Gamma integrals












4












$begingroup$


Is anything known about these integrals? Textbook suggestions are welcome



begin{equation*}
f(n,p)=int_{x=-0.5}^p frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!} dx,
end{equation*}



$n>0, ple n+0.5$.



For instance, as $n$ grows $2^n-f(n,n+1/2)$ seems to be positive and monotonically decreasing...how would I find the limit?




ListPlot[Table[2^n - NIntegrate[n!/(x! (n - x)!), {x, -1/2, n + 1/2}], {n, Range[30]}], PlotRange -> All]











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The equation in your Mathematica code does not match the one in TeX. :)
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 5:02










  • $begingroup$
    To simplify things a bit, your $f(n,p)$ is $int_{-1/2}^p binom{n}{x}mathrm{d}x$
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 5:10










  • $begingroup$
    good catch, fixed
    $endgroup$
    – Yaroslav Bulatov
    Aug 31 '10 at 5:27










  • $begingroup$
    You missed my hint: check your definition for $f(n,p)$
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 6:07










  • $begingroup$
    @J. M. : Is there a typo in the $ple n$ condition, in the definition of $f(n,p)$ ? In your example $f(n,n+1/2)$, $p=n+1/2>n$.
    $endgroup$
    – Américo Tavares
    Aug 31 '10 at 10:19


















4












$begingroup$


Is anything known about these integrals? Textbook suggestions are welcome



begin{equation*}
f(n,p)=int_{x=-0.5}^p frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!} dx,
end{equation*}



$n>0, ple n+0.5$.



For instance, as $n$ grows $2^n-f(n,n+1/2)$ seems to be positive and monotonically decreasing...how would I find the limit?




ListPlot[Table[2^n - NIntegrate[n!/(x! (n - x)!), {x, -1/2, n + 1/2}], {n, Range[30]}], PlotRange -> All]











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The equation in your Mathematica code does not match the one in TeX. :)
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 5:02










  • $begingroup$
    To simplify things a bit, your $f(n,p)$ is $int_{-1/2}^p binom{n}{x}mathrm{d}x$
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 5:10










  • $begingroup$
    good catch, fixed
    $endgroup$
    – Yaroslav Bulatov
    Aug 31 '10 at 5:27










  • $begingroup$
    You missed my hint: check your definition for $f(n,p)$
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 6:07










  • $begingroup$
    @J. M. : Is there a typo in the $ple n$ condition, in the definition of $f(n,p)$ ? In your example $f(n,n+1/2)$, $p=n+1/2>n$.
    $endgroup$
    – Américo Tavares
    Aug 31 '10 at 10:19
















4












4








4


2



$begingroup$


Is anything known about these integrals? Textbook suggestions are welcome



begin{equation*}
f(n,p)=int_{x=-0.5}^p frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!} dx,
end{equation*}



$n>0, ple n+0.5$.



For instance, as $n$ grows $2^n-f(n,n+1/2)$ seems to be positive and monotonically decreasing...how would I find the limit?




ListPlot[Table[2^n - NIntegrate[n!/(x! (n - x)!), {x, -1/2, n + 1/2}], {n, Range[30]}], PlotRange -> All]











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is anything known about these integrals? Textbook suggestions are welcome



begin{equation*}
f(n,p)=int_{x=-0.5}^p frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!} dx,
end{equation*}



$n>0, ple n+0.5$.



For instance, as $n$ grows $2^n-f(n,n+1/2)$ seems to be positive and monotonically decreasing...how would I find the limit?




ListPlot[Table[2^n - NIntegrate[n!/(x! (n - x)!), {x, -1/2, n + 1/2}], {n, Range[30]}], PlotRange -> All]








gamma-function special-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 27 '18 at 10:08









Glorfindel

3,41981830




3,41981830










asked Aug 31 '10 at 4:25









Yaroslav BulatovYaroslav Bulatov

1,87411526




1,87411526












  • $begingroup$
    The equation in your Mathematica code does not match the one in TeX. :)
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 5:02










  • $begingroup$
    To simplify things a bit, your $f(n,p)$ is $int_{-1/2}^p binom{n}{x}mathrm{d}x$
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 5:10










  • $begingroup$
    good catch, fixed
    $endgroup$
    – Yaroslav Bulatov
    Aug 31 '10 at 5:27










  • $begingroup$
    You missed my hint: check your definition for $f(n,p)$
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 6:07










  • $begingroup$
    @J. M. : Is there a typo in the $ple n$ condition, in the definition of $f(n,p)$ ? In your example $f(n,n+1/2)$, $p=n+1/2>n$.
    $endgroup$
    – Américo Tavares
    Aug 31 '10 at 10:19




















  • $begingroup$
    The equation in your Mathematica code does not match the one in TeX. :)
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 5:02










  • $begingroup$
    To simplify things a bit, your $f(n,p)$ is $int_{-1/2}^p binom{n}{x}mathrm{d}x$
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 5:10










  • $begingroup$
    good catch, fixed
    $endgroup$
    – Yaroslav Bulatov
    Aug 31 '10 at 5:27










  • $begingroup$
    You missed my hint: check your definition for $f(n,p)$
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 6:07










  • $begingroup$
    @J. M. : Is there a typo in the $ple n$ condition, in the definition of $f(n,p)$ ? In your example $f(n,n+1/2)$, $p=n+1/2>n$.
    $endgroup$
    – Américo Tavares
    Aug 31 '10 at 10:19


















$begingroup$
The equation in your Mathematica code does not match the one in TeX. :)
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Aug 31 '10 at 5:02




$begingroup$
The equation in your Mathematica code does not match the one in TeX. :)
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Aug 31 '10 at 5:02












$begingroup$
To simplify things a bit, your $f(n,p)$ is $int_{-1/2}^p binom{n}{x}mathrm{d}x$
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Aug 31 '10 at 5:10




$begingroup$
To simplify things a bit, your $f(n,p)$ is $int_{-1/2}^p binom{n}{x}mathrm{d}x$
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Aug 31 '10 at 5:10












$begingroup$
good catch, fixed
$endgroup$
– Yaroslav Bulatov
Aug 31 '10 at 5:27




$begingroup$
good catch, fixed
$endgroup$
– Yaroslav Bulatov
Aug 31 '10 at 5:27












$begingroup$
You missed my hint: check your definition for $f(n,p)$
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Aug 31 '10 at 6:07




$begingroup$
You missed my hint: check your definition for $f(n,p)$
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Aug 31 '10 at 6:07












$begingroup$
@J. M. : Is there a typo in the $ple n$ condition, in the definition of $f(n,p)$ ? In your example $f(n,n+1/2)$, $p=n+1/2>n$.
$endgroup$
– Américo Tavares
Aug 31 '10 at 10:19






$begingroup$
@J. M. : Is there a typo in the $ple n$ condition, in the definition of $f(n,p)$ ? In your example $f(n,n+1/2)$, $p=n+1/2>n$.
$endgroup$
– Américo Tavares
Aug 31 '10 at 10:19












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Not a full solution, but maybe enough for you to get a handle on the problem:



Using $Gamma (x+1) = x Gamma (x)$ and $Gamma(x) Gamma(1-x) = frac{pi}{sin pi x}$, one obtains
$$
Gamma(x + 1) Gamma(n - x + 1) = frac{(-1)^n pi}{sin pi x} prod_{k=0}^{n} (x - k) .
$$
Thus,
$$
f(n, p) = frac{(-1)^n n!}{pi} int_{-0.5}^p frac{sin pi x}{prod_{k=0}^n (x-k)} d x .
$$
Using partial fractions, you can now transform $f$ into a sum of values of the sine integral.



Addendum: Computing the sums yields
$$
f(n, n+frac{1}{2}) = frac{2}{pi} sum_{k = 0}^n binom{n}{k} Si (pi k + frac{pi}{2})
$$
Note, that $Si (x) = frac{pi}{2} + O(x^{- 2})$. However, I have no idea how to leverage this to find the limit.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    That looks even nastier than the original.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 7:27











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3688%2fgamma-integrals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Not a full solution, but maybe enough for you to get a handle on the problem:



Using $Gamma (x+1) = x Gamma (x)$ and $Gamma(x) Gamma(1-x) = frac{pi}{sin pi x}$, one obtains
$$
Gamma(x + 1) Gamma(n - x + 1) = frac{(-1)^n pi}{sin pi x} prod_{k=0}^{n} (x - k) .
$$
Thus,
$$
f(n, p) = frac{(-1)^n n!}{pi} int_{-0.5}^p frac{sin pi x}{prod_{k=0}^n (x-k)} d x .
$$
Using partial fractions, you can now transform $f$ into a sum of values of the sine integral.



Addendum: Computing the sums yields
$$
f(n, n+frac{1}{2}) = frac{2}{pi} sum_{k = 0}^n binom{n}{k} Si (pi k + frac{pi}{2})
$$
Note, that $Si (x) = frac{pi}{2} + O(x^{- 2})$. However, I have no idea how to leverage this to find the limit.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    That looks even nastier than the original.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 7:27
















1












$begingroup$

Not a full solution, but maybe enough for you to get a handle on the problem:



Using $Gamma (x+1) = x Gamma (x)$ and $Gamma(x) Gamma(1-x) = frac{pi}{sin pi x}$, one obtains
$$
Gamma(x + 1) Gamma(n - x + 1) = frac{(-1)^n pi}{sin pi x} prod_{k=0}^{n} (x - k) .
$$
Thus,
$$
f(n, p) = frac{(-1)^n n!}{pi} int_{-0.5}^p frac{sin pi x}{prod_{k=0}^n (x-k)} d x .
$$
Using partial fractions, you can now transform $f$ into a sum of values of the sine integral.



Addendum: Computing the sums yields
$$
f(n, n+frac{1}{2}) = frac{2}{pi} sum_{k = 0}^n binom{n}{k} Si (pi k + frac{pi}{2})
$$
Note, that $Si (x) = frac{pi}{2} + O(x^{- 2})$. However, I have no idea how to leverage this to find the limit.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    That looks even nastier than the original.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 7:27














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Not a full solution, but maybe enough for you to get a handle on the problem:



Using $Gamma (x+1) = x Gamma (x)$ and $Gamma(x) Gamma(1-x) = frac{pi}{sin pi x}$, one obtains
$$
Gamma(x + 1) Gamma(n - x + 1) = frac{(-1)^n pi}{sin pi x} prod_{k=0}^{n} (x - k) .
$$
Thus,
$$
f(n, p) = frac{(-1)^n n!}{pi} int_{-0.5}^p frac{sin pi x}{prod_{k=0}^n (x-k)} d x .
$$
Using partial fractions, you can now transform $f$ into a sum of values of the sine integral.



Addendum: Computing the sums yields
$$
f(n, n+frac{1}{2}) = frac{2}{pi} sum_{k = 0}^n binom{n}{k} Si (pi k + frac{pi}{2})
$$
Note, that $Si (x) = frac{pi}{2} + O(x^{- 2})$. However, I have no idea how to leverage this to find the limit.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Not a full solution, but maybe enough for you to get a handle on the problem:



Using $Gamma (x+1) = x Gamma (x)$ and $Gamma(x) Gamma(1-x) = frac{pi}{sin pi x}$, one obtains
$$
Gamma(x + 1) Gamma(n - x + 1) = frac{(-1)^n pi}{sin pi x} prod_{k=0}^{n} (x - k) .
$$
Thus,
$$
f(n, p) = frac{(-1)^n n!}{pi} int_{-0.5}^p frac{sin pi x}{prod_{k=0}^n (x-k)} d x .
$$
Using partial fractions, you can now transform $f$ into a sum of values of the sine integral.



Addendum: Computing the sums yields
$$
f(n, n+frac{1}{2}) = frac{2}{pi} sum_{k = 0}^n binom{n}{k} Si (pi k + frac{pi}{2})
$$
Note, that $Si (x) = frac{pi}{2} + O(x^{- 2})$. However, I have no idea how to leverage this to find the limit.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Aug 31 '10 at 7:10

























answered Aug 31 '10 at 5:27









Michael UlmMichael Ulm

1,2001710




1,2001710








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    That looks even nastier than the original.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 7:27














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    That looks even nastier than the original.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Aug 31 '10 at 7:27








2




2




$begingroup$
That looks even nastier than the original.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Aug 31 '10 at 7:27




$begingroup$
That looks even nastier than the original.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is not a mathematician
Aug 31 '10 at 7:27


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3688%2fgamma-integrals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna