Computing an Integral by means of measure theory
I need to compute the integral $$int _0 ^ infty xe^{-kx} dx, ,kgeq1$$ by means of measure theory. Integration by parts will not work here. Also I used the Taylor series of the exponential function with the idea in mind to use the fact that for positive functions one can interchange sum symbol and integral, but it did not lead me further.
I will appreciate your help. Thanks.
real-analysis measure-theory
add a comment |
I need to compute the integral $$int _0 ^ infty xe^{-kx} dx, ,kgeq1$$ by means of measure theory. Integration by parts will not work here. Also I used the Taylor series of the exponential function with the idea in mind to use the fact that for positive functions one can interchange sum symbol and integral, but it did not lead me further.
I will appreciate your help. Thanks.
real-analysis measure-theory
2
What do you mean by "measure theoretical means"? And why doesn't integration by parts work here?
– Eclipse Sun
Dec 6 at 17:23
2
maybe you can use the sequence of functions defined by $$f_n(x):=chi_{[0,n)}(x), xleft(1-frac{kx}{n}right)^n$$ It is just an idea
– Masacroso
Dec 6 at 17:27
add a comment |
I need to compute the integral $$int _0 ^ infty xe^{-kx} dx, ,kgeq1$$ by means of measure theory. Integration by parts will not work here. Also I used the Taylor series of the exponential function with the idea in mind to use the fact that for positive functions one can interchange sum symbol and integral, but it did not lead me further.
I will appreciate your help. Thanks.
real-analysis measure-theory
I need to compute the integral $$int _0 ^ infty xe^{-kx} dx, ,kgeq1$$ by means of measure theory. Integration by parts will not work here. Also I used the Taylor series of the exponential function with the idea in mind to use the fact that for positive functions one can interchange sum symbol and integral, but it did not lead me further.
I will appreciate your help. Thanks.
real-analysis measure-theory
real-analysis measure-theory
edited Dec 6 at 17:51
asked Dec 6 at 17:20
user249018
338127
338127
2
What do you mean by "measure theoretical means"? And why doesn't integration by parts work here?
– Eclipse Sun
Dec 6 at 17:23
2
maybe you can use the sequence of functions defined by $$f_n(x):=chi_{[0,n)}(x), xleft(1-frac{kx}{n}right)^n$$ It is just an idea
– Masacroso
Dec 6 at 17:27
add a comment |
2
What do you mean by "measure theoretical means"? And why doesn't integration by parts work here?
– Eclipse Sun
Dec 6 at 17:23
2
maybe you can use the sequence of functions defined by $$f_n(x):=chi_{[0,n)}(x), xleft(1-frac{kx}{n}right)^n$$ It is just an idea
– Masacroso
Dec 6 at 17:27
2
2
What do you mean by "measure theoretical means"? And why doesn't integration by parts work here?
– Eclipse Sun
Dec 6 at 17:23
What do you mean by "measure theoretical means"? And why doesn't integration by parts work here?
– Eclipse Sun
Dec 6 at 17:23
2
2
maybe you can use the sequence of functions defined by $$f_n(x):=chi_{[0,n)}(x), xleft(1-frac{kx}{n}right)^n$$ It is just an idea
– Masacroso
Dec 6 at 17:27
maybe you can use the sequence of functions defined by $$f_n(x):=chi_{[0,n)}(x), xleft(1-frac{kx}{n}right)^n$$ It is just an idea
– Masacroso
Dec 6 at 17:27
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Hint: $$int_0^infty x e^{-kx}; dx = - frac{d}{dk} int_0^infty e^{-kx}; dx $$
Use "measure theoretical means" to justify the interchange of derivative and integral.
Thanks, but $k$ is a constant and not a variable.
– user249018
Dec 6 at 17:49
2
Don't be afraid to turn your constants into variables.
– Robert Israel
Dec 6 at 18:18
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028783%2fcomputing-an-integral-by-means-of-measure-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Hint: $$int_0^infty x e^{-kx}; dx = - frac{d}{dk} int_0^infty e^{-kx}; dx $$
Use "measure theoretical means" to justify the interchange of derivative and integral.
Thanks, but $k$ is a constant and not a variable.
– user249018
Dec 6 at 17:49
2
Don't be afraid to turn your constants into variables.
– Robert Israel
Dec 6 at 18:18
add a comment |
Hint: $$int_0^infty x e^{-kx}; dx = - frac{d}{dk} int_0^infty e^{-kx}; dx $$
Use "measure theoretical means" to justify the interchange of derivative and integral.
Thanks, but $k$ is a constant and not a variable.
– user249018
Dec 6 at 17:49
2
Don't be afraid to turn your constants into variables.
– Robert Israel
Dec 6 at 18:18
add a comment |
Hint: $$int_0^infty x e^{-kx}; dx = - frac{d}{dk} int_0^infty e^{-kx}; dx $$
Use "measure theoretical means" to justify the interchange of derivative and integral.
Hint: $$int_0^infty x e^{-kx}; dx = - frac{d}{dk} int_0^infty e^{-kx}; dx $$
Use "measure theoretical means" to justify the interchange of derivative and integral.
answered Dec 6 at 17:31
Robert Israel
317k23206457
317k23206457
Thanks, but $k$ is a constant and not a variable.
– user249018
Dec 6 at 17:49
2
Don't be afraid to turn your constants into variables.
– Robert Israel
Dec 6 at 18:18
add a comment |
Thanks, but $k$ is a constant and not a variable.
– user249018
Dec 6 at 17:49
2
Don't be afraid to turn your constants into variables.
– Robert Israel
Dec 6 at 18:18
Thanks, but $k$ is a constant and not a variable.
– user249018
Dec 6 at 17:49
Thanks, but $k$ is a constant and not a variable.
– user249018
Dec 6 at 17:49
2
2
Don't be afraid to turn your constants into variables.
– Robert Israel
Dec 6 at 18:18
Don't be afraid to turn your constants into variables.
– Robert Israel
Dec 6 at 18:18
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028783%2fcomputing-an-integral-by-means-of-measure-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
What do you mean by "measure theoretical means"? And why doesn't integration by parts work here?
– Eclipse Sun
Dec 6 at 17:23
2
maybe you can use the sequence of functions defined by $$f_n(x):=chi_{[0,n)}(x), xleft(1-frac{kx}{n}right)^n$$ It is just an idea
– Masacroso
Dec 6 at 17:27