Convex and continuous function on compact set implies Lipschitz












0












$begingroup$


Let the function $f: C rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be convex and continuous, where $C subset mathbb{R}^n$ is a compact set.



Prove or disprove that $f$ is Lipschitz continuous on $C$.



Comments: If $f$ were defined on an open set $O$, then I can show that it is Lipschitz continuous on every compact subset of $O$, see Proving that a convex function is Lipschitz for the scalar case. In this case, however, I need to exploit the assumption that $f$ is continuous also on the boundary of $C$ - continuity of $f$ in the interior of $C$ already follows from the convexity assumption.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Take for simplicity $Csubset mathbb R^1$, where $C=[-1,1]$ and $f$ to be the lower semicircle of the unit sphere in $mathbb R^2$, i.e $f=-sqrt{1-x^2}$. This function is convex and continuous, but not Lipschitz. The problem arises on the boundary of the set, where the derivatives can be unbounded.
    $endgroup$
    – Svetoslav
    Mar 3 '16 at 18:18












  • $begingroup$
    This is correct, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – user284439
    Mar 3 '16 at 19:48
















0












$begingroup$


Let the function $f: C rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be convex and continuous, where $C subset mathbb{R}^n$ is a compact set.



Prove or disprove that $f$ is Lipschitz continuous on $C$.



Comments: If $f$ were defined on an open set $O$, then I can show that it is Lipschitz continuous on every compact subset of $O$, see Proving that a convex function is Lipschitz for the scalar case. In this case, however, I need to exploit the assumption that $f$ is continuous also on the boundary of $C$ - continuity of $f$ in the interior of $C$ already follows from the convexity assumption.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Take for simplicity $Csubset mathbb R^1$, where $C=[-1,1]$ and $f$ to be the lower semicircle of the unit sphere in $mathbb R^2$, i.e $f=-sqrt{1-x^2}$. This function is convex and continuous, but not Lipschitz. The problem arises on the boundary of the set, where the derivatives can be unbounded.
    $endgroup$
    – Svetoslav
    Mar 3 '16 at 18:18












  • $begingroup$
    This is correct, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – user284439
    Mar 3 '16 at 19:48














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


Let the function $f: C rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be convex and continuous, where $C subset mathbb{R}^n$ is a compact set.



Prove or disprove that $f$ is Lipschitz continuous on $C$.



Comments: If $f$ were defined on an open set $O$, then I can show that it is Lipschitz continuous on every compact subset of $O$, see Proving that a convex function is Lipschitz for the scalar case. In this case, however, I need to exploit the assumption that $f$ is continuous also on the boundary of $C$ - continuity of $f$ in the interior of $C$ already follows from the convexity assumption.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let the function $f: C rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be convex and continuous, where $C subset mathbb{R}^n$ is a compact set.



Prove or disprove that $f$ is Lipschitz continuous on $C$.



Comments: If $f$ were defined on an open set $O$, then I can show that it is Lipschitz continuous on every compact subset of $O$, see Proving that a convex function is Lipschitz for the scalar case. In this case, however, I need to exploit the assumption that $f$ is continuous also on the boundary of $C$ - continuity of $f$ in the interior of $C$ already follows from the convexity assumption.







real-analysis convex-analysis compactness lipschitz-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21









Community

1




1










asked Mar 3 '16 at 18:12









user284439user284439

425




425








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Take for simplicity $Csubset mathbb R^1$, where $C=[-1,1]$ and $f$ to be the lower semicircle of the unit sphere in $mathbb R^2$, i.e $f=-sqrt{1-x^2}$. This function is convex and continuous, but not Lipschitz. The problem arises on the boundary of the set, where the derivatives can be unbounded.
    $endgroup$
    – Svetoslav
    Mar 3 '16 at 18:18












  • $begingroup$
    This is correct, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – user284439
    Mar 3 '16 at 19:48














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Take for simplicity $Csubset mathbb R^1$, where $C=[-1,1]$ and $f$ to be the lower semicircle of the unit sphere in $mathbb R^2$, i.e $f=-sqrt{1-x^2}$. This function is convex and continuous, but not Lipschitz. The problem arises on the boundary of the set, where the derivatives can be unbounded.
    $endgroup$
    – Svetoslav
    Mar 3 '16 at 18:18












  • $begingroup$
    This is correct, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – user284439
    Mar 3 '16 at 19:48








3




3




$begingroup$
Take for simplicity $Csubset mathbb R^1$, where $C=[-1,1]$ and $f$ to be the lower semicircle of the unit sphere in $mathbb R^2$, i.e $f=-sqrt{1-x^2}$. This function is convex and continuous, but not Lipschitz. The problem arises on the boundary of the set, where the derivatives can be unbounded.
$endgroup$
– Svetoslav
Mar 3 '16 at 18:18






$begingroup$
Take for simplicity $Csubset mathbb R^1$, where $C=[-1,1]$ and $f$ to be the lower semicircle of the unit sphere in $mathbb R^2$, i.e $f=-sqrt{1-x^2}$. This function is convex and continuous, but not Lipschitz. The problem arises on the boundary of the set, where the derivatives can be unbounded.
$endgroup$
– Svetoslav
Mar 3 '16 at 18:18














$begingroup$
This is correct, thank you.
$endgroup$
– user284439
Mar 3 '16 at 19:48




$begingroup$
This is correct, thank you.
$endgroup$
– user284439
Mar 3 '16 at 19:48










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

As noted by Svetoslav in a comment, the statement is false: a counterexample is given by $f(x) = -sqrt{1-x^2}$ on $[-1,1]$.



A slightly simpler counterexample is $f(x) = -sqrt{x}$ on $[0,1]$.



In both cases, the issue is that $f'$ is not bounded. A function with unbounded derivative cannot be Lipschitz.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    This statement is true if instead of dealing with arbitrary compact subsets, you deal with compact subsets of the interior of the domain. This is Theorem 3.3.1 in these notes.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1681802%2fconvex-and-continuous-function-on-compact-set-implies-lipschitz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0












      $begingroup$

      As noted by Svetoslav in a comment, the statement is false: a counterexample is given by $f(x) = -sqrt{1-x^2}$ on $[-1,1]$.



      A slightly simpler counterexample is $f(x) = -sqrt{x}$ on $[0,1]$.



      In both cases, the issue is that $f'$ is not bounded. A function with unbounded derivative cannot be Lipschitz.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        0












        $begingroup$

        As noted by Svetoslav in a comment, the statement is false: a counterexample is given by $f(x) = -sqrt{1-x^2}$ on $[-1,1]$.



        A slightly simpler counterexample is $f(x) = -sqrt{x}$ on $[0,1]$.



        In both cases, the issue is that $f'$ is not bounded. A function with unbounded derivative cannot be Lipschitz.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          As noted by Svetoslav in a comment, the statement is false: a counterexample is given by $f(x) = -sqrt{1-x^2}$ on $[-1,1]$.



          A slightly simpler counterexample is $f(x) = -sqrt{x}$ on $[0,1]$.



          In both cases, the issue is that $f'$ is not bounded. A function with unbounded derivative cannot be Lipschitz.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          As noted by Svetoslav in a comment, the statement is false: a counterexample is given by $f(x) = -sqrt{1-x^2}$ on $[-1,1]$.



          A slightly simpler counterexample is $f(x) = -sqrt{x}$ on $[0,1]$.



          In both cases, the issue is that $f'$ is not bounded. A function with unbounded derivative cannot be Lipschitz.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 5 '17 at 22:14







          user357151






























              0












              $begingroup$

              This statement is true if instead of dealing with arbitrary compact subsets, you deal with compact subsets of the interior of the domain. This is Theorem 3.3.1 in these notes.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                This statement is true if instead of dealing with arbitrary compact subsets, you deal with compact subsets of the interior of the domain. This is Theorem 3.3.1 in these notes.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  This statement is true if instead of dealing with arbitrary compact subsets, you deal with compact subsets of the interior of the domain. This is Theorem 3.3.1 in these notes.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  This statement is true if instead of dealing with arbitrary compact subsets, you deal with compact subsets of the interior of the domain. This is Theorem 3.3.1 in these notes.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 22 '17 at 22:29









                  Alfred YergerAlfred Yerger

                  10.6k2249




                  10.6k2249






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1681802%2fconvex-and-continuous-function-on-compact-set-implies-lipschitz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bressuire

                      Cabo Verde

                      Gyllenstierna