Why an unbounded operator is not-constructive relying on Hahn Banach theorem?












4












$begingroup$


Let $T: mathcal S(mathbb R)to L^2(mathbb R)$ defined by $$Tf(x)=f'(x),$$
where $mathcal S(mathbb R)$ is the Schwarz space on $mathbb R$. The question is : is there a continuous extension to $L^2(mathbb R)$, and the answer is no, because $frac{|Tf_k|}{|f_k|}to infty $ where $f_k(x)=e^{-k|x|},$ and thus $T$ is unbounded.



You'll see the example here



1) Why is this a counter-example since $e^{-k|x|}notin mathcal S(mathbb R)$ ? and is even not derivable at $0$, so $f'(x)$ is not well defined on $mathbb R$, is it ? Because on $L^2(mathbb R)setminus mathcal S(mathbb R)$, the operator $T$ can be different than $Tf(x)=f'(x)$ ? (for example the fourier transform is not the same on $mathcal S(mathbb R)$ than on $L^2(mathbb R)$.



2) Just under the example in the previous link, they say that the existence of unbounded operators defined everywhere is non constructive relying on Hahn-Banach theorem. Could someone explain what this is true ? I guess that here unbounded mean not continuous ? (and not defined on a subspace of the domain).










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $f$ is derivable a.e. and $f'in L^2$, then $Tf=f'$ is well defined. But as your example show, $T$ won't be bounded on this more general set.
    $endgroup$
    – Surb
    Jan 6 at 16:07
















4












$begingroup$


Let $T: mathcal S(mathbb R)to L^2(mathbb R)$ defined by $$Tf(x)=f'(x),$$
where $mathcal S(mathbb R)$ is the Schwarz space on $mathbb R$. The question is : is there a continuous extension to $L^2(mathbb R)$, and the answer is no, because $frac{|Tf_k|}{|f_k|}to infty $ where $f_k(x)=e^{-k|x|},$ and thus $T$ is unbounded.



You'll see the example here



1) Why is this a counter-example since $e^{-k|x|}notin mathcal S(mathbb R)$ ? and is even not derivable at $0$, so $f'(x)$ is not well defined on $mathbb R$, is it ? Because on $L^2(mathbb R)setminus mathcal S(mathbb R)$, the operator $T$ can be different than $Tf(x)=f'(x)$ ? (for example the fourier transform is not the same on $mathcal S(mathbb R)$ than on $L^2(mathbb R)$.



2) Just under the example in the previous link, they say that the existence of unbounded operators defined everywhere is non constructive relying on Hahn-Banach theorem. Could someone explain what this is true ? I guess that here unbounded mean not continuous ? (and not defined on a subspace of the domain).










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $f$ is derivable a.e. and $f'in L^2$, then $Tf=f'$ is well defined. But as your example show, $T$ won't be bounded on this more general set.
    $endgroup$
    – Surb
    Jan 6 at 16:07














4












4








4


2



$begingroup$


Let $T: mathcal S(mathbb R)to L^2(mathbb R)$ defined by $$Tf(x)=f'(x),$$
where $mathcal S(mathbb R)$ is the Schwarz space on $mathbb R$. The question is : is there a continuous extension to $L^2(mathbb R)$, and the answer is no, because $frac{|Tf_k|}{|f_k|}to infty $ where $f_k(x)=e^{-k|x|},$ and thus $T$ is unbounded.



You'll see the example here



1) Why is this a counter-example since $e^{-k|x|}notin mathcal S(mathbb R)$ ? and is even not derivable at $0$, so $f'(x)$ is not well defined on $mathbb R$, is it ? Because on $L^2(mathbb R)setminus mathcal S(mathbb R)$, the operator $T$ can be different than $Tf(x)=f'(x)$ ? (for example the fourier transform is not the same on $mathcal S(mathbb R)$ than on $L^2(mathbb R)$.



2) Just under the example in the previous link, they say that the existence of unbounded operators defined everywhere is non constructive relying on Hahn-Banach theorem. Could someone explain what this is true ? I guess that here unbounded mean not continuous ? (and not defined on a subspace of the domain).










