homotopy and (co)filtered limits
Suppose we have a (co)filtered digaram $dots rightarrow X_{2}rightarrow X_{1}$ of topological space. Is is true that the natural map $pi_{0}[lim X_{i}]rightarrow lim pi_{0}(X_{i})$ is an isomorphism ?
at.algebraic-topology homotopy-theory
add a comment |
Suppose we have a (co)filtered digaram $dots rightarrow X_{2}rightarrow X_{1}$ of topological space. Is is true that the natural map $pi_{0}[lim X_{i}]rightarrow lim pi_{0}(X_{i})$ is an isomorphism ?
at.algebraic-topology homotopy-theory
7
No. For example, take all your $X_i$ to be the $1$-sphere, and all the maps the degree $2$ map. The limit is actually not pathconnected.
– Achim Krause
Dec 6 at 21:20
add a comment |
Suppose we have a (co)filtered digaram $dots rightarrow X_{2}rightarrow X_{1}$ of topological space. Is is true that the natural map $pi_{0}[lim X_{i}]rightarrow lim pi_{0}(X_{i})$ is an isomorphism ?
at.algebraic-topology homotopy-theory
Suppose we have a (co)filtered digaram $dots rightarrow X_{2}rightarrow X_{1}$ of topological space. Is is true that the natural map $pi_{0}[lim X_{i}]rightarrow lim pi_{0}(X_{i})$ is an isomorphism ?
at.algebraic-topology homotopy-theory
at.algebraic-topology homotopy-theory
edited Dec 7 at 14:58
Rad80
1032
1032
asked Dec 6 at 20:23
Ofra
582520
582520
7
No. For example, take all your $X_i$ to be the $1$-sphere, and all the maps the degree $2$ map. The limit is actually not pathconnected.
– Achim Krause
Dec 6 at 21:20
add a comment |
7
No. For example, take all your $X_i$ to be the $1$-sphere, and all the maps the degree $2$ map. The limit is actually not pathconnected.
– Achim Krause
Dec 6 at 21:20
7
7
No. For example, take all your $X_i$ to be the $1$-sphere, and all the maps the degree $2$ map. The limit is actually not pathconnected.
– Achim Krause
Dec 6 at 21:20
No. For example, take all your $X_i$ to be the $1$-sphere, and all the maps the degree $2$ map. The limit is actually not pathconnected.
– Achim Krause
Dec 6 at 21:20
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This is not true, for two distinct reasons.
The first is that the inverse system of spaces may not behave well homotopy-theoretically. If $X_n = [n, infty) subset Bbb R$, then the limit of $dots to X_2 to X_1 to X_0$ is empty. However, on path components it is the constant system $dots to * to * to *$, with limit $*$. Roughly, you might have a path component that is represented by any space $X_i$ that is not represented by any compatible system of points. This might make $pi_0 lim X_i to lim pi_0 X_i$ not surjective.
The second is the opposite: the map $pi_0 lim X_i to lim pi_0 X_i$ may not be injective. In this case, you may have two points $x$ and $y$ in the limit such that the images in any individual $x_i$ are connected by a path, but where no path can be compatibly lifted all the way up the tower. For example, if $f:S^1 to S^1$ is a degree-2 covering map, then the limit of the tower $$dots xrightarrow{f} S^1 xrightarrow{f} S^1 xrightarrow{f} S^1$$ is called the 2-adic solenoid and it has uncountably many path components.
The first problem goes away if the maps $X_i to X_{i-1}$ are fibrations, and in this case we often call the limit a homotopy limit. The second problem does not go away in this case, but Milnor proved that $pi_0 lim X_i$ is built out of two terms: $lim(pi_0 X_i)$ and a second term called $lim^1(pi_1 X_i)$. In particular, if the spaces $X_i$ are simply-connected then there are no contributions from the second term, and so there will be an isomorphism $pi_0(lim X_i) to lim pi_0(X_i)$.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f317065%2fhomotopy-and-cofiltered-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is not true, for two distinct reasons.
The first is that the inverse system of spaces may not behave well homotopy-theoretically. If $X_n = [n, infty) subset Bbb R$, then the limit of $dots to X_2 to X_1 to X_0$ is empty. However, on path components it is the constant system $dots to * to * to *$, with limit $*$. Roughly, you might have a path component that is represented by any space $X_i$ that is not represented by any compatible system of points. This might make $pi_0 lim X_i to lim pi_0 X_i$ not surjective.
The second is the opposite: the map $pi_0 lim X_i to lim pi_0 X_i$ may not be injective. In this case, you may have two points $x$ and $y$ in the limit such that the images in any individual $x_i$ are connected by a path, but where no path can be compatibly lifted all the way up the tower. For example, if $f:S^1 to S^1$ is a degree-2 covering map, then the limit of the tower $$dots xrightarrow{f} S^1 xrightarrow{f} S^1 xrightarrow{f} S^1$$ is called the 2-adic solenoid and it has uncountably many path components.
The first problem goes away if the maps $X_i to X_{i-1}$ are fibrations, and in this case we often call the limit a homotopy limit. The second problem does not go away in this case, but Milnor proved that $pi_0 lim X_i$ is built out of two terms: $lim(pi_0 X_i)$ and a second term called $lim^1(pi_1 X_i)$. In particular, if the spaces $X_i$ are simply-connected then there are no contributions from the second term, and so there will be an isomorphism $pi_0(lim X_i) to lim pi_0(X_i)$.
add a comment |
This is not true, for two distinct reasons.
The first is that the inverse system of spaces may not behave well homotopy-theoretically. If $X_n = [n, infty) subset Bbb R$, then the limit of $dots to X_2 to X_1 to X_0$ is empty. However, on path components it is the constant system $dots to * to * to *$, with limit $*$. Roughly, you might have a path component that is represented by any space $X_i$ that is not represented by any compatible system of points. This might make $pi_0 lim X_i to lim pi_0 X_i$ not surjective.
The second is the opposite: the map $pi_0 lim X_i to lim pi_0 X_i$ may not be injective. In this case, you may have two points $x$ and $y$ in the limit such that the images in any individual $x_i$ are connected by a path, but where no path can be compatibly lifted all the way up the tower. For example, if $f:S^1 to S^1$ is a degree-2 covering map, then the limit of the tower $$dots xrightarrow{f} S^1 xrightarrow{f} S^1 xrightarrow{f} S^1$$ is called the 2-adic solenoid and it has uncountably many path components.
The first problem goes away if the maps $X_i to X_{i-1}$ are fibrations, and in this case we often call the limit a homotopy limit. The second problem does not go away in this case, but Milnor proved that $pi_0 lim X_i$ is built out of two terms: $lim(pi_0 X_i)$ and a second term called $lim^1(pi_1 X_i)$. In particular, if the spaces $X_i$ are simply-connected then there are no contributions from the second term, and so there will be an isomorphism $pi_0(lim X_i) to lim pi_0(X_i)$.
add a comment |
This is not true, for two distinct reasons.
The first is that the inverse system of spaces may not behave well homotopy-theoretically. If $X_n = [n, infty) subset Bbb R$, then the limit of $dots to X_2 to X_1 to X_0$ is empty. However, on path components it is the constant system $dots to * to * to *$, with limit $*$. Roughly, you might have a path component that is represented by any space $X_i$ that is not represented by any compatible system of points. This might make $pi_0 lim X_i to lim pi_0 X_i$ not surjective.
The second is the opposite: the map $pi_0 lim X_i to lim pi_0 X_i$ may not be injective. In this case, you may have two points $x$ and $y$ in the limit such that the images in any individual $x_i$ are connected by a path, but where no path can be compatibly lifted all the way up the tower. For example, if $f:S^1 to S^1$ is a degree-2 covering map, then the limit of the tower $$dots xrightarrow{f} S^1 xrightarrow{f} S^1 xrightarrow{f} S^1$$ is called the 2-adic solenoid and it has uncountably many path components.
The first problem goes away if the maps $X_i to X_{i-1}$ are fibrations, and in this case we often call the limit a homotopy limit. The second problem does not go away in this case, but Milnor proved that $pi_0 lim X_i$ is built out of two terms: $lim(pi_0 X_i)$ and a second term called $lim^1(pi_1 X_i)$. In particular, if the spaces $X_i$ are simply-connected then there are no contributions from the second term, and so there will be an isomorphism $pi_0(lim X_i) to lim pi_0(X_i)$.
This is not true, for two distinct reasons.
The first is that the inverse system of spaces may not behave well homotopy-theoretically. If $X_n = [n, infty) subset Bbb R$, then the limit of $dots to X_2 to X_1 to X_0$ is empty. However, on path components it is the constant system $dots to * to * to *$, with limit $*$. Roughly, you might have a path component that is represented by any space $X_i$ that is not represented by any compatible system of points. This might make $pi_0 lim X_i to lim pi_0 X_i$ not surjective.
The second is the opposite: the map $pi_0 lim X_i to lim pi_0 X_i$ may not be injective. In this case, you may have two points $x$ and $y$ in the limit such that the images in any individual $x_i$ are connected by a path, but where no path can be compatibly lifted all the way up the tower. For example, if $f:S^1 to S^1$ is a degree-2 covering map, then the limit of the tower $$dots xrightarrow{f} S^1 xrightarrow{f} S^1 xrightarrow{f} S^1$$ is called the 2-adic solenoid and it has uncountably many path components.
The first problem goes away if the maps $X_i to X_{i-1}$ are fibrations, and in this case we often call the limit a homotopy limit. The second problem does not go away in this case, but Milnor proved that $pi_0 lim X_i$ is built out of two terms: $lim(pi_0 X_i)$ and a second term called $lim^1(pi_1 X_i)$. In particular, if the spaces $X_i$ are simply-connected then there are no contributions from the second term, and so there will be an isomorphism $pi_0(lim X_i) to lim pi_0(X_i)$.
answered Dec 6 at 21:26
Tyler Lawson
38.9k8134198
38.9k8134198
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f317065%2fhomotopy-and-cofiltered-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
7
No. For example, take all your $X_i$ to be the $1$-sphere, and all the maps the degree $2$ map. The limit is actually not pathconnected.
– Achim Krause
Dec 6 at 21:20