Applying Kummer's Theorem to a specific P-adic Number Theory problem











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2












DRAFTING REGION



I need to establish a proof or minimal counter example for the following:



$$f(n)=Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}+ left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor +Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}- left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor$$



$$n notin mathbb P land n gt 4 Rightarrow {Bigl{d_{j,f(n),p}}Bigr}_{j=lfloorln_p(f(n))rfloor+1-mathcal L_{n,p}..lfloorln_p(f(n))rfloor+1}={{p-1}}$$
$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(MAIN)}$$



where $d_{j,N,p}$ is the $j^{th}$ digit of a number $N$ in it's base $p$ representation



*also for the above use of curly brackets is in reference to the use of standard set builder notation.



Or simply stated, if $n$ is a composite number greater than four, we are assured that the final $mathcal L_{n,p}$ digits of $f(n)$ in base $p$ are all equal to $p-1$.



Here are some numerical evaluations to clarify my premise:



begin{align*}
f left( 8 right) =&104084078179918440038399999999\
f left( 9 right) =&62585279654387966547717097783295999999999\
f left( 10 right) =
&7918817322448503864877511415653369155260776447999999999\
f left( 14 right) =
&1882896245429872511932094597390061412789401819279245213ddots\
&5414507239528144216026955851728814590763658312910110719ddots\
&999999999999999999999999999
end{align*}



Taking the following lemma to be true lead me to making the above conjecture:



$${Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n-(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}+{Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n+(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}=1 operatorname{iff} n not in mathbb P$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(A0)}$$



$${Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n-(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}+{Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n+(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}=frac{n-2}{n} operatorname{iff} n in mathbb P$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(A1)}$$



where ${{x}}$ is the fractional part of $x$



$operatorname{(A0)}$ and $operatorname{(A1)}$, (Which both readily follow from Wilson's Theorem) then lead me to stating the lemma:



$frac{n}{2} left( Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}+ left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor +Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}- left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor +1-2,{frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}}{n}} right) -frac{1}{2}delta left( n,1 right) =cases{1&$n in mathbb P$cr 0&otherwisecr}
$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(B0)}$$



EDIT:29/10/2018



Let



$$f_1(n)=Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}+ left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor$$



$$f_2(n)=Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}- left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor$$



We have the following parity relations:
$$(f_1(n)-f_2(n))(-1)^{delta(frac{n}{2},lfloorfrac{n}{2}rfloor)}-1=0$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(C0)}$$



$$f_1(n)(-1)^{delta(frac{n}{2},lfloorfrac{n}{2}rfloor)}+f_2(n)(-1)^{delta(frac{n+1}{2},lfloorfrac{n+1}{2}rfloor)}+1=0$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(C1)}$$



Concluding Remarks:



I know that this proof must involve Kummer's Theorem somehow, and not only for the proof, in the case that the conjecture is true, derive an exact expression for $mathcal L_{n,p}$, which based on inductive reasoning alone seems to be $n-2$, however I think this would be a great opportunity for someone to teach me how to apply Kummer's Theorem in a proof for a specific problem involving p-adic integers.



My current intuitive view is directing me to focus on the factor of $frac{1}{2}$ we see in $operatorname{(B0)}$,since there is a constant factor in the denominator that is the minimum prime digit for $p=10$,($2$) which is non zero if and only if $n$ has primality $1$,conversely, we see the trailing digits in $f(n)$ are all equal to the maximum digit value in base $p=10$,$(9)$ if and only if $n$ has primality of $0$ in $operatorname{(MAIN)}$ .



The following lemma are of primary consideration for the proof of the main question of this post also:



Let $mathcal K_{N,m,0}$ be the cardinality of the finite set :



$$S_0=
{Biggl{frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{ncdot m+1}}{p_k}-Biggllfloor frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{ncdot m+1}}{p_k}Biggrrfloor:n leq N land k leq N}Biggr}
$$



$$mathcal K_{N,m,0}=delta left( frac{m}{2},Bigllfloor frac{m}{2} Bigrrfloor right) left( -1 right) ^{delta left( frac{m}{2},Bigllfloor frac{m}{2} Bigrrfloor right) }p_{{pi left( N right) }}
+ Bigl( 2-delta left( frac{m}{2},Bigllfloor frac{m}{2} Bigrrfloor right) Bigr) left( N-1 right) quadquadquadquadquadquadquad(operatorname{WILSON003)}$$



$delta(x,y)$ is the Kronecker delta function.



