Countable subsets of Euclidean Space.
$begingroup$
For an uncountable subset $Esubsetmathbb{R}^n$, I know the following results are true,
$E'$ is uncountable, closed and perfect.- Atmost countably many points of $E$ are not in $E'$
Question: Does this results hold true for countable and finite subsets.
For finite sets it is easy to see because if $E$ is finite, $E'=emptyset$. $E'$ is closed and perfect(vacuously true).
For countable sets??
Edits: $E'$ denote set of all limit points of the set $E$.
real-analysis general-topology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For an uncountable subset $Esubsetmathbb{R}^n$, I know the following results are true,
$E'$ is uncountable, closed and perfect.- Atmost countably many points of $E$ are not in $E'$
Question: Does this results hold true for countable and finite subsets.
For finite sets it is easy to see because if $E$ is finite, $E'=emptyset$. $E'$ is closed and perfect(vacuously true).
For countable sets??
Edits: $E'$ denote set of all limit points of the set $E$.
real-analysis general-topology
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What does $E'$ mean here?
$endgroup$
– D. Brogan
Jan 8 at 17:00
$begingroup$
$E'$ denote set of all limit points of the set $E$.@D.Brogan
$endgroup$
– StammeringMathematician
Jan 8 at 17:05
$begingroup$
Consider $mathbb Z$ and $mathbb Q$ in the space $mathbb R$ of real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
Jan 8 at 17:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For an uncountable subset $Esubsetmathbb{R}^n$, I know the following results are true,
$E'$ is uncountable, closed and perfect.- Atmost countably many points of $E$ are not in $E'$
Question: Does this results hold true for countable and finite subsets.
For finite sets it is easy to see because if $E$ is finite, $E'=emptyset$. $E'$ is closed and perfect(vacuously true).
For countable sets??
Edits: $E'$ denote set of all limit points of the set $E$.
real-analysis general-topology
$endgroup$
For an uncountable subset $Esubsetmathbb{R}^n$, I know the following results are true,
$E'$ is uncountable, closed and perfect.- Atmost countably many points of $E$ are not in $E'$
Question: Does this results hold true for countable and finite subsets.
For finite sets it is easy to see because if $E$ is finite, $E'=emptyset$. $E'$ is closed and perfect(vacuously true).
For countable sets??
Edits: $E'$ denote set of all limit points of the set $E$.
real-analysis general-topology
real-analysis general-topology
edited Jan 8 at 17:05
StammeringMathematician
asked Jan 8 at 16:41
StammeringMathematicianStammeringMathematician
2,7061324
2,7061324
$begingroup$
What does $E'$ mean here?
$endgroup$
– D. Brogan
Jan 8 at 17:00
$begingroup$
$E'$ denote set of all limit points of the set $E$.@D.Brogan
$endgroup$
– StammeringMathematician
Jan 8 at 17:05
$begingroup$
Consider $mathbb Z$ and $mathbb Q$ in the space $mathbb R$ of real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
Jan 8 at 17:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What does $E'$ mean here?
$endgroup$
– D. Brogan
Jan 8 at 17:00
$begingroup$
$E'$ denote set of all limit points of the set $E$.@D.Brogan
$endgroup$
– StammeringMathematician
Jan 8 at 17:05
$begingroup$
Consider $mathbb Z$ and $mathbb Q$ in the space $mathbb R$ of real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
Jan 8 at 17:38
$begingroup$
What does $E'$ mean here?
$endgroup$
– D. Brogan
Jan 8 at 17:00
$begingroup$
What does $E'$ mean here?
$endgroup$
– D. Brogan
Jan 8 at 17:00
$begingroup$
$E'$ denote set of all limit points of the set $E$.@D.Brogan
$endgroup$
– StammeringMathematician
Jan 8 at 17:05
$begingroup$
$E'$ denote set of all limit points of the set $E$.@D.Brogan
$endgroup$
– StammeringMathematician
Jan 8 at 17:05
$begingroup$
Consider $mathbb Z$ and $mathbb Q$ in the space $mathbb R$ of real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
Jan 8 at 17:38
$begingroup$
Consider $mathbb Z$ and $mathbb Q$ in the space $mathbb R$ of real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
Jan 8 at 17:38
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I believe the claim is false for countable sets. Consider $E=left{frac{1}{n};|; ninmathbb{N}right}.$ Then $E'={0},$ so $E'$ is closed, but not perfect since finite sets in $mathbb R$ have no limit points.
In general, if $X$ is a separable metric space and $Esubset X,$ then $E'$ is always closed (exercise!), but $E'$ is not perfect unless $E$ is uncountable (the proof is the same for that of $mathbb R$) or $E$ is finite, as you have observed.
For the second property, it is true that in separable metric spaces uncountable subsets have uncountably many limit points. It is also true that uncountable sets in these metric spaces contain at least one of their limit points [see this answer for a proof]. Thus, if $Esetminus E'$ were uncountable, it would contain one of its limit points, which is also a limit point of $E,$ and hence a member of $E'.$ So $(Esetminus E')cap E'neq emptyset,$ a contradiction.
Thus, to summarize, all of the conclusions still hold, except that $E'$ is perfect.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066401%2fcountable-subsets-of-euclidean-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I believe the claim is false for countable sets. Consider $E=left{frac{1}{n};|; ninmathbb{N}right}.$ Then $E'={0},$ so $E'$ is closed, but not perfect since finite sets in $mathbb R$ have no limit points.
In general, if $X$ is a separable metric space and $Esubset X,$ then $E'$ is always closed (exercise!), but $E'$ is not perfect unless $E$ is uncountable (the proof is the same for that of $mathbb R$) or $E$ is finite, as you have observed.
For the second property, it is true that in separable metric spaces uncountable subsets have uncountably many limit points. It is also true that uncountable sets in these metric spaces contain at least one of their limit points [see this answer for a proof]. Thus, if $Esetminus E'$ were uncountable, it would contain one of its limit points, which is also a limit point of $E,$ and hence a member of $E'.$ So $(Esetminus E')cap E'neq emptyset,$ a contradiction.
Thus, to summarize, all of the conclusions still hold, except that $E'$ is perfect.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I believe the claim is false for countable sets. Consider $E=left{frac{1}{n};|; ninmathbb{N}right}.$ Then $E'={0},$ so $E'$ is closed, but not perfect since finite sets in $mathbb R$ have no limit points.
In general, if $X$ is a separable metric space and $Esubset X,$ then $E'$ is always closed (exercise!), but $E'$ is not perfect unless $E$ is uncountable (the proof is the same for that of $mathbb R$) or $E$ is finite, as you have observed.
For the second property, it is true that in separable metric spaces uncountable subsets have uncountably many limit points. It is also true that uncountable sets in these metric spaces contain at least one of their limit points [see this answer for a proof]. Thus, if $Esetminus E'$ were uncountable, it would contain one of its limit points, which is also a limit point of $E,$ and hence a member of $E'.$ So $(Esetminus E')cap E'neq emptyset,$ a contradiction.
Thus, to summarize, all of the conclusions still hold, except that $E'$ is perfect.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I believe the claim is false for countable sets. Consider $E=left{frac{1}{n};|; ninmathbb{N}right}.$ Then $E'={0},$ so $E'$ is closed, but not perfect since finite sets in $mathbb R$ have no limit points.
In general, if $X$ is a separable metric space and $Esubset X,$ then $E'$ is always closed (exercise!), but $E'$ is not perfect unless $E$ is uncountable (the proof is the same for that of $mathbb R$) or $E$ is finite, as you have observed.
For the second property, it is true that in separable metric spaces uncountable subsets have uncountably many limit points. It is also true that uncountable sets in these metric spaces contain at least one of their limit points [see this answer for a proof]. Thus, if $Esetminus E'$ were uncountable, it would contain one of its limit points, which is also a limit point of $E,$ and hence a member of $E'.$ So $(Esetminus E')cap E'neq emptyset,$ a contradiction.
Thus, to summarize, all of the conclusions still hold, except that $E'$ is perfect.
$endgroup$
I believe the claim is false for countable sets. Consider $E=left{frac{1}{n};|; ninmathbb{N}right}.$ Then $E'={0},$ so $E'$ is closed, but not perfect since finite sets in $mathbb R$ have no limit points.
In general, if $X$ is a separable metric space and $Esubset X,$ then $E'$ is always closed (exercise!), but $E'$ is not perfect unless $E$ is uncountable (the proof is the same for that of $mathbb R$) or $E$ is finite, as you have observed.
For the second property, it is true that in separable metric spaces uncountable subsets have uncountably many limit points. It is also true that uncountable sets in these metric spaces contain at least one of their limit points [see this answer for a proof]. Thus, if $Esetminus E'$ were uncountable, it would contain one of its limit points, which is also a limit point of $E,$ and hence a member of $E'.$ So $(Esetminus E')cap E'neq emptyset,$ a contradiction.
Thus, to summarize, all of the conclusions still hold, except that $E'$ is perfect.
answered Jan 8 at 19:38
D. BroganD. Brogan
763513
763513
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066401%2fcountable-subsets-of-euclidean-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown

$begingroup$
What does $E'$ mean here?
$endgroup$
– D. Brogan
Jan 8 at 17:00
$begingroup$
$E'$ denote set of all limit points of the set $E$.@D.Brogan
$endgroup$
– StammeringMathematician
Jan 8 at 17:05
$begingroup$
Consider $mathbb Z$ and $mathbb Q$ in the space $mathbb R$ of real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
Jan 8 at 17:38