In a pulley system involving two particles attached to the ends of a light, inextensible string…












0












$begingroup$


if one particle descends by a certain distance, will the other particle ascend by the same distance?



For example, if the two particles are hanging next to eachother, both 2 metres above the ground. If one of the particles descends by 2 metres, would the other particle also ascend by 2 metres.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Obviously yes! But where comes from your doubt? Maybe there are many pulleys connected by the string?
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Novati
    Jan 9 at 19:06












  • $begingroup$
    I had done a question where two particles are both two metres above the ground. They asked for the greatest height a particle, Q, reaches above the ground after the other particle, P, descends by 2 metres and hits the ground. I found what further distance Q goes up by after P strikes the ground (some value 'x'). Since they asked Q's greatest height reached above the ground, I added that value (x) to 2 and then 2 again for my final answer as it rises two metres before P strikes the grond and is already 2 metres above the ground. However, the book added 2 to the value (x) only once...
    $endgroup$
    – Siddharth Chaudhary
    Jan 9 at 19:26
















0












$begingroup$


if one particle descends by a certain distance, will the other particle ascend by the same distance?



For example, if the two particles are hanging next to eachother, both 2 metres above the ground. If one of the particles descends by 2 metres, would the other particle also ascend by 2 metres.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Obviously yes! But where comes from your doubt? Maybe there are many pulleys connected by the string?
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Novati
    Jan 9 at 19:06












  • $begingroup$
    I had done a question where two particles are both two metres above the ground. They asked for the greatest height a particle, Q, reaches above the ground after the other particle, P, descends by 2 metres and hits the ground. I found what further distance Q goes up by after P strikes the ground (some value 'x'). Since they asked Q's greatest height reached above the ground, I added that value (x) to 2 and then 2 again for my final answer as it rises two metres before P strikes the grond and is already 2 metres above the ground. However, the book added 2 to the value (x) only once...
    $endgroup$
    – Siddharth Chaudhary
    Jan 9 at 19:26














0












0








0





$begingroup$


if one particle descends by a certain distance, will the other particle ascend by the same distance?



For example, if the two particles are hanging next to eachother, both 2 metres above the ground. If one of the particles descends by 2 metres, would the other particle also ascend by 2 metres.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




if one particle descends by a certain distance, will the other particle ascend by the same distance?



For example, if the two particles are hanging next to eachother, both 2 metres above the ground. If one of the particles descends by 2 metres, would the other particle also ascend by 2 metres.







classical-mechanics






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 9 at 19:03









Siddharth ChaudharySiddharth Chaudhary

1




1












  • $begingroup$
    Obviously yes! But where comes from your doubt? Maybe there are many pulleys connected by the string?
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Novati
    Jan 9 at 19:06












  • $begingroup$
    I had done a question where two particles are both two metres above the ground. They asked for the greatest height a particle, Q, reaches above the ground after the other particle, P, descends by 2 metres and hits the ground. I found what further distance Q goes up by after P strikes the ground (some value 'x'). Since they asked Q's greatest height reached above the ground, I added that value (x) to 2 and then 2 again for my final answer as it rises two metres before P strikes the grond and is already 2 metres above the ground. However, the book added 2 to the value (x) only once...
    $endgroup$
    – Siddharth Chaudhary
    Jan 9 at 19:26


















  • $begingroup$
    Obviously yes! But where comes from your doubt? Maybe there are many pulleys connected by the string?
    $endgroup$
    – Emilio Novati
    Jan 9 at 19:06












  • $begingroup$
    I had done a question where two particles are both two metres above the ground. They asked for the greatest height a particle, Q, reaches above the ground after the other particle, P, descends by 2 metres and hits the ground. I found what further distance Q goes up by after P strikes the ground (some value 'x'). Since they asked Q's greatest height reached above the ground, I added that value (x) to 2 and then 2 again for my final answer as it rises two metres before P strikes the grond and is already 2 metres above the ground. However, the book added 2 to the value (x) only once...
    $endgroup$
    – Siddharth Chaudhary
    Jan 9 at 19:26
















$begingroup$
Obviously yes! But where comes from your doubt? Maybe there are many pulleys connected by the string?
$endgroup$
– Emilio Novati
Jan 9 at 19:06






$begingroup$
Obviously yes! But where comes from your doubt? Maybe there are many pulleys connected by the string?
$endgroup$
– Emilio Novati
Jan 9 at 19:06














$begingroup$
I had done a question where two particles are both two metres above the ground. They asked for the greatest height a particle, Q, reaches above the ground after the other particle, P, descends by 2 metres and hits the ground. I found what further distance Q goes up by after P strikes the ground (some value 'x'). Since they asked Q's greatest height reached above the ground, I added that value (x) to 2 and then 2 again for my final answer as it rises two metres before P strikes the grond and is already 2 metres above the ground. However, the book added 2 to the value (x) only once...
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Chaudhary
Jan 9 at 19:26




$begingroup$
I had done a question where two particles are both two metres above the ground. They asked for the greatest height a particle, Q, reaches above the ground after the other particle, P, descends by 2 metres and hits the ground. I found what further distance Q goes up by after P strikes the ground (some value 'x'). Since they asked Q's greatest height reached above the ground, I added that value (x) to 2 and then 2 again for my final answer as it rises two metres before P strikes the grond and is already 2 metres above the ground. However, the book added 2 to the value (x) only once...
$endgroup$
– Siddharth Chaudhary
Jan 9 at 19:26










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067833%2fin-a-pulley-system-involving-two-particles-attached-to-the-ends-of-a-light-inex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067833%2fin-a-pulley-system-involving-two-particles-attached-to-the-ends-of-a-light-inex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna