Heine theorem without subsequences
I wanted to prove the following without the need of subsequences :
let $f$ be a continuous fonction on a closed interval of $mathbb{R}$ then it is uniformly continuous.
I found this proof but can't understand it
Let us assume every increasing sequence on [0;1] converges (if anyone can help me proving this) and the IVT
then let us create a sequence $u_n$
$begin{cases}u_0=0 \
u_{n+1}=1 text{ if } forall x>x_k, |f(x)-f(x_k)|<varepsilon text{ and we stop here} \
text{otherwise } u_{n+1}=min(x) text{ s.t } |f(x)-f(x_k)|=varepsilon\
end{cases}$
if this sequence is finite, let $eta=max(x_{n+1}-x_n)$ then $forall (x,y),forall varepsilon >0$
$$|x-y|leq eta implies |f(x)-f(y)|<2varepsilon $$
Otherwise we would have a contradiction.
Can anyone help me understanding
Thank you for your time.
proof-verification proof-writing proof-explanation
add a comment |
I wanted to prove the following without the need of subsequences :
let $f$ be a continuous fonction on a closed interval of $mathbb{R}$ then it is uniformly continuous.
I found this proof but can't understand it
Let us assume every increasing sequence on [0;1] converges (if anyone can help me proving this) and the IVT
then let us create a sequence $u_n$
$begin{cases}u_0=0 \
u_{n+1}=1 text{ if } forall x>x_k, |f(x)-f(x_k)|<varepsilon text{ and we stop here} \
text{otherwise } u_{n+1}=min(x) text{ s.t } |f(x)-f(x_k)|=varepsilon\
end{cases}$
if this sequence is finite, let $eta=max(x_{n+1}-x_n)$ then $forall (x,y),forall varepsilon >0$
$$|x-y|leq eta implies |f(x)-f(y)|<2varepsilon $$
Otherwise we would have a contradiction.
Can anyone help me understanding
Thank you for your time.
proof-verification proof-writing proof-explanation
add a comment |
I wanted to prove the following without the need of subsequences :
let $f$ be a continuous fonction on a closed interval of $mathbb{R}$ then it is uniformly continuous.
I found this proof but can't understand it
Let us assume every increasing sequence on [0;1] converges (if anyone can help me proving this) and the IVT
then let us create a sequence $u_n$
$begin{cases}u_0=0 \
u_{n+1}=1 text{ if } forall x>x_k, |f(x)-f(x_k)|<varepsilon text{ and we stop here} \
text{otherwise } u_{n+1}=min(x) text{ s.t } |f(x)-f(x_k)|=varepsilon\
end{cases}$
if this sequence is finite, let $eta=max(x_{n+1}-x_n)$ then $forall (x,y),forall varepsilon >0$
$$|x-y|leq eta implies |f(x)-f(y)|<2varepsilon $$
Otherwise we would have a contradiction.
Can anyone help me understanding
Thank you for your time.
proof-verification proof-writing proof-explanation
I wanted to prove the following without the need of subsequences :
let $f$ be a continuous fonction on a closed interval of $mathbb{R}$ then it is uniformly continuous.
I found this proof but can't understand it
Let us assume every increasing sequence on [0;1] converges (if anyone can help me proving this) and the IVT
then let us create a sequence $u_n$
$begin{cases}u_0=0 \
u_{n+1}=1 text{ if } forall x>x_k, |f(x)-f(x_k)|<varepsilon text{ and we stop here} \
text{otherwise } u_{n+1}=min(x) text{ s.t } |f(x)-f(x_k)|=varepsilon\
end{cases}$
if this sequence is finite, let $eta=max(x_{n+1}-x_n)$ then $forall (x,y),forall varepsilon >0$
$$|x-y|leq eta implies |f(x)-f(y)|<2varepsilon $$
Otherwise we would have a contradiction.
Can anyone help me understanding
Thank you for your time.
proof-verification proof-writing proof-explanation
proof-verification proof-writing proof-explanation
edited Dec 11 '18 at 15:01
Bernard
118k639112
118k639112
asked Dec 11 '18 at 14:55
T.D.
173113
173113
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035367%2fheine-theorem-without-subsequences%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035367%2fheine-theorem-without-subsequences%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown