Taylor expansion of imaginary part?-Doable or not?












7












$begingroup$


I have a number $z = a+re^{i(pi-varepsilon)}$ and $varepsilon>0$ is small, $a,r>0.$



You can assume furthermore that $rle a+2.$



I then define the expressions



$$z_{pm}:=frac{1}{2} left(zpm sqrt{z^2-4} right).$$



The question is: Can one find a Taylor expansion of the imaginary part of $z_{pm}$ in terms of $varepsilon$. I would like to know at least what the leading order terms are for $varepsilon$ small.



Let me finish with a quote of encouragement:



Mark Twain — 'They did not know it was impossible so they did it'










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    7












    $begingroup$


    I have a number $z = a+re^{i(pi-varepsilon)}$ and $varepsilon>0$ is small, $a,r>0.$



    You can assume furthermore that $rle a+2.$



    I then define the expressions



    $$z_{pm}:=frac{1}{2} left(zpm sqrt{z^2-4} right).$$



    The question is: Can one find a Taylor expansion of the imaginary part of $z_{pm}$ in terms of $varepsilon$. I would like to know at least what the leading order terms are for $varepsilon$ small.



    Let me finish with a quote of encouragement:



    Mark Twain — 'They did not know it was impossible so they did it'










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      7












      7








      7


      2



      $begingroup$


      I have a number $z = a+re^{i(pi-varepsilon)}$ and $varepsilon>0$ is small, $a,r>0.$



      You can assume furthermore that $rle a+2.$



      I then define the expressions



      $$z_{pm}:=frac{1}{2} left(zpm sqrt{z^2-4} right).$$



      The question is: Can one find a Taylor expansion of the imaginary part of $z_{pm}$ in terms of $varepsilon$. I would like to know at least what the leading order terms are for $varepsilon$ small.



      Let me finish with a quote of encouragement:



      Mark Twain — 'They did not know it was impossible so they did it'










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have a number $z = a+re^{i(pi-varepsilon)}$ and $varepsilon>0$ is small, $a,r>0.$



      You can assume furthermore that $rle a+2.$



      I then define the expressions



      $$z_{pm}:=frac{1}{2} left(zpm sqrt{z^2-4} right).$$



      The question is: Can one find a Taylor expansion of the imaginary part of $z_{pm}$ in terms of $varepsilon$. I would like to know at least what the leading order terms are for $varepsilon$ small.



      Let me finish with a quote of encouragement:



      Mark Twain — 'They did not know it was impossible so they did it'







      real-analysis calculus complex-analysis functional-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 6 at 10:09







      Sascha

















      asked Jan 8 at 16:43









      SaschaSascha

      93318




      93318






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3





          +100







          $begingroup$

          My approach is based on the fact that $z_{pm}(epsilon)$ is a function from $mathcal{R} tomathcal{C}$ therefore (I THINK, HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO FIND PROOF YET) the Taylor expansion of $text{Im}(z_{pm}(epsilon))$ is the same as Imaginary part of the Taylor expansion of $z_{pm}(epsilon)$.



          Firstly write:
          $ z = a + r exp(ipi)exp(-iepsilon)$.



          Then realize: $z(epsilon = 0 ) = a -r$ and



          $frac{dz}{depsilon}|_{epsilon = 0} = -irexp(ipi)exp(-iepsilon)|_{epsilon = 0} = ir$



          We will now compute the first two terms of the Taylor expansion of $z_{pm}$ in terms around $epsilon = 0$. We start at zeroth order:



          $$z_{pm}|_{epsilon = 0} =frac{1}{2}left(a -r pm sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}right) = frac{1}{2}left(a -r pm sqrt{a -r -2}sqrt{a-r+2}right).$$



          Note here that since $r le a + 2$ the second square root is always positive. If also $r le a -2$ then the first square root is positive and the whole term will be reall. In case $a -2 le r le a+2$ we will have a square root of a negative number and thus we will get Imaginary numbers from there. Thus, the leading order term of the expansion will be $epsilon^0$.



          And now do the first order term:
          $$frac{dz_{pm}}{depsilon}|_{epsilon = 0} = frac{1}{2}left(frac{dz}{depsilon} pm frac{dz}{depsilon} frac{z}{sqrt{z^2 - 4}}right) = frac{ir}{2}left(1 pm frac{a-r}{sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}}right)$$



          The same distinction needs to be made here if $a -2 le r le a+2$ the square root will give us imaginary numbers.



          Putting it all together we get:
          $$z_{pm}(epsilon) approx frac{1}{2}left(a -r pm sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}right) +frac{ir}{2}left(1 pm frac{a-r}{sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}}right) epsilon$$



          In case $a -2 le r le a+2$ we get:
          $$text{Im}left(z_{pm}(epsilon)right) approx pm frac{1}{2}left(|sqrt{a -r -2}|sqrt{a-r+2}right) + frac{r}{2}epsilon$$



          and in case $r le a-2$:



          $$text{Im}left(z_{pm}(epsilon)right) approx frac{r}{2}left(1 pm frac{a-r}{sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}}right) epsilon$$



          Edit: Getting the full expansion shouldn't be too hard once you are aware you can expand $z_{pm}$ and then take the imaginary part.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The reason why mapping from $R to C$ should obey the Taylor relation I mentioned is because if both $f(x)$ and $text{Im}(f(x))$ are analytical (meaning the expansion exists) then we must have that the series converge to each other if we look at the Imaginary part due to uniqueness (the same holds for the real part). For functions $C to C$ this does not hold! Say $f(z) =(2+i) z$ then we can't say $Im(f(z)) = Im(2+i) times Im(z)$ because $z$ is an complex number!
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 6 at 11:22










          • $begingroup$
            Your result seems to imply that if $r=a$ the $Im(z_{pm}(varepsilon)) approx frac{r}{2} varepsilon. $ Now, take $r=a$, then I think it becomes apparent that this result cannot be true. Just look at what $z_{pm}$ is for $varepsilon=0.$
            $endgroup$
            – Sascha
            Mar 6 at 11:25












          • $begingroup$
            Indeed, I require a>r+2.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 6 at 11:49










          • $begingroup$
            I am afraid there is no mistake in the question. Can you adapt your answer to the question?
            $endgroup$
            – Sascha
            Mar 6 at 11:54










          • $begingroup$
            In that case the square root will give us an imaginary number. Then, depending on the value of $a$ and $r$ you will also get an zeroth order contribution. One sec.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 6 at 12:22



















          2












          $begingroup$

          $textbf{Full Edition.}$



          $color{brown}{textbf{Exact expression of the imaginary part.}}$



          Denote
          $$z_1 = y = u+iv,$$
          then $y_1+y_2 = z = a-re^{-ivarepsilon},quad y_1y_2=1,quad$ so
          $$y^2-zy+1=0tag1,$$
          $$(u+iv)^2-(a-rcosvarepsilon+irsinvarepsilon)(u+iv)+1=0,$$
          begin{cases}
          u^2-v^2 - u(a-rcosvarepsilon) + vrsinvarepsilon +1 = 0\
          2uv - ursinvarepsilon - v(a-rcosvarepsilon) =0,
          end{cases}

          begin{cases}
          u=dfrac {v(a-rcosvarepsilon)}{2v-rsinvarepsilon}\[4pt]
          left(dfrac {(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2}{(2v-rsinvarepsilon)^2}-1right)v^2
          - left(dfrac {(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2}{2v-rsinvarepsilon} - rsinvarepsilonright)v +1 = 0,\
          end{cases}

          $$(a- rcosvarepsilon)^2(v^2-v(2v-rsinvarepsilon)) - (v^2-vrsinvarepsilon-1)(2v-rsinvarepsilon)^2 = 0,$$
          or
          $$f(t,varepsilon) = t^4+((a-rcosvarepsilon)^2-r^2sin^2varepsilon-4)t^2-(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2r^2sin^2varepsilon=0,tag{2.1}$$
          where
          $$t=2v-rsinvarepsilon.tag{2.2}$$



          Discriminant of the biquadratic equation $(2.1)$ is
          $$D=((a-rcosvarepsilon-2)^2+r^2sin^2varepsilon)((a-rcosvarepsilon+2)^2+r^2sin^2varepsilon) > 0,tag{3.1}$$
          and the explicit expression for $v(varepsilon)$ is
          $$v(varepsilon)=dfrac{rsinvarepsilonpm t(varepsilon)}2,quadtext{where}quad t(varepsilon) = sqrt{dfrac{r^2sin^2varepsilon+4-(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2 +sqrt D}2}.tag{3.2}$$



          From $(2.1)$ follows that
          $$(t^2)_1(t^2)_2 = -(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2r^2sin^2varepsilon.$$
          I.e. real Taylor series for the other solutions cannot be built.



          $color{brown}{textbf{Data transformations.}}$



          Explicit expression $(3)$ of the imaginary part looks too hard for repeated re-differentiation.



          At the same time, the equation $(2)$ has linear structure and allows suitable repeated re-differentiation. This way required some additional operations.



          Firstly, let us present $(2)$ via superposition in the form of
          $$f(t,varepsilon) = g(t, 1-cosvarepsilon)),tag4$$
          where
          $$g(t,p)=t^4+b(p)t^2+c(p),tag{5.1}$$
          begin{align}
          &b(p)=(a-r(1-p))^2-r^2(1-(1-p)^2)-4 = 2r^2p^2+2r(a-2r)p+((a-r)^2-4)
          ,\[4pt]
          &c(p)= -r^2(a-r(1-p))^2(1-(1-p)^2)\[4pt]
          & = r^4p^4+2r^3(a-2r)p^3+r^2(a^2-6ar+5r^2)p^2-2r^2(a-r)^2p
          end{align}

          $$begin{cases}
          b(p)=2r^2p^2+2r(a-2r)p+(a-r)^2-4\
          c(p) = r^4p^4+2r^3(a-2r)p^3+r^2(a^2-6ar+5r^2)p^2-2r^2(a-r)^2p
          end{cases}tag{5.2}$$



          Will be built Maclaurin series $t(p)$ with
          $$t(0)= t_0 = sqrt{4-(a-r)^2phantom{big|}}.tag6$$



          Required derivatives will be obtained through differentiation of $g(t,p),$
          i.e. the expression $(5).$



          $color{brown}{textbf{Implicit differentiation.}}$



          Denote
          $$g_{ij}(t,p)=dfrac{partial^{(i+j)}g}{partial t^i partial p^j},tag{7.1}$$



          Taking in account that




          $$begin{align} &dfrac d{dp}varphi(t,p) = varphi,'_t,t'+varphi'_p,\[4pt]
          &dfrac d{dp}varphi(t,p)psi(t^{(n)},dots,t'',t')
          = varphipsi,'_{t^{(n)}},t^{(n+1)} +dots+varphipsi,'_{t''},t''' +varphipsi,'_{t'},t''+varphi'_tpsi,t'+varphi'_ppsi,end{align}$$




          repeated re-differentiation of $(5.1)$ becames simple:
          $$begin{aligned}
          &dfrac {dg}{dp} = g_{10}t'+g_{01},\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^2g}{dp^2} = dfrac d{dp}(g_{10}t'+g_{01})
          = Bigl(g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2},+g_{11}t'Bigr)+g_{11}t'+ g_{02}\[4pt]
          &= g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2}+2g_{11}t'+ g_{02},\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^3g}{dp^3}
          = dfrac d{dp}Bigl(g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2}+2g_{11}t'+g_{02}Bigr)\[4pt]
          &= (g_{10}t'''+g_{20}t't''+g_{11}t'')
          +(2g_{20}t't''+g_{30}t'^{,3}+g_{21}t'^{,2})\[4pt]
          &+2(g_{11}t''+g_{21}t'^{,2}+g_{12}t')
          +(g_{12}t'+g_{03})\[4pt]
          &= g_{10}t''' +3g_{20}t't'' +3g_{11}t''
          +g_{30}t'^{,3}+3g_{21}t'^{,2}+3g_{12}t'+g_{03},\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^4g}{dp^4}
          = dfrac d{dp}Bigl(g_{10}t''' +3g_{20}t't'' + 3g_{11}t''
          +g_{30}t'^{,3}+3g_{21}t'^{,2}+3g_{12}t'+g_{03}Bigr)\[4pt]
          &= (g_{10}t^{IV}+g_{20}t't'''+g_{11}t''')
          +3(g_{20}(t't'''+t''^{,2})+g_{30}t'^{,2}t''+g_{21}t't'')\[4pt]
          &+3(g_{11}t'''+g_{21}t't''+g_{12}t'')
          +(3g_{30}t'^{,2}t''+g_{40}t'^{,4}+g_{31}t'^{,3})\[4pt]
          &+3(2g_{21}t't'' +g_{31}t'^{,3}+g_{22}t'^{,2})
          +3(g_{12}t''+g_{22}t'^{,2}+g_{13}t')+(g_{13}t'+g_{04})\[4pt]
          &= g_{10}t^{IV}+g_{20}(4t't'''+3t''^{,2})+4g_{11}t'''
          +6g_{30}t'^{,2}t''+12g_{21}t't''+6g_{12}t''\[4pt]
          &+g_{40}t'^{,4}+4g_{31}t'^{,3}
          +6g_{22}t'^{,2}+4g_{13}t'+g_{04}dots
          end{aligned}tag{7.2}$$



