X,Y)$, be a Cauchy sequence and $epsilon>0$ be given. Then, there exists $N$ s.t. forall $mgeq ngeq N,$
                          $$ |T_n-T_m|<epsilon.$$
                          Since $$ |T_n-T_m|=suplimits_{|x|leq 1}|T_n(x)-T_m(x)|,;;forall;m,nin Bbb{N},$$
                          we have that
                          $$ |T_n(x)-T_m(x)|leq|T_n-T_m|<epsilon,;;forall;mgeq ngeq N,;text{for each};xin X.$$



                          This implies that $T_n(x)to T(x),;text{as};ntoinfty$, pointwise and since $Y$ is complete, $T(x)in Y$



                          Fix $ngeq N$ and allow $mtoinfty.$ Then, for each $xin X,$
                          $$ |T_n(x)-T(x)|leqepsilon.$$
                          Taking $sup$ over $|x|leq 1,$ we have



                          $$ |T_n-T|=suplimits_{|x|leq 1}|T_n(x)-T(x)|leqepsilon,;;forall ngeq N.$$
                          Hence, $Tin B(X,Y)$ and we're done!







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Dec 18 '18 at 17:32









                          Omojola MichealOmojola Micheal

                          1,831324




                          1,831324






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045155%2fproving-that-bx-y-is-a-banach-space-if-y-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Måne

                              Storängen

                              VLT Carioca