Primes and Riemann zeta function.
$begingroup$
Primes numbers and Riemann zeta function.
Question 1: Is there a proof of the infinitude of prime numbers using the Riemann Zeta function. Exboço could show me a proof of this where I could find it?
Question 2: What is the relationship of this function with the famous Riemann hypothesis?
number-theory analysis riemann-zeta
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Primes numbers and Riemann zeta function.
Question 1: Is there a proof of the infinitude of prime numbers using the Riemann Zeta function. Exboço could show me a proof of this where I could find it?
Question 2: What is the relationship of this function with the famous Riemann hypothesis?
number-theory analysis riemann-zeta
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
For 2, see this and this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:07
2
$begingroup$
Q2: Which function? If zeta, of course, the RH is about the zeroes of the zeta function.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:08
2
$begingroup$
$zeta(1)= prod_{p {rm prime}} frac{1}{1- frac{1}{p}} = infty $ This guarantees that there are infinitely many primes... Also PNT is usually proven using properties of the RH..... Last but not least, if there would be finitely many primes then the Euler product would be finite, thus "convergent" everywhere... Which would imply many things known not to be true (for example that $zeta$ has no zero)...
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:12
$begingroup$
For 1, see this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:13
1
$begingroup$
I'm sorry. I do not search for a tag on "Riemann-function Zenta." There execelentes answers in this tag.
$endgroup$
– MathOverview
Dec 20 '11 at 16:30
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Primes numbers and Riemann zeta function.
Question 1: Is there a proof of the infinitude of prime numbers using the Riemann Zeta function. Exboço could show me a proof of this where I could find it?
Question 2: What is the relationship of this function with the famous Riemann hypothesis?
number-theory analysis riemann-zeta
$endgroup$
Primes numbers and Riemann zeta function.
Question 1: Is there a proof of the infinitude of prime numbers using the Riemann Zeta function. Exboço could show me a proof of this where I could find it?
Question 2: What is the relationship of this function with the famous Riemann hypothesis?
number-theory analysis riemann-zeta
number-theory analysis riemann-zeta
edited Dec 17 '18 at 12:27
MathOverview
asked Dec 20 '11 at 16:04
MathOverviewMathOverview
8,54843163
8,54843163
2
$begingroup$
For 2, see this and this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:07
2
$begingroup$
Q2: Which function? If zeta, of course, the RH is about the zeroes of the zeta function.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:08
2
$begingroup$
$zeta(1)= prod_{p {rm prime}} frac{1}{1- frac{1}{p}} = infty $ This guarantees that there are infinitely many primes... Also PNT is usually proven using properties of the RH..... Last but not least, if there would be finitely many primes then the Euler product would be finite, thus "convergent" everywhere... Which would imply many things known not to be true (for example that $zeta$ has no zero)...
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:12
$begingroup$
For 1, see this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:13
1
$begingroup$
I'm sorry. I do not search for a tag on "Riemann-function Zenta." There execelentes answers in this tag.
$endgroup$
– MathOverview
Dec 20 '11 at 16:30
|
show 1 more comment
2
$begingroup$
For 2, see this and this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:07
2
$begingroup$
Q2: Which function? If zeta, of course, the RH is about the zeroes of the zeta function.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:08
2
$begingroup$
$zeta(1)= prod_{p {rm prime}} frac{1}{1- frac{1}{p}} = infty $ This guarantees that there are infinitely many primes... Also PNT is usually proven using properties of the RH..... Last but not least, if there would be finitely many primes then the Euler product would be finite, thus "convergent" everywhere... Which would imply many things known not to be true (for example that $zeta$ has no zero)...
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:12
$begingroup$
For 1, see this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:13
1
$begingroup$
I'm sorry. I do not search for a tag on "Riemann-function Zenta." There execelentes answers in this tag.
$endgroup$
– MathOverview
Dec 20 '11 at 16:30
2
2
$begingroup$
For 2, see this and this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:07
$begingroup$
For 2, see this and this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:07
2
2
$begingroup$
Q2: Which function? If zeta, of course, the RH is about the zeroes of the zeta function.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:08
$begingroup$
Q2: Which function? If zeta, of course, the RH is about the zeroes of the zeta function.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:08
2
2
$begingroup$
$zeta(1)= prod_{p {rm prime}} frac{1}{1- frac{1}{p}} = infty $ This guarantees that there are infinitely many primes... Also PNT is usually proven using properties of the RH..... Last but not least, if there would be finitely many primes then the Euler product would be finite, thus "convergent" everywhere... Which would imply many things known not to be true (for example that $zeta$ has no zero)...
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:12
$begingroup$
$zeta(1)= prod_{p {rm prime}} frac{1}{1- frac{1}{p}} = infty $ This guarantees that there are infinitely many primes... Also PNT is usually proven using properties of the RH..... Last but not least, if there would be finitely many primes then the Euler product would be finite, thus "convergent" everywhere... Which would imply many things known not to be true (for example that $zeta$ has no zero)...
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:12
$begingroup$
For 1, see this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:13
$begingroup$
For 1, see this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:13
1
1
$begingroup$
I'm sorry. I do not search for a tag on "Riemann-function Zenta." There execelentes answers in this tag.
$endgroup$
– MathOverview
Dec 20 '11 at 16:30
$begingroup$
I'm sorry. I do not search for a tag on "Riemann-function Zenta." There execelentes answers in this tag.
$endgroup$
– MathOverview
Dec 20 '11 at 16:30
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is easy to lose track of the Riemann Hypothesis behind all the noise about the Riemann Hypothesis. But following the usual statement of the problem (where I use the Clay Mathematics Institute and their prize as the usual statement), the hypothesis is that all the zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function occur on the line $Re(s) = 1/2$.
With respect to your first question, the Riemann Zeta Function is traditionally used in one proof of the Prime Number Theorem (which states the asymptotic density of primes). In this way, it gives that there are infinitely many primes.
Alternatively, as pointed out by N.S. in the comments, the fact that $zeta(1) = infty$ is a direct statement that there are infinitely many primes. And 'calculating' this is not so bad, as long as you know that the harmonic series diverges and that $sumlimits frac{1}{n} = prod_p frac{1}{1 - p^{-1}}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f92976%2fprimes-and-riemann-zeta-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is easy to lose track of the Riemann Hypothesis behind all the noise about the Riemann Hypothesis. But following the usual statement of the problem (where I use the Clay Mathematics Institute and their prize as the usual statement), the hypothesis is that all the zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function occur on the line $Re(s) = 1/2$.
With respect to your first question, the Riemann Zeta Function is traditionally used in one proof of the Prime Number Theorem (which states the asymptotic density of primes). In this way, it gives that there are infinitely many primes.
Alternatively, as pointed out by N.S. in the comments, the fact that $zeta(1) = infty$ is a direct statement that there are infinitely many primes. And 'calculating' this is not so bad, as long as you know that the harmonic series diverges and that $sumlimits frac{1}{n} = prod_p frac{1}{1 - p^{-1}}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is easy to lose track of the Riemann Hypothesis behind all the noise about the Riemann Hypothesis. But following the usual statement of the problem (where I use the Clay Mathematics Institute and their prize as the usual statement), the hypothesis is that all the zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function occur on the line $Re(s) = 1/2$.
With respect to your first question, the Riemann Zeta Function is traditionally used in one proof of the Prime Number Theorem (which states the asymptotic density of primes). In this way, it gives that there are infinitely many primes.
Alternatively, as pointed out by N.S. in the comments, the fact that $zeta(1) = infty$ is a direct statement that there are infinitely many primes. And 'calculating' this is not so bad, as long as you know that the harmonic series diverges and that $sumlimits frac{1}{n} = prod_p frac{1}{1 - p^{-1}}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is easy to lose track of the Riemann Hypothesis behind all the noise about the Riemann Hypothesis. But following the usual statement of the problem (where I use the Clay Mathematics Institute and their prize as the usual statement), the hypothesis is that all the zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function occur on the line $Re(s) = 1/2$.
With respect to your first question, the Riemann Zeta Function is traditionally used in one proof of the Prime Number Theorem (which states the asymptotic density of primes). In this way, it gives that there are infinitely many primes.
Alternatively, as pointed out by N.S. in the comments, the fact that $zeta(1) = infty$ is a direct statement that there are infinitely many primes. And 'calculating' this is not so bad, as long as you know that the harmonic series diverges and that $sumlimits frac{1}{n} = prod_p frac{1}{1 - p^{-1}}$.
$endgroup$
It is easy to lose track of the Riemann Hypothesis behind all the noise about the Riemann Hypothesis. But following the usual statement of the problem (where I use the Clay Mathematics Institute and their prize as the usual statement), the hypothesis is that all the zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function occur on the line $Re(s) = 1/2$.
With respect to your first question, the Riemann Zeta Function is traditionally used in one proof of the Prime Number Theorem (which states the asymptotic density of primes). In this way, it gives that there are infinitely many primes.
Alternatively, as pointed out by N.S. in the comments, the fact that $zeta(1) = infty$ is a direct statement that there are infinitely many primes. And 'calculating' this is not so bad, as long as you know that the harmonic series diverges and that $sumlimits frac{1}{n} = prod_p frac{1}{1 - p^{-1}}$.
edited Dec 22 '11 at 1:23
J. M. is not a mathematician
60.9k5151290
60.9k5151290
answered Dec 21 '11 at 22:26
davidlowryduda♦davidlowryduda
74.5k7118253
74.5k7118253
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f92976%2fprimes-and-riemann-zeta-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
For 2, see this and this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:07
2
$begingroup$
Q2: Which function? If zeta, of course, the RH is about the zeroes of the zeta function.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:08
2
$begingroup$
$zeta(1)= prod_{p {rm prime}} frac{1}{1- frac{1}{p}} = infty $ This guarantees that there are infinitely many primes... Also PNT is usually proven using properties of the RH..... Last but not least, if there would be finitely many primes then the Euler product would be finite, thus "convergent" everywhere... Which would imply many things known not to be true (for example that $zeta$ has no zero)...
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 20 '11 at 16:12
$begingroup$
For 1, see this.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Dec 20 '11 at 16:13
1
$begingroup$
I'm sorry. I do not search for a tag on "Riemann-function Zenta." There execelentes answers in this tag.
$endgroup$
– MathOverview
Dec 20 '11 at 16:30