Squares of finite fields (mod p*q)












3














Lets say we have $mathbb{Z}_p$, where $p$ is prime. For each element ($x$) we have two squares ($y$) so that $y^2=x$, i.e., if $p=7$ for $x=4$ we have $y_1=2,y_2=7-2=5,y=pm2 $.



Let's have $mathbb{Z}_{3*5},mathbb{Z}_{15}$. For $x=4$, $2$ and $15-2=13$ are trivial, besides all squareroots will be $y_1=2 y_2=-2=13$, also $y_3=7$, $y_4=-7=8$



It is easily observable that if $s$ is amount of factors in group order, amount of square roots is $2^s$. it is also mentionable here - s is amount of distinct primes, group of order $3^3=27$ has two squareroots same way as $3^2=9$. For 4 it will always be 2 and $order-2$ for trivial reasons.



Any other proof, besides empirical induction, that $2^s$ is amount of squares for group of order, where $s$ is amount of distinct prime factors of?



Supporting module in Sage










share|cite|improve this question
























  • The Chinese remainder theorem is your friend. Basically what happens is that modulo an (odd) prime power you get two square roots (or none). CRT then tells you that the total number of square roots is $2^s$ (or none). The prime $2$, if a factor of your modulus, complicates matters further.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Mar 25 '15 at 20:25












  • In this thread there are worked out examples finding square roots of $-1$ modulo an odd integer. Two things are explained there: A) if you know a square root modulo $p^k$, you can "lift" it to a square root modulo $p^{k+1}$. B) the CRT technique of combining the square roots modulo different prime powers.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Mar 25 '15 at 20:34
















3














Lets say we have $mathbb{Z}_p$, where $p$ is prime. For each element ($x$) we have two squares ($y$) so that $y^2=x$, i.e., if $p=7$ for $x=4$ we have $y_1=2,y_2=7-2=5,y=pm2 $.



Let's have $mathbb{Z}_{3*5},mathbb{Z}_{15}$. For $x=4$, $2$ and $15-2=13$ are trivial, besides all squareroots will be $y_1=2 y_2=-2=13$, also $y_3=7$, $y_4=-7=8$



It is easily observable that if $s$ is amount of factors in group order, amount of square roots is $2^s$. it is also mentionable here - s is amount of distinct primes, group of order $3^3=27$ has two squareroots same way as $3^2=9$. For 4 it will always be 2 and $order-2$ for trivial reasons.



Any other proof, besides empirical induction, that $2^s$ is amount of squares for group of order, where $s$ is amount of distinct prime factors of?



Supporting module in Sage










share|cite|improve this question
























  • The Chinese remainder theorem is your friend. Basically what happens is that modulo an (odd) prime power you get two square roots (or none). CRT then tells you that the total number of square roots is $2^s$ (or none). The prime $2$, if a factor of your modulus, complicates matters further.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Mar 25 '15 at 20:25












  • In this thread there are worked out examples finding square roots of $-1$ modulo an odd integer. Two things are explained there: A) if you know a square root modulo $p^k$, you can "lift" it to a square root modulo $p^{k+1}$. B) the CRT technique of combining the square roots modulo different prime powers.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Mar 25 '15 at 20:34














3












3








3


1





Lets say we have $mathbb{Z}_p$, where $p$ is prime. For each element ($x$) we have two squares ($y$) so that $y^2=x$, i.e., if $p=7$ for $x=4$ we have $y_1=2,y_2=7-2=5,y=pm2 $.



Let's have $mathbb{Z}_{3*5},mathbb{Z}_{15}$. For $x=4$, $2$ and $15-2=13$ are trivial, besides all squareroots will be $y_1=2 y_2=-2=13$, also $y_3=7$, $y_4=-7=8$



It is easily observable that if $s$ is amount of factors in group order, amount of square roots is $2^s$. it is also mentionable here - s is amount of distinct primes, group of order $3^3=27$ has two squareroots same way as $3^2=9$. For 4 it will always be 2 and $order-2$ for trivial reasons.



Any other proof, besides empirical induction, that $2^s$ is amount of squares for group of order, where $s$ is amount of distinct prime factors of?



Supporting module in Sage










share|cite|improve this question















Lets say we have $mathbb{Z}_p$, where $p$ is prime. For each element ($x$) we have two squares ($y$) so that $y^2=x$, i.e., if $p=7$ for $x=4$ we have $y_1=2,y_2=7-2=5,y=pm2 $.



Let's have $mathbb{Z}_{3*5},mathbb{Z}_{15}$. For $x=4$, $2$ and $15-2=13$ are trivial, besides all squareroots will be $y_1=2 y_2=-2=13$, also $y_3=7$, $y_4=-7=8$



It is easily observable that if $s$ is amount of factors in group order, amount of square roots is $2^s$. it is also mentionable here - s is amount of distinct primes, group of order $3^3=27$ has two squareroots same way as $3^2=9$. For 4 it will always be 2 and $order-2$ for trivial reasons.



Any other proof, besides empirical induction, that $2^s$ is amount of squares for group of order, where $s$ is amount of distinct prime factors of?



Supporting module in Sage







roots prime-factorization sagemath






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 11 '18 at 14:55









Klangen

1,65711334




1,65711334










asked Mar 25 '15 at 20:16









Timo Junolainen

364111




364111












  • The Chinese remainder theorem is your friend. Basically what happens is that modulo an (odd) prime power you get two square roots (or none). CRT then tells you that the total number of square roots is $2^s$ (or none). The prime $2$, if a factor of your modulus, complicates matters further.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Mar 25 '15 at 20:25












  • In this thread there are worked out examples finding square roots of $-1$ modulo an odd integer. Two things are explained there: A) if you know a square root modulo $p^k$, you can "lift" it to a square root modulo $p^{k+1}$. B) the CRT technique of combining the square roots modulo different prime powers.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Mar 25 '15 at 20:34


















  • The Chinese remainder theorem is your friend. Basically what happens is that modulo an (odd) prime power you get two square roots (or none). CRT then tells you that the total number of square roots is $2^s$ (or none). The prime $2$, if a factor of your modulus, complicates matters further.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Mar 25 '15 at 20:25












  • In this thread there are worked out examples finding square roots of $-1$ modulo an odd integer. Two things are explained there: A) if you know a square root modulo $p^k$, you can "lift" it to a square root modulo $p^{k+1}$. B) the CRT technique of combining the square roots modulo different prime powers.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Mar 25 '15 at 20:34
















The Chinese remainder theorem is your friend. Basically what happens is that modulo an (odd) prime power you get two square roots (or none). CRT then tells you that the total number of square roots is $2^s$ (or none). The prime $2$, if a factor of your modulus, complicates matters further.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 25 '15 at 20:25






The Chinese remainder theorem is your friend. Basically what happens is that modulo an (odd) prime power you get two square roots (or none). CRT then tells you that the total number of square roots is $2^s$ (or none). The prime $2$, if a factor of your modulus, complicates matters further.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 25 '15 at 20:25














In this thread there are worked out examples finding square roots of $-1$ modulo an odd integer. Two things are explained there: A) if you know a square root modulo $p^k$, you can "lift" it to a square root modulo $p^{k+1}$. B) the CRT technique of combining the square roots modulo different prime powers.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 25 '15 at 20:34




In this thread there are worked out examples finding square roots of $-1$ modulo an odd integer. Two things are explained there: A) if you know a square root modulo $p^k$, you can "lift" it to a square root modulo $p^{k+1}$. B) the CRT technique of combining the square roots modulo different prime powers.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 25 '15 at 20:34










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1206514%2fsquares-of-finite-fields-mod-pq%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1206514%2fsquares-of-finite-fields-mod-pq%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna