Is the Legendre transform connected to identity in any sense












0












$begingroup$


Is the Legendre transform connected to identity in any sense? Is there a "good" way to interpolate continuously between a convex function and its Legendre transform in the sense that



$gamma: [0,1] rightarrow { text{mappings of convex functions into convex functions} }$



such that



$gamma(0) = id quad text{and} quad gamma(1) = text{Legendre transform}$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "connected to identity"?
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 13 '18 at 16:47










  • $begingroup$
    clarified a little
    $endgroup$
    – tonydo
    Dec 13 '18 at 16:55
















0












$begingroup$


Is the Legendre transform connected to identity in any sense? Is there a "good" way to interpolate continuously between a convex function and its Legendre transform in the sense that



$gamma: [0,1] rightarrow { text{mappings of convex functions into convex functions} }$



such that



$gamma(0) = id quad text{and} quad gamma(1) = text{Legendre transform}$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "connected to identity"?
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 13 '18 at 16:47










  • $begingroup$
    clarified a little
    $endgroup$
    – tonydo
    Dec 13 '18 at 16:55














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Is the Legendre transform connected to identity in any sense? Is there a "good" way to interpolate continuously between a convex function and its Legendre transform in the sense that



$gamma: [0,1] rightarrow { text{mappings of convex functions into convex functions} }$



such that



$gamma(0) = id quad text{and} quad gamma(1) = text{Legendre transform}$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is the Legendre transform connected to identity in any sense? Is there a "good" way to interpolate continuously between a convex function and its Legendre transform in the sense that



$gamma: [0,1] rightarrow { text{mappings of convex functions into convex functions} }$



such that



$gamma(0) = id quad text{and} quad gamma(1) = text{Legendre transform}$







convex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 13 '18 at 16:54







tonydo

















asked Dec 13 '18 at 16:42









tonydotonydo

1477




1477












  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "connected to identity"?
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 13 '18 at 16:47










  • $begingroup$
    clarified a little
    $endgroup$
    – tonydo
    Dec 13 '18 at 16:55


















  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "connected to identity"?
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 13 '18 at 16:47










  • $begingroup$
    clarified a little
    $endgroup$
    – tonydo
    Dec 13 '18 at 16:55
















$begingroup$
What do you mean by "connected to identity"?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 16:47




$begingroup$
What do you mean by "connected to identity"?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 16:47












$begingroup$
clarified a little
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 13 '18 at 16:55




$begingroup$
clarified a little
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 13 '18 at 16:55










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

I doubt there's anything like what you're seeking. Let $X$ be a Banach space, for a proper function $f:Xto Bbb Rcup {infty}$, its Legendre-Fenchel transform $f^*:X^*toBbb Rcup{infty}$ is defined on a totally different space.



Given that you want $gamma$ such that $gamma(0)=f$ and $gamma(1)=f^*$, the domain of the function $gamma(t)$ for $tin (0,1)$ is already a problem. Do you want it to be $X,X^*$ or something else entirely? You'd need to think of a continuous way to transform $X$ into $X^*$ (and I'm not even sure how to make that precise).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    doesn't need to be general; what about special cases for $X=[text{min}(f),infty]$?
    $endgroup$
    – tonydo
    Dec 13 '18 at 17:14












  • $begingroup$
    It just happens to be the case that $(Bbb R^n)^*simeqBbb R^n$, normally there's no connection between a point $x$ in our original space and a linear functional. My main point is there's no "middle ground" between $X$ and $X^*$ so you can't expect anything "in between".
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 13 '18 at 17:18











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038265%2fis-the-legendre-transform-connected-to-identity-in-any-sense%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

I doubt there's anything like what you're seeking. Let $X$ be a Banach space, for a proper function $f:Xto Bbb Rcup {infty}$, its Legendre-Fenchel transform $f^*:X^*toBbb Rcup{infty}$ is defined on a totally different space.



Given that you want $gamma$ such that $gamma(0)=f$ and $gamma(1)=f^*$, the domain of the function $gamma(t)$ for $tin (0,1)$ is already a problem. Do you want it to be $X,X^*$ or something else entirely? You'd need to think of a continuous way to transform $X$ into $X^*$ (and I'm not even sure how to make that precise).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    doesn't need to be general; what about special cases for $X=[text{min}(f),infty]$?
    $endgroup$
    – tonydo
    Dec 13 '18 at 17:14












  • $begingroup$
    It just happens to be the case that $(Bbb R^n)^*simeqBbb R^n$, normally there's no connection between a point $x$ in our original space and a linear functional. My main point is there's no "middle ground" between $X$ and $X^*$ so you can't expect anything "in between".
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 13 '18 at 17:18
















0












$begingroup$

I doubt there's anything like what you're seeking. Let $X$ be a Banach space, for a proper function $f:Xto Bbb Rcup {infty}$, its Legendre-Fenchel transform $f^*:X^*toBbb Rcup{infty}$ is defined on a totally different space.



Given that you want $gamma$ such that $gamma(0)=f$ and $gamma(1)=f^*$, the domain of the function $gamma(t)$ for $tin (0,1)$ is already a problem. Do you want it to be $X,X^*$ or something else entirely? You'd need to think of a continuous way to transform $X$ into $X^*$ (and I'm not even sure how to make that precise).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    doesn't need to be general; what about special cases for $X=[text{min}(f),infty]$?
    $endgroup$
    – tonydo
    Dec 13 '18 at 17:14












  • $begingroup$
    It just happens to be the case that $(Bbb R^n)^*simeqBbb R^n$, normally there's no connection between a point $x$ in our original space and a linear functional. My main point is there's no "middle ground" between $X$ and $X^*$ so you can't expect anything "in between".
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 13 '18 at 17:18














0












0








0





$begingroup$

I doubt there's anything like what you're seeking. Let $X$ be a Banach space, for a proper function $f:Xto Bbb Rcup {infty}$, its Legendre-Fenchel transform $f^*:X^*toBbb Rcup{infty}$ is defined on a totally different space.



Given that you want $gamma$ such that $gamma(0)=f$ and $gamma(1)=f^*$, the domain of the function $gamma(t)$ for $tin (0,1)$ is already a problem. Do you want it to be $X,X^*$ or something else entirely? You'd need to think of a continuous way to transform $X$ into $X^*$ (and I'm not even sure how to make that precise).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



I doubt there's anything like what you're seeking. Let $X$ be a Banach space, for a proper function $f:Xto Bbb Rcup {infty}$, its Legendre-Fenchel transform $f^*:X^*toBbb Rcup{infty}$ is defined on a totally different space.



Given that you want $gamma$ such that $gamma(0)=f$ and $gamma(1)=f^*$, the domain of the function $gamma(t)$ for $tin (0,1)$ is already a problem. Do you want it to be $X,X^*$ or something else entirely? You'd need to think of a continuous way to transform $X$ into $X^*$ (and I'm not even sure how to make that precise).







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 13 '18 at 17:04









BigbearZzzBigbearZzz

7,56821650




7,56821650












  • $begingroup$
    doesn't need to be general; what about special cases for $X=[text{min}(f),infty]$?
    $endgroup$
    – tonydo
    Dec 13 '18 at 17:14












  • $begingroup$
    It just happens to be the case that $(Bbb R^n)^*simeqBbb R^n$, normally there's no connection between a point $x$ in our original space and a linear functional. My main point is there's no "middle ground" between $X$ and $X^*$ so you can't expect anything "in between".
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 13 '18 at 17:18


















  • $begingroup$
    doesn't need to be general; what about special cases for $X=[text{min}(f),infty]$?
    $endgroup$
    – tonydo
    Dec 13 '18 at 17:14












  • $begingroup$
    It just happens to be the case that $(Bbb R^n)^*simeqBbb R^n$, normally there's no connection between a point $x$ in our original space and a linear functional. My main point is there's no "middle ground" between $X$ and $X^*$ so you can't expect anything "in between".
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 13 '18 at 17:18
















$begingroup$
doesn't need to be general; what about special cases for $X=[text{min}(f),infty]$?
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 13 '18 at 17:14






$begingroup$
doesn't need to be general; what about special cases for $X=[text{min}(f),infty]$?
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 13 '18 at 17:14














$begingroup$
It just happens to be the case that $(Bbb R^n)^*simeqBbb R^n$, normally there's no connection between a point $x$ in our original space and a linear functional. My main point is there's no "middle ground" between $X$ and $X^*$ so you can't expect anything "in between".
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 17:18




$begingroup$
It just happens to be the case that $(Bbb R^n)^*simeqBbb R^n$, normally there's no connection between a point $x$ in our original space and a linear functional. My main point is there's no "middle ground" between $X$ and $X^*$ so you can't expect anything "in between".
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Dec 13 '18 at 17:18


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038265%2fis-the-legendre-transform-connected-to-identity-in-any-sense%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna