Why is every $p$-norm convex?
$begingroup$
I know that $p$-norm of $xinBbb{R}^n$ is defined as, for all $pge1$,$$Vert{x}Vert_p=left(sum_{i=1}^{n} vert{x_i}vert^pright)^{1/p}.$$
The textbook refers to "Every norm is convex" for an example of convex functions.
I failed to prove $f(x)=Vert{x}Vert_p$ for all $pge1$, then tried to find the proof on the internet but I cannot find it.
Can someone let me understand why $p$-norm is convex for all $pge1$.
convex-analysis norm lp-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know that $p$-norm of $xinBbb{R}^n$ is defined as, for all $pge1$,$$Vert{x}Vert_p=left(sum_{i=1}^{n} vert{x_i}vert^pright)^{1/p}.$$
The textbook refers to "Every norm is convex" for an example of convex functions.
I failed to prove $f(x)=Vert{x}Vert_p$ for all $pge1$, then tried to find the proof on the internet but I cannot find it.
Can someone let me understand why $p$-norm is convex for all $pge1$.
convex-analysis norm lp-spaces
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_inequality or did you want an intuition? Anyway using the triangle inequality: $||lambda a+(1-lambda) b|| le ||lambda a|| +||(1-lambda) b||=lambda ||a|| +(1-lambda)||b||$
$endgroup$
– Felix B.
May 14 '17 at 10:41
$begingroup$
@FelixB. Triangular inequality?? Hmm... I will try it again. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Danny_Kim
May 15 '17 at 14:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know that $p$-norm of $xinBbb{R}^n$ is defined as, for all $pge1$,$$Vert{x}Vert_p=left(sum_{i=1}^{n} vert{x_i}vert^pright)^{1/p}.$$
The textbook refers to "Every norm is convex" for an example of convex functions.
I failed to prove $f(x)=Vert{x}Vert_p$ for all $pge1$, then tried to find the proof on the internet but I cannot find it.
Can someone let me understand why $p$-norm is convex for all $pge1$.
convex-analysis norm lp-spaces
$endgroup$
I know that $p$-norm of $xinBbb{R}^n$ is defined as, for all $pge1$,$$Vert{x}Vert_p=left(sum_{i=1}^{n} vert{x_i}vert^pright)^{1/p}.$$
The textbook refers to "Every norm is convex" for an example of convex functions.
I failed to prove $f(x)=Vert{x}Vert_p$ for all $pge1$, then tried to find the proof on the internet but I cannot find it.
Can someone let me understand why $p$-norm is convex for all $pge1$.
convex-analysis norm lp-spaces
convex-analysis norm lp-spaces
asked May 14 '17 at 10:37
Danny_KimDanny_Kim
1,3811623
1,3811623
4
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_inequality or did you want an intuition? Anyway using the triangle inequality: $||lambda a+(1-lambda) b|| le ||lambda a|| +||(1-lambda) b||=lambda ||a|| +(1-lambda)||b||$
$endgroup$
– Felix B.
May 14 '17 at 10:41
$begingroup$
@FelixB. Triangular inequality?? Hmm... I will try it again. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Danny_Kim
May 15 '17 at 14:43
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_inequality or did you want an intuition? Anyway using the triangle inequality: $||lambda a+(1-lambda) b|| le ||lambda a|| +||(1-lambda) b||=lambda ||a|| +(1-lambda)||b||$
$endgroup$
– Felix B.
May 14 '17 at 10:41
$begingroup$
@FelixB. Triangular inequality?? Hmm... I will try it again. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Danny_Kim
May 15 '17 at 14:43
4
4
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_inequality or did you want an intuition? Anyway using the triangle inequality: $||lambda a+(1-lambda) b|| le ||lambda a|| +||(1-lambda) b||=lambda ||a|| +(1-lambda)||b||$
$endgroup$
– Felix B.
May 14 '17 at 10:41
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_inequality or did you want an intuition? Anyway using the triangle inequality: $||lambda a+(1-lambda) b|| le ||lambda a|| +||(1-lambda) b||=lambda ||a|| +(1-lambda)||b||$
$endgroup$
– Felix B.
May 14 '17 at 10:41
$begingroup$
@FelixB. Triangular inequality?? Hmm... I will try it again. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Danny_Kim
May 15 '17 at 14:43
$begingroup$
@FelixB. Triangular inequality?? Hmm... I will try it again. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Danny_Kim
May 15 '17 at 14:43
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The Definition of a norm is:
Be V a Vectorspace, $|cdot|: V rightarrow mathbb{R} $ is a norm $:Leftrightarrow $
$forall v in V: |v|ge0$ and $|v| =0 Leftrightarrow v=0$ (positive/definite)
$forall vin V, lambdain mathbb{R}: |lambda||v| =|lambda v|$ (absolutely scaleable)
$forall v,win V : |v+w| le |v|+|w|$ (Triangle inequality)
The Definition of convex is:
$f:Vrightarrowmathbb{R}$ is convex $:Leftrightarrow$
$forall v,w in V, lambda in [0,1]: f(lambda v+(1-lambda )w)le lambda f(v) +(1-lambda)f(w)$
So using the Triangle inequality and the fact that the norm is absolutely scaleable, you can see that every Norm is convex:
$$|lambda v+(1-lambda )w|le|lambda v|+|(1-lambda)w| = lambda|v|+(1- lambda)|w|$$
So by definition every norm is convex. What is left to show is, that the p-norm is in fact a norm.The first two Requirements are pretty easy to show, the third is hard. That is why it has its own name: the Minkowski Inequality which is a result of the Hölder inequality and shows that the triangle inequality holds for every p-norm (if p>1) and thus that it is a norm.
EDIT: Since this seems to be somewhat popular, I thought I would add a sketch of the proof of the minkowski inequality.
- You show Young's Inequality: $xyle frac{x^p}{p}+frac{y^q}{q}quad forall q,p>1 text{ with } frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1, forall x,yge 0$.
You can do that by looking at the function $f(x)=frac{x^p}{p}+frac{y^q}{q}-xy$ find the extremum, show it is a minimum and is greater zero (derivatives).
- You show the Hölder Inequality: $|fg|_1 le |f|_p|g|_q quad forall q,p>1 text{ with } frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1$
You can do that by setting $x=frac{|f|}{||f||_p}$ and $y=frac{|g|}{||g||_q}$ and plug them into young's inequality.
You get
begin{align}
&&frac{|fg|}{|f|_p|g|_q}&le frac{|f|^p}{p|f|_p^p} + frac{|g|^q}{q|g|_q^q}
\
Rightarrow &&int frac{|fg|}{|f|_p|g|_q} dmu &le int frac{|f|^p}{p|f|_p^p}dmu + int frac{|g|^q}{q|g|_q^q}dmu
\
Rightarrow &&frac{|fg|_1}{|f|_p|g|_q}&le frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1
end{align}
It works just the same for sequences or $mathbb{R}^n$, you just use young's inequality for every index and then sum over it instead of using the integral.
- And last the Minkowski Inequality: $|x+y|_ple|x|_p+|y|_p quad forall p>1$
Set $q=frac{p}{p-1}$ thus $q(p-1)=p$ and $frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1$. Then:
begin{align}
|x+y|_p^p&=int |x+y|^pdmuleint |x+y|^{p-1}|x|dmu+ int |x+y|^{p-1}|y|dmu
\
&le left(int|x+y|^{q(p-1)}dmuright)^{1/q}left(int|x|^pdmuright)^{1/p} + left(int|x+y|^{q(p-1)}dmuright)^{1/q}left(int|y|^pdmuright)^{1/p}
\
&=left(int|x+y|^{p}dmuright)^{frac{1}{p}frac{p}{q}}(|x|_p+|y|_p)
=|x+y|_p^{p/q}(|x|_p+|y|_p)
end{align}
If you realize that $p-frac{p}{q}=p(1-frac{1}{q})=1$ you are done.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is the perfect explanation among what I have seen so far. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Danny_Kim
May 17 '17 at 4:25
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2280341%2fwhy-is-every-p-norm-convex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The Definition of a norm is:
Be V a Vectorspace, $|cdot|: V rightarrow mathbb{R} $ is a norm $:Leftrightarrow $
$forall v in V: |v|ge0$ and $|v| =0 Leftrightarrow v=0$ (positive/definite)
$forall vin V, lambdain mathbb{R}: |lambda||v| =|lambda v|$ (absolutely scaleable)
$forall v,win V : |v+w| le |v|+|w|$ (Triangle inequality)
The Definition of convex is:
$f:Vrightarrowmathbb{R}$ is convex $:Leftrightarrow$
$forall v,w in V, lambda in [0,1]: f(lambda v+(1-lambda )w)le lambda f(v) +(1-lambda)f(w)$
So using the Triangle inequality and the fact that the norm is absolutely scaleable, you can see that every Norm is convex:
$$|lambda v+(1-lambda )w|le|lambda v|+|(1-lambda)w| = lambda|v|+(1- lambda)|w|$$
So by definition every norm is convex. What is left to show is, that the p-norm is in fact a norm.The first two Requirements are pretty easy to show, the third is hard. That is why it has its own name: the Minkowski Inequality which is a result of the Hölder inequality and shows that the triangle inequality holds for every p-norm (if p>1) and thus that it is a norm.
EDIT: Since this seems to be somewhat popular, I thought I would add a sketch of the proof of the minkowski inequality.
- You show Young's Inequality: $xyle frac{x^p}{p}+frac{y^q}{q}quad forall q,p>1 text{ with } frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1, forall x,yge 0$.
You can do that by looking at the function $f(x)=frac{x^p}{p}+frac{y^q}{q}-xy$ find the extremum, show it is a minimum and is greater zero (derivatives).
- You show the Hölder Inequality: $|fg|_1 le |f|_p|g|_q quad forall q,p>1 text{ with } frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1$
You can do that by setting $x=frac{|f|}{||f||_p}$ and $y=frac{|g|}{||g||_q}$ and plug them into young's inequality.
You get
begin{align}
&&frac{|fg|}{|f|_p|g|_q}&le frac{|f|^p}{p|f|_p^p} + frac{|g|^q}{q|g|_q^q}
\
Rightarrow &&int frac{|fg|}{|f|_p|g|_q} dmu &le int frac{|f|^p}{p|f|_p^p}dmu + int frac{|g|^q}{q|g|_q^q}dmu
\
Rightarrow &&frac{|fg|_1}{|f|_p|g|_q}&le frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1
end{align}
It works just the same for sequences or $mathbb{R}^n$, you just use young's inequality for every index and then sum over it instead of using the integral.
- And last the Minkowski Inequality: $|x+y|_ple|x|_p+|y|_p quad forall p>1$
Set $q=frac{p}{p-1}$ thus $q(p-1)=p$ and $frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1$. Then:
begin{align}
|x+y|_p^p&=int |x+y|^pdmuleint |x+y|^{p-1}|x|dmu+ int |x+y|^{p-1}|y|dmu
\
&le left(int|x+y|^{q(p-1)}dmuright)^{1/q}left(int|x|^pdmuright)^{1/p} + left(int|x+y|^{q(p-1)}dmuright)^{1/q}left(int|y|^pdmuright)^{1/p}
\
&=left(int|x+y|^{p}dmuright)^{frac{1}{p}frac{p}{q}}(|x|_p+|y|_p)
=|x+y|_p^{p/q}(|x|_p+|y|_p)
end{align}
If you realize that $p-frac{p}{q}=p(1-frac{1}{q})=1$ you are done.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is the perfect explanation among what I have seen so far. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Danny_Kim
May 17 '17 at 4:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Definition of a norm is:
Be V a Vectorspace, $|cdot|: V rightarrow mathbb{R} $ is a norm $:Leftrightarrow $
$forall v in V: |v|ge0$ and $|v| =0 Leftrightarrow v=0$ (positive/definite)
$forall vin V, lambdain mathbb{R}: |lambda||v| =|lambda v|$ (absolutely scaleable)
$forall v,win V : |v+w| le |v|+|w|$ (Triangle inequality)
The Definition of convex is:
$f:Vrightarrowmathbb{R}$ is convex $:Leftrightarrow$
$forall v,w in V, lambda in [0,1]: f(lambda v+(1-lambda )w)le lambda f(v) +(1-lambda)f(w)$
So using the Triangle inequality and the fact that the norm is absolutely scaleable, you can see that every Norm is convex:
$$|lambda v+(1-lambda )w|le|lambda v|+|(1-lambda)w| = lambda|v|+(1- lambda)|w|$$
So by definition every norm is convex. What is left to show is, that the p-norm is in fact a norm.The first two Requirements are pretty easy to show, the third is hard. That is why it has its own name: the Minkowski Inequality which is a result of the Hölder inequality and shows that the triangle inequality holds for every p-norm (if p>1) and thus that it is a norm.
EDIT: Since this seems to be somewhat popular, I thought I would add a sketch of the proof of the minkowski inequality.
- You show Young's Inequality: $xyle frac{x^p}{p}+frac{y^q}{q}quad forall q,p>1 text{ with } frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1, forall x,yge 0$.
You can do that by looking at the function $f(x)=frac{x^p}{p}+frac{y^q}{q}-xy$ find the extremum, show it is a minimum and is greater zero (derivatives).
- You show the Hölder Inequality: $|fg|_1 le |f|_p|g|_q quad forall q,p>1 text{ with } frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1$
You can do that by setting $x=frac{|f|}{||f||_p}$ and $y=frac{|g|}{||g||_q}$ and plug them into young's inequality.
You get
begin{align}
&&frac{|fg|}{|f|_p|g|_q}&le frac{|f|^p}{p|f|_p^p} + frac{|g|^q}{q|g|_q^q}
\
Rightarrow &&int frac{|fg|}{|f|_p|g|_q} dmu &le int frac{|f|^p}{p|f|_p^p}dmu + int frac{|g|^q}{q|g|_q^q}dmu
\
Rightarrow &&frac{|fg|_1}{|f|_p|g|_q}&le frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1
end{align}
It works just the same for sequences or $mathbb{R}^n$, you just use young's inequality for every index and then sum over it instead of using the integral.
- And last the Minkowski Inequality: $|x+y|_ple|x|_p+|y|_p quad forall p>1$
Set $q=frac{p}{p-1}$ thus $q(p-1)=p$ and $frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1$. Then:
begin{align}
|x+y|_p^p&=int |x+y|^pdmuleint |x+y|^{p-1}|x|dmu+ int |x+y|^{p-1}|y|dmu
\
&le left(int|x+y|^{q(p-1)}dmuright)^{1/q}left(int|x|^pdmuright)^{1/p} + left(int|x+y|^{q(p-1)}dmuright)^{1/q}left(int|y|^pdmuright)^{1/p}
\
&=left(int|x+y|^{p}dmuright)^{frac{1}{p}frac{p}{q}}(|x|_p+|y|_p)
=|x+y|_p^{p/q}(|x|_p+|y|_p)
end{align}
If you realize that $p-frac{p}{q}=p(1-frac{1}{q})=1$ you are done.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is the perfect explanation among what I have seen so far. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Danny_Kim
May 17 '17 at 4:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Definition of a norm is:
Be V a Vectorspace, $|cdot|: V rightarrow mathbb{R} $ is a norm $:Leftrightarrow $
$forall v in V: |v|ge0$ and $|v| =0 Leftrightarrow v=0$ (positive/definite)
$forall vin V, lambdain mathbb{R}: |lambda||v| =|lambda v|$ (absolutely scaleable)
$forall v,win V : |v+w| le |v|+|w|$ (Triangle inequality)
The Definition of convex is:
$f:Vrightarrowmathbb{R}$ is convex $:Leftrightarrow$
$forall v,w in V, lambda in [0,1]: f(lambda v+(1-lambda )w)le lambda f(v) +(1-lambda)f(w)$
So using the Triangle inequality and the fact that the norm is absolutely scaleable, you can see that every Norm is convex:
$$|lambda v+(1-lambda )w|le|lambda v|+|(1-lambda)w| = lambda|v|+(1- lambda)|w|$$
So by definition every norm is convex. What is left to show is, that the p-norm is in fact a norm.The first two Requirements are pretty easy to show, the third is hard. That is why it has its own name: the Minkowski Inequality which is a result of the Hölder inequality and shows that the triangle inequality holds for every p-norm (if p>1) and thus that it is a norm.
EDIT: Since this seems to be somewhat popular, I thought I would add a sketch of the proof of the minkowski inequality.
- You show Young's Inequality: $xyle frac{x^p}{p}+frac{y^q}{q}quad forall q,p>1 text{ with } frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1, forall x,yge 0$.
You can do that by looking at the function $f(x)=frac{x^p}{p}+frac{y^q}{q}-xy$ find the extremum, show it is a minimum and is greater zero (derivatives).
- You show the Hölder Inequality: $|fg|_1 le |f|_p|g|_q quad forall q,p>1 text{ with } frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1$
You can do that by setting $x=frac{|f|}{||f||_p}$ and $y=frac{|g|}{||g||_q}$ and plug them into young's inequality.
You get
begin{align}
&&frac{|fg|}{|f|_p|g|_q}&le frac{|f|^p}{p|f|_p^p} + frac{|g|^q}{q|g|_q^q}
\
Rightarrow &&int frac{|fg|}{|f|_p|g|_q} dmu &le int frac{|f|^p}{p|f|_p^p}dmu + int frac{|g|^q}{q|g|_q^q}dmu
\
Rightarrow &&frac{|fg|_1}{|f|_p|g|_q}&le frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1
end{align}
It works just the same for sequences or $mathbb{R}^n$, you just use young's inequality for every index and then sum over it instead of using the integral.
- And last the Minkowski Inequality: $|x+y|_ple|x|_p+|y|_p quad forall p>1$
Set $q=frac{p}{p-1}$ thus $q(p-1)=p$ and $frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1$. Then:
begin{align}
|x+y|_p^p&=int |x+y|^pdmuleint |x+y|^{p-1}|x|dmu+ int |x+y|^{p-1}|y|dmu
\
&le left(int|x+y|^{q(p-1)}dmuright)^{1/q}left(int|x|^pdmuright)^{1/p} + left(int|x+y|^{q(p-1)}dmuright)^{1/q}left(int|y|^pdmuright)^{1/p}
\
&=left(int|x+y|^{p}dmuright)^{frac{1}{p}frac{p}{q}}(|x|_p+|y|_p)
=|x+y|_p^{p/q}(|x|_p+|y|_p)
end{align}
If you realize that $p-frac{p}{q}=p(1-frac{1}{q})=1$ you are done.
$endgroup$
The Definition of a norm is:
Be V a Vectorspace, $|cdot|: V rightarrow mathbb{R} $ is a norm $:Leftrightarrow $
$forall v in V: |v|ge0$ and $|v| =0 Leftrightarrow v=0$ (positive/definite)
$forall vin V, lambdain mathbb{R}: |lambda||v| =|lambda v|$ (absolutely scaleable)
$forall v,win V : |v+w| le |v|+|w|$ (Triangle inequality)
The Definition of convex is:
$f:Vrightarrowmathbb{R}$ is convex $:Leftrightarrow$
$forall v,w in V, lambda in [0,1]: f(lambda v+(1-lambda )w)le lambda f(v) +(1-lambda)f(w)$
So using the Triangle inequality and the fact that the norm is absolutely scaleable, you can see that every Norm is convex:
$$|lambda v+(1-lambda )w|le|lambda v|+|(1-lambda)w| = lambda|v|+(1- lambda)|w|$$
So by definition every norm is convex. What is left to show is, that the p-norm is in fact a norm.The first two Requirements are pretty easy to show, the third is hard. That is why it has its own name: the Minkowski Inequality which is a result of the Hölder inequality and shows that the triangle inequality holds for every p-norm (if p>1) and thus that it is a norm.
EDIT: Since this seems to be somewhat popular, I thought I would add a sketch of the proof of the minkowski inequality.
- You show Young's Inequality: $xyle frac{x^p}{p}+frac{y^q}{q}quad forall q,p>1 text{ with } frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1, forall x,yge 0$.
You can do that by looking at the function $f(x)=frac{x^p}{p}+frac{y^q}{q}-xy$ find the extremum, show it is a minimum and is greater zero (derivatives).
- You show the Hölder Inequality: $|fg|_1 le |f|_p|g|_q quad forall q,p>1 text{ with } frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1$
You can do that by setting $x=frac{|f|}{||f||_p}$ and $y=frac{|g|}{||g||_q}$ and plug them into young's inequality.
You get
begin{align}
&&frac{|fg|}{|f|_p|g|_q}&le frac{|f|^p}{p|f|_p^p} + frac{|g|^q}{q|g|_q^q}
\
Rightarrow &&int frac{|fg|}{|f|_p|g|_q} dmu &le int frac{|f|^p}{p|f|_p^p}dmu + int frac{|g|^q}{q|g|_q^q}dmu
\
Rightarrow &&frac{|fg|_1}{|f|_p|g|_q}&le frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1
end{align}
It works just the same for sequences or $mathbb{R}^n$, you just use young's inequality for every index and then sum over it instead of using the integral.
- And last the Minkowski Inequality: $|x+y|_ple|x|_p+|y|_p quad forall p>1$
Set $q=frac{p}{p-1}$ thus $q(p-1)=p$ and $frac{1}{p}+frac{1}{q}=1$. Then:
begin{align}
|x+y|_p^p&=int |x+y|^pdmuleint |x+y|^{p-1}|x|dmu+ int |x+y|^{p-1}|y|dmu
\
&le left(int|x+y|^{q(p-1)}dmuright)^{1/q}left(int|x|^pdmuright)^{1/p} + left(int|x+y|^{q(p-1)}dmuright)^{1/q}left(int|y|^pdmuright)^{1/p}
\
&=left(int|x+y|^{p}dmuright)^{frac{1}{p}frac{p}{q}}(|x|_p+|y|_p)
=|x+y|_p^{p/q}(|x|_p+|y|_p)
end{align}
If you realize that $p-frac{p}{q}=p(1-frac{1}{q})=1$ you are done.
edited Jan 28 at 11:13
answered May 16 '17 at 17:54
Felix B.Felix B.
739217
739217
1
$begingroup$
This is the perfect explanation among what I have seen so far. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Danny_Kim
May 17 '17 at 4:25
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
This is the perfect explanation among what I have seen so far. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Danny_Kim
May 17 '17 at 4:25
1
1
$begingroup$
This is the perfect explanation among what I have seen so far. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Danny_Kim
May 17 '17 at 4:25
$begingroup$
This is the perfect explanation among what I have seen so far. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Danny_Kim
May 17 '17 at 4:25
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2280341%2fwhy-is-every-p-norm-convex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_inequality or did you want an intuition? Anyway using the triangle inequality: $||lambda a+(1-lambda) b|| le ||lambda a|| +||(1-lambda) b||=lambda ||a|| +(1-lambda)||b||$
$endgroup$
– Felix B.
May 14 '17 at 10:41
$begingroup$
@FelixB. Triangular inequality?? Hmm... I will try it again. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Danny_Kim
May 15 '17 at 14:43