          Partial derivatives in the point $(t_0,0)$ can be calculated by formula
          $$g_{ij}= delta_{j0}T_{4i}+B_jT_{2i}+delta_{i0}C_j,tag{8.1}$$
          where $delta_{ij}$ is Kronecker symbol,
          $$begin{pmatrix}T_{40} \ T_{41} \ T_{42} \ T_{43} \ T_{44}end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}t_0^4 \4t_0^3 \12t_0^2 \24t_0 \24 end{pmatrix},quad
          begin{pmatrix}T_{20} \ T_{21} \ T_{22} \ T_{23} \ T_{24}end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}t_0^2 \2t_0 \2 \0 \0 end{pmatrix},tag{8.2}$$



          $$begin{pmatrix}B_0 \ B_1 \ B_2 \ B_3 \ B_4end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}-t_0^2 \2ar-4r^2 \4r^2 \0 \0 end{pmatrix},quad
          begin{pmatrix}C_0 \ C_1 \ C_2 \ C_3 \ C_4end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}0 \-2r^2(a-r)^2 \ 2r^2(a-r)(a-5r) \12r^3(a-2r) \24r^4 end{pmatrix}.tag{8.3}$$



          The derivatives' values $g_{ij}(t_0,0)$ can be presented in the table form of
          $$left[begin{matrix}
          g_{ij}(t_0,0) & j=0 & j=1 & j=2 & j=3 & j=4 \
          i=0 & 0 & 2r(a-2r)t_0^2-2r^2(a-r)^2 & 4r^2t_0^2 +2r^2(a-r)(a-5r)& 12r^3(a-2r) & 24r^4 \
          i=1 & 2t_0^3 & 4r(a-2r)t_0 & 8r^2t_0 & 0 && \
          i=2 & 10t_0^2 & 4r(a-2r) & 8r^2 &&& \
          i=3 & 24t_0 & 0 &&&& \
          i=4 & 24 & &&&& \
          end{matrix}right]tag9$$

          All the other derivatives' values $g_{ij}(t_0,0)$ equal to zero.



          $color{brown}{textbf{Derivatives for the series.}}$



          Obtained results $(7),(9)$ allow to write the simple system for $t'(0),t''(0),t'''(0),t^{IV}(0)$ in the form of



          $$begin{aligned}
          &dfrac {dg}{dp}(t_0,0) = bigg(g_{10}t'+g_{01}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)} = 0,\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^2g}{dp^2}(t_0,0)= bigg(g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2},+2g_{11}t'+g_{02}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)}=0,\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^3g}{dp^3}(t_0,0) = bigg(g_{10}t''' +3(g_{20}t'+g_{11})t''
          +g_{30}t'^{,3}+3g_{21}t'^{,2}+3g_{12}t'+g_{03}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)}=0,\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^4g}{dp^4}(t_0,0) = bigg(g_{10}t^{IV}+4(g_{20}t'+g_{11})t''' +3g_{20}t''^{,2}+6(g_{30}t'^{,2}+2g_{21}t'+g_{12})t''\[4pt]
          &+g_{40}t'^{,4}+4g_{31}t'^{,3}+6g_{22}t'^{,2}+4g_{13}t'+g_{04}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)}=0dots.
          end{aligned}tag{10}$$



          The system $(10)$ allows to get the explicit expressions for the required derivatives
          $$tau_1=t'(0), tau_2=t''(0), tau_3=t'''(0), tau_4=t^{IV}(0). tag{11}$$



          There are
          $$begin{aligned}
          &tau_1 = - dfrac{g_{01}}{g_{10}},\[4pt]
          &tau_2 = - dfrac{1}{g_{10}} bigg(g_{20}tau_1^2+2g_{11}tau_1+g_{02}bigg),\[4pt]
          &tau_3 = - dfrac{1}{g_{10}} bigg(3(g_{20}tau_1+g_{11})tau_2
          +g_{30}tau_1^3+3g_{21}tau_1^2+3g_{12}tau_1+g_{03}bigg),\[4pt]
          &tau_4 = - dfrac{1}{g_{10}} bigg(4(g_{20}tau_1+g_{11})tau_3 +3g_{20}tau_2^2+6(g_{30}tau_1^2+2g_{21}tau_1+g_{12})tau_2
          +g_{40}tau_1^4+6g_{22}tau_1^2+g_{04}bigg),\[4pt]
          &dots,
          end{aligned}tag{12}$$

          wherein all unzero values $g_{ij}$ are defined in the table $(9).$



          Expressions for the next $tau_k$ can not contain essentially greater quantity of terms, because all the next partial derivatives are zeros.



          $color{brown}{textbf{Maclaurin series of 9th order.}}$



          Obtained series has the form of
          $$begin{align}
          &t(varepsilon) = t_0 + tau_1(1-cosvarepsilon)+frac12tau_2(1-cosvarepsilon)^2+frac16tau_3(1-cosvarepsilon)^3+frac1{24}tau_4(1-cosvarepsilon)^4+dots\[4pt]
          &= t_0 + tau_1left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2 -frac1{4!}varepsilon^4 +frac1{6!}varepsilon^6-frac1{8!}varepsilon^8right)
          +frac12tau_2left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2-frac1{4!}varepsilon^4 +frac1{6!}varepsilon^6right)^2\[4pt]
          &+frac16tau_3left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2-frac1{4!}varepsilon^4right)^3 +frac1{24}tau_4left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2right)^4+dots
          = t_0 + frac12tau_1varepsilon^2 \[4pt]
          &+frac1{24}(-tau_1+6tau_2)varepsilon^4+frac1{720}(tau_1-15tau_2+15tau_3)varepsilon^6
          +frac1{40320}(-tau_1+63tau_2-210tau_3+105tau_4+dots
          end{align}$$



          Then, in accordance with $(3)-(4),$ can be obtained Maclaurin series for the both branches in the form of
          $$begin{align}
          &v(varepsilon)=frac 12(rsinvarepsilon pm t(varepsilon))
          = pmfrac12 t_0 + frac r2 varepsilon pm frac14 tau_1varepsilon^2 -frac r{12} varepsilon^3 pm frac1{48}(-tau_1+6tau_1)varepsilon^4 +frac r{240}varepsilon^5\[4pt]
          & pm frac1{1440}(tau_1-15tau_2+15tau_3)varepsilon^6
          - frac r{10080}varepsilon^7
          pm frac1{80640}(-tau_1+63tau_2-210tau_3+105tau_4)varepsilon^8\[4pt]
          &+ frac r{362880}varepsilon^9+dots
          end{align}$$



          Therefore, Maclaurin series of nineth order $color{green}{textrm{can be built}}$.



          Easy to see that used approach allows to calculate the arbitrary quantity of the series terms.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ready. Waiting for comments
            $endgroup$
            – Yuri Negometyanov
            Mar 12 at 20:50










          • $begingroup$
            Take $r = 0$ and $a = 5$. Then equation 6, describing $t_0$ will give an imaginary result. Therefore the expression for $v(epsilon)$ will give imaginary terms - this should not be the case. I am sorry but I am unable to (quickly) see where the error is - your method (and the notation) is impressive but hard to follow for me.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 12 at 22:15










          • $begingroup$
            @PiotrBenedysiuk $r=0$ eliminates $varepsilon$ at all.
            $endgroup$
            – Yuri Negometyanov
            Mar 12 at 22:45










          • $begingroup$
            It doesn't in the expression for your $v$. But the argument holds to if $r=1$ and $a=5$.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 12 at 23:05










          • $begingroup$
            @PiotrBenedysiuk Then should $6ge|z|ge4,,$ and I cannot find solution of $(1)$
            $endgroup$
            – Yuri Negometyanov
            Mar 12 at 23:40












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066407%2ftaylor-expansion-of-imaginary-part-doable-or-not%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3





          +100







          $begingroup$

          My approach is based on the fact that $z_{pm}(epsilon)$ is a function from $mathcal{R} tomathcal{C}$ therefore (I THINK, HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO FIND PROOF YET) the Taylor expansion of $text{Im}(z_{pm}(epsilon))$ is the same as Imaginary part of the Taylor expansion of $z_{pm}(epsilon)$.



          Firstly write:
          $ z = a + r exp(ipi)exp(-iepsilon)$.



          Then realize: $z(epsilon = 0 ) = a -r$ and



          $frac{dz}{depsilon}|_{epsilon = 0} = -irexp(ipi)exp(-iepsilon)|_{epsilon = 0} = ir$



          We will now compute the first two terms of the Taylor expansion of $z_{pm}$ in terms around $epsilon = 0$. We start at zeroth order:



          $$z_{pm}|_{epsilon = 0} =frac{1}{2}left(a -r pm sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}right) = frac{1}{2}left(a -r pm sqrt{a -r -2}sqrt{a-r+2}right).$$



          Note here that since $r le a + 2$ the second square root is always positive. If also $r le a -2$ then the first square root is positive and the whole term will be reall. In case $a -2 le r le a+2$ we will have a square root of a negative number and thus we will get Imaginary numbers from there. Thus, the leading order term of the expansion will be $epsilon^0$.



          And now do the first order term:
          $$frac{dz_{pm}}{depsilon}|_{epsilon = 0} = frac{1}{2}left(frac{dz}{depsilon} pm frac{dz}{depsilon} frac{z}{sqrt{z^2 - 4}}right) = frac{ir}{2}left(1 pm frac{a-r}{sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}}right)$$



          The same distinction needs to be made here if $a -2 le r le a+2$ the square root will give us imaginary numbers.



          Putting it all together we get:
          $$z_{pm}(epsilon) approx frac{1}{2}left(a -r pm sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}right) +frac{ir}{2}left(1 pm frac{a-r}{sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}}right) epsilon$$



          In case $a -2 le r le a+2$ we get:
          $$text{Im}left(z_{pm}(epsilon)right) approx pm frac{1}{2}left(|sqrt{a -r -2}|sqrt{a-r+2}right) + frac{r}{2}epsilon$$



          and in case $r le a-2$:



          $$text{Im}left(z_{pm}(epsilon)right) approx frac{r}{2}left(1 pm frac{a-r}{sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}}right) epsilon$$



          Edit: Getting the full expansion shouldn't be too hard once you are aware you can expand $z_{pm}$ and then take the imaginary part.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The reason why mapping from $R to C$ should obey the Taylor relation I mentioned is because if both $f(x)$ and $text{Im}(f(x))$ are analytical (meaning the expansion exists) then we must have that the series converge to each other if we look at the Imaginary part due to uniqueness (the same holds for the real part). For functions $C to C$ this does not hold! Say $f(z) =(2+i) z$ then we can't say $Im(f(z)) = Im(2+i) times Im(z)$ because $z$ is an complex number!
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 6 at 11:22










          • $begingroup$
            Your result seems to imply that if $r=a$ the $Im(z_{pm}(varepsilon)) approx frac{r}{2} varepsilon. $ Now, take $r=a$, then I think it becomes apparent that this result cannot be true. Just look at what $z_{pm}$ is for $varepsilon=0.$
            $endgroup$
            – Sascha
            Mar 6 at 11:25












          • $begingroup$
            Indeed, I require a>r+2.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 6 at 11:49










          • $begingroup$
            I am afraid there is no mistake in the question. Can you adapt your answer to the question?
            $endgroup$
            – Sascha
            Mar 6 at 11:54










          • $begingroup$
            In that case the square root will give us an imaginary number. Then, depending on the value of $a$ and $r$ you will also get an zeroth order contribution. One sec.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 6 at 12:22
















          3





          +100







          $begingroup$

          My approach is based on the fact that $z_{pm}(epsilon)$ is a function from $mathcal{R} tomathcal{C}$ therefore (I THINK, HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO FIND PROOF YET) the Taylor expansion of $text{Im}(z_{pm}(epsilon))$ is the same as Imaginary part of the Taylor expansion of $z_{pm}(epsilon)$.



          Firstly write:
          $ z = a + r exp(ipi)exp(-iepsilon)$.



          Then realize: $z(epsilon = 0 ) = a -r$ and



          $frac{dz}{depsilon}|_{epsilon = 0} = -irexp(ipi)exp(-iepsilon)|_{epsilon = 0} = ir$



          We will now compute the first two terms of the Taylor expansion of $z_{pm}$ in terms around $epsilon = 0$. We start at zeroth order:



          $$z_{pm}|_{epsilon = 0} =frac{1}{2}left(a -r pm sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}right) = frac{1}{2}left(a -r pm sqrt{a -r -2}sqrt{a-r+2}right).$$



          Note here that since $r le a + 2$ the second square root is always positive. If also $r le a -2$ then the first square root is positive and the whole term will be reall. In case $a -2 le r le a+2$ we will have a square root of a negative number and thus we will get Imaginary numbers from there. Thus, the leading order term of the expansion will be $epsilon^0$.



          And now do the first order term:
          $$frac{dz_{pm}}{depsilon}|_{epsilon = 0} = frac{1}{2}left(frac{dz}{depsilon} pm frac{dz}{depsilon} frac{z}{sqrt{z^2 - 4}}right) = frac{ir}{2}left(1 pm frac{a-r}{sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}}right)$$



          The same distinction needs to be made here if $a -2 le r le a+2$ the square root will give us imaginary numbers.



          Putting it all together we get:
          $$z_{pm}(epsilon) approx frac{1}{2}left(a -r pm sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}right) +frac{ir}{2}left(1 pm frac{a-r}{sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}}right) epsilon$$



          In case $a -2 le r le a+2$ we get:
          $$text{Im}left(z_{pm}(epsilon)right) approx pm frac{1}{2}left(|sqrt{a -r -2}|sqrt{a-r+2}right) + frac{r}{2}epsilon$$



          and in case $r le a-2$:



          $$text{Im}left(z_{pm}(epsilon)right) approx frac{r}{2}left(1 pm frac{a-r}{sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}}right) epsilon$$



          Edit: Getting the full expansion shouldn't be too hard once you are aware you can expand $z_{pm}$ and then take the imaginary part.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The reason why mapping from $R to C$ should obey the Taylor relation I mentioned is because if both $f(x)$ and $text{Im}(f(x))$ are analytical (meaning the expansion exists) then we must have that the series converge to each other if we look at the Imaginary part due to uniqueness (the same holds for the real part). For functions $C to C$ this does not hold! Say $f(z) =(2+i) z$ then we can't say $Im(f(z)) = Im(2+i) times Im(z)$ because $z$ is an complex number!
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 6 at 11:22










          • $begingroup$
            Your result seems to imply that if $r=a$ the $Im(z_{pm}(varepsilon)) approx frac{r}{2} varepsilon. $ Now, take $r=a$, then I think it becomes apparent that this result cannot be true. Just look at what $z_{pm}$ is for $varepsilon=0.$
            $endgroup$
            – Sascha
            Mar 6 at 11:25












          • $begingroup$
            Indeed, I require a>r+2.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 6 at 11:49










          • $begingroup$
            I am afraid there is no mistake in the question. Can you adapt your answer to the question?
            $endgroup$
            – Sascha
            Mar 6 at 11:54










          • $begingroup$
            In that case the square root will give us an imaginary number. Then, depending on the value of $a$ and $r$ you will also get an zeroth order contribution. One sec.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 6 at 12:22














          3





          +100







          3





          +100



          3




          +100



          $begingroup$

          My approach is based on the fact that $z_{pm}(epsilon)$ is a function from $mathcal{R} tomathcal{C}$ therefore (I THINK, HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO FIND PROOF YET) the Taylor expansion of $text{Im}(z_{pm}(epsilon))$ is the same as Imaginary part of the Taylor expansion of $z_{pm}(epsilon)$.



          Firstly write:
          $ z = a + r exp(ipi)exp(-iepsilon)$.



          Then realize: $z(epsilon = 0 ) = a -r$ and



          $frac{dz}{depsilon}|_{epsilon = 0} = -irexp(ipi)exp(-iepsilon)|_{epsilon = 0} = ir$



          We will now compute the first two terms of the Taylor expansion of $z_{pm}$ in terms around $epsilon = 0$. We start at zeroth order:



          $$z_{pm}|_{epsilon = 0} =frac{1}{2}left(a -r pm sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}right) = frac{1}{2}left(a -r pm sqrt{a -r -2}sqrt{a-r+2}right).$$



          Note here that since $r le a + 2$ the second square root is always positive. If also $r le a -2$ then the first square root is positive and the whole term will be reall. In case $a -2 le r le a+2$ we will have a square root of a negative number and thus we will get Imaginary numbers from there. Thus, the leading order term of the expansion will be $epsilon^0$.



          And now do the first order term:
          $$frac{dz_{pm}}{depsilon}|_{epsilon = 0} = frac{1}{2}left(frac{dz}{depsilon} pm frac{dz}{depsilon} frac{z}{sqrt{z^2 - 4}}right) = frac{ir}{2}left(1 pm frac{a-r}{sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}}right)$$



          The same distinction needs to be made here if $a -2 le r le a+2$ the square root will give us imaginary numbers.



          Putting it all together we get:
          $$z_{pm}(epsilon) approx frac{1}{2}left(a -r pm sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}right) +frac{ir}{2}left(1 pm frac{a-r}{sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}}right) epsilon$$



          In case $a -2 le r le a+2$ we get:
          $$text{Im}left(z_{pm}(epsilon)right) approx pm frac{1}{2}left(|sqrt{a -r -2}|sqrt{a-r+2}right) + frac{r}{2}epsilon$$



          and in case $r le a-2$:



          $$text{Im}left(z_{pm}(epsilon)right) approx frac{r}{2}left(1 pm frac{a-r}{sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}}right) epsilon$$



          Edit: Getting the full expansion shouldn't be too hard once you are aware you can expand $z_{pm}$ and then take the imaginary part.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          My approach is based on the fact that $z_{pm}(epsilon)$ is a function from $mathcal{R} tomathcal{C}$ therefore (I THINK, HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO FIND PROOF YET) the Taylor expansion of $text{Im}(z_{pm}(epsilon))$ is the same as Imaginary part of the Taylor expansion of $z_{pm}(epsilon)$.



          Firstly write:
          $ z = a + r exp(ipi)exp(-iepsilon)$.



          Then realize: $z(epsilon = 0 ) = a -r$ and



          $frac{dz}{depsilon}|_{epsilon = 0} = -irexp(ipi)exp(-iepsilon)|_{epsilon = 0} = ir$



          We will now compute the first two terms of the Taylor expansion of $z_{pm}$ in terms around $epsilon = 0$. We start at zeroth order:



          $$z_{pm}|_{epsilon = 0} =frac{1}{2}left(a -r pm sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}right) = frac{1}{2}left(a -r pm sqrt{a -r -2}sqrt{a-r+2}right).$$



          Note here that since $r le a + 2$ the second square root is always positive. If also $r le a -2$ then the first square root is positive and the whole term will be reall. In case $a -2 le r le a+2$ we will have a square root of a negative number and thus we will get Imaginary numbers from there. Thus, the leading order term of the expansion will be $epsilon^0$.



          And now do the first order term:
          $$frac{dz_{pm}}{depsilon}|_{epsilon = 0} = frac{1}{2}left(frac{dz}{depsilon} pm frac{dz}{depsilon} frac{z}{sqrt{z^2 - 4}}right) = frac{ir}{2}left(1 pm frac{a-r}{sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}}right)$$



          The same distinction needs to be made here if $a -2 le r le a+2$ the square root will give us imaginary numbers.



          Putting it all together we get:
          $$z_{pm}(epsilon) approx frac{1}{2}left(a -r pm sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}right) +frac{ir}{2}left(1 pm frac{a-r}{sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}}right) epsilon$$



          In case $a -2 le r le a+2$ we get:
          $$text{Im}left(z_{pm}(epsilon)right) approx pm frac{1}{2}left(|sqrt{a -r -2}|sqrt{a-r+2}right) + frac{r}{2}epsilon$$



          and in case $r le a-2$:



          $$text{Im}left(z_{pm}(epsilon)right) approx frac{r}{2}left(1 pm frac{a-r}{sqrt{(a-r)^2 -4}}right) epsilon$$



          Edit: Getting the full expansion shouldn't be too hard once you are aware you can expand $z_{pm}$ and then take the imaginary part.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 6 at 12:45

























          answered Mar 6 at 11:13









          Piotr BenedysiukPiotr Benedysiuk

          1,344519




          1,344519












          • $begingroup$
            The reason why mapping from $R to C$ should obey the Taylor relation I mentioned is because if both $f(x)$ and $text{Im}(f(x))$ are analytical (meaning the expansion exists) then we must have that the series converge to each other if we look at the Imaginary part due to uniqueness (the same holds for the real part). For functions $C to C$ this does not hold! Say $f(z) =(2+i) z$ then we can't say $Im(f(z)) = Im(2+i) times Im(z)$ because $z$ is an complex number!
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 6 at 11:22










          • $begingroup$
            Your result seems to imply that if $r=a$ the $Im(z_{pm}(varepsilon)) approx frac{r}{2} varepsilon. $ Now, take $r=a$, then I think it becomes apparent that this result cannot be true. Just look at what $z_{pm}$ is for $varepsilon=0.$
            $endgroup$
            – Sascha
            Mar 6 at 11:25












          • $begingroup$
            Indeed, I require a>r+2.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 6 at 11:49










          • $begingroup$
            I am afraid there is no mistake in the question. Can you adapt your answer to the question?
            $endgroup$
            – Sascha
            Mar 6 at 11:54










          • $begingroup$
            In that case the square root will give us an imaginary number. Then, depending on the value of $a$ and $r$ you will also get an zeroth order contribution. One sec.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 6 at 12:22


















          • $begingroup$
            The reason why mapping from $R to C$ should obey the Taylor relation I mentioned is because if both $f(x)$ and $text{Im}(f(x))$ are analytical (meaning the expansion exists) then we must have that the series converge to each other if we look at the Imaginary part due to uniqueness (the same holds for the real part). For functions $C to C$ this does not hold! Say $f(z) =(2+i) z$ then we can't say $Im(f(z)) = Im(2+i) times Im(z)$ because $z$ is an complex number!
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 6 at 11:22










          • $begingroup$
            Your result seems to imply that if $r=a$ the $Im(z_{pm}(varepsilon)) approx frac{r}{2} varepsilon. $ Now, take $r=a$, then I think it becomes apparent that this result cannot be true. Just look at what $z_{pm}$ is for $varepsilon=0.$
            $endgroup$
            – Sascha
            Mar 6 at 11:25












          • $begingroup$
            Indeed, I require a>r+2.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 6 at 11:49










          • $begingroup$
            I am afraid there is no mistake in the question. Can you adapt your answer to the question?
            $endgroup$
            – Sascha
            Mar 6 at 11:54










          • $begingroup$
            In that case the square root will give us an imaginary number. Then, depending on the value of $a$ and $r$ you will also get an zeroth order contribution. One sec.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 6 at 12:22
















          $begingroup$
          The reason why mapping from $R to C$ should obey the Taylor relation I mentioned is because if both $f(x)$ and $text{Im}(f(x))$ are analytical (meaning the expansion exists) then we must have that the series converge to each other if we look at the Imaginary part due to uniqueness (the same holds for the real part). For functions $C to C$ this does not hold! Say $f(z) =(2+i) z$ then we can't say $Im(f(z)) = Im(2+i) times Im(z)$ because $z$ is an complex number!
          $endgroup$
          – Piotr Benedysiuk
          Mar 6 at 11:22




          $begingroup$
          The reason why mapping from $R to C$ should obey the Taylor relation I mentioned is because if both $f(x)$ and $text{Im}(f(x))$ are analytical (meaning the expansion exists) then we must have that the series converge to each other if we look at the Imaginary part due to uniqueness (the same holds for the real part). For functions $C to C$ this does not hold! Say $f(z) =(2+i) z$ then we can't say $Im(f(z)) = Im(2+i) times Im(z)$ because $z$ is an complex number!
          $endgroup$
          – Piotr Benedysiuk
          Mar 6 at 11:22












          $begingroup$
          Your result seems to imply that if $r=a$ the $Im(z_{pm}(varepsilon)) approx frac{r}{2} varepsilon. $ Now, take $r=a$, then I think it becomes apparent that this result cannot be true. Just look at what $z_{pm}$ is for $varepsilon=0.$
          $endgroup$
          – Sascha
          Mar 6 at 11:25






          $begingroup$
          Your result seems to imply that if $r=a$ the $Im(z_{pm}(varepsilon)) approx frac{r}{2} varepsilon. $ Now, take $r=a$, then I think it becomes apparent that this result cannot be true. Just look at what $z_{pm}$ is for $varepsilon=0.$
          $endgroup$
          – Sascha
          Mar 6 at 11:25














          $begingroup$
          Indeed, I require a>r+2.
          $endgroup$
          – Piotr Benedysiuk
          Mar 6 at 11:49




          $begingroup$
          Indeed, I require a>r+2.
          $endgroup$
          – Piotr Benedysiuk
          Mar 6 at 11:49












          $begingroup$
          I am afraid there is no mistake in the question. Can you adapt your answer to the question?
          $endgroup$
          – Sascha
          Mar 6 at 11:54




          $begingroup$
          I am afraid there is no mistake in the question. Can you adapt your answer to the question?
          $endgroup$
          – Sascha
          Mar 6 at 11:54












          $begingroup$
          In that case the square root will give us an imaginary number. Then, depending on the value of $a$ and $r$ you will also get an zeroth order contribution. One sec.
          $endgroup$
          – Piotr Benedysiuk
          Mar 6 at 12:22




          $begingroup$
          In that case the square root will give us an imaginary number. Then, depending on the value of $a$ and $r$ you will also get an zeroth order contribution. One sec.
          $endgroup$
          – Piotr Benedysiuk
          Mar 6 at 12:22











          2












          $begingroup$

          $textbf{Full Edition.}$



          $color{brown}{textbf{Exact expression of the imaginary part.}}$



          Denote
          $$z_1 = y = u+iv,$$
          then $y_1+y_2 = z = a-re^{-ivarepsilon},quad y_1y_2=1,quad$ so
          $$y^2-zy+1=0tag1,$$
          $$(u+iv)^2-(a-rcosvarepsilon+irsinvarepsilon)(u+iv)+1=0,$$
          begin{cases}
          u^2-v^2 - u(a-rcosvarepsilon) + vrsinvarepsilon +1 = 0\
          2uv - ursinvarepsilon - v(a-rcosvarepsilon) =0,
          end{cases}

          begin{cases}
          u=dfrac {v(a-rcosvarepsilon)}{2v-rsinvarepsilon}\[4pt]
          left(dfrac {(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2}{(2v-rsinvarepsilon)^2}-1right)v^2
          - left(dfrac {(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2}{2v-rsinvarepsilon} - rsinvarepsilonright)v +1 = 0,\
          end{cases}

          $$(a- rcosvarepsilon)^2(v^2-v(2v-rsinvarepsilon)) - (v^2-vrsinvarepsilon-1)(2v-rsinvarepsilon)^2 = 0,$$
          or
          $$f(t,varepsilon) = t^4+((a-rcosvarepsilon)^2-r^2sin^2varepsilon-4)t^2-(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2r^2sin^2varepsilon=0,tag{2.1}$$
          where
          $$t=2v-rsinvarepsilon.tag{2.2}$$



          Discriminant of the biquadratic equation $(2.1)$ is
          $$D=((a-rcosvarepsilon-2)^2+r^2sin^2varepsilon)((a-rcosvarepsilon+2)^2+r^2sin^2varepsilon) > 0,tag{3.1}$$
          and the explicit expression for $v(varepsilon)$ is
          $$v(varepsilon)=dfrac{rsinvarepsilonpm t(varepsilon)}2,quadtext{where}quad t(varepsilon) = sqrt{dfrac{r^2sin^2varepsilon+4-(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2 +sqrt D}2}.tag{3.2}$$



          From $(2.1)$ follows that
          $$(t^2)_1(t^2)_2 = -(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2r^2sin^2varepsilon.$$
          I.e. real Taylor series for the other solutions cannot be built.



          $color{brown}{textbf{Data transformations.}}$



          Explicit expression $(3)$ of the imaginary part looks too hard for repeated re-differentiation.



          At the same time, the equation $(2)$ has linear structure and allows suitable repeated re-differentiation. This way required some additional operations.



          Firstly, let us present $(2)$ via superposition in the form of
          $$f(t,varepsilon) = g(t, 1-cosvarepsilon)),tag4$$
          where
          $$g(t,p)=t^4+b(p)t^2+c(p),tag{5.1}$$
          begin{align}
          &b(p)=(a-r(1-p))^2-r^2(1-(1-p)^2)-4 = 2r^2p^2+2r(a-2r)p+((a-r)^2-4)
          ,\[4pt]
          &c(p)= -r^2(a-r(1-p))^2(1-(1-p)^2)\[4pt]
          & = r^4p^4+2r^3(a-2r)p^3+r^2(a^2-6ar+5r^2)p^2-2r^2(a-r)^2p
          end{align}

          $$begin{cases}
          b(p)=2r^2p^2+2r(a-2r)p+(a-r)^2-4\
          c(p) = r^4p^4+2r^3(a-2r)p^3+r^2(a^2-6ar+5r^2)p^2-2r^2(a-r)^2p
          end{cases}tag{5.2}$$



          Will be built Maclaurin series $t(p)$ with
          $$t(0)= t_0 = sqrt{4-(a-r)^2phantom{big|}}.tag6$$



          Required derivatives will be obtained through differentiation of $g(t,p),$
          i.e. the expression $(5).$



          $color{brown}{textbf{Implicit differentiation.}}$



          Denote
          $$g_{ij}(t,p)=dfrac{partial^{(i+j)}g}{partial t^i partial p^j},tag{7.1}$$



          Taking in account that




          $$begin{align} &dfrac d{dp}varphi(t,p) = varphi,'_t,t'+varphi'_p,\[4pt]
          &dfrac d{dp}varphi(t,p)psi(t^{(n)},dots,t'',t')
          = varphipsi,'_{t^{(n)}},t^{(n+1)} +dots+varphipsi,'_{t''},t''' +varphipsi,'_{t'},t''+varphi'_tpsi,t'+varphi'_ppsi,end{align}$$




          repeated re-differentiation of $(5.1)$ becames simple:
          $$begin{aligned}
          &dfrac {dg}{dp} = g_{10}t'+g_{01},\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^2g}{dp^2} = dfrac d{dp}(g_{10}t'+g_{01})
          = Bigl(g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2},+g_{11}t'Bigr)+g_{11}t'+ g_{02}\[4pt]
          &= g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2}+2g_{11}t'+ g_{02},\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^3g}{dp^3}
          = dfrac d{dp}Bigl(g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2}+2g_{11}t'+g_{02}Bigr)\[4pt]
          &= (g_{10}t'''+g_{20}t't''+g_{11}t'')
          +(2g_{20}t't''+g_{30}t'^{,3}+g_{21}t'^{,2})\[4pt]
          &+2(g_{11}t''+g_{21}t'^{,2}+g_{12}t')
          +(g_{12}t'+g_{03})\[4pt]
          &= g_{10}t''' +3g_{20}t't'' +3g_{11}t''
          +g_{30}t'^{,3}+3g_{21}t'^{,2}+3g_{12}t'+g_{03},\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^4g}{dp^4}
          = dfrac d{dp}Bigl(g_{10}t''' +3g_{20}t't'' + 3g_{11}t''
          +g_{30}t'^{,3}+3g_{21}t'^{,2}+3g_{12}t'+g_{03}Bigr)\[4pt]
          &= (g_{10}t^{IV}+g_{20}t't'''+g_{11}t''')
          +3(g_{20}(t't'''+t''^{,2})+g_{30}t'^{,2}t''+g_{21}t't'')\[4pt]
          &+3(g_{11}t'''+g_{21}t't''+g_{12}t'')
          +(3g_{30}t'^{,2}t''+g_{40}t'^{,4}+g_{31}t'^{,3})\[4pt]
          &+3(2g_{21}t't'' +g_{31}t'^{,3}+g_{22}t'^{,2})
          +3(g_{12}t''+g_{22}t'^{,2}+g_{13}t')+(g_{13}t'+g_{04})\[4pt]
          &= g_{10}t^{IV}+g_{20}(4t't'''+3t''^{,2})+4g_{11}t'''
          +6g_{30}t'^{,2}t''+12g_{21}t't''+6g_{12}t''\[4pt]
          &+g_{40}t'^{,4}+4g_{31}t'^{,3}
          +6g_{22}t'^{,2}+4g_{13}t'+g_{04}dots
          end{aligned}tag{7.2}$$



          Partial derivatives in the point $(t_0,0)$ can be calculated by formula
          $$g_{ij}= delta_{j0}T_{4i}+B_jT_{2i}+delta_{i0}C_j,tag{8.1}$$
          where $delta_{ij}$ is Kronecker symbol,
          $$begin{pmatrix}T_{40} \ T_{41} \ T_{42} \ T_{43} \ T_{44}end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}t_0^4 \4t_0^3 \12t_0^2 \24t_0 \24 end{pmatrix},quad
          begin{pmatrix}T_{20} \ T_{21} \ T_{22} \ T_{23} \ T_{24}end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}t_0^2 \2t_0 \2 \0 \0 end{pmatrix},tag{8.2}$$



          $$begin{pmatrix}B_0 \ B_1 \ B_2 \ B_3 \ B_4end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}-t_0^2 \2ar-4r^2 \4r^2 \0 \0 end{pmatrix},quad
          begin{pmatrix}C_0 \ C_1 \ C_2 \ C_3 \ C_4end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}0 \-2r^2(a-r)^2 \ 2r^2(a-r)(a-5r) \12r^3(a-2r) \24r^4 end{pmatrix}.tag{8.3}$$



          The derivatives' values $g_{ij}(t_0,0)$ can be presented in the table form of
          $$left[begin{matrix}
          g_{ij}(t_0,0) & j=0 & j=1 & j=2 & j=3 & j=4 \
          i=0 & 0 & 2r(a-2r)t_0^2-2r^2(a-r)^2 & 4r^2t_0^2 +2r^2(a-r)(a-5r)& 12r^3(a-2r) & 24r^4 \
          i=1 & 2t_0^3 & 4r(a-2r)t_0 & 8r^2t_0 & 0 && \
          i=2 & 10t_0^2 & 4r(a-2r) & 8r^2 &&& \
          i=3 & 24t_0 & 0 &&&& \
          i=4 & 24 & &&&& \
          end{matrix}right]tag9$$

          All the other derivatives' values $g_{ij}(t_0,0)$ equal to zero.



          $color{brown}{textbf{Derivatives for the series.}}$



          Obtained results $(7),(9)$ allow to write the simple system for $t'(0),t''(0),t'''(0),t^{IV}(0)$ in the form of



          $$begin{aligned}
          &dfrac {dg}{dp}(t_0,0) = bigg(g_{10}t'+g_{01}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)} = 0,\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^2g}{dp^2}(t_0,0)= bigg(g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2},+2g_{11}t'+g_{02}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)}=0,\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^3g}{dp^3}(t_0,0) = bigg(g_{10}t''' +3(g_{20}t'+g_{11})t''
          +g_{30}t'^{,3}+3g_{21}t'^{,2}+3g_{12}t'+g_{03}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)}=0,\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^4g}{dp^4}(t_0,0) = bigg(g_{10}t^{IV}+4(g_{20}t'+g_{11})t''' +3g_{20}t''^{,2}+6(g_{30}t'^{,2}+2g_{21}t'+g_{12})t''\[4pt]
          &+g_{40}t'^{,4}+4g_{31}t'^{,3}+6g_{22}t'^{,2}+4g_{13}t'+g_{04}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)}=0dots.
          end{aligned}tag{10}$$



          The system $(10)$ allows to get the explicit expressions for the required derivatives
          $$tau_1=t'(0), tau_2=t''(0), tau_3=t'''(0), tau_4=t^{IV}(0). tag{11}$$



          There are
          $$begin{aligned}
          &tau_1 = - dfrac{g_{01}}{g_{10}},\[4pt]
          &tau_2 = - dfrac{1}{g_{10}} bigg(g_{20}tau_1^2+2g_{11}tau_1+g_{02}bigg),\[4pt]
          &tau_3 = - dfrac{1}{g_{10}} bigg(3(g_{20}tau_1+g_{11})tau_2
          +g_{30}tau_1^3+3g_{21}tau_1^2+3g_{12}tau_1+g_{03}bigg),\[4pt]
          &tau_4 = - dfrac{1}{g_{10}} bigg(4(g_{20}tau_1+g_{11})tau_3 +3g_{20}tau_2^2+6(g_{30}tau_1^2+2g_{21}tau_1+g_{12})tau_2
          +g_{40}tau_1^4+6g_{22}tau_1^2+g_{04}bigg),\[4pt]
          &dots,
          end{aligned}tag{12}$$

          wherein all unzero values $g_{ij}$ are defined in the table $(9).$



          Expressions for the next $tau_k$ can not contain essentially greater quantity of terms, because all the next partial derivatives are zeros.



          $color{brown}{textbf{Maclaurin series of 9th order.}}$



          Obtained series has the form of
          $$begin{align}
          &t(varepsilon) = t_0 + tau_1(1-cosvarepsilon)+frac12tau_2(1-cosvarepsilon)^2+frac16tau_3(1-cosvarepsilon)^3+frac1{24}tau_4(1-cosvarepsilon)^4+dots\[4pt]
          &= t_0 + tau_1left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2 -frac1{4!}varepsilon^4 +frac1{6!}varepsilon^6-frac1{8!}varepsilon^8right)
          +frac12tau_2left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2-frac1{4!}varepsilon^4 +frac1{6!}varepsilon^6right)^2\[4pt]
          &+frac16tau_3left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2-frac1{4!}varepsilon^4right)^3 +frac1{24}tau_4left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2right)^4+dots
          = t_0 + frac12tau_1varepsilon^2 \[4pt]
          &+frac1{24}(-tau_1+6tau_2)varepsilon^4+frac1{720}(tau_1-15tau_2+15tau_3)varepsilon^6
          +frac1{40320}(-tau_1+63tau_2-210tau_3+105tau_4+dots
          end{align}$$



          Then, in accordance with $(3)-(4),$ can be obtained Maclaurin series for the both branches in the form of
          $$begin{align}
          &v(varepsilon)=frac 12(rsinvarepsilon pm t(varepsilon))
          = pmfrac12 t_0 + frac r2 varepsilon pm frac14 tau_1varepsilon^2 -frac r{12} varepsilon^3 pm frac1{48}(-tau_1+6tau_1)varepsilon^4 +frac r{240}varepsilon^5\[4pt]
          & pm frac1{1440}(tau_1-15tau_2+15tau_3)varepsilon^6
          - frac r{10080}varepsilon^7
          pm frac1{80640}(-tau_1+63tau_2-210tau_3+105tau_4)varepsilon^8\[4pt]
          &+ frac r{362880}varepsilon^9+dots
          end{align}$$



          Therefore, Maclaurin series of nineth order $color{green}{textrm{can be built}}$.



          Easy to see that used approach allows to calculate the arbitrary quantity of the series terms.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ready. Waiting for comments
            $endgroup$
            – Yuri Negometyanov
            Mar 12 at 20:50










          • $begingroup$
            Take $r = 0$ and $a = 5$. Then equation 6, describing $t_0$ will give an imaginary result. Therefore the expression for $v(epsilon)$ will give imaginary terms - this should not be the case. I am sorry but I am unable to (quickly) see where the error is - your method (and the notation) is impressive but hard to follow for me.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 12 at 22:15










          • $begingroup$
            @PiotrBenedysiuk $r=0$ eliminates $varepsilon$ at all.
            $endgroup$
            – Yuri Negometyanov
            Mar 12 at 22:45










          • $begingroup$
            It doesn't in the expression for your $v$. But the argument holds to if $r=1$ and $a=5$.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 12 at 23:05










          • $begingroup$
            @PiotrBenedysiuk Then should $6ge|z|ge4,,$ and I cannot find solution of $(1)$
            $endgroup$
            – Yuri Negometyanov
            Mar 12 at 23:40
















          2












          $begingroup$

          $textbf{Full Edition.}$



          $color{brown}{textbf{Exact expression of the imaginary part.}}$



          Denote
          $$z_1 = y = u+iv,$$
          then $y_1+y_2 = z = a-re^{-ivarepsilon},quad y_1y_2=1,quad$ so
          $$y^2-zy+1=0tag1,$$
          $$(u+iv)^2-(a-rcosvarepsilon+irsinvarepsilon)(u+iv)+1=0,$$
          begin{cases}
          u^2-v^2 - u(a-rcosvarepsilon) + vrsinvarepsilon +1 = 0\
          2uv - ursinvarepsilon - v(a-rcosvarepsilon) =0,
          end{cases}

          begin{cases}
          u=dfrac {v(a-rcosvarepsilon)}{2v-rsinvarepsilon}\[4pt]
          left(dfrac {(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2}{(2v-rsinvarepsilon)^2}-1right)v^2
          - left(dfrac {(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2}{2v-rsinvarepsilon} - rsinvarepsilonright)v +1 = 0,\
          end{cases}

          $$(a- rcosvarepsilon)^2(v^2-v(2v-rsinvarepsilon)) - (v^2-vrsinvarepsilon-1)(2v-rsinvarepsilon)^2 = 0,$$
          or
          $$f(t,varepsilon) = t^4+((a-rcosvarepsilon)^2-r^2sin^2varepsilon-4)t^2-(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2r^2sin^2varepsilon=0,tag{2.1}$$
          where
          $$t=2v-rsinvarepsilon.tag{2.2}$$



          Discriminant of the biquadratic equation $(2.1)$ is
          $$D=((a-rcosvarepsilon-2)^2+r^2sin^2varepsilon)((a-rcosvarepsilon+2)^2+r^2sin^2varepsilon) > 0,tag{3.1}$$
          and the explicit expression for $v(varepsilon)$ is
          $$v(varepsilon)=dfrac{rsinvarepsilonpm t(varepsilon)}2,quadtext{where}quad t(varepsilon) = sqrt{dfrac{r^2sin^2varepsilon+4-(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2 +sqrt D}2}.tag{3.2}$$



          From $(2.1)$ follows that
          $$(t^2)_1(t^2)_2 = -(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2r^2sin^2varepsilon.$$
          I.e. real Taylor series for the other solutions cannot be built.



          $color{brown}{textbf{Data transformations.}}$



          Explicit expression $(3)$ of the imaginary part looks too hard for repeated re-differentiation.



          At the same time, the equation $(2)$ has linear structure and allows suitable repeated re-differentiation. This way required some additional operations.



          Firstly, let us present $(2)$ via superposition in the form of
          $$f(t,varepsilon) = g(t, 1-cosvarepsilon)),tag4$$
          where
          $$g(t,p)=t^4+b(p)t^2+c(p),tag{5.1}$$
          begin{align}
          &b(p)=(a-r(1-p))^2-r^2(1-(1-p)^2)-4 = 2r^2p^2+2r(a-2r)p+((a-r)^2-4)
          ,\[4pt]
          &c(p)= -r^2(a-r(1-p))^2(1-(1-p)^2)\[4pt]
          & = r^4p^4+2r^3(a-2r)p^3+r^2(a^2-6ar+5r^2)p^2-2r^2(a-r)^2p
          end{align}

          $$begin{cases}
          b(p)=2r^2p^2+2r(a-2r)p+(a-r)^2-4\
          c(p) = r^4p^4+2r^3(a-2r)p^3+r^2(a^2-6ar+5r^2)p^2-2r^2(a-r)^2p
          end{cases}tag{5.2}$$



          Will be built Maclaurin series $t(p)$ with
          $$t(0)= t_0 = sqrt{4-(a-r)^2phantom{big|}}.tag6$$



          Required derivatives will be obtained through differentiation of $g(t,p),$
          i.e. the expression $(5).$



          $color{brown}{textbf{Implicit differentiation.}}$



          Denote
          $$g_{ij}(t,p)=dfrac{partial^{(i+j)}g}{partial t^i partial p^j},tag{7.1}$$



          Taking in account that




          $$begin{align} &dfrac d{dp}varphi(t,p) = varphi,'_t,t'+varphi'_p,\[4pt]
          &dfrac d{dp}varphi(t,p)psi(t^{(n)},dots,t'',t')
          = varphipsi,'_{t^{(n)}},t^{(n+1)} +dots+varphipsi,'_{t''},t''' +varphipsi,'_{t'},t''+varphi'_tpsi,t'+varphi'_ppsi,end{align}$$




          repeated re-differentiation of $(5.1)$ becames simple:
          $$begin{aligned}
          &dfrac {dg}{dp} = g_{10}t'+g_{01},\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^2g}{dp^2} = dfrac d{dp}(g_{10}t'+g_{01})
          = Bigl(g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2},+g_{11}t'Bigr)+g_{11}t'+ g_{02}\[4pt]
          &= g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2}+2g_{11}t'+ g_{02},\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^3g}{dp^3}
          = dfrac d{dp}Bigl(g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2}+2g_{11}t'+g_{02}Bigr)\[4pt]
          &= (g_{10}t'''+g_{20}t't''+g_{11}t'')
          +(2g_{20}t't''+g_{30}t'^{,3}+g_{21}t'^{,2})\[4pt]
          &+2(g_{11}t''+g_{21}t'^{,2}+g_{12}t')
          +(g_{12}t'+g_{03})\[4pt]
          &= g_{10}t''' +3g_{20}t't'' +3g_{11}t''
          +g_{30}t'^{,3}+3g_{21}t'^{,2}+3g_{12}t'+g_{03},\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^4g}{dp^4}
          = dfrac d{dp}Bigl(g_{10}t''' +3g_{20}t't'' + 3g_{11}t''
          +g_{30}t'^{,3}+3g_{21}t'^{,2}+3g_{12}t'+g_{03}Bigr)\[4pt]
          &= (g_{10}t^{IV}+g_{20}t't'''+g_{11}t''')
          +3(g_{20}(t't'''+t''^{,2})+g_{30}t'^{,2}t''+g_{21}t't'')\[4pt]
          &+3(g_{11}t'''+g_{21}t't''+g_{12}t'')
          +(3g_{30}t'^{,2}t''+g_{40}t'^{,4}+g_{31}t'^{,3})\[4pt]
          &+3(2g_{21}t't'' +g_{31}t'^{,3}+g_{22}t'^{,2})
          +3(g_{12}t''+g_{22}t'^{,2}+g_{13}t')+(g_{13}t'+g_{04})\[4pt]
          &= g_{10}t^{IV}+g_{20}(4t't'''+3t''^{,2})+4g_{11}t'''
          +6g_{30}t'^{,2}t''+12g_{21}t't''+6g_{12}t''\[4pt]
          &+g_{40}t'^{,4}+4g_{31}t'^{,3}
          +6g_{22}t'^{,2}+4g_{13}t'+g_{04}dots
          end{aligned}tag{7.2}$$



          Partial derivatives in the point $(t_0,0)$ can be calculated by formula
          $$g_{ij}= delta_{j0}T_{4i}+B_jT_{2i}+delta_{i0}C_j,tag{8.1}$$
          where $delta_{ij}$ is Kronecker symbol,
          $$begin{pmatrix}T_{40} \ T_{41} \ T_{42} \ T_{43} \ T_{44}end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}t_0^4 \4t_0^3 \12t_0^2 \24t_0 \24 end{pmatrix},quad
          begin{pmatrix}T_{20} \ T_{21} \ T_{22} \ T_{23} \ T_{24}end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}t_0^2 \2t_0 \2 \0 \0 end{pmatrix},tag{8.2}$$



          $$begin{pmatrix}B_0 \ B_1 \ B_2 \ B_3 \ B_4end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}-t_0^2 \2ar-4r^2 \4r^2 \0 \0 end{pmatrix},quad
          begin{pmatrix}C_0 \ C_1 \ C_2 \ C_3 \ C_4end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}0 \-2r^2(a-r)^2 \ 2r^2(a-r)(a-5r) \12r^3(a-2r) \24r^4 end{pmatrix}.tag{8.3}$$



          The derivatives' values $g_{ij}(t_0,0)$ can be presented in the table form of
          $$left[begin{matrix}
          g_{ij}(t_0,0) & j=0 & j=1 & j=2 & j=3 & j=4 \
          i=0 & 0 & 2r(a-2r)t_0^2-2r^2(a-r)^2 & 4r^2t_0^2 +2r^2(a-r)(a-5r)& 12r^3(a-2r) & 24r^4 \
          i=1 & 2t_0^3 & 4r(a-2r)t_0 & 8r^2t_0 & 0 && \
          i=2 & 10t_0^2 & 4r(a-2r) & 8r^2 &&& \
          i=3 & 24t_0 & 0 &&&& \
          i=4 & 24 & &&&& \
          end{matrix}right]tag9$$

          All the other derivatives' values $g_{ij}(t_0,0)$ equal to zero.



