Matrices of bounded linear operators












0












$begingroup$


Let $X,Y$ be Banach spaces and let $A=(A_{n,k})$ be an infinite matrix of bounded linear operators $A_{n,k}:X to Y$. Suppose $sup_n sum_k |A_{n,k}|<infty$.



Property: For each sequence $x=(x_1,x_2,ldots)$ contained in compact of $X$, the image
$$
Ax:=left(sum_k A_{n,k}x_k:nge 1right)
$$

is a well-defined sequence contained in a compact of $Y$. Does such kind of matrices have a name? Or the property is always verified?



(Their property is reminescent of compact operators, i.e., the images of bounded sets are relatively compact.)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As a side note, such type of matrices appear when checking if a linear map $A:mathcal Atomathcal B$ between $C^*$-algebras $mathcal A,mathcal B$ is completely positive although I feel like this is not what you were looking for.
    $endgroup$
    – Frederik vom Ende
    Jan 4 at 9:55












  • $begingroup$
    This is not a homework task, yes I am interested. How is it related to "complete regularity" of such matrices? By the name I guess this is stronger than the classical Toeplitz conditions of mapping convergent sequences into convergent sequences.
    $endgroup$
    – Nduccio
    Jan 4 at 10:31
















0












$begingroup$


Let $X,Y$ be Banach spaces and let $A=(A_{n,k})$ be an infinite matrix of bounded linear operators $A_{n,k}:X to Y$. Suppose $sup_n sum_k |A_{n,k}|<infty$.



Property: For each sequence $x=(x_1,x_2,ldots)$ contained in compact of $X$, the image
$$
Ax:=left(sum_k A_{n,k}x_k:nge 1right)
$$

is a well-defined sequence contained in a compact of $Y$. Does such kind of matrices have a name? Or the property is always verified?



(Their property is reminescent of compact operators, i.e., the images of bounded sets are relatively compact.)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As a side note, such type of matrices appear when checking if a linear map $A:mathcal Atomathcal B$ between $C^*$-algebras $mathcal A,mathcal B$ is completely positive although I feel like this is not what you were looking for.
    $endgroup$
    – Frederik vom Ende
    Jan 4 at 9:55












  • $begingroup$
    This is not a homework task, yes I am interested. How is it related to "complete regularity" of such matrices? By the name I guess this is stronger than the classical Toeplitz conditions of mapping convergent sequences into convergent sequences.
    $endgroup$
    – Nduccio
    Jan 4 at 10:31














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $X,Y$ be Banach spaces and let $A=(A_{n,k})$ be an infinite matrix of bounded linear operators $A_{n,k}:X to Y$. Suppose $sup_n sum_k |A_{n,k}|<infty$.



Property: For each sequence $x=(x_1,x_2,ldots)$ contained in compact of $X$, the image
$$
Ax:=left(sum_k A_{n,k}x_k:nge 1right)
$$

is a well-defined sequence contained in a compact of $Y$. Does such kind of matrices have a name? Or the property is always verified?



(Their property is reminescent of compact operators, i.e., the images of bounded sets are relatively compact.)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $X,Y$ be Banach spaces and let $A=(A_{n,k})$ be an infinite matrix of bounded linear operators $A_{n,k}:X to Y$. Suppose $sup_n sum_k |A_{n,k}|<infty$.



Property: For each sequence $x=(x_1,x_2,ldots)$ contained in compact of $X$, the image
$$
Ax:=left(sum_k A_{n,k}x_k:nge 1right)
$$

is a well-defined sequence contained in a compact of $Y$. Does such kind of matrices have a name? Or the property is always verified?



(Their property is reminescent of compact operators, i.e., the images of bounded sets are relatively compact.)







banach-spaces compactness compact-operators






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 4 at 2:37









NduccioNduccio

518313




518313








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As a side note, such type of matrices appear when checking if a linear map $A:mathcal Atomathcal B$ between $C^*$-algebras $mathcal A,mathcal B$ is completely positive although I feel like this is not what you were looking for.
    $endgroup$
    – Frederik vom Ende
    Jan 4 at 9:55












  • $begingroup$
    This is not a homework task, yes I am interested. How is it related to "complete regularity" of such matrices? By the name I guess this is stronger than the classical Toeplitz conditions of mapping convergent sequences into convergent sequences.
    $endgroup$
    – Nduccio
    Jan 4 at 10:31














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    As a side note, such type of matrices appear when checking if a linear map $A:mathcal Atomathcal B$ between $C^*$-algebras $mathcal A,mathcal B$ is completely positive although I feel like this is not what you were looking for.
    $endgroup$
    – Frederik vom Ende
    Jan 4 at 9:55












  • $begingroup$
    This is not a homework task, yes I am interested. How is it related to "complete regularity" of such matrices? By the name I guess this is stronger than the classical Toeplitz conditions of mapping convergent sequences into convergent sequences.
    $endgroup$
    – Nduccio
    Jan 4 at 10:31








1




1




$begingroup$
As a side note, such type of matrices appear when checking if a linear map $A:mathcal Atomathcal B$ between $C^*$-algebras $mathcal A,mathcal B$ is completely positive although I feel like this is not what you were looking for.
$endgroup$
– Frederik vom Ende
Jan 4 at 9:55






$begingroup$
As a side note, such type of matrices appear when checking if a linear map $A:mathcal Atomathcal B$ between $C^*$-algebras $mathcal A,mathcal B$ is completely positive although I feel like this is not what you were looking for.
$endgroup$
– Frederik vom Ende
Jan 4 at 9:55














$begingroup$
This is not a homework task, yes I am interested. How is it related to "complete regularity" of such matrices? By the name I guess this is stronger than the classical Toeplitz conditions of mapping convergent sequences into convergent sequences.
$endgroup$
– Nduccio
Jan 4 at 10:31




$begingroup$
This is not a homework task, yes I am interested. How is it related to "complete regularity" of such matrices? By the name I guess this is stronger than the classical Toeplitz conditions of mapping convergent sequences into convergent sequences.
$endgroup$
– Nduccio
Jan 4 at 10:31










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The condition $M:=sup_n sum_k |A_{n,k}|<infty$ is sufficient for $Ax$ well-defined for all $x in ell_infty(X)$. Then the linear map $xmapsto Ax$ on $ell_infty(X)$ is continuous because
$$
|Ax-Ay|=sup_n |sum_k A_{n,k}(x_k-y_k)| le M|x-y|.
$$

To conclude, the continuous image of relatively compact sets is relatively compact, see here.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061255%2fmatrices-of-bounded-linear-operators%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    The condition $M:=sup_n sum_k |A_{n,k}|<infty$ is sufficient for $Ax$ well-defined for all $x in ell_infty(X)$. Then the linear map $xmapsto Ax$ on $ell_infty(X)$ is continuous because
    $$
    |Ax-Ay|=sup_n |sum_k A_{n,k}(x_k-y_k)| le M|x-y|.
    $$

    To conclude, the continuous image of relatively compact sets is relatively compact, see here.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      The condition $M:=sup_n sum_k |A_{n,k}|<infty$ is sufficient for $Ax$ well-defined for all $x in ell_infty(X)$. Then the linear map $xmapsto Ax$ on $ell_infty(X)$ is continuous because
      $$
      |Ax-Ay|=sup_n |sum_k A_{n,k}(x_k-y_k)| le M|x-y|.
      $$

      To conclude, the continuous image of relatively compact sets is relatively compact, see here.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        The condition $M:=sup_n sum_k |A_{n,k}|<infty$ is sufficient for $Ax$ well-defined for all $x in ell_infty(X)$. Then the linear map $xmapsto Ax$ on $ell_infty(X)$ is continuous because
        $$
        |Ax-Ay|=sup_n |sum_k A_{n,k}(x_k-y_k)| le M|x-y|.
        $$

        To conclude, the continuous image of relatively compact sets is relatively compact, see here.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The condition $M:=sup_n sum_k |A_{n,k}|<infty$ is sufficient for $Ax$ well-defined for all $x in ell_infty(X)$. Then the linear map $xmapsto Ax$ on $ell_infty(X)$ is continuous because
        $$
        |Ax-Ay|=sup_n |sum_k A_{n,k}(x_k-y_k)| le M|x-y|.
        $$

        To conclude, the continuous image of relatively compact sets is relatively compact, see here.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 4 at 2:51









        Paolo LeonettiPaolo Leonetti

        11.5k21550




        11.5k21550






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061255%2fmatrices-of-bounded-linear-operators%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Cabo Verde

            Gyllenstierna