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $T: mathcal S(mathbb R)to L^2(mathbb R)$ defined by $$Tf(x)=f'(x),$$
where $mathcal S(mathbb R)$ is the Schwarz space on $mathbb R$. The question is : is there a continuous extension to $L^2(mathbb R)$, and the answer is no, because $frac{|Tf_k|}{|f_k|}to infty $ where $f_k(x)=e^{-k|x|},$ and thus $T$ is unbounded.



You'll see the example here



1) Why is this a counter-example since $e^{-k|x|}notin mathcal S(mathbb R)$ ? and is even not derivable at $0$, so $f'(x)$ is not well defined on $mathbb R$, is it ? Because on $L^2(mathbb R)setminus mathcal S(mathbb R)$, the operator $T$ can be different than $Tf(x)=f'(x)$ ? (for example the fourier transform is not the same on $mathcal S(mathbb R)$ than on $L^2(mathbb R)$.



2) Just under the example in the previous link, they say that the existence of unbounded operators defined everywhere is non constructive relying on Hahn-Banach theorem. Could someone explain what this is true ? I guess that here unbounded mean not continuous ? (and not defined on a subspace of the domain).







functional-analysis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 6 at 15:47









NewMathNewMath

4059




4059












  • $begingroup$
    If $f$ is derivable a.e. and $f'in L^2$, then $Tf=f'$ is well defined. But as your example show, $T$ won't be bounded on this more general set.
    $endgroup$
    – Surb
    Jan 6 at 16:07


















  • $begingroup$
    If $f$ is derivable a.e. and $f'in L^2$, then $Tf=f'$ is well defined. But as your example show, $T$ won't be bounded on this more general set.
    $endgroup$
    – Surb
    Jan 6 at 16:07
















$begingroup$
If $f$ is derivable a.e. and $f'in L^2$, then $Tf=f'$ is well defined. But as your example show, $T$ won't be bounded on this more general set.
$endgroup$
– Surb
Jan 6 at 16:07




$begingroup$
If $f$ is derivable a.e. and $f'in L^2$, then $Tf=f'$ is well defined. But as your example show, $T$ won't be bounded on this more general set.
$endgroup$
– Surb
Jan 6 at 16:07










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

By a theorem of Solovay, it's consistent with ZF (the Zermelo-Frankel axioms, without Choice) + DC (Dependent Choice) that every subset of a complete separable metric space has the property of Baire. From this it would follow that every everywhere-defined linear operator from a Hilbert space to itself is continuous.
So to get an unbounded operator you need Axiom of Choice (or something pretty close to it). See J.D.M. Wright, BAMS 79 (1973) 1247-1250.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So if $T: L^2to L^2$, then $T$ is always continuous ? But this mean that there are non unbounded operator on a hilbert space that is defined every where...
    $endgroup$
    – NewMath
    Jan 6 at 16:12








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is consistent with ZF+DC that every $T: L^2 to L^2$ is continuous. Axiom of Choice says there are unbounded operators, but without Axiom of Choice you can't construct one and prove it is unbounded.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 6 at 19:50











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064018%2fwhy-an-unbounded-operator-is-not-constructive-relying-on-hahn-banach-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6












$begingroup$

By a theorem of Solovay, it's consistent with ZF (the Zermelo-Frankel axioms, without Choice) + DC (Dependent Choice) that every subset of a complete separable metric space has the property of Baire. From this it would follow that every everywhere-defined linear operator from a Hilbert space to itself is continuous.
So to get an unbounded operator you need Axiom of Choice (or something pretty close to it). See J.D.M. Wright, BAMS 79 (1973) 1247-1250.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So if $T: L^2to L^2$, then $T$ is always continuous ? But this mean that there are non unbounded operator on a hilbert space that is defined every where...
    $endgroup$
    – NewMath
    Jan 6 at 16:12








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is consistent with ZF+DC that every $T: L^2 to L^2$ is continuous. Axiom of Choice says there are unbounded operators, but without Axiom of Choice you can't construct one and prove it is unbounded.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 6 at 19:50
















6












$begingroup$

By a theorem of Solovay, it's consistent with ZF (the Zermelo-Frankel axioms, without Choice) + DC (Dependent Choice) that every subset of a complete separable metric space has the property of Baire. From this it would follow that every everywhere-defined linear operator from a Hilbert space to itself is continuous.
So to get an unbounded operator you need Axiom of Choice (or something pretty close to it). See J.D.M. Wright, BAMS 79 (1973) 1247-1250.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So if $T: L^2to L^2$, then $T$ is always continuous ? But this mean that there are non unbounded operator on a hilbert space that is defined every where...
    $endgroup$
    – NewMath
    Jan 6 at 16:12








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is consistent with ZF+DC that every $T: L^2 to L^2$ is continuous. Axiom of Choice says there are unbounded operators, but without Axiom of Choice you can't construct one and prove it is unbounded.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 6 at 19:50














6












6








6





$begingroup$

By a theorem of Solovay, it's consistent with ZF (the Zermelo-Frankel axioms, without Choice) + DC (Dependent Choice) that every subset of a complete separable metric space has the property of Baire. From this it would follow that every everywhere-defined linear operator from a Hilbert space to itself is continuous.
So to get an unbounded operator you need Axiom of Choice (or something pretty close to it). See J.D.M. Wright, BAMS 79 (1973) 1247-1250.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



By a theorem of Solovay, it's consistent with ZF (the Zermelo-Frankel axioms, without Choice) + DC (Dependent Choice) that every subset of a complete separable metric space has the property of Baire. From this it would follow that every everywhere-defined linear operator from a Hilbert space to itself is continuous.
So to get an unbounded operator you need Axiom of Choice (or something pretty close to it). See J.D.M. Wright, BAMS 79 (1973) 1247-1250.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 6 at 19:51

























answered Jan 6 at 16:06









Robert IsraelRobert Israel

329k23217470




329k23217470








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So if $T: L^2to L^2$, then $T$ is always continuous ? But this mean that there are non unbounded operator on a hilbert space that is defined every where...
    $endgroup$
    – NewMath
    Jan 6 at 16:12








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is consistent with ZF+DC that every $T: L^2 to L^2$ is continuous. Axiom of Choice says there are unbounded operators, but without Axiom of Choice you can't construct one and prove it is unbounded.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 6 at 19:50














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    So if $T: L^2to L^2$, then $T$ is always continuous ? But this mean that there are non unbounded operator on a hilbert space that is defined every where...
    $endgroup$
    – NewMath
    Jan 6 at 16:12








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is consistent with ZF+DC that every $T: L^2 to L^2$ is continuous. Axiom of Choice says there are unbounded operators, but without Axiom of Choice you can't construct one and prove it is unbounded.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 6 at 19:50








1




1




$begingroup$
So if $T: L^2to L^2$, then $T$ is always continuous ? But this mean that there are non unbounded operator on a hilbert space that is defined every where...
$endgroup$
– NewMath
Jan 6 at 16:12






$begingroup$
So if $T: L^2to L^2$, then $T$ is always continuous ? But this mean that there are non unbounded operator on a hilbert space that is defined every where...
$endgroup$
– NewMath
Jan 6 at 16:12






1




1




$begingroup$
It is consistent with ZF+DC that every $T: L^2 to L^2$ is continuous. Axiom of Choice says there are unbounded operators, but without Axiom of Choice you can't construct one and prove it is unbounded.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 6 at 19:50




$begingroup$
It is consistent with ZF+DC that every $T: L^2 to L^2$ is continuous. Axiom of Choice says there are unbounded operators, but without Axiom of Choice you can't construct one and prove it is unbounded.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 6 at 19:50


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064018%2fwhy-an-unbounded-operator-is-not-constructive-relying-on-hahn-banach-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Måne

Storängen

VLT Carioca