          $color{brown}{textbf{Derivatives for the series.}}$



          Obtained results $(7),(9)$ allow to write the simple system for $t'(0),t''(0),t'''(0),t^{IV}(0)$ in the form of



          $$begin{aligned}
          &dfrac {dg}{dp}(t_0,0) = bigg(g_{10}t'+g_{01}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)} = 0,\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^2g}{dp^2}(t_0,0)= bigg(g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2},+2g_{11}t'+g_{02}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)}=0,\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^3g}{dp^3}(t_0,0) = bigg(g_{10}t''' +3(g_{20}t'+g_{11})t''
          +g_{30}t'^{,3}+3g_{21}t'^{,2}+3g_{12}t'+g_{03}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)}=0,\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^4g}{dp^4}(t_0,0) = bigg(g_{10}t^{IV}+4(g_{20}t'+g_{11})t''' +3g_{20}t''^{,2}+6(g_{30}t'^{,2}+2g_{21}t'+g_{12})t''\[4pt]
          &+g_{40}t'^{,4}+4g_{31}t'^{,3}+6g_{22}t'^{,2}+4g_{13}t'+g_{04}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)}=0dots.
          end{aligned}tag{10}$$



          The system $(10)$ allows to get the explicit expressions for the required derivatives
          $$tau_1=t'(0), tau_2=t''(0), tau_3=t'''(0), tau_4=t^{IV}(0). tag{11}$$



          There are
          $$begin{aligned}
          &tau_1 = - dfrac{g_{01}}{g_{10}},\[4pt]
          &tau_2 = - dfrac{1}{g_{10}} bigg(g_{20}tau_1^2+2g_{11}tau_1+g_{02}bigg),\[4pt]
          &tau_3 = - dfrac{1}{g_{10}} bigg(3(g_{20}tau_1+g_{11})tau_2
          +g_{30}tau_1^3+3g_{21}tau_1^2+3g_{12}tau_1+g_{03}bigg),\[4pt]
          &tau_4 = - dfrac{1}{g_{10}} bigg(4(g_{20}tau_1+g_{11})tau_3 +3g_{20}tau_2^2+6(g_{30}tau_1^2+2g_{21}tau_1+g_{12})tau_2
          +g_{40}tau_1^4+6g_{22}tau_1^2+g_{04}bigg),\[4pt]
          &dots,
          end{aligned}tag{12}$$

          wherein all unzero values $g_{ij}$ are defined in the table $(9).$



          Expressions for the next $tau_k$ can not contain essentially greater quantity of terms, because all the next partial derivatives are zeros.



          $color{brown}{textbf{Maclaurin series of 9th order.}}$



          Obtained series has the form of
          $$begin{align}
          &t(varepsilon) = t_0 + tau_1(1-cosvarepsilon)+frac12tau_2(1-cosvarepsilon)^2+frac16tau_3(1-cosvarepsilon)^3+frac1{24}tau_4(1-cosvarepsilon)^4+dots\[4pt]
          &= t_0 + tau_1left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2 -frac1{4!}varepsilon^4 +frac1{6!}varepsilon^6-frac1{8!}varepsilon^8right)
          +frac12tau_2left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2-frac1{4!}varepsilon^4 +frac1{6!}varepsilon^6right)^2\[4pt]
          &+frac16tau_3left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2-frac1{4!}varepsilon^4right)^3 +frac1{24}tau_4left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2right)^4+dots
          = t_0 + frac12tau_1varepsilon^2 \[4pt]
          &+frac1{24}(-tau_1+6tau_2)varepsilon^4+frac1{720}(tau_1-15tau_2+15tau_3)varepsilon^6
          +frac1{40320}(-tau_1+63tau_2-210tau_3+105tau_4+dots
          end{align}$$



          Then, in accordance with $(3)-(4),$ can be obtained Maclaurin series for the both branches in the form of
          $$begin{align}
          &v(varepsilon)=frac 12(rsinvarepsilon pm t(varepsilon))
          = pmfrac12 t_0 + frac r2 varepsilon pm frac14 tau_1varepsilon^2 -frac r{12} varepsilon^3 pm frac1{48}(-tau_1+6tau_1)varepsilon^4 +frac r{240}varepsilon^5\[4pt]
          & pm frac1{1440}(tau_1-15tau_2+15tau_3)varepsilon^6
          - frac r{10080}varepsilon^7
          pm frac1{80640}(-tau_1+63tau_2-210tau_3+105tau_4)varepsilon^8\[4pt]
          &+ frac r{362880}varepsilon^9+dots
          end{align}$$



          Therefore, Maclaurin series of nineth order $color{green}{textrm{can be built}}$.



          Easy to see that used approach allows to calculate the arbitrary quantity of the series terms.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ready. Waiting for comments
            $endgroup$
            – Yuri Negometyanov
            Mar 12 at 20:50










          • $begingroup$
            Take $r = 0$ and $a = 5$. Then equation 6, describing $t_0$ will give an imaginary result. Therefore the expression for $v(epsilon)$ will give imaginary terms - this should not be the case. I am sorry but I am unable to (quickly) see where the error is - your method (and the notation) is impressive but hard to follow for me.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 12 at 22:15










          • $begingroup$
            @PiotrBenedysiuk $r=0$ eliminates $varepsilon$ at all.
            $endgroup$
            – Yuri Negometyanov
            Mar 12 at 22:45










          • $begingroup$
            It doesn't in the expression for your $v$. But the argument holds to if $r=1$ and $a=5$.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 12 at 23:05










          • $begingroup$
            @PiotrBenedysiuk Then should $6ge|z|ge4,,$ and I cannot find solution of $(1)$
            $endgroup$
            – Yuri Negometyanov
            Mar 12 at 23:40














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          $textbf{Full Edition.}$



          $color{brown}{textbf{Exact expression of the imaginary part.}}$



          Denote
          $$z_1 = y = u+iv,$$
          then $y_1+y_2 = z = a-re^{-ivarepsilon},quad y_1y_2=1,quad$ so
          $$y^2-zy+1=0tag1,$$
          $$(u+iv)^2-(a-rcosvarepsilon+irsinvarepsilon)(u+iv)+1=0,$$
          begin{cases}
          u^2-v^2 - u(a-rcosvarepsilon) + vrsinvarepsilon +1 = 0\
          2uv - ursinvarepsilon - v(a-rcosvarepsilon) =0,
          end{cases}

          begin{cases}
          u=dfrac {v(a-rcosvarepsilon)}{2v-rsinvarepsilon}\[4pt]
          left(dfrac {(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2}{(2v-rsinvarepsilon)^2}-1right)v^2
          - left(dfrac {(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2}{2v-rsinvarepsilon} - rsinvarepsilonright)v +1 = 0,\
          end{cases}

          $$(a- rcosvarepsilon)^2(v^2-v(2v-rsinvarepsilon)) - (v^2-vrsinvarepsilon-1)(2v-rsinvarepsilon)^2 = 0,$$
          or
          $$f(t,varepsilon) = t^4+((a-rcosvarepsilon)^2-r^2sin^2varepsilon-4)t^2-(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2r^2sin^2varepsilon=0,tag{2.1}$$
          where
          $$t=2v-rsinvarepsilon.tag{2.2}$$



          Discriminant of the biquadratic equation $(2.1)$ is
          $$D=((a-rcosvarepsilon-2)^2+r^2sin^2varepsilon)((a-rcosvarepsilon+2)^2+r^2sin^2varepsilon) > 0,tag{3.1}$$
          and the explicit expression for $v(varepsilon)$ is
          $$v(varepsilon)=dfrac{rsinvarepsilonpm t(varepsilon)}2,quadtext{where}quad t(varepsilon) = sqrt{dfrac{r^2sin^2varepsilon+4-(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2 +sqrt D}2}.tag{3.2}$$



          From $(2.1)$ follows that
          $$(t^2)_1(t^2)_2 = -(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2r^2sin^2varepsilon.$$
          I.e. real Taylor series for the other solutions cannot be built.



          $color{brown}{textbf{Data transformations.}}$



          Explicit expression $(3)$ of the imaginary part looks too hard for repeated re-differentiation.



          At the same time, the equation $(2)$ has linear structure and allows suitable repeated re-differentiation. This way required some additional operations.



          Firstly, let us present $(2)$ via superposition in the form of
          $$f(t,varepsilon) = g(t, 1-cosvarepsilon)),tag4$$
          where
          $$g(t,p)=t^4+b(p)t^2+c(p),tag{5.1}$$
          begin{align}
          &b(p)=(a-r(1-p))^2-r^2(1-(1-p)^2)-4 = 2r^2p^2+2r(a-2r)p+((a-r)^2-4)
          ,\[4pt]
          &c(p)= -r^2(a-r(1-p))^2(1-(1-p)^2)\[4pt]
          & = r^4p^4+2r^3(a-2r)p^3+r^2(a^2-6ar+5r^2)p^2-2r^2(a-r)^2p
          end{align}

          $$begin{cases}
          b(p)=2r^2p^2+2r(a-2r)p+(a-r)^2-4\
          c(p) = r^4p^4+2r^3(a-2r)p^3+r^2(a^2-6ar+5r^2)p^2-2r^2(a-r)^2p
          end{cases}tag{5.2}$$



          Will be built Maclaurin series $t(p)$ with
          $$t(0)= t_0 = sqrt{4-(a-r)^2phantom{big|}}.tag6$$



          Required derivatives will be obtained through differentiation of $g(t,p),$
          i.e. the expression $(5).$



          $color{brown}{textbf{Implicit differentiation.}}$



          Denote
          $$g_{ij}(t,p)=dfrac{partial^{(i+j)}g}{partial t^i partial p^j},tag{7.1}$$



          Taking in account that




          $$begin{align} &dfrac d{dp}varphi(t,p) = varphi,'_t,t'+varphi'_p,\[4pt]
          &dfrac d{dp}varphi(t,p)psi(t^{(n)},dots,t'',t')
          = varphipsi,'_{t^{(n)}},t^{(n+1)} +dots+varphipsi,'_{t''},t''' +varphipsi,'_{t'},t''+varphi'_tpsi,t'+varphi'_ppsi,end{align}$$




          repeated re-differentiation of $(5.1)$ becames simple:
          $$begin{aligned}
          &dfrac {dg}{dp} = g_{10}t'+g_{01},\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^2g}{dp^2} = dfrac d{dp}(g_{10}t'+g_{01})
          = Bigl(g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2},+g_{11}t'Bigr)+g_{11}t'+ g_{02}\[4pt]
          &= g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2}+2g_{11}t'+ g_{02},\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^3g}{dp^3}
          = dfrac d{dp}Bigl(g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2}+2g_{11}t'+g_{02}Bigr)\[4pt]
          &= (g_{10}t'''+g_{20}t't''+g_{11}t'')
          +(2g_{20}t't''+g_{30}t'^{,3}+g_{21}t'^{,2})\[4pt]
          &+2(g_{11}t''+g_{21}t'^{,2}+g_{12}t')
          +(g_{12}t'+g_{03})\[4pt]
          &= g_{10}t''' +3g_{20}t't'' +3g_{11}t''
          +g_{30}t'^{,3}+3g_{21}t'^{,2}+3g_{12}t'+g_{03},\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^4g}{dp^4}
          = dfrac d{dp}Bigl(g_{10}t''' +3g_{20}t't'' + 3g_{11}t''
          +g_{30}t'^{,3}+3g_{21}t'^{,2}+3g_{12}t'+g_{03}Bigr)\[4pt]
          &= (g_{10}t^{IV}+g_{20}t't'''+g_{11}t''')
          +3(g_{20}(t't'''+t''^{,2})+g_{30}t'^{,2}t''+g_{21}t't'')\[4pt]
          &+3(g_{11}t'''+g_{21}t't''+g_{12}t'')
          +(3g_{30}t'^{,2}t''+g_{40}t'^{,4}+g_{31}t'^{,3})\[4pt]
          &+3(2g_{21}t't'' +g_{31}t'^{,3}+g_{22}t'^{,2})
          +3(g_{12}t''+g_{22}t'^{,2}+g_{13}t')+(g_{13}t'+g_{04})\[4pt]
          &= g_{10}t^{IV}+g_{20}(4t't'''+3t''^{,2})+4g_{11}t'''
          +6g_{30}t'^{,2}t''+12g_{21}t't''+6g_{12}t''\[4pt]
          &+g_{40}t'^{,4}+4g_{31}t'^{,3}
          +6g_{22}t'^{,2}+4g_{13}t'+g_{04}dots
          end{aligned}tag{7.2}$$



          Partial derivatives in the point $(t_0,0)$ can be calculated by formula
          $$g_{ij}= delta_{j0}T_{4i}+B_jT_{2i}+delta_{i0}C_j,tag{8.1}$$
          where $delta_{ij}$ is Kronecker symbol,
          $$begin{pmatrix}T_{40} \ T_{41} \ T_{42} \ T_{43} \ T_{44}end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}t_0^4 \4t_0^3 \12t_0^2 \24t_0 \24 end{pmatrix},quad
          begin{pmatrix}T_{20} \ T_{21} \ T_{22} \ T_{23} \ T_{24}end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}t_0^2 \2t_0 \2 \0 \0 end{pmatrix},tag{8.2}$$



          $$begin{pmatrix}B_0 \ B_1 \ B_2 \ B_3 \ B_4end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}-t_0^2 \2ar-4r^2 \4r^2 \0 \0 end{pmatrix},quad
          begin{pmatrix}C_0 \ C_1 \ C_2 \ C_3 \ C_4end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}0 \-2r^2(a-r)^2 \ 2r^2(a-r)(a-5r) \12r^3(a-2r) \24r^4 end{pmatrix}.tag{8.3}$$



          The derivatives' values $g_{ij}(t_0,0)$ can be presented in the table form of
          $$left[begin{matrix}
          g_{ij}(t_0,0) & j=0 & j=1 & j=2 & j=3 & j=4 \
          i=0 & 0 & 2r(a-2r)t_0^2-2r^2(a-r)^2 & 4r^2t_0^2 +2r^2(a-r)(a-5r)& 12r^3(a-2r) & 24r^4 \
          i=1 & 2t_0^3 & 4r(a-2r)t_0 & 8r^2t_0 & 0 && \
          i=2 & 10t_0^2 & 4r(a-2r) & 8r^2 &&& \
          i=3 & 24t_0 & 0 &&&& \
          i=4 & 24 & &&&& \
          end{matrix}right]tag9$$

          All the other derivatives' values $g_{ij}(t_0,0)$ equal to zero.



          $color{brown}{textbf{Derivatives for the series.}}$



          Obtained results $(7),(9)$ allow to write the simple system for $t'(0),t''(0),t'''(0),t^{IV}(0)$ in the form of



          $$begin{aligned}
          &dfrac {dg}{dp}(t_0,0) = bigg(g_{10}t'+g_{01}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)} = 0,\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^2g}{dp^2}(t_0,0)= bigg(g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2},+2g_{11}t'+g_{02}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)}=0,\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^3g}{dp^3}(t_0,0) = bigg(g_{10}t''' +3(g_{20}t'+g_{11})t''
          +g_{30}t'^{,3}+3g_{21}t'^{,2}+3g_{12}t'+g_{03}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)}=0,\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^4g}{dp^4}(t_0,0) = bigg(g_{10}t^{IV}+4(g_{20}t'+g_{11})t''' +3g_{20}t''^{,2}+6(g_{30}t'^{,2}+2g_{21}t'+g_{12})t''\[4pt]
          &+g_{40}t'^{,4}+4g_{31}t'^{,3}+6g_{22}t'^{,2}+4g_{13}t'+g_{04}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)}=0dots.
          end{aligned}tag{10}$$



          The system $(10)$ allows to get the explicit expressions for the required derivatives
          $$tau_1=t'(0), tau_2=t''(0), tau_3=t'''(0), tau_4=t^{IV}(0). tag{11}$$



          There are
          $$begin{aligned}
          &tau_1 = - dfrac{g_{01}}{g_{10}},\[4pt]
          &tau_2 = - dfrac{1}{g_{10}} bigg(g_{20}tau_1^2+2g_{11}tau_1+g_{02}bigg),\[4pt]
          &tau_3 = - dfrac{1}{g_{10}} bigg(3(g_{20}tau_1+g_{11})tau_2
          +g_{30}tau_1^3+3g_{21}tau_1^2+3g_{12}tau_1+g_{03}bigg),\[4pt]
          &tau_4 = - dfrac{1}{g_{10}} bigg(4(g_{20}tau_1+g_{11})tau_3 +3g_{20}tau_2^2+6(g_{30}tau_1^2+2g_{21}tau_1+g_{12})tau_2
          +g_{40}tau_1^4+6g_{22}tau_1^2+g_{04}bigg),\[4pt]
          &dots,
          end{aligned}tag{12}$$

          wherein all unzero values $g_{ij}$ are defined in the table $(9).$



          Expressions for the next $tau_k$ can not contain essentially greater quantity of terms, because all the next partial derivatives are zeros.



          $color{brown}{textbf{Maclaurin series of 9th order.}}$



          Obtained series has the form of
          $$begin{align}
          &t(varepsilon) = t_0 + tau_1(1-cosvarepsilon)+frac12tau_2(1-cosvarepsilon)^2+frac16tau_3(1-cosvarepsilon)^3+frac1{24}tau_4(1-cosvarepsilon)^4+dots\[4pt]
          &= t_0 + tau_1left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2 -frac1{4!}varepsilon^4 +frac1{6!}varepsilon^6-frac1{8!}varepsilon^8right)
          +frac12tau_2left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2-frac1{4!}varepsilon^4 +frac1{6!}varepsilon^6right)^2\[4pt]
          &+frac16tau_3left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2-frac1{4!}varepsilon^4right)^3 +frac1{24}tau_4left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2right)^4+dots
          = t_0 + frac12tau_1varepsilon^2 \[4pt]
          &+frac1{24}(-tau_1+6tau_2)varepsilon^4+frac1{720}(tau_1-15tau_2+15tau_3)varepsilon^6
          +frac1{40320}(-tau_1+63tau_2-210tau_3+105tau_4+dots
          end{align}$$



          Then, in accordance with $(3)-(4),$ can be obtained Maclaurin series for the both branches in the form of
          $$begin{align}
          &v(varepsilon)=frac 12(rsinvarepsilon pm t(varepsilon))
          = pmfrac12 t_0 + frac r2 varepsilon pm frac14 tau_1varepsilon^2 -frac r{12} varepsilon^3 pm frac1{48}(-tau_1+6tau_1)varepsilon^4 +frac r{240}varepsilon^5\[4pt]
          & pm frac1{1440}(tau_1-15tau_2+15tau_3)varepsilon^6
          - frac r{10080}varepsilon^7
          pm frac1{80640}(-tau_1+63tau_2-210tau_3+105tau_4)varepsilon^8\[4pt]
          &+ frac r{362880}varepsilon^9+dots
          end{align}$$



          Therefore, Maclaurin series of nineth order $color{green}{textrm{can be built}}$.



          Easy to see that used approach allows to calculate the arbitrary quantity of the series terms.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          $textbf{Full Edition.}$



          $color{brown}{textbf{Exact expression of the imaginary part.}}$



          Denote
          $$z_1 = y = u+iv,$$
          then $y_1+y_2 = z = a-re^{-ivarepsilon},quad y_1y_2=1,quad$ so
          $$y^2-zy+1=0tag1,$$
          $$(u+iv)^2-(a-rcosvarepsilon+irsinvarepsilon)(u+iv)+1=0,$$
          begin{cases}
          u^2-v^2 - u(a-rcosvarepsilon) + vrsinvarepsilon +1 = 0\
          2uv - ursinvarepsilon - v(a-rcosvarepsilon) =0,
          end{cases}

          begin{cases}
          u=dfrac {v(a-rcosvarepsilon)}{2v-rsinvarepsilon}\[4pt]
          left(dfrac {(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2}{(2v-rsinvarepsilon)^2}-1right)v^2
          - left(dfrac {(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2}{2v-rsinvarepsilon} - rsinvarepsilonright)v +1 = 0,\
          end{cases}

          $$(a- rcosvarepsilon)^2(v^2-v(2v-rsinvarepsilon)) - (v^2-vrsinvarepsilon-1)(2v-rsinvarepsilon)^2 = 0,$$
          or
          $$f(t,varepsilon) = t^4+((a-rcosvarepsilon)^2-r^2sin^2varepsilon-4)t^2-(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2r^2sin^2varepsilon=0,tag{2.1}$$
          where
          $$t=2v-rsinvarepsilon.tag{2.2}$$



          Discriminant of the biquadratic equation $(2.1)$ is
          $$D=((a-rcosvarepsilon-2)^2+r^2sin^2varepsilon)((a-rcosvarepsilon+2)^2+r^2sin^2varepsilon) > 0,tag{3.1}$$
          and the explicit expression for $v(varepsilon)$ is
          $$v(varepsilon)=dfrac{rsinvarepsilonpm t(varepsilon)}2,quadtext{where}quad t(varepsilon) = sqrt{dfrac{r^2sin^2varepsilon+4-(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2 +sqrt D}2}.tag{3.2}$$



          From $(2.1)$ follows that
          $$(t^2)_1(t^2)_2 = -(a-rcosvarepsilon)^2r^2sin^2varepsilon.$$
          I.e. real Taylor series for the other solutions cannot be built.



          $color{brown}{textbf{Data transformations.}}$



          Explicit expression $(3)$ of the imaginary part looks too hard for repeated re-differentiation.



          At the same time, the equation $(2)$ has linear structure and allows suitable repeated re-differentiation. This way required some additional operations.



          Firstly, let us present $(2)$ via superposition in the form of
          $$f(t,varepsilon) = g(t, 1-cosvarepsilon)),tag4$$
          where
          $$g(t,p)=t^4+b(p)t^2+c(p),tag{5.1}$$
          begin{align}
          &b(p)=(a-r(1-p))^2-r^2(1-(1-p)^2)-4 = 2r^2p^2+2r(a-2r)p+((a-r)^2-4)
          ,\[4pt]
          &c(p)= -r^2(a-r(1-p))^2(1-(1-p)^2)\[4pt]
          & = r^4p^4+2r^3(a-2r)p^3+r^2(a^2-6ar+5r^2)p^2-2r^2(a-r)^2p
          end{align}

          $$begin{cases}
          b(p)=2r^2p^2+2r(a-2r)p+(a-r)^2-4\
          c(p) = r^4p^4+2r^3(a-2r)p^3+r^2(a^2-6ar+5r^2)p^2-2r^2(a-r)^2p
          end{cases}tag{5.2}$$



          Will be built Maclaurin series $t(p)$ with
          $$t(0)= t_0 = sqrt{4-(a-r)^2phantom{big|}}.tag6$$



          Required derivatives will be obtained through differentiation of $g(t,p),$
          i.e. the expression $(5).$



          $color{brown}{textbf{Implicit differentiation.}}$



          Denote
          $$g_{ij}(t,p)=dfrac{partial^{(i+j)}g}{partial t^i partial p^j},tag{7.1}$$



          Taking in account that




          $$begin{align} &dfrac d{dp}varphi(t,p) = varphi,'_t,t'+varphi'_p,\[4pt]
          &dfrac d{dp}varphi(t,p)psi(t^{(n)},dots,t'',t')
          = varphipsi,'_{t^{(n)}},t^{(n+1)} +dots+varphipsi,'_{t''},t''' +varphipsi,'_{t'},t''+varphi'_tpsi,t'+varphi'_ppsi,end{align}$$




          repeated re-differentiation of $(5.1)$ becames simple:
          $$begin{aligned}
          &dfrac {dg}{dp} = g_{10}t'+g_{01},\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^2g}{dp^2} = dfrac d{dp}(g_{10}t'+g_{01})
          = Bigl(g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2},+g_{11}t'Bigr)+g_{11}t'+ g_{02}\[4pt]
          &= g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2}+2g_{11}t'+ g_{02},\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^3g}{dp^3}
          = dfrac d{dp}Bigl(g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2}+2g_{11}t'+g_{02}Bigr)\[4pt]
          &= (g_{10}t'''+g_{20}t't''+g_{11}t'')
          +(2g_{20}t't''+g_{30}t'^{,3}+g_{21}t'^{,2})\[4pt]
          &+2(g_{11}t''+g_{21}t'^{,2}+g_{12}t')
          +(g_{12}t'+g_{03})\[4pt]
          &= g_{10}t''' +3g_{20}t't'' +3g_{11}t''
          +g_{30}t'^{,3}+3g_{21}t'^{,2}+3g_{12}t'+g_{03},\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^4g}{dp^4}
          = dfrac d{dp}Bigl(g_{10}t''' +3g_{20}t't'' + 3g_{11}t''
          +g_{30}t'^{,3}+3g_{21}t'^{,2}+3g_{12}t'+g_{03}Bigr)\[4pt]
          &= (g_{10}t^{IV}+g_{20}t't'''+g_{11}t''')
          +3(g_{20}(t't'''+t''^{,2})+g_{30}t'^{,2}t''+g_{21}t't'')\[4pt]
          &+3(g_{11}t'''+g_{21}t't''+g_{12}t'')
          +(3g_{30}t'^{,2}t''+g_{40}t'^{,4}+g_{31}t'^{,3})\[4pt]
          &+3(2g_{21}t't'' +g_{31}t'^{,3}+g_{22}t'^{,2})
          +3(g_{12}t''+g_{22}t'^{,2}+g_{13}t')+(g_{13}t'+g_{04})\[4pt]
          &= g_{10}t^{IV}+g_{20}(4t't'''+3t''^{,2})+4g_{11}t'''
          +6g_{30}t'^{,2}t''+12g_{21}t't''+6g_{12}t''\[4pt]
          &+g_{40}t'^{,4}+4g_{31}t'^{,3}
          +6g_{22}t'^{,2}+4g_{13}t'+g_{04}dots
          end{aligned}tag{7.2}$$



          Partial derivatives in the point $(t_0,0)$ can be calculated by formula
          $$g_{ij}= delta_{j0}T_{4i}+B_jT_{2i}+delta_{i0}C_j,tag{8.1}$$
          where $delta_{ij}$ is Kronecker symbol,
          $$begin{pmatrix}T_{40} \ T_{41} \ T_{42} \ T_{43} \ T_{44}end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}t_0^4 \4t_0^3 \12t_0^2 \24t_0 \24 end{pmatrix},quad
          begin{pmatrix}T_{20} \ T_{21} \ T_{22} \ T_{23} \ T_{24}end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}t_0^2 \2t_0 \2 \0 \0 end{pmatrix},tag{8.2}$$



          $$begin{pmatrix}B_0 \ B_1 \ B_2 \ B_3 \ B_4end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}-t_0^2 \2ar-4r^2 \4r^2 \0 \0 end{pmatrix},quad
          begin{pmatrix}C_0 \ C_1 \ C_2 \ C_3 \ C_4end{pmatrix}
          =begin{pmatrix}0 \-2r^2(a-r)^2 \ 2r^2(a-r)(a-5r) \12r^3(a-2r) \24r^4 end{pmatrix}.tag{8.3}$$



          The derivatives' values $g_{ij}(t_0,0)$ can be presented in the table form of
          $$left[begin{matrix}
          g_{ij}(t_0,0) & j=0 & j=1 & j=2 & j=3 & j=4 \
          i=0 & 0 & 2r(a-2r)t_0^2-2r^2(a-r)^2 & 4r^2t_0^2 +2r^2(a-r)(a-5r)& 12r^3(a-2r) & 24r^4 \
          i=1 & 2t_0^3 & 4r(a-2r)t_0 & 8r^2t_0 & 0 && \
          i=2 & 10t_0^2 & 4r(a-2r) & 8r^2 &&& \
          i=3 & 24t_0 & 0 &&&& \
          i=4 & 24 & &&&& \
          end{matrix}right]tag9$$

          All the other derivatives' values $g_{ij}(t_0,0)$ equal to zero.



          $color{brown}{textbf{Derivatives for the series.}}$



          Obtained results $(7),(9)$ allow to write the simple system for $t'(0),t''(0),t'''(0),t^{IV}(0)$ in the form of



          $$begin{aligned}
          &dfrac {dg}{dp}(t_0,0) = bigg(g_{10}t'+g_{01}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)} = 0,\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^2g}{dp^2}(t_0,0)= bigg(g_{10}t''+g_{20}t'^{,2},+2g_{11}t'+g_{02}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)}=0,\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^3g}{dp^3}(t_0,0) = bigg(g_{10}t''' +3(g_{20}t'+g_{11})t''
          +g_{30}t'^{,3}+3g_{21}t'^{,2}+3g_{12}t'+g_{03}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)}=0,\[4pt]
          &dfrac {d^4g}{dp^4}(t_0,0) = bigg(g_{10}t^{IV}+4(g_{20}t'+g_{11})t''' +3g_{20}t''^{,2}+6(g_{30}t'^{,2}+2g_{21}t'+g_{12})t''\[4pt]
          &+g_{40}t'^{,4}+4g_{31}t'^{,3}+6g_{22}t'^{,2}+4g_{13}t'+g_{04}bigg)bigg|_{(t_0,0)}=0dots.
          end{aligned}tag{10}$$



          The system $(10)$ allows to get the explicit expressions for the required derivatives
          $$tau_1=t'(0), tau_2=t''(0), tau_3=t'''(0), tau_4=t^{IV}(0). tag{11}$$



          There are
          $$begin{aligned}
          &tau_1 = - dfrac{g_{01}}{g_{10}},\[4pt]
          &tau_2 = - dfrac{1}{g_{10}} bigg(g_{20}tau_1^2+2g_{11}tau_1+g_{02}bigg),\[4pt]
          &tau_3 = - dfrac{1}{g_{10}} bigg(3(g_{20}tau_1+g_{11})tau_2
          +g_{30}tau_1^3+3g_{21}tau_1^2+3g_{12}tau_1+g_{03}bigg),\[4pt]
          &tau_4 = - dfrac{1}{g_{10}} bigg(4(g_{20}tau_1+g_{11})tau_3 +3g_{20}tau_2^2+6(g_{30}tau_1^2+2g_{21}tau_1+g_{12})tau_2
          +g_{40}tau_1^4+6g_{22}tau_1^2+g_{04}bigg),\[4pt]
          &dots,
          end{aligned}tag{12}$$

          wherein all unzero values $g_{ij}$ are defined in the table $(9).$



          Expressions for the next $tau_k$ can not contain essentially greater quantity of terms, because all the next partial derivatives are zeros.



          $color{brown}{textbf{Maclaurin series of 9th order.}}$



          Obtained series has the form of
          $$begin{align}
          &t(varepsilon) = t_0 + tau_1(1-cosvarepsilon)+frac12tau_2(1-cosvarepsilon)^2+frac16tau_3(1-cosvarepsilon)^3+frac1{24}tau_4(1-cosvarepsilon)^4+dots\[4pt]
          &= t_0 + tau_1left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2 -frac1{4!}varepsilon^4 +frac1{6!}varepsilon^6-frac1{8!}varepsilon^8right)
          +frac12tau_2left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2-frac1{4!}varepsilon^4 +frac1{6!}varepsilon^6right)^2\[4pt]
          &+frac16tau_3left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2-frac1{4!}varepsilon^4right)^3 +frac1{24}tau_4left(frac1{2!}varepsilon^2right)^4+dots
          = t_0 + frac12tau_1varepsilon^2 \[4pt]
          &+frac1{24}(-tau_1+6tau_2)varepsilon^4+frac1{720}(tau_1-15tau_2+15tau_3)varepsilon^6
          +frac1{40320}(-tau_1+63tau_2-210tau_3+105tau_4+dots
          end{align}$$



          Then, in accordance with $(3)-(4),$ can be obtained Maclaurin series for the both branches in the form of
          $$begin{align}
          &v(varepsilon)=frac 12(rsinvarepsilon pm t(varepsilon))
          = pmfrac12 t_0 + frac r2 varepsilon pm frac14 tau_1varepsilon^2 -frac r{12} varepsilon^3 pm frac1{48}(-tau_1+6tau_1)varepsilon^4 +frac r{240}varepsilon^5\[4pt]
          & pm frac1{1440}(tau_1-15tau_2+15tau_3)varepsilon^6
          - frac r{10080}varepsilon^7
          pm frac1{80640}(-tau_1+63tau_2-210tau_3+105tau_4)varepsilon^8\[4pt]
          &+ frac r{362880}varepsilon^9+dots
          end{align}$$



          Therefore, Maclaurin series of nineth order $color{green}{textrm{can be built}}$.



          Easy to see that used approach allows to calculate the arbitrary quantity of the series terms.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 13 at 9:53

























          answered Mar 11 at 17:06









          Yuri NegometyanovYuri Negometyanov

          12.5k1729




          12.5k1729












          • $begingroup$
            Ready. Waiting for comments
            $endgroup$
            – Yuri Negometyanov
            Mar 12 at 20:50










          • $begingroup$
            Take $r = 0$ and $a = 5$. Then equation 6, describing $t_0$ will give an imaginary result. Therefore the expression for $v(epsilon)$ will give imaginary terms - this should not be the case. I am sorry but I am unable to (quickly) see where the error is - your method (and the notation) is impressive but hard to follow for me.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 12 at 22:15










          • $begingroup$
            @PiotrBenedysiuk $r=0$ eliminates $varepsilon$ at all.
            $endgroup$
            – Yuri Negometyanov
            Mar 12 at 22:45










          • $begingroup$
            It doesn't in the expression for your $v$. But the argument holds to if $r=1$ and $a=5$.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 12 at 23:05










          • $begingroup$
            @PiotrBenedysiuk Then should $6ge|z|ge4,,$ and I cannot find solution of $(1)$
            $endgroup$
            – Yuri Negometyanov
            Mar 12 at 23:40


















          • $begingroup$
            Ready. Waiting for comments
            $endgroup$
            – Yuri Negometyanov
            Mar 12 at 20:50










          • $begingroup$
            Take $r = 0$ and $a = 5$. Then equation 6, describing $t_0$ will give an imaginary result. Therefore the expression for $v(epsilon)$ will give imaginary terms - this should not be the case. I am sorry but I am unable to (quickly) see where the error is - your method (and the notation) is impressive but hard to follow for me.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 12 at 22:15










          • $begingroup$
            @PiotrBenedysiuk $r=0$ eliminates $varepsilon$ at all.
            $endgroup$
            – Yuri Negometyanov
            Mar 12 at 22:45










          • $begingroup$
            It doesn't in the expression for your $v$. But the argument holds to if $r=1$ and $a=5$.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Benedysiuk
            Mar 12 at 23:05










          • $begingroup$
            @PiotrBenedysiuk Then should $6ge|z|ge4,,$ and I cannot find solution of $(1)$
            $endgroup$
            – Yuri Negometyanov
            Mar 12 at 23:40
















          $begingroup$
          Ready. Waiting for comments
          $endgroup$
          – Yuri Negometyanov
          Mar 12 at 20:50




          $begingroup$
          Ready. Waiting for comments
          $endgroup$
          – Yuri Negometyanov
          Mar 12 at 20:50












          $begingroup$
          Take $r = 0$ and $a = 5$. Then equation 6, describing $t_0$ will give an imaginary result. Therefore the expression for $v(epsilon)$ will give imaginary terms - this should not be the case. I am sorry but I am unable to (quickly) see where the error is - your method (and the notation) is impressive but hard to follow for me.
          $endgroup$
          – Piotr Benedysiuk
          Mar 12 at 22:15




          $begingroup$
          Take $r = 0$ and $a = 5$. Then equation 6, describing $t_0$ will give an imaginary result. Therefore the expression for $v(epsilon)$ will give imaginary terms - this should not be the case. I am sorry but I am unable to (quickly) see where the error is - your method (and the notation) is impressive but hard to follow for me.
          $endgroup$
          – Piotr Benedysiuk
          Mar 12 at 22:15












          $begingroup$
          @PiotrBenedysiuk $r=0$ eliminates $varepsilon$ at all.
          $endgroup$
          – Yuri Negometyanov
          Mar 12 at 22:45




          $begingroup$
          @PiotrBenedysiuk $r=0$ eliminates $varepsilon$ at all.
          $endgroup$
          – Yuri Negometyanov
          Mar 12 at 22:45












          $begingroup$
          It doesn't in the expression for your $v$. But the argument holds to if $r=1$ and $a=5$.
          $endgroup$
          – Piotr Benedysiuk
          Mar 12 at 23:05




          $begingroup$
          It doesn't in the expression for your $v$. But the argument holds to if $r=1$ and $a=5$.
          $endgroup$
          – Piotr Benedysiuk
          Mar 12 at 23:05












          $begingroup$
          @PiotrBenedysiuk Then should $6ge|z|ge4,,$ and I cannot find solution of $(1)$
          $endgroup$
          – Yuri Negometyanov
          Mar 12 at 23:40




          $begingroup$
          @PiotrBenedysiuk Then should $6ge|z|ge4,,$ and I cannot find solution of $(1)$
          $endgroup$
          – Yuri Negometyanov
          Mar 12 at 23:40


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066407%2ftaylor-expansion-of-imaginary-part-doable-or-not%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Måne

          Storängen

          VLT Carioca