Let $R$ be a comm ring w/ 1, $M$ be a left $R$-module. Show that $Hom_R(M,M)$, a left $R$-module












0














Let $R$ be a commutative ring with 1 and let $M$ be a left $R$-module. Show that $Hom_R(M,M)$, the set of $R$-homomorphisms from $M$ to itself is a left $R$-module if we set $(r·f)(m) = rf(m)$ for all $r ∈ R,m ∈ M,f ∈ Hom(M,M)$.



Here is my proof of this, I'd appreciate it if someone looked over the details, I have some questions scattered about here and there, which I marked with letters for anyone who wants to help me out.



So first things first I need to show that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group; to this extent, let $f,g in Hom_R(M,M)$, $m,n in M$.



Then $(f+g)(m)=f(m)+g(m)=g(m)+f(m)=(g+f)(m)$.



My first question $(a)$: Did what I wrote above prove that commutativey condition require dfor $Hom_R(M,M)$ to be an abelian group? Or rather do we need to get another element of $M$ involved to show that $f,g$ are morphisms of abelian groups? Something like:



$(f+g)(m+n)=f(m+n)+g(m+n)=f(m)+f(n)+g(m)+g(n)=f(m)+g(m)+f(n)+g(n)=(f+g)(m)+(f+g)(n)$



This is question $(a)$, I wouldn't mind if one of you genius's shed some light in general on what's going on this for me. Thanks!



Next, Let $0 in Hom_R(M,M)$ s.t. $0(m)=0_m$ $forall m in M$, it is trivial to show that this is the identity element for $Hom_R(M,M)$ as an abelian group.



Next, if $f in Hom_R(M,M)$, define $-f$ by $(-f)(m)=-f(m)$ $forall m in M$. It is trivial that $-f$ is the inverse of $f$ for the binary operation of $Hom_R(M,M)$



Now, let $r in R$. Then we have:



$(f+g)(rm) = f(rm) + g(rm) = rf(m) + rg(m)=r(f(m)+g(m))=r(f+g)(m)$ and therefore $(f+g)$ is $R$-linear, and thus $(f+g) in Hom_R(M,M)$ .



Question (b): By this point, have I proven that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group? Where there any steps that were unnecessary or any that could have been more clear?



Now is the part that is a little tricky for me, showing that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is a left $R$ module using the natural action of $r*f(m)=rf(m)$. I get a little confused on this, because a part of me thinks it should be true automatically since $f$ is $R$-linear, but the truth is you also need the commutativity condition on $R$.



So, I must show that $g=rf in Hom_R(M,M)$. To this extent, let elements be defined as above:



$g(m+n) = rf(m+n) = rf(m)+rf(n) = g(m)+g(n)$. Thus $g$ a homomorphism.



But is $g$ $R$-linear? Let $s in R$.



$g(sm)=rf(sm)=r(sf(m))=(rs)(f(m))$



but also, $sg(m)=s(rf(m))=(sr)(f(m))$



so $g=rf$ is $R$-linear $iff$ $R$ is commutative.



Again, i'd appreciate it if somebody when through this for me and told me where I could be more explicit, efficient, or if I forgot something completely. I just realized I didn't show associativity, but i'd probably put that right along with the identity function and inverse functions as trivial.



Thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    Let $R$ be a commutative ring with 1 and let $M$ be a left $R$-module. Show that $Hom_R(M,M)$, the set of $R$-homomorphisms from $M$ to itself is a left $R$-module if we set $(r·f)(m) = rf(m)$ for all $r ∈ R,m ∈ M,f ∈ Hom(M,M)$.



    Here is my proof of this, I'd appreciate it if someone looked over the details, I have some questions scattered about here and there, which I marked with letters for anyone who wants to help me out.



    So first things first I need to show that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group; to this extent, let $f,g in Hom_R(M,M)$, $m,n in M$.



    Then $(f+g)(m)=f(m)+g(m)=g(m)+f(m)=(g+f)(m)$.



    My first question $(a)$: Did what I wrote above prove that commutativey condition require dfor $Hom_R(M,M)$ to be an abelian group? Or rather do we need to get another element of $M$ involved to show that $f,g$ are morphisms of abelian groups? Something like:



    $(f+g)(m+n)=f(m+n)+g(m+n)=f(m)+f(n)+g(m)+g(n)=f(m)+g(m)+f(n)+g(n)=(f+g)(m)+(f+g)(n)$



    This is question $(a)$, I wouldn't mind if one of you genius's shed some light in general on what's going on this for me. Thanks!



