Why it is needed to show $X$ is a subspace of $Y$ in the one point compactification theorem?
$begingroup$
Why it is needed to show $X$ is a subspace of $Y$ in the one point compactification theorem?
The Theorem is the following.
" X be a space. Then $X$ is locally compact Hausdorff iff there exists a space $Y$ satisfying the following conditions
1) $X$ is a subspace of $Y$.
2) The set $Y-X$ consists of single point.
3) $Y$ is a compact Hausdorff space. "
$X$ is a subset of $Y$ . Then why $X$ is not becoming naturally a subspace of $Y$?
Can anyone please make me understand ?
general-topology compactness
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why it is needed to show $X$ is a subspace of $Y$ in the one point compactification theorem?
The Theorem is the following.
" X be a space. Then $X$ is locally compact Hausdorff iff there exists a space $Y$ satisfying the following conditions
1) $X$ is a subspace of $Y$.
2) The set $Y-X$ consists of single point.
3) $Y$ is a compact Hausdorff space. "
$X$ is a subset of $Y$ . Then why $X$ is not becoming naturally a subspace of $Y$?
Can anyone please make me understand ?
general-topology compactness
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why it is needed to show $X$ is a subspace of $Y$ in the one point compactification theorem?
The Theorem is the following.
" X be a space. Then $X$ is locally compact Hausdorff iff there exists a space $Y$ satisfying the following conditions
1) $X$ is a subspace of $Y$.
2) The set $Y-X$ consists of single point.
3) $Y$ is a compact Hausdorff space. "
$X$ is a subset of $Y$ . Then why $X$ is not becoming naturally a subspace of $Y$?
Can anyone please make me understand ?
general-topology compactness
$endgroup$
Why it is needed to show $X$ is a subspace of $Y$ in the one point compactification theorem?
The Theorem is the following.
" X be a space. Then $X$ is locally compact Hausdorff iff there exists a space $Y$ satisfying the following conditions
1) $X$ is a subspace of $Y$.
2) The set $Y-X$ consists of single point.
3) $Y$ is a compact Hausdorff space. "
$X$ is a subset of $Y$ . Then why $X$ is not becoming naturally a subspace of $Y$?
Can anyone please make me understand ?
general-topology compactness
general-topology compactness
edited Dec 30 '18 at 16:23
Henno Brandsma
111k348118
111k348118
asked Dec 30 '18 at 15:30
cmicmi
1,121312
1,121312
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You start with a space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ where $X$ denotes the underlying set and $tau_X$ denotes a topology on this set.
Now a locally compact Hausdorff space $mathbf Y=(Y,tau_Y)$ might exist such that $Xsubseteq Y$ and $Y-X$ is a singleton, but that on its own says at most that $Y$ is compactification of space $(X,rho)$ where $rho$ denotes the subspace topology on $X$ inherited from $mathbf Y$.
So it says nothing yet about our original space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$.
To make that change it must be demanded that $tau_X$ and $rho$ coincide or equivalently that $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ is a subspace of $mathbf Y$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056935%2fwhy-it-is-needed-to-show-x-is-a-subspace-of-y-in-the-one-point-compactificat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You start with a space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ where $X$ denotes the underlying set and $tau_X$ denotes a topology on this set.
Now a locally compact Hausdorff space $mathbf Y=(Y,tau_Y)$ might exist such that $Xsubseteq Y$ and $Y-X$ is a singleton, but that on its own says at most that $Y$ is compactification of space $(X,rho)$ where $rho$ denotes the subspace topology on $X$ inherited from $mathbf Y$.
So it says nothing yet about our original space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$.
To make that change it must be demanded that $tau_X$ and $rho$ coincide or equivalently that $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ is a subspace of $mathbf Y$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You start with a space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ where $X$ denotes the underlying set and $tau_X$ denotes a topology on this set.
Now a locally compact Hausdorff space $mathbf Y=(Y,tau_Y)$ might exist such that $Xsubseteq Y$ and $Y-X$ is a singleton, but that on its own says at most that $Y$ is compactification of space $(X,rho)$ where $rho$ denotes the subspace topology on $X$ inherited from $mathbf Y$.
So it says nothing yet about our original space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$.
To make that change it must be demanded that $tau_X$ and $rho$ coincide or equivalently that $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ is a subspace of $mathbf Y$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You start with a space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ where $X$ denotes the underlying set and $tau_X$ denotes a topology on this set.
Now a locally compact Hausdorff space $mathbf Y=(Y,tau_Y)$ might exist such that $Xsubseteq Y$ and $Y-X$ is a singleton, but that on its own says at most that $Y$ is compactification of space $(X,rho)$ where $rho$ denotes the subspace topology on $X$ inherited from $mathbf Y$.
So it says nothing yet about our original space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$.
To make that change it must be demanded that $tau_X$ and $rho$ coincide or equivalently that $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ is a subspace of $mathbf Y$.
$endgroup$
You start with a space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ where $X$ denotes the underlying set and $tau_X$ denotes a topology on this set.
Now a locally compact Hausdorff space $mathbf Y=(Y,tau_Y)$ might exist such that $Xsubseteq Y$ and $Y-X$ is a singleton, but that on its own says at most that $Y$ is compactification of space $(X,rho)$ where $rho$ denotes the subspace topology on $X$ inherited from $mathbf Y$.
So it says nothing yet about our original space $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$.
To make that change it must be demanded that $tau_X$ and $rho$ coincide or equivalently that $mathbf X=(X,tau_X)$ is a subspace of $mathbf Y$.
edited Dec 30 '18 at 16:03
answered Dec 30 '18 at 15:55
drhabdrhab
102k545136
102k545136
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056935%2fwhy-it-is-needed-to-show-x-is-a-subspace-of-y-in-the-one-point-compactificat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown