Computing an Integral by means of measure theory












0














I need to compute the integral $$int _0 ^ infty xe^{-kx} dx, ,kgeq1$$ by means of measure theory. Integration by parts will not work here. Also I used the Taylor series of the exponential function with the idea in mind to use the fact that for positive functions one can interchange sum symbol and integral, but it did not lead me further.



I will appreciate your help. Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    What do you mean by "measure theoretical means"? And why doesn't integration by parts work here?
    – Eclipse Sun
    Dec 6 at 17:23






  • 2




    maybe you can use the sequence of functions defined by $$f_n(x):=chi_{[0,n)}(x), xleft(1-frac{kx}{n}right)^n$$ It is just an idea
    – Masacroso
    Dec 6 at 17:27


















0














I need to compute the integral $$int _0 ^ infty xe^{-kx} dx, ,kgeq1$$ by means of measure theory. Integration by parts will not work here. Also I used the Taylor series of the exponential function with the idea in mind to use the fact that for positive functions one can interchange sum symbol and integral, but it did not lead me further.



I will appreciate your help. Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    What do you mean by "measure theoretical means"? And why doesn't integration by parts work here?
    – Eclipse Sun
    Dec 6 at 17:23






  • 2




    maybe you can use the sequence of functions defined by $$f_n(x):=chi_{[0,n)}(x), xleft(1-frac{kx}{n}right)^n$$ It is just an idea
    – Masacroso
    Dec 6 at 17:27
















0












0








0







I need to compute the integral $$int _0 ^ infty xe^{-kx} dx, ,kgeq1$$ by means of measure theory. Integration by parts will not work here. Also I used the Taylor series of the exponential function with the idea in mind to use the fact that for positive functions one can interchange sum symbol and integral, but it did not lead me further.



I will appreciate your help. Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question















I need to compute the integral $$int _0 ^ infty xe^{-kx} dx, ,kgeq1$$ by means of measure theory. Integration by parts will not work here. Also I used the Taylor series of the exponential function with the idea in mind to use the fact that for positive functions one can interchange sum symbol and integral, but it did not lead me further.



I will appreciate your help. Thanks.







real-analysis measure-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 6 at 17:51

























asked Dec 6 at 17:20









user249018

338127




338127








  • 2




    What do you mean by "measure theoretical means"? And why doesn't integration by parts work here?
    – Eclipse Sun
    Dec 6 at 17:23






  • 2




    maybe you can use the sequence of functions defined by $$f_n(x):=chi_{[0,n)}(x), xleft(1-frac{kx}{n}right)^n$$ It is just an idea
    – Masacroso
    Dec 6 at 17:27
















  • 2




    What do you mean by "measure theoretical means"? And why doesn't integration by parts work here?
    – Eclipse Sun
    Dec 6 at 17:23






  • 2




    maybe you can use the sequence of functions defined by $$f_n(x):=chi_{[0,n)}(x), xleft(1-frac{kx}{n}right)^n$$ It is just an idea
    – Masacroso
    Dec 6 at 17:27










2




2




What do you mean by "measure theoretical means"? And why doesn't integration by parts work here?
– Eclipse Sun
Dec 6 at 17:23




What do you mean by "measure theoretical means"? And why doesn't integration by parts work here?
– Eclipse Sun
Dec 6 at 17:23




2




2




maybe you can use the sequence of functions defined by $$f_n(x):=chi_{[0,n)}(x), xleft(1-frac{kx}{n}right)^n$$ It is just an idea
– Masacroso
Dec 6 at 17:27






maybe you can use the sequence of functions defined by $$f_n(x):=chi_{[0,n)}(x), xleft(1-frac{kx}{n}right)^n$$ It is just an idea
– Masacroso
Dec 6 at 17:27












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7














Hint: $$int_0^infty x e^{-kx}; dx = - frac{d}{dk} int_0^infty e^{-kx}; dx $$
Use "measure theoretical means" to justify the interchange of derivative and integral.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks, but $k$ is a constant and not a variable.
    – user249018
    Dec 6 at 17:49






  • 2




    Don't be afraid to turn your constants into variables.
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 6 at 18:18











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028783%2fcomputing-an-integral-by-means-of-measure-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7














Hint: $$int_0^infty x e^{-kx}; dx = - frac{d}{dk} int_0^infty e^{-kx}; dx $$
Use "measure theoretical means" to justify the interchange of derivative and integral.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks, but $k$ is a constant and not a variable.
    – user249018
    Dec 6 at 17:49






  • 2




    Don't be afraid to turn your constants into variables.
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 6 at 18:18
















7














Hint: $$int_0^infty x e^{-kx}; dx = - frac{d}{dk} int_0^infty e^{-kx}; dx $$
Use "measure theoretical means" to justify the interchange of derivative and integral.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks, but $k$ is a constant and not a variable.
    – user249018
    Dec 6 at 17:49






  • 2




    Don't be afraid to turn your constants into variables.
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 6 at 18:18














7












7








7






Hint: $$int_0^infty x e^{-kx}; dx = - frac{d}{dk} int_0^infty e^{-kx}; dx $$
Use "measure theoretical means" to justify the interchange of derivative and integral.






share|cite|improve this answer












Hint: $$int_0^infty x e^{-kx}; dx = - frac{d}{dk} int_0^infty e^{-kx}; dx $$
Use "measure theoretical means" to justify the interchange of derivative and integral.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 6 at 17:31









Robert Israel

317k23206457




317k23206457












  • Thanks, but $k$ is a constant and not a variable.
    – user249018
    Dec 6 at 17:49






  • 2




    Don't be afraid to turn your constants into variables.
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 6 at 18:18


















  • Thanks, but $k$ is a constant and not a variable.
    – user249018
    Dec 6 at 17:49






  • 2




    Don't be afraid to turn your constants into variables.
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 6 at 18:18
















Thanks, but $k$ is a constant and not a variable.
– user249018
Dec 6 at 17:49




Thanks, but $k$ is a constant and not a variable.
– user249018
Dec 6 at 17:49




2




2




Don't be afraid to turn your constants into variables.
– Robert Israel
Dec 6 at 18:18




Don't be afraid to turn your constants into variables.
– Robert Israel
Dec 6 at 18:18


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028783%2fcomputing-an-integral-by-means-of-measure-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna