Show that $alpha = (1 2 3)(2 3 4)(5 6 7)(7 8 9 10)$ has order $10$ in $S_n$ $(ngeq10)$.
So I have done problem #13 in section 7.5 of t book Abstract Algebra: An Intorduction, 3rd Edition by Thomas W. Hungerford (ISBN: 978-1-1115696-2-4). multiple times over now, but I still get the order of $alpha$ is 6. Here is some of my work:
$alpha = (12)(34)(5678910)$
$alpha^2 = (579)(6810)$
$alpha^3 = (12)(34)(58)(69)(710)$
$alpha^6 = alpha^3 • alpha^3 = [(12)(34)(58)(69)(710)] • [(12)(34)(58)(69)(710)] = (1)$
Even by Theorem 7.25 I am getting that the order of $alpha$ is 6. Theorem 7.25 states:
The order of a permutation $tau$ in $S_n$ is the least common multiple of the lengths of the disjoint cycles whose product is $tau$.
Is there something I am doing incorrectly, or is the book wrong?
P.S. I tried to post images of my work and the book question but “I need at least 10 reputation to post images” or so the error message said.
abstract-algebra permutations least-common-multiple
|
show 1 more comment
So I have done problem #13 in section 7.5 of t book Abstract Algebra: An Intorduction, 3rd Edition by Thomas W. Hungerford (ISBN: 978-1-1115696-2-4). multiple times over now, but I still get the order of $alpha$ is 6. Here is some of my work:
$alpha = (12)(34)(5678910)$
$alpha^2 = (579)(6810)$
$alpha^3 = (12)(34)(58)(69)(710)$
$alpha^6 = alpha^3 • alpha^3 = [(12)(34)(58)(69)(710)] • [(12)(34)(58)(69)(710)] = (1)$
Even by Theorem 7.25 I am getting that the order of $alpha$ is 6. Theorem 7.25 states:
The order of a permutation $tau$ in $S_n$ is the least common multiple of the lengths of the disjoint cycles whose product is $tau$.
Is there something I am doing incorrectly, or is the book wrong?
P.S. I tried to post images of my work and the book question but “I need at least 10 reputation to post images” or so the error message said.
abstract-algebra permutations least-common-multiple
Those aren't disjoint cycles in the title. What does your decomposition into disjoint cycles look like?
– jmerry
Dec 7 at 22:32
The theorem says "disjoint".
– Tobias Kildetoft
Dec 7 at 22:33
Which book are you referring to?
– Shaun
Dec 7 at 22:36
Please edit the question to include which book you mean.
– Shaun
Dec 7 at 22:41
The book is Abstract Algebra: An Intorduction, 3rd Edition by Thomas W. Hungerford with ISBN: 978-1-1115696-2-4.
– AMN52
Dec 7 at 22:44
|
show 1 more comment
So I have done problem #13 in section 7.5 of t book Abstract Algebra: An Intorduction, 3rd Edition by Thomas W. Hungerford (ISBN: 978-1-1115696-2-4). multiple times over now, but I still get the order of $alpha$ is 6. Here is some of my work:
$alpha = (12)(34)(5678910)$
$alpha^2 = (579)(6810)$
$alpha^3 = (12)(34)(58)(69)(710)$
$alpha^6 = alpha^3 • alpha^3 = [(12)(34)(58)(69)(710)] • [(12)(34)(58)(69)(710)] = (1)$
Even by Theorem 7.25 I am getting that the order of $alpha$ is 6. Theorem 7.25 states:
The order of a permutation $tau$ in $S_n$ is the least common multiple of the lengths of the disjoint cycles whose product is $tau$.
Is there something I am doing incorrectly, or is the book wrong?
P.S. I tried to post images of my work and the book question but “I need at least 10 reputation to post images” or so the error message said.
abstract-algebra permutations least-common-multiple
So I have done problem #13 in section 7.5 of t book Abstract Algebra: An Intorduction, 3rd Edition by Thomas W. Hungerford (ISBN: 978-1-1115696-2-4). multiple times over now, but I still get the order of $alpha$ is 6. Here is some of my work:
$alpha = (12)(34)(5678910)$
$alpha^2 = (579)(6810)$
$alpha^3 = (12)(34)(58)(69)(710)$
$alpha^6 = alpha^3 • alpha^3 = [(12)(34)(58)(69)(710)] • [(12)(34)(58)(69)(710)] = (1)$
Even by Theorem 7.25 I am getting that the order of $alpha$ is 6. Theorem 7.25 states:
The order of a permutation $tau$ in $S_n$ is the least common multiple of the lengths of the disjoint cycles whose product is $tau$.
Is there something I am doing incorrectly, or is the book wrong?
P.S. I tried to post images of my work and the book question but “I need at least 10 reputation to post images” or so the error message said.
abstract-algebra permutations least-common-multiple
abstract-algebra permutations least-common-multiple
edited Dec 7 at 22:50
asked Dec 7 at 22:22
AMN52
326
326
Those aren't disjoint cycles in the title. What does your decomposition into disjoint cycles look like?
– jmerry
Dec 7 at 22:32
The theorem says "disjoint".
– Tobias Kildetoft
Dec 7 at 22:33
Which book are you referring to?
– Shaun
Dec 7 at 22:36
Please edit the question to include which book you mean.
– Shaun
Dec 7 at 22:41
The book is Abstract Algebra: An Intorduction, 3rd Edition by Thomas W. Hungerford with ISBN: 978-1-1115696-2-4.
– AMN52
Dec 7 at 22:44
|
show 1 more comment
Those aren't disjoint cycles in the title. What does your decomposition into disjoint cycles look like?
– jmerry
Dec 7 at 22:32
The theorem says "disjoint".
– Tobias Kildetoft
Dec 7 at 22:33
Which book are you referring to?
– Shaun
Dec 7 at 22:36
Please edit the question to include which book you mean.
– Shaun
Dec 7 at 22:41
The book is Abstract Algebra: An Intorduction, 3rd Edition by Thomas W. Hungerford with ISBN: 978-1-1115696-2-4.
– AMN52
Dec 7 at 22:44
Those aren't disjoint cycles in the title. What does your decomposition into disjoint cycles look like?
– jmerry
Dec 7 at 22:32
Those aren't disjoint cycles in the title. What does your decomposition into disjoint cycles look like?
– jmerry
Dec 7 at 22:32
The theorem says "disjoint".
– Tobias Kildetoft
Dec 7 at 22:33
The theorem says "disjoint".
– Tobias Kildetoft
Dec 7 at 22:33
Which book are you referring to?
– Shaun
Dec 7 at 22:36
Which book are you referring to?
– Shaun
Dec 7 at 22:36
Please edit the question to include which book you mean.
– Shaun
Dec 7 at 22:41
Please edit the question to include which book you mean.
– Shaun
Dec 7 at 22:41
The book is Abstract Algebra: An Intorduction, 3rd Edition by Thomas W. Hungerford with ISBN: 978-1-1115696-2-4.
– AMN52
Dec 7 at 22:44
The book is Abstract Algebra: An Intorduction, 3rd Edition by Thomas W. Hungerford with ISBN: 978-1-1115696-2-4.
– AMN52
Dec 7 at 22:44
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You're right. The decomposition into disjoint cycles yields
$$(1, 2, 3)(2, 3 ,4)(5, 6, 7)(7 ,8, 9, 10)=(1,2)(3,4) (5,6,7,8,9,10).$$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030438%2fshow-that-alpha-1-2-32-3-45-6-77-8-9-10-has-order-10-in-s-n-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You're right. The decomposition into disjoint cycles yields
$$(1, 2, 3)(2, 3 ,4)(5, 6, 7)(7 ,8, 9, 10)=(1,2)(3,4) (5,6,7,8,9,10).$$
add a comment |
You're right. The decomposition into disjoint cycles yields
$$(1, 2, 3)(2, 3 ,4)(5, 6, 7)(7 ,8, 9, 10)=(1,2)(3,4) (5,6,7,8,9,10).$$
add a comment |
You're right. The decomposition into disjoint cycles yields
$$(1, 2, 3)(2, 3 ,4)(5, 6, 7)(7 ,8, 9, 10)=(1,2)(3,4) (5,6,7,8,9,10).$$
You're right. The decomposition into disjoint cycles yields
$$(1, 2, 3)(2, 3 ,4)(5, 6, 7)(7 ,8, 9, 10)=(1,2)(3,4) (5,6,7,8,9,10).$$
answered Dec 7 at 22:38
Bernard
118k638112
118k638112
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030438%2fshow-that-alpha-1-2-32-3-45-6-77-8-9-10-has-order-10-in-s-n-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Those aren't disjoint cycles in the title. What does your decomposition into disjoint cycles look like?
– jmerry
Dec 7 at 22:32
The theorem says "disjoint".
– Tobias Kildetoft
Dec 7 at 22:33
Which book are you referring to?
– Shaun
Dec 7 at 22:36
Please edit the question to include which book you mean.
– Shaun
Dec 7 at 22:41
The book is Abstract Algebra: An Intorduction, 3rd Edition by Thomas W. Hungerford with ISBN: 978-1-1115696-2-4.
– AMN52
Dec 7 at 22:44