infinite sum as integral for the counting measure
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $u: mathbb{N} to mathbb{R}^+$ be a positive sequence. Then it is true that
$$
int u dmu = sum_{n=1}^infty u(n).
$$
For the measure space $(mathbb{N}, mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}),mu)$, where $mu$ is the counting measure. The proof uses monotone convergence theorem, and goes as follows:
Take the measure space $(mathbb{N},mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}), underbrace{sum_{j=1}^infty delta_j}_{mu})$.
Let $u: mathbb{N} to mathbb{R}^+$ be a positive function ($u geq 0$).
We define
$$
u_n(k) =
begin{cases}
u(k) & k leq n, \
0 & k > n.
end{cases}
$$
For all $n in mathbb{N}$, $u_n$ is a normal function since we have $u_n = sum_{k=1}^n u(k)1_{{k}}$. Thus, the approximation cuts of $u$ after $n$. Moreover, we have
$$
int u_n dmu = I_mu(f) = sum_{k=1}^n u(k) mu({k}) = sum_{k=1}^n u(k).
$$
Since we have $0 leq u_n uparrow u$, then it follows by MCT that
$$
int_{mathbb{N}} u dmu stackrel{MTC}{=} lim_{n to infty} int u_n dmu = sum_{k=1}^infty u(k).
$$
Now can someone tell me under what condition this is true if $u: mathbb{N} to mathbb{R}$ is not necessarily positive?
integration sequences-and-series measure-theory
|
show 11 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $u: mathbb{N} to mathbb{R}^+$ be a positive sequence. Then it is true that
$$
int u dmu = sum_{n=1}^infty u(n).
$$
For the measure space $(mathbb{N}, mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}),mu)$, where $mu$ is the counting measure. The proof uses monotone convergence theorem, and goes as follows:
Take the measure space $(mathbb{N},mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}), underbrace{sum_{j=1}^infty delta_j}_{mu})$.
Let $u: mathbb{N} to mathbb{R}^+$ be a positive function ($u geq 0$).
We define
$$
u_n(k) =
begin{cases}
u(k) & k leq n, \
0 & k > n.
end{cases}
$$
For all $n in mathbb{N}$, $u_n$ is a normal function since we have $u_n = sum_{k=1}^n u(k)1_{{k}}$. Thus, the approximation cuts of $u$ after $n$. Moreover, we have
$$
int u_n dmu = I_mu(f) = sum_{k=1}^n u(k) mu({k}) = sum_{k=1}^n u(k).
$$
Since we have $0 leq u_n uparrow u$, then it follows by MCT that
$$
int_{mathbb{N}} u dmu stackrel{MTC}{=} lim_{n to infty} int u_n dmu = sum_{k=1}^infty u(k).
$$
Now can someone tell me under what condition this is true if $u: mathbb{N} to mathbb{R}$ is not necessarily positive?
integration sequences-and-series measure-theory
I think you confuses the definitions. The equality holds by the definition of the integral and has nothing to do with the monotone convergence theorem. Also if $u:mathbb{N}rightarrowmathbb{R}^{+}$ then it is necessarily positive (again by definition).
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:37
Why it holds by definition?
– Sigurd
Dec 3 at 18:38
Which definition of integration do you use?
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:40
For step functions / simple functions $f = sum_{i=1}^N alpha_i 1_{A_i}$: $I_mu(f) := sum_{i=1}^N alpha_i mu({A_i})$. For positive functions: $int u dmu := sup{I_mu(g): g leq u, g $ simple $} in [0,infty]$. For general functions: $int u dmu = int u^+dmu - int u^- dmu$.
– Sigurd
Dec 3 at 18:43
Alright so a simple function in this case is a function that is supported only on finitely many points. It is only left to understand why $sup {I_u(g):gleq u, g text{ simple} } = lim_{nrightarrowinfty} I_u(u_n)$ where $u_n$ is $u$ restricted to the first $n$ points (i.e. $u_n(k)=u(k)$ if $kleq n$ and $0$ otherwise). Does it explain?
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:46
|
show 11 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $u: mathbb{N} to mathbb{R}^+$ be a positive sequence. Then it is true that
$$
int u dmu = sum_{n=1}^infty u(n).
$$
For the measure space $(mathbb{N}, mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}),mu)$, where $mu$ is the counting measure. The proof uses monotone convergence theorem, and goes as follows:
Take the measure space $(mathbb{N},mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}), underbrace{sum_{j=1}^infty delta_j}_{mu})$.
Let $u: mathbb{N} to mathbb{R}^+$ be a positive function ($u geq 0$).
We define
$$
u_n(k) =
begin{cases}
u(k) & k leq n, \
0 & k > n.
end{cases}
$$
For all $n in mathbb{N}$, $u_n$ is a normal function since we have $u_n = sum_{k=1}^n u(k)1_{{k}}$. Thus, the approximation cuts of $u$ after $n$. Moreover, we have
$$
int u_n dmu = I_mu(f) = sum_{k=1}^n u(k) mu({k}) = sum_{k=1}^n u(k).
$$
Since we have $0 leq u_n uparrow u$, then it follows by MCT that
$$
int_{mathbb{N}} u dmu stackrel{MTC}{=} lim_{n to infty} int u_n dmu = sum_{k=1}^infty u(k).
$$
Now can someone tell me under what condition this is true if $u: mathbb{N} to mathbb{R}$ is not necessarily positive?
integration sequences-and-series measure-theory
Let $u: mathbb{N} to mathbb{R}^+$ be a positive sequence. Then it is true that
$$
int u dmu = sum_{n=1}^infty u(n).
$$
For the measure space $(mathbb{N}, mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}),mu)$, where $mu$ is the counting measure. The proof uses monotone convergence theorem, and goes as follows:
Take the measure space $(mathbb{N},mathcal{P}(mathbb{N}), underbrace{sum_{j=1}^infty delta_j}_{mu})$.
Let $u: mathbb{N} to mathbb{R}^+$ be a positive function ($u geq 0$).
We define
$$
u_n(k) =
begin{cases}
u(k) & k leq n, \
0 & k > n.
end{cases}
$$
For all $n in mathbb{N}$, $u_n$ is a normal function since we have $u_n = sum_{k=1}^n u(k)1_{{k}}$. Thus, the approximation cuts of $u$ after $n$. Moreover, we have
$$
int u_n dmu = I_mu(f) = sum_{k=1}^n u(k) mu({k}) = sum_{k=1}^n u(k).
$$
Since we have $0 leq u_n uparrow u$, then it follows by MCT that
$$
int_{mathbb{N}} u dmu stackrel{MTC}{=} lim_{n to infty} int u_n dmu = sum_{k=1}^infty u(k).
$$
Now can someone tell me under what condition this is true if $u: mathbb{N} to mathbb{R}$ is not necessarily positive?
integration sequences-and-series measure-theory
integration sequences-and-series measure-theory
edited Dec 3 at 18:54
asked Dec 3 at 18:35
Sigurd
480211
480211
I think you confuses the definitions. The equality holds by the definition of the integral and has nothing to do with the monotone convergence theorem. Also if $u:mathbb{N}rightarrowmathbb{R}^{+}$ then it is necessarily positive (again by definition).
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:37
Why it holds by definition?
– Sigurd
Dec 3 at 18:38
Which definition of integration do you use?
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:40
For step functions / simple functions $f = sum_{i=1}^N alpha_i 1_{A_i}$: $I_mu(f) := sum_{i=1}^N alpha_i mu({A_i})$. For positive functions: $int u dmu := sup{I_mu(g): g leq u, g $ simple $} in [0,infty]$. For general functions: $int u dmu = int u^+dmu - int u^- dmu$.
– Sigurd
Dec 3 at 18:43
Alright so a simple function in this case is a function that is supported only on finitely many points. It is only left to understand why $sup {I_u(g):gleq u, g text{ simple} } = lim_{nrightarrowinfty} I_u(u_n)$ where $u_n$ is $u$ restricted to the first $n$ points (i.e. $u_n(k)=u(k)$ if $kleq n$ and $0$ otherwise). Does it explain?
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:46
|
show 11 more comments
I think you confuses the definitions. The equality holds by the definition of the integral and has nothing to do with the monotone convergence theorem. Also if $u:mathbb{N}rightarrowmathbb{R}^{+}$ then it is necessarily positive (again by definition).
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:37
Why it holds by definition?
– Sigurd
Dec 3 at 18:38
Which definition of integration do you use?
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:40
For step functions / simple functions $f = sum_{i=1}^N alpha_i 1_{A_i}$: $I_mu(f) := sum_{i=1}^N alpha_i mu({A_i})$. For positive functions: $int u dmu := sup{I_mu(g): g leq u, g $ simple $} in [0,infty]$. For general functions: $int u dmu = int u^+dmu - int u^- dmu$.
– Sigurd
Dec 3 at 18:43
Alright so a simple function in this case is a function that is supported only on finitely many points. It is only left to understand why $sup {I_u(g):gleq u, g text{ simple} } = lim_{nrightarrowinfty} I_u(u_n)$ where $u_n$ is $u$ restricted to the first $n$ points (i.e. $u_n(k)=u(k)$ if $kleq n$ and $0$ otherwise). Does it explain?
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:46
I think you confuses the definitions. The equality holds by the definition of the integral and has nothing to do with the monotone convergence theorem. Also if $u:mathbb{N}rightarrowmathbb{R}^{+}$ then it is necessarily positive (again by definition).
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:37
I think you confuses the definitions. The equality holds by the definition of the integral and has nothing to do with the monotone convergence theorem. Also if $u:mathbb{N}rightarrowmathbb{R}^{+}$ then it is necessarily positive (again by definition).
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:37
Why it holds by definition?
– Sigurd
Dec 3 at 18:38
Why it holds by definition?
– Sigurd
Dec 3 at 18:38
Which definition of integration do you use?
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:40
Which definition of integration do you use?
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:40
For step functions / simple functions $f = sum_{i=1}^N alpha_i 1_{A_i}$: $I_mu(f) := sum_{i=1}^N alpha_i mu({A_i})$. For positive functions: $int u dmu := sup{I_mu(g): g leq u, g $ simple $} in [0,infty]$. For general functions: $int u dmu = int u^+dmu - int u^- dmu$.
– Sigurd
Dec 3 at 18:43
For step functions / simple functions $f = sum_{i=1}^N alpha_i 1_{A_i}$: $I_mu(f) := sum_{i=1}^N alpha_i mu({A_i})$. For positive functions: $int u dmu := sup{I_mu(g): g leq u, g $ simple $} in [0,infty]$. For general functions: $int u dmu = int u^+dmu - int u^- dmu$.
– Sigurd
Dec 3 at 18:43
Alright so a simple function in this case is a function that is supported only on finitely many points. It is only left to understand why $sup {I_u(g):gleq u, g text{ simple} } = lim_{nrightarrowinfty} I_u(u_n)$ where $u_n$ is $u$ restricted to the first $n$ points (i.e. $u_n(k)=u(k)$ if $kleq n$ and $0$ otherwise). Does it explain?
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:46
Alright so a simple function in this case is a function that is supported only on finitely many points. It is only left to understand why $sup {I_u(g):gleq u, g text{ simple} } = lim_{nrightarrowinfty} I_u(u_n)$ where $u_n$ is $u$ restricted to the first $n$ points (i.e. $u_n(k)=u(k)$ if $kleq n$ and $0$ otherwise). Does it explain?
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:46
|
show 11 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I prove
If $u(n)$ is a sequence such that $sum_n |u(n)| <infty$ then $int u dmu = sum_n u(n)$
By the definition of integral we have $int u dmu = int u^+ dmu - int u^- dmu$
By what you just showed for $u^+,u^-$ we have $u^pm = sum_n u^pm (n)$
Since the sum is uniformly convergence it is the same to sum from $1,2,...$ or to sum first the $n$ for which $u(n)>0$ and only then the $n$ for which $u(n)<0$.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I prove
If $u(n)$ is a sequence such that $sum_n |u(n)| <infty$ then $int u dmu = sum_n u(n)$
By the definition of integral we have $int u dmu = int u^+ dmu - int u^- dmu$
By what you just showed for $u^+,u^-$ we have $u^pm = sum_n u^pm (n)$
Since the sum is uniformly convergence it is the same to sum from $1,2,...$ or to sum first the $n$ for which $u(n)>0$ and only then the $n$ for which $u(n)<0$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I prove
If $u(n)$ is a sequence such that $sum_n |u(n)| <infty$ then $int u dmu = sum_n u(n)$
By the definition of integral we have $int u dmu = int u^+ dmu - int u^- dmu$
By what you just showed for $u^+,u^-$ we have $u^pm = sum_n u^pm (n)$
Since the sum is uniformly convergence it is the same to sum from $1,2,...$ or to sum first the $n$ for which $u(n)>0$ and only then the $n$ for which $u(n)<0$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I prove
If $u(n)$ is a sequence such that $sum_n |u(n)| <infty$ then $int u dmu = sum_n u(n)$
By the definition of integral we have $int u dmu = int u^+ dmu - int u^- dmu$
By what you just showed for $u^+,u^-$ we have $u^pm = sum_n u^pm (n)$
Since the sum is uniformly convergence it is the same to sum from $1,2,...$ or to sum first the $n$ for which $u(n)>0$ and only then the $n$ for which $u(n)<0$.
I prove
If $u(n)$ is a sequence such that $sum_n |u(n)| <infty$ then $int u dmu = sum_n u(n)$
By the definition of integral we have $int u dmu = int u^+ dmu - int u^- dmu$
By what you just showed for $u^+,u^-$ we have $u^pm = sum_n u^pm (n)$
Since the sum is uniformly convergence it is the same to sum from $1,2,...$ or to sum first the $n$ for which $u(n)>0$ and only then the $n$ for which $u(n)<0$.
answered Dec 3 at 19:10
Yanko
5,315722
5,315722
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024489%2finfinite-sum-as-integral-for-the-counting-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I think you confuses the definitions. The equality holds by the definition of the integral and has nothing to do with the monotone convergence theorem. Also if $u:mathbb{N}rightarrowmathbb{R}^{+}$ then it is necessarily positive (again by definition).
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:37
Why it holds by definition?
– Sigurd
Dec 3 at 18:38
Which definition of integration do you use?
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:40
For step functions / simple functions $f = sum_{i=1}^N alpha_i 1_{A_i}$: $I_mu(f) := sum_{i=1}^N alpha_i mu({A_i})$. For positive functions: $int u dmu := sup{I_mu(g): g leq u, g $ simple $} in [0,infty]$. For general functions: $int u dmu = int u^+dmu - int u^- dmu$.
– Sigurd
Dec 3 at 18:43
Alright so a simple function in this case is a function that is supported only on finitely many points. It is only left to understand why $sup {I_u(g):gleq u, g text{ simple} } = lim_{nrightarrowinfty} I_u(u_n)$ where $u_n$ is $u$ restricted to the first $n$ points (i.e. $u_n(k)=u(k)$ if $kleq n$ and $0$ otherwise). Does it explain?
– Yanko
Dec 3 at 18:46