    Next, Let $0 in Hom_R(M,M)$ s.t. $0(m)=0_m$ $forall m in M$, it is trivial to show that this is the identity element for $Hom_R(M,M)$ as an abelian group.



    Next, if $f in Hom_R(M,M)$, define $-f$ by $(-f)(m)=-f(m)$ $forall m in M$. It is trivial that $-f$ is the inverse of $f$ for the binary operation of $Hom_R(M,M)$



    Now, let $r in R$. Then we have:



    $(f+g)(rm) = f(rm) + g(rm) = rf(m) + rg(m)=r(f(m)+g(m))=r(f+g)(m)$ and therefore $(f+g)$ is $R$-linear, and thus $(f+g) in Hom_R(M,M)$ .



    Question (b): By this point, have I proven that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group? Where there any steps that were unnecessary or any that could have been more clear?



    Now is the part that is a little tricky for me, showing that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is a left $R$ module using the natural action of $r*f(m)=rf(m)$. I get a little confused on this, because a part of me thinks it should be true automatically since $f$ is $R$-linear, but the truth is you also need the commutativity condition on $R$.



    So, I must show that $g=rf in Hom_R(M,M)$. To this extent, let elements be defined as above:



    $g(m+n) = rf(m+n) = rf(m)+rf(n) = g(m)+g(n)$. Thus $g$ a homomorphism.



    But is $g$ $R$-linear? Let $s in R$.



    $g(sm)=rf(sm)=r(sf(m))=(rs)(f(m))$



    but also, $sg(m)=s(rf(m))=(sr)(f(m))$



    so $g=rf$ is $R$-linear $iff$ $R$ is commutative.



    Again, i'd appreciate it if somebody when through this for me and told me where I could be more explicit, efficient, or if I forgot something completely. I just realized I didn't show associativity, but i'd probably put that right along with the identity function and inverse functions as trivial.



    Thanks in advance!










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      Let $R$ be a commutative ring with 1 and let $M$ be a left $R$-module. Show that $Hom_R(M,M)$, the set of $R$-homomorphisms from $M$ to itself is a left $R$-module if we set $(r·f)(m) = rf(m)$ for all $r ∈ R,m ∈ M,f ∈ Hom(M,M)$.



      Here is my proof of this, I'd appreciate it if someone looked over the details, I have some questions scattered about here and there, which I marked with letters for anyone who wants to help me out.



      So first things first I need to show that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group; to this extent, let $f,g in Hom_R(M,M)$, $m,n in M$.



      Then $(f+g)(m)=f(m)+g(m)=g(m)+f(m)=(g+f)(m)$.



      My first question $(a)$: Did what I wrote above prove that commutativey condition require dfor $Hom_R(M,M)$ to be an abelian group? Or rather do we need to get another element of $M$ involved to show that $f,g$ are morphisms of abelian groups? Something like:



      $(f+g)(m+n)=f(m+n)+g(m+n)=f(m)+f(n)+g(m)+g(n)=f(m)+g(m)+f(n)+g(n)=(f+g)(m)+(f+g)(n)$



      This is question $(a)$, I wouldn't mind if one of you genius's shed some light in general on what's going on this for me. Thanks!



      Next, Let $0 in Hom_R(M,M)$ s.t. $0(m)=0_m$ $forall m in M$, it is trivial to show that this is the identity element for $Hom_R(M,M)$ as an abelian group.



      Next, if $f in Hom_R(M,M)$, define $-f$ by $(-f)(m)=-f(m)$ $forall m in M$. It is trivial that $-f$ is the inverse of $f$ for the binary operation of $Hom_R(M,M)$



      Now, let $r in R$. Then we have:



      $(f+g)(rm) = f(rm) + g(rm) = rf(m) + rg(m)=r(f(m)+g(m))=r(f+g)(m)$ and therefore $(f+g)$ is $R$-linear, and thus $(f+g) in Hom_R(M,M)$ .



      Question (b): By this point, have I proven that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group? Where there any steps that were unnecessary or any that could have been more clear?



      Now is the part that is a little tricky for me, showing that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is a left $R$ module using the natural action of $r*f(m)=rf(m)$. I get a little confused on this, because a part of me thinks it should be true automatically since $f$ is $R$-linear, but the truth is you also need the commutativity condition on $R$.



      So, I must show that $g=rf in Hom_R(M,M)$. To this extent, let elements be defined as above:



      $g(m+n) = rf(m+n) = rf(m)+rf(n) = g(m)+g(n)$. Thus $g$ a homomorphism.



      But is $g$ $R$-linear? Let $s in R$.



      $g(sm)=rf(sm)=r(sf(m))=(rs)(f(m))$



      but also, $sg(m)=s(rf(m))=(sr)(f(m))$



      so $g=rf$ is $R$-linear $iff$ $R$ is commutative.



      Again, i'd appreciate it if somebody when through this for me and told me where I could be more explicit, efficient, or if I forgot something completely. I just realized I didn't show associativity, but i'd probably put that right along with the identity function and inverse functions as trivial.



      Thanks in advance!










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $R$ be a commutative ring with 1 and let $M$ be a left $R$-module. Show that $Hom_R(M,M)$, the set of $R$-homomorphisms from $M$ to itself is a left $R$-module if we set $(r·f)(m) = rf(m)$ for all $r ∈ R,m ∈ M,f ∈ Hom(M,M)$.



      Here is my proof of this, I'd appreciate it if someone looked over the details, I have some questions scattered about here and there, which I marked with letters for anyone who wants to help me out.



      So first things first I need to show that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group; to this extent, let $f,g in Hom_R(M,M)$, $m,n in M$.



      Then $(f+g)(m)=f(m)+g(m)=g(m)+f(m)=(g+f)(m)$.



      My first question $(a)$: Did what I wrote above prove that commutativey condition require dfor $Hom_R(M,M)$ to be an abelian group? Or rather do we need to get another element of $M$ involved to show that $f,g$ are morphisms of abelian groups? Something like:



      $(f+g)(m+n)=f(m+n)+g(m+n)=f(m)+f(n)+g(m)+g(n)=f(m)+g(m)+f(n)+g(n)=(f+g)(m)+(f+g)(n)$



      This is question $(a)$, I wouldn't mind if one of you genius's shed some light in general on what's going on this for me. Thanks!



      Next, Let $0 in Hom_R(M,M)$ s.t. $0(m)=0_m$ $forall m in M$, it is trivial to show that this is the identity element for $Hom_R(M,M)$ as an abelian group.



      Next, if $f in Hom_R(M,M)$, define $-f$ by $(-f)(m)=-f(m)$ $forall m in M$. It is trivial that $-f$ is the inverse of $f$ for the binary operation of $Hom_R(M,M)$



      Now, let $r in R$. Then we have:



      $(f+g)(rm) = f(rm) + g(rm) = rf(m) + rg(m)=r(f(m)+g(m))=r(f+g)(m)$ and therefore $(f+g)$ is $R$-linear, and thus $(f+g) in Hom_R(M,M)$ .



      Question (b): By this point, have I proven that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is an abelian group? Where there any steps that were unnecessary or any that could have been more clear?



      Now is the part that is a little tricky for me, showing that $Hom_R(M,M)$ is a left $R$ module using the natural action of $r*f(m)=rf(m)$. I get a little confused on this, because a part of me thinks it should be true automatically since $f$ is $R$-linear, but the truth is you also need the commutativity condition on $R$.



      So, I must show that $g=rf in Hom_R(M,M)$. To this extent, let elements be defined as above:



      $g(m+n) = rf(m+n) = rf(m)+rf(n) = g(m)+g(n)$. Thus $g$ a homomorphism.



      But is $g$ $R$-linear? Let $s in R$.



      $g(sm)=rf(sm)=r(sf(m))=(rs)(f(m))$



      but also, $sg(m)=s(rf(m))=(sr)(f(m))$



      so $g=rf$ is $R$-linear $iff$ $R$ is commutative.



      Again, i'd appreciate it if somebody when through this for me and told me where I could be more explicit, efficient, or if I forgot something completely. I just realized I didn't show associativity, but i'd probably put that right along with the identity function and inverse functions as trivial.



      Thanks in advance!







      abstract-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 9 at 19:08









      Michael Vaughan

      790211




      790211



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032809%2flet-r-be-a-comm-ring-w-1-m-be-a-left-r-module-show-that-hom-rm-m-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032809%2flet-r-be-a-comm-ring-w-1-m-be-a-left-r-module-show-that-hom-rm-m-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Cabo Verde

          Gyllenstierna