Prove that the functional is non-negative for $x_igeq 0$












3












$begingroup$


Consider the following functional $Phi:mathbb R^ntomathbb R $:
$$
Phi(x)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1}(1+x_i)(x_i-x_n)^2(2(1+x_i+x_n)+x_i x_n-x_1).
$$

The computer experiments show that it is non-negative for all $x_igeq 0$. I need to prove this. Note that we have both $Phi(x)=0$ and $nabla Phi(x)=0$ for all $x$ with equal coordinates. The proof should be simple, but I can't manage to find it. Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $Phi$ is not nonnegative on $mathbb R^n$. E.g. when $x_1=x_2=cdots=x_{n-1}=1$, $Phi(x)=6(n-1)(x_n-1)^2(x_n+1)$, which is negative when $x_n+1<0$.
    $endgroup$
    – user1551
    Jan 11 at 20:00










  • $begingroup$
    @user1551 thank you very much, you are right. I corrected the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Nasa Momdele
    Jan 11 at 20:19
















3












$begingroup$


Consider the following functional $Phi:mathbb R^ntomathbb R $:
$$
Phi(x)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1}(1+x_i)(x_i-x_n)^2(2(1+x_i+x_n)+x_i x_n-x_1).
$$

The computer experiments show that it is non-negative for all $x_igeq 0$. I need to prove this. Note that we have both $Phi(x)=0$ and $nabla Phi(x)=0$ for all $x$ with equal coordinates. The proof should be simple, but I can't manage to find it. Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $Phi$ is not nonnegative on $mathbb R^n$. E.g. when $x_1=x_2=cdots=x_{n-1}=1$, $Phi(x)=6(n-1)(x_n-1)^2(x_n+1)$, which is negative when $x_n+1<0$.
    $endgroup$
    – user1551
    Jan 11 at 20:00










  • $begingroup$
    @user1551 thank you very much, you are right. I corrected the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Nasa Momdele
    Jan 11 at 20:19














3












3








3


0



$begingroup$


Consider the following functional $Phi:mathbb R^ntomathbb R $:
$$
Phi(x)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1}(1+x_i)(x_i-x_n)^2(2(1+x_i+x_n)+x_i x_n-x_1).
$$

The computer experiments show that it is non-negative for all $x_igeq 0$. I need to prove this. Note that we have both $Phi(x)=0$ and $nabla Phi(x)=0$ for all $x$ with equal coordinates. The proof should be simple, but I can't manage to find it. Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Consider the following functional $Phi:mathbb R^ntomathbb R $:
$$
Phi(x)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1}(1+x_i)(x_i-x_n)^2(2(1+x_i+x_n)+x_i x_n-x_1).
$$

The computer experiments show that it is non-negative for all $x_igeq 0$. I need to prove this. Note that we have both $Phi(x)=0$ and $nabla Phi(x)=0$ for all $x$ with equal coordinates. The proof should be simple, but I can't manage to find it. Any ideas?







inequality






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 11 at 20:19







Nasa Momdele

















asked Jan 10 at 22:16









Nasa MomdeleNasa Momdele

254




254








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $Phi$ is not nonnegative on $mathbb R^n$. E.g. when $x_1=x_2=cdots=x_{n-1}=1$, $Phi(x)=6(n-1)(x_n-1)^2(x_n+1)$, which is negative when $x_n+1<0$.
    $endgroup$
    – user1551
    Jan 11 at 20:00










  • $begingroup$
    @user1551 thank you very much, you are right. I corrected the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Nasa Momdele
    Jan 11 at 20:19














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $Phi$ is not nonnegative on $mathbb R^n$. E.g. when $x_1=x_2=cdots=x_{n-1}=1$, $Phi(x)=6(n-1)(x_n-1)^2(x_n+1)$, which is negative when $x_n+1<0$.
    $endgroup$
    – user1551
    Jan 11 at 20:00










  • $begingroup$
    @user1551 thank you very much, you are right. I corrected the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Nasa Momdele
    Jan 11 at 20:19








1




1




$begingroup$
$Phi$ is not nonnegative on $mathbb R^n$. E.g. when $x_1=x_2=cdots=x_{n-1}=1$, $Phi(x)=6(n-1)(x_n-1)^2(x_n+1)$, which is negative when $x_n+1<0$.
$endgroup$
– user1551
Jan 11 at 20:00