$pi(x)$ is the prime counting function.



Let $mathcal K_{N,m,1}$ be the cardinality of the finite set :



$$S_1=
{Biggl{frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{n}}{p_k}-Biggllfloor frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{n}}{p_k}Biggrrfloor:n leq N land k leq N}Biggr}
$$



we have:



$mathcal K_{N,m,1}=2N-1quadquadquadquadquadquadquad(operatorname{WILSON004)}$



Linked Questions relevant:



First



Second



Third



Fourth



Fifth



Many thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Is $mathcal L_{n,p}$ a number which is defined somewhere else and I don't see the definition, or is it an unknown quantity and part of your question is how to compute it?
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Oct 25 at 22:50










  • yes the later is correct sir I thought I had mentioned this somewhere but I will try and clarify it, it appears to be $n-2$ but I have not been able to establish a derivation for it, only that it does appear to have proportion to the total number of digits of of $f(n)$.
    – Adam
    Oct 25 at 23:15












  • And it's my current view that at least something similar to Kummer's theorem being applied would both establish a proof for the problem and allow for deriving an exact expression for $mathcal L_{n,p}$
    – Adam
    Oct 25 at 23:16















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2












DRAFTING REGION



I need to establish a proof or minimal counter example for the following:



$$f(n)=Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}+ left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor +Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}- left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor$$



$$n notin mathbb P land n gt 4 Rightarrow {Bigl{d_{j,f(n),p}}Bigr}_{j=lfloorln_p(f(n))rfloor+1-mathcal L_{n,p}..lfloorln_p(f(n))rfloor+1}={{p-1}}$$
$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(MAIN)}$$



where $d_{j,N,p}$ is the $j^{th}$ digit of a number $N$ in it's base $p$ representation



*also for the above use of curly brackets is in reference to the use of standard set builder notation.



Or simply stated, if $n$ is a composite number greater than four, we are assured that the final $mathcal L_{n,p}$ digits of $f(n)$ in base $p$ are all equal to $p-1$.



Here are some numerical evaluations to clarify my premise:



begin{align*}
f left( 8 right) =&104084078179918440038399999999\
f left( 9 right) =&62585279654387966547717097783295999999999\
f left( 10 right) =
&7918817322448503864877511415653369155260776447999999999\
f left( 14 right) =
&1882896245429872511932094597390061412789401819279245213ddots\
&5414507239528144216026955851728814590763658312910110719ddots\
&999999999999999999999999999
end{align*}



Taking the following lemma to be true lead me to making the above conjecture:



$${Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n-(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}+{Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n+(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}=1 operatorname{iff} n not in mathbb P$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(A0)}$$



$${Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n-(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}+{Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n+(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}=frac{n-2}{n} operatorname{iff} n in mathbb P$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(A1)}$$



where ${{x}}$ is the fractional part of $x$



$operatorname{(A0)}$ and $operatorname{(A1)}$, (Which both readily follow from Wilson's Theorem) then lead me to stating the lemma:



$frac{n}{2} left( Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}+ left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor +Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}- left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor +1-2,{frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}}{n}} right) -frac{1}{2}delta left( n,1 right) =cases{1&$n in mathbb P$cr 0&otherwisecr}
$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(B0)}$$



EDIT:29/10/2018



Let



$$f_1(n)=Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}+ left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor$$



$$f_2(n)=Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}- left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor$$



We have the following parity relations:
$$(f_1(n)-f_2(n))(-1)^{delta(frac{n}{2},lfloorfrac{n}{2}rfloor)}-1=0$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(C0)}$$



$$f_1(n)(-1)^{delta(frac{n}{2},lfloorfrac{n}{2}rfloor)}+f_2(n)(-1)^{delta(frac{n+1}{2},lfloorfrac{n+1}{2}rfloor)}+1=0$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(C1)}$$



Concluding Remarks:



I know that this proof must involve Kummer's Theorem somehow, and not only for the proof, in the case that the conjecture is true, derive an exact expression for $mathcal L_{n,p}$, which based on inductive reasoning alone seems to be $n-2$, however I think this would be a great opportunity for someone to teach me how to apply Kummer's Theorem in a proof for a specific problem involving p-adic integers.



My current intuitive view is directing me to focus on the factor of $frac{1}{2}$ we see in $operatorname{(B0)}$,since there is a constant factor in the denominator that is the minimum prime digit for $p=10$,($2$) which is non zero if and only if $n$ has primality $1$,conversely, we see the trailing digits in $f(n)$ are all equal to the maximum digit value in base $p=10$,$(9)$ if and only if $n$ has primality of $0$ in $operatorname{(MAIN)}$ .



The following lemma are of primary consideration for the proof of the main question of this post also:



Let $mathcal K_{N,m,0}$ be the cardinality of the finite set :



$$S_0=
{Biggl{frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{ncdot m+1}}{p_k}-Biggllfloor frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{ncdot m+1}}{p_k}Biggrrfloor:n leq N land k leq N}Biggr}
$$



$$mathcal K_{N,m,0}=delta left( frac{m}{2},Bigllfloor frac{m}{2} Bigrrfloor right) left( -1 right) ^{delta left( frac{m}{2},Bigllfloor frac{m}{2} Bigrrfloor right) }p_{{pi left( N right) }}
+ Bigl( 2-delta left( frac{m}{2},Bigllfloor frac{m}{2} Bigrrfloor right) Bigr) left( N-1 right) quadquadquadquadquadquadquad(operatorname{WILSON003)}$$



$delta(x,y)$ is the Kronecker delta function.



$pi(x)$ is the prime counting function.



Let $mathcal K_{N,m,1}$ be the cardinality of the finite set :



$$S_1=
{Biggl{frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{n}}{p_k}-Biggllfloor frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{n}}{p_k}Biggrrfloor:n leq N land k leq N}Biggr}
$$



we have:



$mathcal K_{N,m,1}=2N-1quadquadquadquadquadquadquad(operatorname{WILSON004)}$



Linked Questions relevant:



First



Second



Third



Fourth



Fifth



Many thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Is $mathcal L_{n,p}$ a number which is defined somewhere else and I don't see the definition, or is it an unknown quantity and part of your question is how to compute it?
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Oct 25 at 22:50










  • yes the later is correct sir I thought I had mentioned this somewhere but I will try and clarify it, it appears to be $n-2$ but I have not been able to establish a derivation for it, only that it does appear to have proportion to the total number of digits of of $f(n)$.
    – Adam
    Oct 25 at 23:15












  • And it's my current view that at least something similar to Kummer's theorem being applied would both establish a proof for the problem and allow for deriving an exact expression for $mathcal L_{n,p}$
    – Adam
    Oct 25 at 23:16













up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2






2





DRAFTING REGION



I need to establish a proof or minimal counter example for the following:



$$f(n)=Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}+ left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor +Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}- left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor$$



$$n notin mathbb P land n gt 4 Rightarrow {Bigl{d_{j,f(n),p}}Bigr}_{j=lfloorln_p(f(n))rfloor+1-mathcal L_{n,p}..lfloorln_p(f(n))rfloor+1}={{p-1}}$$
$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(MAIN)}$$



where $d_{j,N,p}$ is the $j^{th}$ digit of a number $N$ in it's base $p$ representation



*also for the above use of curly brackets is in reference to the use of standard set builder notation.



Or simply stated, if $n$ is a composite number greater than four, we are assured that the final $mathcal L_{n,p}$ digits of $f(n)$ in base $p$ are all equal to $p-1$.



Here are some numerical evaluations to clarify my premise:



begin{align*}
f left( 8 right) =&104084078179918440038399999999\
f left( 9 right) =&62585279654387966547717097783295999999999\
f left( 10 right) =
&7918817322448503864877511415653369155260776447999999999\
f left( 14 right) =
&1882896245429872511932094597390061412789401819279245213ddots\
&5414507239528144216026955851728814590763658312910110719ddots\
&999999999999999999999999999
end{align*}



Taking the following lemma to be true lead me to making the above conjecture:



$${Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n-(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}+{Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n+(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}=1 operatorname{iff} n not in mathbb P$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(A0)}$$



$${Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n-(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}+{Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n+(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}=frac{n-2}{n} operatorname{iff} n in mathbb P$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(A1)}$$



where ${{x}}$ is the fractional part of $x$



$operatorname{(A0)}$ and $operatorname{(A1)}$, (Which both readily follow from Wilson's Theorem) then lead me to stating the lemma:



$frac{n}{2} left( Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}+ left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor +Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}- left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor +1-2,{frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}}{n}} right) -frac{1}{2}delta left( n,1 right) =cases{1&$n in mathbb P$cr 0&otherwisecr}
$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(B0)}$$



EDIT:29/10/2018



Let



$$f_1(n)=Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}+ left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor$$



$$f_2(n)=Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}- left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor$$



We have the following parity relations:
$$(f_1(n)-f_2(n))(-1)^{delta(frac{n}{2},lfloorfrac{n}{2}rfloor)}-1=0$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(C0)}$$



$$f_1(n)(-1)^{delta(frac{n}{2},lfloorfrac{n}{2}rfloor)}+f_2(n)(-1)^{delta(frac{n+1}{2},lfloorfrac{n+1}{2}rfloor)}+1=0$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(C1)}$$



Concluding Remarks:



I know that this proof must involve Kummer's Theorem somehow, and not only for the proof, in the case that the conjecture is true, derive an exact expression for $mathcal L_{n,p}$, which based on inductive reasoning alone seems to be $n-2$, however I think this would be a great opportunity for someone to teach me how to apply Kummer's Theorem in a proof for a specific problem involving p-adic integers.



My current intuitive view is directing me to focus on the factor of $frac{1}{2}$ we see in $operatorname{(B0)}$,since there is a constant factor in the denominator that is the minimum prime digit for $p=10$,($2$) which is non zero if and only if $n$ has primality $1$,conversely, we see the trailing digits in $f(n)$ are all equal to the maximum digit value in base $p=10$,$(9)$ if and only if $n$ has primality of $0$ in $operatorname{(MAIN)}$ .



The following lemma are of primary consideration for the proof of the main question of this post also:



Let $mathcal K_{N,m,0}$ be the cardinality of the finite set :



$$S_0=
{Biggl{frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{ncdot m+1}}{p_k}-Biggllfloor frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{ncdot m+1}}{p_k}Biggrrfloor:n leq N land k leq N}Biggr}
$$



$$mathcal K_{N,m,0}=delta left( frac{m}{2},Bigllfloor frac{m}{2} Bigrrfloor right) left( -1 right) ^{delta left( frac{m}{2},Bigllfloor frac{m}{2} Bigrrfloor right) }p_{{pi left( N right) }}
+ Bigl( 2-delta left( frac{m}{2},Bigllfloor frac{m}{2} Bigrrfloor right) Bigr) left( N-1 right) quadquadquadquadquadquadquad(operatorname{WILSON003)}$$



$delta(x,y)$ is the Kronecker delta function.



$pi(x)$ is the prime counting function.



Let $mathcal K_{N,m,1}$ be the cardinality of the finite set :



$$S_1=
{Biggl{frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{n}}{p_k}-Biggllfloor frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{n}}{p_k}Biggrrfloor:n leq N land k leq N}Biggr}
$$



we have:



$mathcal K_{N,m,1}=2N-1quadquadquadquadquadquadquad(operatorname{WILSON004)}$



Linked Questions relevant:



First



Second



Third



Fourth



Fifth



Many thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question















DRAFTING REGION



I need to establish a proof or minimal counter example for the following:



$$f(n)=Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}+ left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor +Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}- left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor$$



$$n notin mathbb P land n gt 4 Rightarrow {Bigl{d_{j,f(n),p}}Bigr}_{j=lfloorln_p(f(n))rfloor+1-mathcal L_{n,p}..lfloorln_p(f(n))rfloor+1}={{p-1}}$$
$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(MAIN)}$$



where $d_{j,N,p}$ is the $j^{th}$ digit of a number $N$ in it's base $p$ representation



*also for the above use of curly brackets is in reference to the use of standard set builder notation.



Or simply stated, if $n$ is a composite number greater than four, we are assured that the final $mathcal L_{n,p}$ digits of $f(n)$ in base $p$ are all equal to $p-1$.



Here are some numerical evaluations to clarify my premise:



begin{align*}
f left( 8 right) =&104084078179918440038399999999\
f left( 9 right) =&62585279654387966547717097783295999999999\
f left( 10 right) =
&7918817322448503864877511415653369155260776447999999999\
f left( 14 right) =
&1882896245429872511932094597390061412789401819279245213ddots\
&5414507239528144216026955851728814590763658312910110719ddots\
&999999999999999999999999999
end{align*}



Taking the following lemma to be true lead me to making the above conjecture:



$${Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n-(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}+{Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n+(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}=1 operatorname{iff} n not in mathbb P$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(A0)}$$



$${Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n-(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}+{Biggl{frac{(n-1)!^n+(-1)^n}{n}}Biggr}=frac{n-2}{n} operatorname{iff} n in mathbb P$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(A1)}$$



where ${{x}}$ is the fractional part of $x$



$operatorname{(A0)}$ and $operatorname{(A1)}$, (Which both readily follow from Wilson's Theorem) then lead me to stating the lemma:



$frac{n}{2} left( Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}+ left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor +Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}- left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor +1-2,{frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}}{n}} right) -frac{1}{2}delta left( n,1 right) =cases{1&$n in mathbb P$cr 0&otherwisecr}
$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(B0)}$$



EDIT:29/10/2018



Let



$$f_1(n)=Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}+ left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor$$



$$f_2(n)=Biggllfloor {frac { left( left( n-1 right) !
right) ^{n}- left( -1 right) ^{n}}{n}} Biggrrfloor$$



We have the following parity relations:
$$(f_1(n)-f_2(n))(-1)^{delta(frac{n}{2},lfloorfrac{n}{2}rfloor)}-1=0$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(C0)}$$



$$f_1(n)(-1)^{delta(frac{n}{2},lfloorfrac{n}{2}rfloor)}+f_2(n)(-1)^{delta(frac{n+1}{2},lfloorfrac{n+1}{2}rfloor)}+1=0$$



$$quadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadquadoperatorname{(C1)}$$



Concluding Remarks:



I know that this proof must involve Kummer's Theorem somehow, and not only for the proof, in the case that the conjecture is true, derive an exact expression for $mathcal L_{n,p}$, which based on inductive reasoning alone seems to be $n-2$, however I think this would be a great opportunity for someone to teach me how to apply Kummer's Theorem in a proof for a specific problem involving p-adic integers.



My current intuitive view is directing me to focus on the factor of $frac{1}{2}$ we see in $operatorname{(B0)}$,since there is a constant factor in the denominator that is the minimum prime digit for $p=10$,($2$) which is non zero if and only if $n$ has primality $1$,conversely, we see the trailing digits in $f(n)$ are all equal to the maximum digit value in base $p=10$,$(9)$ if and only if $n$ has primality of $0$ in $operatorname{(MAIN)}$ .



The following lemma are of primary consideration for the proof of the main question of this post also:



Let $mathcal K_{N,m,0}$ be the cardinality of the finite set :



$$S_0=
{Biggl{frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{ncdot m+1}}{p_k}-Biggllfloor frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{ncdot m+1}}{p_k}Biggrrfloor:n leq N land k leq N}Biggr}
$$



$$mathcal K_{N,m,0}=delta left( frac{m}{2},Bigllfloor frac{m}{2} Bigrrfloor right) left( -1 right) ^{delta left( frac{m}{2},Bigllfloor frac{m}{2} Bigrrfloor right) }p_{{pi left( N right) }}
+ Bigl( 2-delta left( frac{m}{2},Bigllfloor frac{m}{2} Bigrrfloor right) Bigr) left( N-1 right) quadquadquadquadquadquadquad(operatorname{WILSON003)}$$



$delta(x,y)$ is the Kronecker delta function.



$pi(x)$ is the prime counting function.



Let $mathcal K_{N,m,1}$ be the cardinality of the finite set :



$$S_1=
{Biggl{frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{n}}{p_k}-Biggllfloor frac { left( (ncdot p_k)! right) ^{m}pm left( -1 right) ^{n}}{p_k}Biggrrfloor:n leq N land k leq N}Biggr}
$$



we have:



$mathcal K_{N,m,1}=2N-1quadquadquadquadquadquadquad(operatorname{WILSON004)}$



Linked Questions relevant:



First



Second



Third



Fourth



Fifth



Many thanks in advance.







elementary-number-theory p-adic-number-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 3 at 18:38

























asked Oct 24 at 4:58









Adam

53714




53714












  • Is $mathcal L_{n,p}$ a number which is defined somewhere else and I don't see the definition, or is it an unknown quantity and part of your question is how to compute it?
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Oct 25 at 22:50










  • yes the later is correct sir I thought I had mentioned this somewhere but I will try and clarify it, it appears to be $n-2$ but I have not been able to establish a derivation for it, only that it does appear to have proportion to the total number of digits of of $f(n)$.
    – Adam
    Oct 25 at 23:15












  • And it's my current view that at least something similar to Kummer's theorem being applied would both establish a proof for the problem and allow for deriving an exact expression for $mathcal L_{n,p}$
    – Adam
    Oct 25 at 23:16


















  • Is $mathcal L_{n,p}$ a number which is defined somewhere else and I don't see the definition, or is it an unknown quantity and part of your question is how to compute it?
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Oct 25 at 22:50










  • yes the later is correct sir I thought I had mentioned this somewhere but I will try and clarify it, it appears to be $n-2$ but I have not been able to establish a derivation for it, only that it does appear to have proportion to the total number of digits of of $f(n)$.
    – Adam
    Oct 25 at 23:15












  • And it's my current view that at least something similar to Kummer's theorem being applied would both establish a proof for the problem and allow for deriving an exact expression for $mathcal L_{n,p}$
    – Adam
    Oct 25 at 23:16
















Is $mathcal L_{n,p}$ a number which is defined somewhere else and I don't see the definition, or is it an unknown quantity and part of your question is how to compute it?
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Oct 25 at 22:50




Is $mathcal L_{n,p}$ a number which is defined somewhere else and I don't see the definition, or is it an unknown quantity and part of your question is how to compute it?
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Oct 25 at 22:50












yes the later is correct sir I thought I had mentioned this somewhere but I will try and clarify it, it appears to be $n-2$ but I have not been able to establish a derivation for it, only that it does appear to have proportion to the total number of digits of of $f(n)$.
– Adam
Oct 25 at 23:15






yes the later is correct sir I thought I had mentioned this somewhere but I will try and clarify it, it appears to be $n-2$ but I have not been able to establish a derivation for it, only that it does appear to have proportion to the total number of digits of of $f(n)$.
– Adam
Oct 25 at 23:15














And it's my current view that at least something similar to Kummer's theorem being applied would both establish a proof for the problem and allow for deriving an exact expression for $mathcal L_{n,p}$
– Adam
Oct 25 at 23:16




And it's my current view that at least something similar to Kummer's theorem being applied would both establish a proof for the problem and allow for deriving an exact expression for $mathcal L_{n,p}$
– Adam
Oct 25 at 23:16















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2968702%2fapplying-kummers-theorem-to-a-specific-p-adic-number-theory-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2968702%2fapplying-kummers-theorem-to-a-specific-p-adic-number-theory-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna