What will be the sum of the numbers in the $100^{text{th}}$ step?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2












So this question states that a triangle is found where in between every $2$ numbers, their sum will be found in the next step, an example can be found below for the first $3$ steps. The question asks what will be the sum of the numbers in the $100^{text{th}}$ step? I managed to find a pattern that states $S_n=S_{n-1}+2 times 3^{n-1}$ if $S_k$ is the sum of step $k$. However, is this pattern correct and if it is then why? Also, can this triangle relate to Pascal's triangle? Thank you anyways.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    But the third row adds to $28$, your formula gives $26$. Can you write one more row?
    – farruhota
    Dec 2 at 14:42










  • @Krishna I noticed that this triangle is similar to Pascal's and that is how I got the $2^n$ in my equation. However, the second part of my equation would be the harder one to prove as it does not have a huge relation with Pascal's triangle.
    – user587054
    Dec 2 at 14:42










  • @farruhota Thank you for that notice I realized I had a mistake and meant to say $S_n=S_{n-1}+2 times 3^{n-1}$ This will be fixed.
    – user587054
    Dec 2 at 14:47










  • I do not understand how the third row is made from the second, let alone how subsequent rows are made.
    – Servaes
    Dec 2 at 14:47










  • @Servaes The same numbers from the second row have been written down again but this time with an extra number between each $2$ numbers being their sum. So the $4$ came from being the sum of $1+3$ and the from the $5$ sum of $3+2$
    – user587054
    Dec 2 at 14:52















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2












So this question states that a triangle is found where in between every $2$ numbers, their sum will be found in the next step, an example can be found below for the first $3$ steps. The question asks what will be the sum of the numbers in the $100^{text{th}}$ step? I managed to find a pattern that states $S_n=S_{n-1}+2 times 3^{n-1}$ if $S_k$ is the sum of step $k$. However, is this pattern correct and if it is then why? Also, can this triangle relate to Pascal's triangle? Thank you anyways.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    But the third row adds to $28$, your formula gives $26$. Can you write one more row?
    – farruhota
    Dec 2 at 14:42










  • @Krishna I noticed that this triangle is similar to Pascal's and that is how I got the $2^n$ in my equation. However, the second part of my equation would be the harder one to prove as it does not have a huge relation with Pascal's triangle.
    – user587054
    Dec 2 at 14:42










  • @farruhota Thank you for that notice I realized I had a mistake and meant to say $S_n=S_{n-1}+2 times 3^{n-1}$ This will be fixed.
    – user587054
    Dec 2 at 14:47










  • I do not understand how the third row is made from the second, let alone how subsequent rows are made.
    – Servaes
    Dec 2 at 14:47










  • @Servaes The same numbers from the second row have been written down again but this time with an extra number between each $2$ numbers being their sum. So the $4$ came from being the sum of $1+3$ and the from the $5$ sum of $3+2$
    – user587054
    Dec 2 at 14:52













up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2






2





So this question states that a triangle is found where in between every $2$ numbers, their sum will be found in the next step, an example can be found below for the first $3$ steps. The question asks what will be the sum of the numbers in the $100^{text{th}}$ step? I managed to find a pattern that states $S_n=S_{n-1}+2 times 3^{n-1}$ if $S_k$ is the sum of step $k$. However, is this pattern correct and if it is then why? Also, can this triangle relate to Pascal's triangle? Thank you anyways.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question















So this question states that a triangle is found where in between every $2$ numbers, their sum will be found in the next step, an example can be found below for the first $3$ steps. The question asks what will be the sum of the numbers in the $100^{text{th}}$ step? I managed to find a pattern that states $S_n=S_{n-1}+2 times 3^{n-1}$ if $S_k$ is the sum of step $k$. However, is this pattern correct and if it is then why? Also, can this triangle relate to Pascal's triangle? Thank you anyways.



enter image description here







combinatorics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 2 at 14:48

























asked Dec 2 at 14:31









user587054

31810




31810








  • 2




    But the third row adds to $28$, your formula gives $26$. Can you write one more row?
    – farruhota
    Dec 2 at 14:42










  • @Krishna I noticed that this triangle is similar to Pascal's and that is how I got the $2^n$ in my equation. However, the second part of my equation would be the harder one to prove as it does not have a huge relation with Pascal's triangle.
    – user587054
    Dec 2 at 14:42










  • @farruhota Thank you for that notice I realized I had a mistake and meant to say $S_n=S_{n-1}+2 times 3^{n-1}$ This will be fixed.
    – user587054
    Dec 2 at 14:47










  • I do not understand how the third row is made from the second, let alone how subsequent rows are made.
    – Servaes
    Dec 2 at 14:47










  • @Servaes The same numbers from the second row have been written down again but this time with an extra number between each $2$ numbers being their sum. So the $4$ came from being the sum of $1+3$ and the from the $5$ sum of $3+2$
    – user587054
    Dec 2 at 14:52














  • 2




    But the third row adds to $28$, your formula gives $26$. Can you write one more row?
    – farruhota
    Dec 2 at 14:42










  • @Krishna I noticed that this triangle is similar to Pascal's and that is how I got the $2^n$ in my equation. However, the second part of my equation would be the harder one to prove as it does not have a huge relation with Pascal's triangle.
    – user587054
    Dec 2 at 14:42










  • @farruhota Thank you for that notice I realized I had a mistake and meant to say $S_n=S_{n-1}+2 times 3^{n-1}$ This will be fixed.
    – user587054
    Dec 2 at 14:47










  • I do not understand how the third row is made from the second, let alone how subsequent rows are made.
    – Servaes
    Dec 2 at 14:47










  • @Servaes The same numbers from the second row have been written down again but this time with an extra number between each $2$ numbers being their sum. So the $4$ came from being the sum of $1+3$ and the from the $5$ sum of $3+2$
    – user587054
    Dec 2 at 14:52








2




2




But the third row adds to $28$, your formula gives $26$. Can you write one more row?
– farruhota
Dec 2 at 14:42




But the third row adds to $28$, your formula gives $26$. Can you write one more row?
– farruhota
Dec 2 at 14:42












@Krishna I noticed that this triangle is similar to Pascal's and that is how I got the $2^n$ in my equation. However, the second part of my equation would be the harder one to prove as it does not have a huge relation with Pascal's triangle.
– user587054
Dec 2 at 14:42




@Krishna I noticed that this triangle is similar to Pascal's and that is how I got the $2^n$ in my equation. However, the second part of my equation would be the harder one to prove as it does not have a huge relation with Pascal's triangle.
– user587054
Dec 2 at 14:42












@farruhota Thank you for that notice I realized I had a mistake and meant to say $S_n=S_{n-1}+2 times 3^{n-1}$ This will be fixed.
– user587054
Dec 2 at 14:47




@farruhota Thank you for that notice I realized I had a mistake and meant to say $S_n=S_{n-1}+2 times 3^{n-1}$ This will be fixed.
– user587054
Dec 2 at 14:47












I do not understand how the third row is made from the second, let alone how subsequent rows are made.
– Servaes
Dec 2 at 14:47




I do not understand how the third row is made from the second, let alone how subsequent rows are made.
– Servaes
Dec 2 at 14:47












@Servaes The same numbers from the second row have been written down again but this time with an extra number between each $2$ numbers being their sum. So the $4$ came from being the sum of $1+3$ and the from the $5$ sum of $3+2$
– user587054
Dec 2 at 14:52




@Servaes The same numbers from the second row have been written down again but this time with an extra number between each $2$ numbers being their sum. So the $4$ came from being the sum of $1+3$ and the from the $5$ sum of $3+2$
– user587054
Dec 2 at 14:52










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Every number in the $n+1$-th row either comes directly from the $n$-th row, or is the sum of two neighbouring numbers in the $n$-th row. Every number in the $n$-th row has two neighbours (except the first and last) and so it is in two sums. So in summing the $n+1$-th row, we in fact sum every number from the $n$-th row three times (except the first and last). This yields the recursive formula
$$S_{n+1}=3S_n-2.$$






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Your recurrence equation is also correct. Note that:
    $$S_n=S_{n-1}+2cdot 3^{n-1}, S_1=4 Rightarrow frac{S_n}{3^n}=frac13cdot frac{S_{n-1}}{3^{n-1}}+frac23 Rightarrow \
    a_n=frac13a_{n-1}+frac23, a_1=frac43 Rightarrow a_n=left(frac13right)^n+1=frac{S_n}{3^n} Rightarrow \
    S_n=3^n+1.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022703%2fwhat-will-be-the-sum-of-the-numbers-in-the-100-textth-step%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      Every number in the $n+1$-th row either comes directly from the $n$-th row, or is the sum of two neighbouring numbers in the $n$-th row. Every number in the $n$-th row has two neighbours (except the first and last) and so it is in two sums. So in summing the $n+1$-th row, we in fact sum every number from the $n$-th row three times (except the first and last). This yields the recursive formula
      $$S_{n+1}=3S_n-2.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted










        Every number in the $n+1$-th row either comes directly from the $n$-th row, or is the sum of two neighbouring numbers in the $n$-th row. Every number in the $n$-th row has two neighbours (except the first and last) and so it is in two sums. So in summing the $n+1$-th row, we in fact sum every number from the $n$-th row three times (except the first and last). This yields the recursive formula
        $$S_{n+1}=3S_n-2.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          Every number in the $n+1$-th row either comes directly from the $n$-th row, or is the sum of two neighbouring numbers in the $n$-th row. Every number in the $n$-th row has two neighbours (except the first and last) and so it is in two sums. So in summing the $n+1$-th row, we in fact sum every number from the $n$-th row three times (except the first and last). This yields the recursive formula
          $$S_{n+1}=3S_n-2.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Every number in the $n+1$-th row either comes directly from the $n$-th row, or is the sum of two neighbouring numbers in the $n$-th row. Every number in the $n$-th row has two neighbours (except the first and last) and so it is in two sums. So in summing the $n+1$-th row, we in fact sum every number from the $n$-th row three times (except the first and last). This yields the recursive formula
          $$S_{n+1}=3S_n-2.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 2 at 14:53









          Servaes

          21.8k33792




          21.8k33792






















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Your recurrence equation is also correct. Note that:
              $$S_n=S_{n-1}+2cdot 3^{n-1}, S_1=4 Rightarrow frac{S_n}{3^n}=frac13cdot frac{S_{n-1}}{3^{n-1}}+frac23 Rightarrow \
              a_n=frac13a_{n-1}+frac23, a_1=frac43 Rightarrow a_n=left(frac13right)^n+1=frac{S_n}{3^n} Rightarrow \
              S_n=3^n+1.$$






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                Your recurrence equation is also correct. Note that:
                $$S_n=S_{n-1}+2cdot 3^{n-1}, S_1=4 Rightarrow frac{S_n}{3^n}=frac13cdot frac{S_{n-1}}{3^{n-1}}+frac23 Rightarrow \
                a_n=frac13a_{n-1}+frac23, a_1=frac43 Rightarrow a_n=left(frac13right)^n+1=frac{S_n}{3^n} Rightarrow \
                S_n=3^n+1.$$






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  Your recurrence equation is also correct. Note that:
                  $$S_n=S_{n-1}+2cdot 3^{n-1}, S_1=4 Rightarrow frac{S_n}{3^n}=frac13cdot frac{S_{n-1}}{3^{n-1}}+frac23 Rightarrow \
                  a_n=frac13a_{n-1}+frac23, a_1=frac43 Rightarrow a_n=left(frac13right)^n+1=frac{S_n}{3^n} Rightarrow \
                  S_n=3^n+1.$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Your recurrence equation is also correct. Note that:
                  $$S_n=S_{n-1}+2cdot 3^{n-1}, S_1=4 Rightarrow frac{S_n}{3^n}=frac13cdot frac{S_{n-1}}{3^{n-1}}+frac23 Rightarrow \
                  a_n=frac13a_{n-1}+frac23, a_1=frac43 Rightarrow a_n=left(frac13right)^n+1=frac{S_n}{3^n} Rightarrow \
                  S_n=3^n+1.$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 2 at 15:51









                  farruhota

                  18.3k2736




                  18.3k2736






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022703%2fwhat-will-be-the-sum-of-the-numbers-in-the-100-textth-step%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bressuire

                      Cabo Verde

                      Gyllenstierna