$begingroup$
$Phi$ is not nonnegative on $mathbb R^n$. E.g. when $x_1=x_2=cdots=x_{n-1}=1$, $Phi(x)=6(n-1)(x_n-1)^2(x_n+1)$, which is negative when $x_n+1<0$.
$endgroup$
– user1551
Jan 11 at 20:00












$begingroup$
@user1551 thank you very much, you are right. I corrected the question.
$endgroup$
– Nasa Momdele
Jan 11 at 20:19




$begingroup$
@user1551 thank you very much, you are right. I corrected the question.
$endgroup$
– Nasa Momdele
Jan 11 at 20:19










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

$Phi$ is not always nonnegative. Let $f(x_i)=(1+x_i)(x_i-x_n)^2(2(1+x_i+x_n)+x_i x_n-x_1)$. When $x_1=7,,x_2=x_3=cdots=x_{n-1}=1$ and $x_n=0$, we have, for $2le ile n-1$,
begin{aligned}
f(x_i)
&=(1+x_i)(x_i-x_n)^2(2(1+x_i+x_n)+x_i x_n-x_1)\
&=2(1)^2left(2(1+1+0)+0-7right)\
&=-6.
end{aligned}

Therefore $Phi(x)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1}f(x_i)=f(x_1)-6(n-2)$ is negative when $n$ is sufficiently large.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Could you please take a look at a similar inequality? math.stackexchange.com/q/3075042/633591
    $endgroup$
    – Nasa Momdele
    Jan 15 at 22:16





















1












$begingroup$

Not an answer, merely recording a partial result, found trying to find the least $n$ with a $Phi_n(x) < 0$.



begin{align*}
Phi_{78}(frac{13018}{3}, 1626, dots, 1626,0) = frac{-868,706,947,328}{81}
end{align*}

In fact, $Phi_{78}left( frac{25979 b}{9736}, b, dots, b, 0 right)$ has constant negative fourth derivative and has negative first, second, and third derivatives as soon as $b > 1200.487dots$, so $Phi_{78}$ decreases like $Theta(-b^4)$ starting there. (More on $Theta$.)






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069244%2fprove-that-the-functional-is-non-negative-for-x-i-geq-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    $Phi$ is not always nonnegative. Let $f(x_i)=(1+x_i)(x_i-x_n)^2(2(1+x_i+x_n)+x_i x_n-x_1)$. When $x_1=7,,x_2=x_3=cdots=x_{n-1}=1$ and $x_n=0$, we have, for $2le ile n-1$,
    begin{aligned}
    f(x_i)
    &=(1+x_i)(x_i-x_n)^2(2(1+x_i+x_n)+x_i x_n-x_1)\
    &=2(1)^2left(2(1+1+0)+0-7right)\
    &=-6.
    end{aligned}

    Therefore $Phi(x)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1}f(x_i)=f(x_1)-6(n-2)$ is negative when $n$ is sufficiently large.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Could you please take a look at a similar inequality? math.stackexchange.com/q/3075042/633591
      $endgroup$
      – Nasa Momdele
      Jan 15 at 22:16


















    1












    $begingroup$

    $Phi$ is not always nonnegative. Let $f(x_i)=(1+x_i)(x_i-x_n)^2(2(1+x_i+x_n)+x_i x_n-x_1)$. When $x_1=7,,x_2=x_3=cdots=x_{n-1}=1$ and $x_n=0$, we have, for $2le ile n-1$,
    begin{aligned}
    f(x_i)
    &=(1+x_i)(x_i-x_n)^2(2(1+x_i+x_n)+x_i x_n-x_1)\
    &=2(1)^2left(2(1+1+0)+0-7right)\
    &=-6.
    end{aligned}

    Therefore $Phi(x)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1}f(x_i)=f(x_1)-6(n-2)$ is negative when $n$ is sufficiently large.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Could you please take a look at a similar inequality? math.stackexchange.com/q/3075042/633591
      $endgroup$
      – Nasa Momdele
      Jan 15 at 22:16
















    1












    1








    1





    $begingroup$

    $Phi$ is not always nonnegative. Let $f(x_i)=(1+x_i)(x_i-x_n)^2(2(1+x_i+x_n)+x_i x_n-x_1)$. When $x_1=7,,x_2=x_3=cdots=x_{n-1}=1$ and $x_n=0$, we have, for $2le ile n-1$,
    begin{aligned}
    f(x_i)
    &=(1+x_i)(x_i-x_n)^2(2(1+x_i+x_n)+x_i x_n-x_1)\
    &=2(1)^2left(2(1+1+0)+0-7right)\
    &=-6.
    end{aligned}

    Therefore $Phi(x)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1}f(x_i)=f(x_1)-6(n-2)$ is negative when $n$ is sufficiently large.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    $Phi$ is not always nonnegative. Let $f(x_i)=(1+x_i)(x_i-x_n)^2(2(1+x_i+x_n)+x_i x_n-x_1)$. When $x_1=7,,x_2=x_3=cdots=x_{n-1}=1$ and $x_n=0$, we have, for $2le ile n-1$,
    begin{aligned}
    f(x_i)
    &=(1+x_i)(x_i-x_n)^2(2(1+x_i+x_n)+x_i x_n-x_1)\
    &=2(1)^2left(2(1+1+0)+0-7right)\
    &=-6.
    end{aligned}

    Therefore $Phi(x)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1}f(x_i)=f(x_1)-6(n-2)$ is negative when $n$ is sufficiently large.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Jan 11 at 20:34









    user1551user1551

    74.3k566129




    74.3k566129












    • $begingroup$
      Could you please take a look at a similar inequality? math.stackexchange.com/q/3075042/633591
      $endgroup$
      – Nasa Momdele
      Jan 15 at 22:16




















    • $begingroup$
      Could you please take a look at a similar inequality? math.stackexchange.com/q/3075042/633591
      $endgroup$
      – Nasa Momdele
      Jan 15 at 22:16


















    $begingroup$
    Could you please take a look at a similar inequality? math.stackexchange.com/q/3075042/633591
    $endgroup$
    – Nasa Momdele
    Jan 15 at 22:16






    $begingroup$
    Could you please take a look at a similar inequality? math.stackexchange.com/q/3075042/633591
    $endgroup$
    – Nasa Momdele
    Jan 15 at 22:16













    1












    $begingroup$

    Not an answer, merely recording a partial result, found trying to find the least $n$ with a $Phi_n(x) < 0$.



    begin{align*}
    Phi_{78}(frac{13018}{3}, 1626, dots, 1626,0) = frac{-868,706,947,328}{81}
    end{align*}

    In fact, $Phi_{78}left( frac{25979 b}{9736}, b, dots, b, 0 right)$ has constant negative fourth derivative and has negative first, second, and third derivatives as soon as $b > 1200.487dots$, so $Phi_{78}$ decreases like $Theta(-b^4)$ starting there. (More on $Theta$.)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Not an answer, merely recording a partial result, found trying to find the least $n$ with a $Phi_n(x) < 0$.



      begin{align*}
      Phi_{78}(frac{13018}{3}, 1626, dots, 1626,0) = frac{-868,706,947,328}{81}
      end{align*}

      In fact, $Phi_{78}left( frac{25979 b}{9736}, b, dots, b, 0 right)$ has constant negative fourth derivative and has negative first, second, and third derivatives as soon as $b > 1200.487dots$, so $Phi_{78}$ decreases like $Theta(-b^4)$ starting there. (More on $Theta$.)






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Not an answer, merely recording a partial result, found trying to find the least $n$ with a $Phi_n(x) < 0$.



        begin{align*}
        Phi_{78}(frac{13018}{3}, 1626, dots, 1626,0) = frac{-868,706,947,328}{81}
        end{align*}

        In fact, $Phi_{78}left( frac{25979 b}{9736}, b, dots, b, 0 right)$ has constant negative fourth derivative and has negative first, second, and third derivatives as soon as $b > 1200.487dots$, so $Phi_{78}$ decreases like $Theta(-b^4)$ starting there. (More on $Theta$.)






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Not an answer, merely recording a partial result, found trying to find the least $n$ with a $Phi_n(x) < 0$.



        begin{align*}
        Phi_{78}(frac{13018}{3}, 1626, dots, 1626,0) = frac{-868,706,947,328}{81}
        end{align*}

        In fact, $Phi_{78}left( frac{25979 b}{9736}, b, dots, b, 0 right)$ has constant negative fourth derivative and has negative first, second, and third derivatives as soon as $b > 1200.487dots$, so $Phi_{78}$ decreases like $Theta(-b^4)$ starting there. (More on $Theta$.)







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 11 at 23:04









        Eric TowersEric Towers

        33.9k22370




        33.9k22370






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069244%2fprove-that-the-functional-is-non-negative-for-x-i-geq-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Cabo Verde

            Gyllenstierna