Let $R$ be a comm ring w/ 1, $M$ be a left $R$-module. Show that $Hom_R(M,M)$, a left $R$-module
Let $R$ be a commutative ring with 1 and let $M$ be a left $R$-module. Show that $Hom_R(M,M)$, the set of $R$-homomorphisms from $M$ to itself is a left $R$-module if we set $(r·f)(m) = rf(m)$ for all $r ∈ R,m ∈ M,f ∈ Hom(M,M)$.
Here is my proof of this, I'd appreciate it if someone looked over the details, I have some questions scattered about here and there, which I marked with letters for anyone who wants to help me out.
So first things first I need to show that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group; to this extent, let $f,g in Hom_R(M,M)$, $m,n in M$.
Then $(f+g)(m)=f(m)+g(m)=g(m)+f(m)=(g+f)(m)$.
My first question $(a)$: Did what I wrote above prove that commutativey condition require dfor $Hom_R(M,M)$ to be an abelian group? Or rather do we need to get another element of $M$ involved to show that $f,g$ are morphisms of abelian groups? Something like:
$(f+g)(m+n)=f(m+n)+g(m+n)=f(m)+f(n)+g(m)+g(n)=f(m)+g(m)+f(n)+g(n)=(f+g)(m)+(f+g)(n)$
This is question $(a)$, I wouldn't mind if one of you genius's shed some light in general on what's going on this for me. Thanks!
Next, Let $0 in Hom_R(M,M)$ s.t. $0(m)=0_m$ $forall m in M$, it is trivial to show that this is the identity element for $Hom_R(M,M)$ as an abelian group.
Next, if $f in Hom_R(M,M)$, define $-f$ by $(-f)(m)=-f(m)$ $forall m in M$. It is trivial that $-f$ is the inverse of $f$ for the binary operation of $Hom_R(M,M)$
Now, let $r in R$. Then we have:
$(f+g)(rm) = f(rm) + g(rm) = rf(m) + rg(m)=r(f(m)+g(m))=r(f+g)(m)$ and therefore $(f+g)$ is $R$-linear, and thus $(f+g) in Hom_R(M,M)$ .
Question (b): By this point, have I proven that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group? Where there any steps that were unnecessary or any that could have been more clear?
Now is the part that is a little tricky for me, showing that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is a left $R$ module using the natural action of $r*f(m)=rf(m)$. I get a little confused on this, because a part of me thinks it should be true automatically since $f$ is $R$-linear, but the truth is you also need the commutativity condition on $R$.
So, I must show that $g=rf in Hom_R(M,M)$. To this extent, let elements be defined as above:
$g(m+n) = rf(m+n) = rf(m)+rf(n) = g(m)+g(n)$. Thus $g$ a homomorphism.
But is $g$ $R$-linear? Let $s in R$.
$g(sm)=rf(sm)=r(sf(m))=(rs)(f(m))$
but also, $sg(m)=s(rf(m))=(sr)(f(m))$
so $g=rf$ is $R$-linear $iff$ $R$ is commutative.
Again, i'd appreciate it if somebody when through this for me and told me where I could be more explicit, efficient, or if I forgot something completely. I just realized I didn't show associativity, but i'd probably put that right along with the identity function and inverse functions as trivial.
Thanks in advance!
abstract-algebra
add a comment |
Let $R$ be a commutative ring with 1 and let $M$ be a left $R$-module. Show that $Hom_R(M,M)$, the set of $R$-homomorphisms from $M$ to itself is a left $R$-module if we set $(r·f)(m) = rf(m)$ for all $r ∈ R,m ∈ M,f ∈ Hom(M,M)$.
Here is my proof of this, I'd appreciate it if someone looked over the details, I have some questions scattered about here and there, which I marked with letters for anyone who wants to help me out.
So first things first I need to show that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group; to this extent, let $f,g in Hom_R(M,M)$, $m,n in M$.
Then $(f+g)(m)=f(m)+g(m)=g(m)+f(m)=(g+f)(m)$.
My first question $(a)$: Did what I wrote above prove that commutativey condition require dfor $Hom_R(M,M)$ to be an abelian group? Or rather do we need to get another element of $M$ involved to show that $f,g$ are morphisms of abelian groups? Something like:
$(f+g)(m+n)=f(m+n)+g(m+n)=f(m)+f(n)+g(m)+g(n)=f(m)+g(m)+f(n)+g(n)=(f+g)(m)+(f+g)(n)$
This is question $(a)$, I wouldn't mind if one of you genius's shed some light in general on what's going on this for me. Thanks!
Next, Let $0 in Hom_R(M,M)$ s.t. $0(m)=0_m$ $forall m in M$, it is trivial to show that this is the identity element for $Hom_R(M,M)$ as an abelian group.
Next, if $f in Hom_R(M,M)$, define $-f$ by $(-f)(m)=-f(m)$ $forall m in M$. It is trivial that $-f$ is the inverse of $f$ for the binary operation of $Hom_R(M,M)$
Now, let $r in R$. Then we have:
$(f+g)(rm) = f(rm) + g(rm) = rf(m) + rg(m)=r(f(m)+g(m))=r(f+g)(m)$ and therefore $(f+g)$ is $R$-linear, and thus $(f+g) in Hom_R(M,M)$ .
Question (b): By this point, have I proven that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group? Where there any steps that were unnecessary or any that could have been more clear?
Now is the part that is a little tricky for me, showing that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is a left $R$ module using the natural action of $r*f(m)=rf(m)$. I get a little confused on this, because a part of me thinks it should be true automatically since $f$ is $R$-linear, but the truth is you also need the commutativity condition on $R$.
So, I must show that $g=rf in Hom_R(M,M)$. To this extent, let elements be defined as above:
$g(m+n) = rf(m+n) = rf(m)+rf(n) = g(m)+g(n)$. Thus $g$ a homomorphism.
But is $g$ $R$-linear? Let $s in R$.
$g(sm)=rf(sm)=r(sf(m))=(rs)(f(m))$
but also, $sg(m)=s(rf(m))=(sr)(f(m))$
so $g=rf$ is $R$-linear $iff$ $R$ is commutative.
Again, i'd appreciate it if somebody when through this for me and told me where I could be more explicit, efficient, or if I forgot something completely. I just realized I didn't show associativity, but i'd probably put that right along with the identity function and inverse functions as trivial.
Thanks in advance!
abstract-algebra
add a comment |
Let $R$ be a commutative ring with 1 and let $M$ be a left $R$-module. Show that $Hom_R(M,M)$, the set of $R$-homomorphisms from $M$ to itself is a left $R$-module if we set $(r·f)(m) = rf(m)$ for all $r ∈ R,m ∈ M,f ∈ Hom(M,M)$.
Here is my proof of this, I'd appreciate it if someone looked over the details, I have some questions scattered about here and there, which I marked with letters for anyone who wants to help me out.
So first things first I need to show that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group; to this extent, let $f,g in Hom_R(M,M)$, $m,n in M$.
Then $(f+g)(m)=f(m)+g(m)=g(m)+f(m)=(g+f)(m)$.
My first question $(a)$: Did what I wrote above prove that commutativey condition require dfor $Hom_R(M,M)$ to be an abelian group? Or rather do we need to get another element of $M$ involved to show that $f,g$ are morphisms of abelian groups? Something like:
$(f+g)(m+n)=f(m+n)+g(m+n)=f(m)+f(n)+g(m)+g(n)=f(m)+g(m)+f(n)+g(n)=(f+g)(m)+(f+g)(n)$
This is question $(a)$, I wouldn't mind if one of you genius's shed some light in general on what's going on this for me. Thanks!
Next, Let $0 in Hom_R(M,M)$ s.t. $0(m)=0_m$ $forall m in M$, it is trivial to show that this is the identity element for $Hom_R(M,M)$ as an abelian group.
Next, if $f in Hom_R(M,M)$, define $-f$ by $(-f)(m)=-f(m)$ $forall m in M$. It is trivial that $-f$ is the inverse of $f$ for the binary operation of $Hom_R(M,M)$
Now, let $r in R$. Then we have:
$(f+g)(rm) = f(rm) + g(rm) = rf(m) + rg(m)=r(f(m)+g(m))=r(f+g)(m)$ and therefore $(f+g)$ is $R$-linear, and thus $(f+g) in Hom_R(M,M)$ .
Question (b): By this point, have I proven that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group? Where there any steps that were unnecessary or any that could have been more clear?
Now is the part that is a little tricky for me, showing that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is a left $R$ module using the natural action of $r*f(m)=rf(m)$. I get a little confused on this, because a part of me thinks it should be true automatically since $f$ is $R$-linear, but the truth is you also need the commutativity condition on $R$.
So, I must show that $g=rf in Hom_R(M,M)$. To this extent, let elements be defined as above:
$g(m+n) = rf(m+n) = rf(m)+rf(n) = g(m)+g(n)$. Thus $g$ a homomorphism.
But is $g$ $R$-linear? Let $s in R$.
$g(sm)=rf(sm)=r(sf(m))=(rs)(f(m))$
but also, $sg(m)=s(rf(m))=(sr)(f(m))$
so $g=rf$ is $R$-linear $iff$ $R$ is commutative.
Again, i'd appreciate it if somebody when through this for me and told me where I could be more explicit, efficient, or if I forgot something completely. I just realized I didn't show associativity, but i'd probably put that right along with the identity function and inverse functions as trivial.
Thanks in advance!
abstract-algebra
Let $R$ be a commutative ring with 1 and let $M$ be a left $R$-module. Show that $Hom_R(M,M)$, the set of $R$-homomorphisms from $M$ to itself is a left $R$-module if we set $(r·f)(m) = rf(m)$ for all $r ∈ R,m ∈ M,f ∈ Hom(M,M)$.
Here is my proof of this, I'd appreciate it if someone looked over the details, I have some questions scattered about here and there, which I marked with letters for anyone who wants to help me out.
So first things first I need to show that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group; to this extent, let $f,g in Hom_R(M,M)$, $m,n in M$.
Then $(f+g)(m)=f(m)+g(m)=g(m)+f(m)=(g+f)(m)$.
My first question $(a)$: Did what I wrote above prove that commutativey condition require dfor $Hom_R(M,M)$ to be an abelian group? Or rather do we need to get another element of $M$ involved to show that $f,g$ are morphisms of abelian groups? Something like:
$(f+g)(m+n)=f(m+n)+g(m+n)=f(m)+f(n)+g(m)+g(n)=f(m)+g(m)+f(n)+g(n)=(f+g)(m)+(f+g)(n)$
This is question $(a)$, I wouldn't mind if one of you genius's shed some light in general on what's going on this for me. Thanks!
Next, Let $0 in Hom_R(M,M)$ s.t. $0(m)=0_m$ $forall m in M$, it is trivial to show that this is the identity element for $Hom_R(M,M)$ as an abelian group.
Next, if $f in Hom_R(M,M)$, define $-f$ by $(-f)(m)=-f(m)$ $forall m in M$. It is trivial that $-f$ is the inverse of $f$ for the binary operation of $Hom_R(M,M)$
Now, let $r in R$. Then we have:
$(f+g)(rm) = f(rm) + g(rm) = rf(m) + rg(m)=r(f(m)+g(m))=r(f+g)(m)$ and therefore $(f+g)$ is $R$-linear, and thus $(f+g) in Hom_R(M,M)$ .
Question (b): By this point, have I proven that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group? Where there any steps that were unnecessary or any that could have been more clear?
Now is the part that is a little tricky for me, showing that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is a left $R$ module using the natural action of $r*f(m)=rf(m)$. I get a little confused on this, because a part of me thinks it should be true automatically since $f$ is $R$-linear, but the truth is you also need the commutativity condition on $R$.
So, I must show that $g=rf in Hom_R(M,M)$. To this extent, let elements be defined as above:
$g(m+n) = rf(m+n) = rf(m)+rf(n) = g(m)+g(n)$. Thus $g$ a homomorphism.
But is $g$ $R$-linear? Let $s in R$.
$g(sm)=rf(sm)=r(sf(m))=(rs)(f(m))$
but also, $sg(m)=s(rf(m))=(sr)(f(m))$
so $g=rf$ is $R$-linear $iff$ $R$ is commutative.
Again, i'd appreciate it if somebody when through this for me and told me where I could be more explicit, efficient, or if I forgot something completely. I just realized I didn't show associativity, but i'd probably put that right along with the identity function and inverse functions as trivial.
Thanks in advance!
abstract-algebra
abstract-algebra
asked Dec 9 at 19:08
Michael Vaughan
790211
790211
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032809%2flet-r-be-a-comm-ring-w-1-m-be-a-left-r-module-show-that-hom-rm-m-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032809%2flet-r-be-a-comm-ring-w-1-m-be-a-left-r-module-show-that-hom-rm-m-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown