Issue with @ifl@ter and expl3 date style
I use MiKTeX on windows and am currently having trouble loading expl3. I recently updated the LaTeX3 packages. The following code is sufficient to generate the error:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{expl3}
begin{document}
test
end{document}
To which latex replies:
! Missing = inserted for ifnum.
<to be read again>
-
l.3 begin
{document}
I uninstalled and reinstalled both l3kernel
and l3packages
. MiKTeX Package Manager reports that l3kernel
is "Packaged on" 2018-11-22 and "Installed on" 2018-12-05 and that l3packages
is "Packaged on" 2018-10-18 and "Installed on" 2018-12-05. Maybe the issue has to do with the different dates they are "Packaged on"? I haven't looked at the diff between the two versions.
Anyways, throwing a tracingall
in before usepackage{expl3}
I get:
.... 40 megabyes of text
@ifl@t@r #1#2->ifnum expandafter @parse@version #1//00@nil <expandafter
@parse@version #2//00@nil expandafter @secondoftwo else expandafter @firs
toftwo fi
#1<-ver@expl3.sty
#2<-
{ifnum: (level 1) entered on line 9}
{expandafter}
ver@expl3.sty ->2018-11-19 L3 programming layer (loader)
@parse@version #1/#2/#3#4#5@nil ->#1#2#3#4
#1<-2018-11-19 L3 programming layer (loader)
#2<-
#3<-0
#4<-0
#5<-
! Missing = inserted for ifnum.
<to be read again>
-
So the issue is that the innermost macro of @ifpackagelater
called @ifl@ter
is expecting expl3
to report its date as e.g., 2018/11/19
but it's reported as 2018-11-19
with dashes instead of slashes. For now, I can get code to run by saying:
documentclass{article}
makeatletter
letsave@ifl@ter@ifl@ter
def@ifl@ter#1#2#3#4#5{} % Temporarily dummy out @ifl@ter
usepackage{expl3} % load package
let@ifl@tersave@ifl@ter % Restore @ifl@ter
% This would break with the same error as before:
%@ifpackagelater{expl3}{10/10/2018}{message{yes}}{message{no}}
makeatother
begin{document}
test
end{document}
packages expl3
|
show 1 more comment
I use MiKTeX on windows and am currently having trouble loading expl3. I recently updated the LaTeX3 packages. The following code is sufficient to generate the error:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{expl3}
begin{document}
test
end{document}
To which latex replies:
! Missing = inserted for ifnum.
<to be read again>
-
l.3 begin
{document}
I uninstalled and reinstalled both l3kernel
and l3packages
. MiKTeX Package Manager reports that l3kernel
is "Packaged on" 2018-11-22 and "Installed on" 2018-12-05 and that l3packages
is "Packaged on" 2018-10-18 and "Installed on" 2018-12-05. Maybe the issue has to do with the different dates they are "Packaged on"? I haven't looked at the diff between the two versions.
Anyways, throwing a tracingall
in before usepackage{expl3}
I get:
.... 40 megabyes of text
@ifl@t@r #1#2->ifnum expandafter @parse@version #1//00@nil <expandafter
@parse@version #2//00@nil expandafter @secondoftwo else expandafter @firs
toftwo fi
#1<-ver@expl3.sty
#2<-
{ifnum: (level 1) entered on line 9}
{expandafter}
ver@expl3.sty ->2018-11-19 L3 programming layer (loader)
@parse@version #1/#2/#3#4#5@nil ->#1#2#3#4
#1<-2018-11-19 L3 programming layer (loader)
#2<-
#3<-0
#4<-0
#5<-
! Missing = inserted for ifnum.
<to be read again>
-
So the issue is that the innermost macro of @ifpackagelater
called @ifl@ter
is expecting expl3
to report its date as e.g., 2018/11/19
but it's reported as 2018-11-19
with dashes instead of slashes. For now, I can get code to run by saying:
documentclass{article}
makeatletter
letsave@ifl@ter@ifl@ter
def@ifl@ter#1#2#3#4#5{} % Temporarily dummy out @ifl@ter
usepackage{expl3} % load package
let@ifl@tersave@ifl@ter % Restore @ifl@ter
% This would break with the same error as before:
%@ifpackagelater{expl3}{10/10/2018}{message{yes}}{message{no}}
makeatother
begin{document}
test
end{document}
packages expl3
1
Tha LaTeX kernel got updated and replaced the date format fromdd/mm/yyyy
todd-mm-yyyy
. You probably should update the LaTeX kernel as well.
– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 18:41
How do I do that? Does mpm have an entry for the latex kernel? Searching for "kernel" the only package that turns up isl3kernel
.
– Hood Chatham
Dec 6 at 18:44
2
@HoodChatham It will be listed just aslatex
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 6 at 18:47
3
run the update manager as user and as admin.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 6 at 18:47
1
Probably related: tex.stackexchange.com/q/422176/35864
– moewe
Dec 6 at 20:32
|
show 1 more comment
I use MiKTeX on windows and am currently having trouble loading expl3. I recently updated the LaTeX3 packages. The following code is sufficient to generate the error:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{expl3}
begin{document}
test
end{document}
To which latex replies:
! Missing = inserted for ifnum.
<to be read again>
-
l.3 begin
{document}
I uninstalled and reinstalled both l3kernel
and l3packages
. MiKTeX Package Manager reports that l3kernel
is "Packaged on" 2018-11-22 and "Installed on" 2018-12-05 and that l3packages
is "Packaged on" 2018-10-18 and "Installed on" 2018-12-05. Maybe the issue has to do with the different dates they are "Packaged on"? I haven't looked at the diff between the two versions.
Anyways, throwing a tracingall
in before usepackage{expl3}
I get:
.... 40 megabyes of text
@ifl@t@r #1#2->ifnum expandafter @parse@version #1//00@nil <expandafter
@parse@version #2//00@nil expandafter @secondoftwo else expandafter @firs
toftwo fi
#1<-ver@expl3.sty
#2<-
{ifnum: (level 1) entered on line 9}
{expandafter}
ver@expl3.sty ->2018-11-19 L3 programming layer (loader)
@parse@version #1/#2/#3#4#5@nil ->#1#2#3#4
#1<-2018-11-19 L3 programming layer (loader)
#2<-
#3<-0
#4<-0
#5<-
! Missing = inserted for ifnum.
<to be read again>
-
So the issue is that the innermost macro of @ifpackagelater
called @ifl@ter
is expecting expl3
to report its date as e.g., 2018/11/19
but it's reported as 2018-11-19
with dashes instead of slashes. For now, I can get code to run by saying:
documentclass{article}
makeatletter
letsave@ifl@ter@ifl@ter
def@ifl@ter#1#2#3#4#5{} % Temporarily dummy out @ifl@ter
usepackage{expl3} % load package
let@ifl@tersave@ifl@ter % Restore @ifl@ter
% This would break with the same error as before:
%@ifpackagelater{expl3}{10/10/2018}{message{yes}}{message{no}}
makeatother
begin{document}
test
end{document}
packages expl3
I use MiKTeX on windows and am currently having trouble loading expl3. I recently updated the LaTeX3 packages. The following code is sufficient to generate the error:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{expl3}
begin{document}
test
end{document}
To which latex replies:
! Missing = inserted for ifnum.
<to be read again>
-
l.3 begin
{document}
I uninstalled and reinstalled both l3kernel
and l3packages
. MiKTeX Package Manager reports that l3kernel
is "Packaged on" 2018-11-22 and "Installed on" 2018-12-05 and that l3packages
is "Packaged on" 2018-10-18 and "Installed on" 2018-12-05. Maybe the issue has to do with the different dates they are "Packaged on"? I haven't looked at the diff between the two versions.
Anyways, throwing a tracingall
in before usepackage{expl3}
I get:
.... 40 megabyes of text
@ifl@t@r #1#2->ifnum expandafter @parse@version #1//00@nil <expandafter
@parse@version #2//00@nil expandafter @secondoftwo else expandafter @firs
toftwo fi
#1<-ver@expl3.sty
#2<-
{ifnum: (level 1) entered on line 9}
{expandafter}
ver@expl3.sty ->2018-11-19 L3 programming layer (loader)
@parse@version #1/#2/#3#4#5@nil ->#1#2#3#4
#1<-2018-11-19 L3 programming layer (loader)
#2<-
#3<-0
#4<-0
#5<-
! Missing = inserted for ifnum.
<to be read again>
-
So the issue is that the innermost macro of @ifpackagelater
called @ifl@ter
is expecting expl3
to report its date as e.g., 2018/11/19
but it's reported as 2018-11-19
with dashes instead of slashes. For now, I can get code to run by saying:
documentclass{article}
makeatletter
letsave@ifl@ter@ifl@ter
def@ifl@ter#1#2#3#4#5{} % Temporarily dummy out @ifl@ter
usepackage{expl3} % load package
let@ifl@tersave@ifl@ter % Restore @ifl@ter
% This would break with the same error as before:
%@ifpackagelater{expl3}{10/10/2018}{message{yes}}{message{no}}
makeatother
begin{document}
test
end{document}
packages expl3
packages expl3
edited Dec 6 at 18:39
Phelype Oleinik
21.3k54380
21.3k54380
asked Dec 6 at 18:37
Hood Chatham
4,1021227
4,1021227
1
Tha LaTeX kernel got updated and replaced the date format fromdd/mm/yyyy
todd-mm-yyyy
. You probably should update the LaTeX kernel as well.
– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 18:41
How do I do that? Does mpm have an entry for the latex kernel? Searching for "kernel" the only package that turns up isl3kernel
.
– Hood Chatham
Dec 6 at 18:44
2
@HoodChatham It will be listed just aslatex
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 6 at 18:47
3
run the update manager as user and as admin.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 6 at 18:47
1
Probably related: tex.stackexchange.com/q/422176/35864
– moewe
Dec 6 at 20:32
|
show 1 more comment
1
Tha LaTeX kernel got updated and replaced the date format fromdd/mm/yyyy
todd-mm-yyyy
. You probably should update the LaTeX kernel as well.
– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 18:41
How do I do that? Does mpm have an entry for the latex kernel? Searching for "kernel" the only package that turns up isl3kernel
.
– Hood Chatham
Dec 6 at 18:44
2
@HoodChatham It will be listed just aslatex
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 6 at 18:47
3
run the update manager as user and as admin.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 6 at 18:47
1
Probably related: tex.stackexchange.com/q/422176/35864
– moewe
Dec 6 at 20:32
1
1
Tha LaTeX kernel got updated and replaced the date format from
dd/mm/yyyy
to dd-mm-yyyy
. You probably should update the LaTeX kernel as well.– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 18:41
Tha LaTeX kernel got updated and replaced the date format from
dd/mm/yyyy
to dd-mm-yyyy
. You probably should update the LaTeX kernel as well.– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 18:41
How do I do that? Does mpm have an entry for the latex kernel? Searching for "kernel" the only package that turns up is
l3kernel
.– Hood Chatham
Dec 6 at 18:44
How do I do that? Does mpm have an entry for the latex kernel? Searching for "kernel" the only package that turns up is
l3kernel
.– Hood Chatham
Dec 6 at 18:44
2
2
@HoodChatham It will be listed just as
latex
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 6 at 18:47
@HoodChatham It will be listed just as
latex
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 6 at 18:47
3
3
run the update manager as user and as admin.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 6 at 18:47
run the update manager as user and as admin.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 6 at 18:47
1
1
Probably related: tex.stackexchange.com/q/422176/35864
– moewe
Dec 6 at 20:32
Probably related: tex.stackexchange.com/q/422176/35864
– moewe
Dec 6 at 20:32
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The LaTeX kernel got updated in April, 2017 to use the ISO 8601 date format yyyy-mm-dd
instead of a format Frank invented :)
You have to update your LaTeX kernel to a newer version so that the date format in expl3
works. It's always better to update all packages together, or these conflicts might happen.
If you can't update for whatever reason, you can use the newer date parser (code tested with an up-to-date (Dec 6th, 2018) expl3
with the LaTeX kernel of TeXLive 2015):
documentclass{article}
makeatletter
def@ifl@t@r#1#2{%
ifnumexpandafter@parse@version@#1//00@nil<%
expandafter@parse@version@#2//00@nil
expandafter@secondoftwo
else
expandafter@firstoftwo
fi}
def@parse@version@#1{@parse@version0#1}
def@parse@version#1/#2/#3#4#5@nil{%
@parse@version@dash#1-#2-#3#4@nil
}
def@parse@version@dash#1-#2-#3#4#5@nil{%
ifrelax#2relaxelse#1fi#2#3#4 }
makeatother
usepackage{expl3}
begin{document}
hello
end{document}
begin{nitpick}
You did meanyyyy-mm-dd
, didn't you?end{nitpick}
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Dec 6 at 19:26
@HaraldHanche-Olsenbegin{thanks}
Oops, you're right :)end{thanks}
– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 19:34
I think theYYYY-MM-DD
format has been supported since 2017 (latex-project.org/news/latex2e-news/ltnews27.pdf).latexrelease
may also help here.
– moewe
Dec 6 at 20:33
@moewe Indeed. I hadn't found thisltnews
before. Thanks :)
– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 21:29
1
nice to see my inventions being commented on :-) but I made more important ones I hope
– Frank Mittelbach
Dec 8 at 13:18
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463566%2fissue-with-iflter-and-expl3-date-style%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The LaTeX kernel got updated in April, 2017 to use the ISO 8601 date format yyyy-mm-dd
instead of a format Frank invented :)
You have to update your LaTeX kernel to a newer version so that the date format in expl3
works. It's always better to update all packages together, or these conflicts might happen.
If you can't update for whatever reason, you can use the newer date parser (code tested with an up-to-date (Dec 6th, 2018) expl3
with the LaTeX kernel of TeXLive 2015):
documentclass{article}
makeatletter
def@ifl@t@r#1#2{%
ifnumexpandafter@parse@version@#1//00@nil<%
expandafter@parse@version@#2//00@nil
expandafter@secondoftwo
else
expandafter@firstoftwo
fi}
def@parse@version@#1{@parse@version0#1}
def@parse@version#1/#2/#3#4#5@nil{%
@parse@version@dash#1-#2-#3#4@nil
}
def@parse@version@dash#1-#2-#3#4#5@nil{%
ifrelax#2relaxelse#1fi#2#3#4 }
makeatother
usepackage{expl3}
begin{document}
hello
end{document}
begin{nitpick}
You did meanyyyy-mm-dd
, didn't you?end{nitpick}
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Dec 6 at 19:26
@HaraldHanche-Olsenbegin{thanks}
Oops, you're right :)end{thanks}
– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 19:34
I think theYYYY-MM-DD
format has been supported since 2017 (latex-project.org/news/latex2e-news/ltnews27.pdf).latexrelease
may also help here.
– moewe
Dec 6 at 20:33
@moewe Indeed. I hadn't found thisltnews
before. Thanks :)
– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 21:29
1
nice to see my inventions being commented on :-) but I made more important ones I hope
– Frank Mittelbach
Dec 8 at 13:18
add a comment |
The LaTeX kernel got updated in April, 2017 to use the ISO 8601 date format yyyy-mm-dd
instead of a format Frank invented :)
You have to update your LaTeX kernel to a newer version so that the date format in expl3
works. It's always better to update all packages together, or these conflicts might happen.
If you can't update for whatever reason, you can use the newer date parser (code tested with an up-to-date (Dec 6th, 2018) expl3
with the LaTeX kernel of TeXLive 2015):
documentclass{article}
makeatletter
def@ifl@t@r#1#2{%
ifnumexpandafter@parse@version@#1//00@nil<%
expandafter@parse@version@#2//00@nil
expandafter@secondoftwo
else
expandafter@firstoftwo
fi}
def@parse@version@#1{@parse@version0#1}
def@parse@version#1/#2/#3#4#5@nil{%
@parse@version@dash#1-#2-#3#4@nil
}
def@parse@version@dash#1-#2-#3#4#5@nil{%
ifrelax#2relaxelse#1fi#2#3#4 }
makeatother
usepackage{expl3}
begin{document}
hello
end{document}
begin{nitpick}
You did meanyyyy-mm-dd
, didn't you?end{nitpick}
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Dec 6 at 19:26
@HaraldHanche-Olsenbegin{thanks}
Oops, you're right :)end{thanks}
– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 19:34
I think theYYYY-MM-DD
format has been supported since 2017 (latex-project.org/news/latex2e-news/ltnews27.pdf).latexrelease
may also help here.
– moewe
Dec 6 at 20:33
@moewe Indeed. I hadn't found thisltnews
before. Thanks :)
– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 21:29
1
nice to see my inventions being commented on :-) but I made more important ones I hope
– Frank Mittelbach
Dec 8 at 13:18
add a comment |
The LaTeX kernel got updated in April, 2017 to use the ISO 8601 date format yyyy-mm-dd
instead of a format Frank invented :)
You have to update your LaTeX kernel to a newer version so that the date format in expl3
works. It's always better to update all packages together, or these conflicts might happen.
If you can't update for whatever reason, you can use the newer date parser (code tested with an up-to-date (Dec 6th, 2018) expl3
with the LaTeX kernel of TeXLive 2015):
documentclass{article}
makeatletter
def@ifl@t@r#1#2{%
ifnumexpandafter@parse@version@#1//00@nil<%
expandafter@parse@version@#2//00@nil
expandafter@secondoftwo
else
expandafter@firstoftwo
fi}
def@parse@version@#1{@parse@version0#1}
def@parse@version#1/#2/#3#4#5@nil{%
@parse@version@dash#1-#2-#3#4@nil
}
def@parse@version@dash#1-#2-#3#4#5@nil{%
ifrelax#2relaxelse#1fi#2#3#4 }
makeatother
usepackage{expl3}
begin{document}
hello
end{document}
The LaTeX kernel got updated in April, 2017 to use the ISO 8601 date format yyyy-mm-dd
instead of a format Frank invented :)
You have to update your LaTeX kernel to a newer version so that the date format in expl3
works. It's always better to update all packages together, or these conflicts might happen.
If you can't update for whatever reason, you can use the newer date parser (code tested with an up-to-date (Dec 6th, 2018) expl3
with the LaTeX kernel of TeXLive 2015):
documentclass{article}
makeatletter
def@ifl@t@r#1#2{%
ifnumexpandafter@parse@version@#1//00@nil<%
expandafter@parse@version@#2//00@nil
expandafter@secondoftwo
else
expandafter@firstoftwo
fi}
def@parse@version@#1{@parse@version0#1}
def@parse@version#1/#2/#3#4#5@nil{%
@parse@version@dash#1-#2-#3#4@nil
}
def@parse@version@dash#1-#2-#3#4#5@nil{%
ifrelax#2relaxelse#1fi#2#3#4 }
makeatother
usepackage{expl3}
begin{document}
hello
end{document}
edited Dec 6 at 21:28
answered Dec 6 at 18:55
Phelype Oleinik
21.3k54380
21.3k54380
begin{nitpick}
You did meanyyyy-mm-dd
, didn't you?end{nitpick}
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Dec 6 at 19:26
@HaraldHanche-Olsenbegin{thanks}
Oops, you're right :)end{thanks}
– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 19:34
I think theYYYY-MM-DD
format has been supported since 2017 (latex-project.org/news/latex2e-news/ltnews27.pdf).latexrelease
may also help here.
– moewe
Dec 6 at 20:33
@moewe Indeed. I hadn't found thisltnews
before. Thanks :)
– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 21:29
1
nice to see my inventions being commented on :-) but I made more important ones I hope
– Frank Mittelbach
Dec 8 at 13:18
add a comment |
begin{nitpick}
You did meanyyyy-mm-dd
, didn't you?end{nitpick}
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Dec 6 at 19:26
@HaraldHanche-Olsenbegin{thanks}
Oops, you're right :)end{thanks}
– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 19:34
I think theYYYY-MM-DD
format has been supported since 2017 (latex-project.org/news/latex2e-news/ltnews27.pdf).latexrelease
may also help here.
– moewe
Dec 6 at 20:33
@moewe Indeed. I hadn't found thisltnews
before. Thanks :)
– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 21:29
1
nice to see my inventions being commented on :-) but I made more important ones I hope
– Frank Mittelbach
Dec 8 at 13:18
begin{nitpick}
You did mean yyyy-mm-dd
, didn't you? end{nitpick}
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Dec 6 at 19:26
begin{nitpick}
You did mean yyyy-mm-dd
, didn't you? end{nitpick}
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Dec 6 at 19:26
@HaraldHanche-Olsen
begin{thanks}
Oops, you're right :) end{thanks}
– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 19:34
@HaraldHanche-Olsen
begin{thanks}
Oops, you're right :) end{thanks}
– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 19:34
I think the
YYYY-MM-DD
format has been supported since 2017 (latex-project.org/news/latex2e-news/ltnews27.pdf). latexrelease
may also help here.– moewe
Dec 6 at 20:33
I think the
YYYY-MM-DD
format has been supported since 2017 (latex-project.org/news/latex2e-news/ltnews27.pdf). latexrelease
may also help here.– moewe
Dec 6 at 20:33
@moewe Indeed. I hadn't found this
ltnews
before. Thanks :)– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 21:29
@moewe Indeed. I hadn't found this
ltnews
before. Thanks :)– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 21:29
1
1
nice to see my inventions being commented on :-) but I made more important ones I hope
– Frank Mittelbach
Dec 8 at 13:18
nice to see my inventions being commented on :-) but I made more important ones I hope
– Frank Mittelbach
Dec 8 at 13:18
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463566%2fissue-with-iflter-and-expl3-date-style%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Tha LaTeX kernel got updated and replaced the date format from
dd/mm/yyyy
todd-mm-yyyy
. You probably should update the LaTeX kernel as well.– Phelype Oleinik
Dec 6 at 18:41
How do I do that? Does mpm have an entry for the latex kernel? Searching for "kernel" the only package that turns up is
l3kernel
.– Hood Chatham
Dec 6 at 18:44
2
@HoodChatham It will be listed just as
latex
– Joseph Wright♦
Dec 6 at 18:47
3
run the update manager as user and as admin.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 6 at 18:47
1
Probably related: tex.stackexchange.com/q/422176/35864
– moewe
Dec 6 at 20:32