Showing that $Y = cup_{n=1}^infty Y_n$ is dense over the Hilbert $H$.












1














Source of question : Trying to prove that if the Hilbert $H$ has an orthonormal basis, then it is separable.



Elaboration :



Let $H$ be a Hilbert space and ${e_n : n in mathbb N}$ an orthonormal basis of $H$.



Let $Y_n$ be the space such $forall n in mathbb N$ :



$$Y_n = bigg{sum_{i=1}^nq_ie_i : q_i in mathbb Qbigg}$$



I know that every such $Y_n$ is measurable, because $Y_n$ is (I don't know the word in English - apologies!) with $mathbb Q_n$, because every element of it is written as a linear combination of $q_1,dots,q_n$. Now, I know that if $Y = cup_{n=1}^infty Y_n$, then $Y$ is measurable as a union of measurable sets. Now, $Y$ is dense over $H$, but this is the part that I cannot show.



I know I need to show that $forall x in H$ and $varepsilon >0$, $y in Y$ it is $| x-y| < varepsilon$.



Since ${e_n}$ is an orthonormal basis of $H$, then every $x in H$ can be written as :
$$x = sum_{n=1}^infty langle x, e_nrangle e_n$$



Thus the desired norm becomes :



$$bigg|sum_{n=1}^infty langle x, e_nrangle e_n - ybigg|$$



How should I continue now to prove $|x-y| < varepsilon$ aka that $Y$ is dense over $H$ and complete my proof ?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • what does measurable mean?
    – mathworker21
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:06










  • I apologise for any inconvenience regarding terminology, as I am Greek. In greek the word used essentially means "it can be numbered".
    – Rebellos
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:07










  • also, your question is easy. first take $N$ s.t. $||sum_{n=1}^infty langle x,e_n rangle e_n - sum_{n=1}^N langle x,e_n rangle e_n|| < frac{epsilon}{2}$. Then approximate each of the finitely many $langle x, e_n rangle$ well enough by rational numbers.
    – mathworker21
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:08






  • 1




    "Easy" is a very relative term.
    – Rebellos
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:09










  • I didn't mean to be rude. I just meant that the short thing I said is a full proof basically.
    – mathworker21
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:09
















1














Source of question : Trying to prove that if the Hilbert $H$ has an orthonormal basis, then it is separable.



Elaboration :



Let $H$ be a Hilbert space and ${e_n : n in mathbb N}$ an orthonormal basis of $H$.



Let $Y_n$ be the space such $forall n in mathbb N$ :



$$Y_n = bigg{sum_{i=1}^nq_ie_i : q_i in mathbb Qbigg}$$



I know that every such $Y_n$ is measurable, because $Y_n$ is (I don't know the word in English - apologies!) with $mathbb Q_n$, because every element of it is written as a linear combination of $q_1,dots,q_n$. Now, I know that if $Y = cup_{n=1}^infty Y_n$, then $Y$ is measurable as a union of measurable sets. Now, $Y$ is dense over $H$, but this is the part that I cannot show.



I know I need to show that $forall x in H$ and $varepsilon >0$, $y in Y$ it is $| x-y| < varepsilon$.



Since ${e_n}$ is an orthonormal basis of $H$, then every $x in H$ can be written as :
$$x = sum_{n=1}^infty langle x, e_nrangle e_n$$



Thus the desired norm becomes :



$$bigg|sum_{n=1}^infty langle x, e_nrangle e_n - ybigg|$$



How should I continue now to prove $|x-y| < varepsilon$ aka that $Y$ is dense over $H$ and complete my proof ?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • what does measurable mean?
    – mathworker21
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:06










  • I apologise for any inconvenience regarding terminology, as I am Greek. In greek the word used essentially means "it can be numbered".
    – Rebellos
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:07










  • also, your question is easy. first take $N$ s.t. $||sum_{n=1}^infty langle x,e_n rangle e_n - sum_{n=1}^N langle x,e_n rangle e_n|| < frac{epsilon}{2}$. Then approximate each of the finitely many $langle x, e_n rangle$ well enough by rational numbers.
    – mathworker21
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:08






  • 1




    "Easy" is a very relative term.
    – Rebellos
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:09










  • I didn't mean to be rude. I just meant that the short thing I said is a full proof basically.
    – mathworker21
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:09














1












1








1







Source of question : Trying to prove that if the Hilbert $H$ has an orthonormal basis, then it is separable.



Elaboration :



Let $H$ be a Hilbert space and ${e_n : n in mathbb N}$ an orthonormal basis of $H$.



Let $Y_n$ be the space such $forall n in mathbb N$ :



$$Y_n = bigg{sum_{i=1}^nq_ie_i : q_i in mathbb Qbigg}$$



I know that every such $Y_n$ is measurable, because $Y_n$ is (I don't know the word in English - apologies!) with $mathbb Q_n$, because every element of it is written as a linear combination of $q_1,dots,q_n$. Now, I know that if $Y = cup_{n=1}^infty Y_n$, then $Y$ is measurable as a union of measurable sets. Now, $Y$ is dense over $H$, but this is the part that I cannot show.



I know I need to show that $forall x in H$ and $varepsilon >0$, $y in Y$ it is $| x-y| < varepsilon$.



Since ${e_n}$ is an orthonormal basis of $H$, then every $x in H$ can be written as :
$$x = sum_{n=1}^infty langle x, e_nrangle e_n$$



Thus the desired norm becomes :



$$bigg|sum_{n=1}^infty langle x, e_nrangle e_n - ybigg|$$



How should I continue now to prove $|x-y| < varepsilon$ aka that $Y$ is dense over $H$ and complete my proof ?










share|cite|improve this question













Source of question : Trying to prove that if the Hilbert $H$ has an orthonormal basis, then it is separable.



Elaboration :



Let $H$ be a Hilbert space and ${e_n : n in mathbb N}$ an orthonormal basis of $H$.



Let $Y_n$ be the space such $forall n in mathbb N$ :



$$Y_n = bigg{sum_{i=1}^nq_ie_i : q_i in mathbb Qbigg}$$



I know that every such $Y_n$ is measurable, because $Y_n$ is (I don't know the word in English - apologies!) with $mathbb Q_n$, because every element of it is written as a linear combination of $q_1,dots,q_n$. Now, I know that if $Y = cup_{n=1}^infty Y_n$, then $Y$ is measurable as a union of measurable sets. Now, $Y$ is dense over $H$, but this is the part that I cannot show.



I know I need to show that $forall x in H$ and $varepsilon >0$, $y in Y$ it is $| x-y| < varepsilon$.



Since ${e_n}$ is an orthonormal basis of $H$, then every $x in H$ can be written as :
$$x = sum_{n=1}^infty langle x, e_nrangle e_n$$



Thus the desired norm becomes :



$$bigg|sum_{n=1}^infty langle x, e_nrangle e_n - ybigg|$$



How should I continue now to prove $|x-y| < varepsilon$ aka that $Y$ is dense over $H$ and complete my proof ?







real-analysis functional-analysis hilbert-spaces inner-product-space separable-spaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 10 '18 at 20:02









Rebellos

14.5k31245




14.5k31245












  • what does measurable mean?
    – mathworker21
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:06










  • I apologise for any inconvenience regarding terminology, as I am Greek. In greek the word used essentially means "it can be numbered".
    – Rebellos
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:07










  • also, your question is easy. first take $N$ s.t. $||sum_{n=1}^infty langle x,e_n rangle e_n - sum_{n=1}^N langle x,e_n rangle e_n|| < frac{epsilon}{2}$. Then approximate each of the finitely many $langle x, e_n rangle$ well enough by rational numbers.
    – mathworker21
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:08






  • 1




    "Easy" is a very relative term.
    – Rebellos
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:09










  • I didn't mean to be rude. I just meant that the short thing I said is a full proof basically.
    – mathworker21
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:09


















  • what does measurable mean?
    – mathworker21
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:06










  • I apologise for any inconvenience regarding terminology, as I am Greek. In greek the word used essentially means "it can be numbered".
    – Rebellos
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:07










  • also, your question is easy. first take $N$ s.t. $||sum_{n=1}^infty langle x,e_n rangle e_n - sum_{n=1}^N langle x,e_n rangle e_n|| < frac{epsilon}{2}$. Then approximate each of the finitely many $langle x, e_n rangle$ well enough by rational numbers.
    – mathworker21
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:08






  • 1




    "Easy" is a very relative term.
    – Rebellos
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:09










  • I didn't mean to be rude. I just meant that the short thing I said is a full proof basically.
    – mathworker21
    Dec 10 '18 at 20:09
















what does measurable mean?
– mathworker21
Dec 10 '18 at 20:06




what does measurable mean?
– mathworker21
Dec 10 '18 at 20:06












I apologise for any inconvenience regarding terminology, as I am Greek. In greek the word used essentially means "it can be numbered".
– Rebellos
Dec 10 '18 at 20:07




I apologise for any inconvenience regarding terminology, as I am Greek. In greek the word used essentially means "it can be numbered".
– Rebellos
Dec 10 '18 at 20:07












also, your question is easy. first take $N$ s.t. $||sum_{n=1}^infty langle x,e_n rangle e_n - sum_{n=1}^N langle x,e_n rangle e_n|| < frac{epsilon}{2}$. Then approximate each of the finitely many $langle x, e_n rangle$ well enough by rational numbers.
– mathworker21
Dec 10 '18 at 20:08




also, your question is easy. first take $N$ s.t. $||sum_{n=1}^infty langle x,e_n rangle e_n - sum_{n=1}^N langle x,e_n rangle e_n|| < frac{epsilon}{2}$. Then approximate each of the finitely many $langle x, e_n rangle$ well enough by rational numbers.
– mathworker21
Dec 10 '18 at 20:08




1




1




"Easy" is a very relative term.
– Rebellos
Dec 10 '18 at 20:09




"Easy" is a very relative term.
– Rebellos
Dec 10 '18 at 20:09












I didn't mean to be rude. I just meant that the short thing I said is a full proof basically.
– mathworker21
Dec 10 '18 at 20:09




I didn't mean to be rude. I just meant that the short thing I said is a full proof basically.
– mathworker21
Dec 10 '18 at 20:09










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














I'm assuming that this is a real Hilbert space. Following the definition, $H$ is separable if it contains a countable dense subset.



You already found $Ysubset H$; there only remains to prove that it is countable and dense in $H$.



In order to prove the latter, you already noticed that any element $x$ of your Hilbert space may be written as a combination $x=∑_{i=1}^∞⟨x,e_i⟩e_i$. The other important observation is that Parseval's Identity holds, namely $$| x |^2=∑_{i=1}^∞|⟨x,e_i⟩|^2.$$



Since $| x |$ is a finite quantity, it follows that the tail $∑_{i=N}^∞|⟨x,e_i⟩|^2 to 0$ as $Nto infty$. You can then choose $N$ so that the tail is small, say $∑_{i=N}^∞|⟨x,e_i⟩|^2 < epsilon_1$ and approximate the first $N$ coordinates by $q_1, dots, q_N in mathbb Q$ the same way that you would in the proof that $mathbb Q^N$ is dense in $mathbb R^N$.



Write that approximation as $x' = ∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_i$. We know that $x'$ is an element of $ Y_N$, so that it is contained in the proposed subset $Y$. Suppose we choose $q_1, dots q_N$ in such a way that
$$left|∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_i - ∑_{i=1}^N ⟨x,e_i⟩e_iright| < epsilon_2.$$
Then the distance $|x - x'|$ between $x$ and $x'$ will be



$$ left|∑_{i=1}^infty ⟨x,e_i⟩e_i - ∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_iright| leq \ left|∑_{i=1}^N ⟨x,e_i⟩e_i - ∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_i right| + left|∑_{i=N}^infty ⟨x,e_i⟩right| < epsilon_2 + sqrt epsilon_1$$



(using the triangle inequality of the norm). As $epsilon_1$ and $epsilon_2$ are free to choose, given any $epsilon > 0$ you can do so in such a way that $sqrtepsilon_1 + epsilon_2 < epsilon$.



It seems that you know how to prove that $Y$ is countable, so I'll leave that to you.






share|cite|improve this answer































    1














    Actually the correct word here is not 'measurable' but 'countable'! A separable space is one which has a countable dense subset. I assume here you have a real Hilbert space.



    As for the proof, given $ epsilon > 0 $, and knowing that the series of squares of coefficients $ sum_{i=1}^{infty} |langle x, e_i rangle|^2 $ converges, there is an $ N $ such that $$ sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} |langle x, e_i rangle|^2 < frac{epsilon}{2} $$ Now we can choose $ y in Y_N $ such that $ || sum_{i=1}^{N} langle x, e_i rangle e_i - y || < frac{epsilon}{2} $. (Simply choose appropriate rational numbers close to the finitely many coefficients $ langle x, e_i rangle , i = 1, 2, cdots, N $). We claim that this $ y $ works because we have $$ || x - y || = || (sum_{i=1}^{N} langle x, e_i rangle e_i - y) + sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} langle x, e_i rangle e_i || le || (sum_{i=1}^{N} langle x, e_i rangle e_i - y) || + || sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} langle x, e_i rangle e_i || $$ $$ < frac{epsilon}{2} + sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} |langle x, e_i rangle|^2 < epsilon $$
    This completes the proof.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034398%2fshowing-that-y-cup-n-1-infty-y-n-is-dense-over-the-hilbert-h%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      I'm assuming that this is a real Hilbert space. Following the definition, $H$ is separable if it contains a countable dense subset.



      You already found $Ysubset H$; there only remains to prove that it is countable and dense in $H$.



      In order to prove the latter, you already noticed that any element $x$ of your Hilbert space may be written as a combination $x=∑_{i=1}^∞⟨x,e_i⟩e_i$. The other important observation is that Parseval's Identity holds, namely $$| x |^2=∑_{i=1}^∞|⟨x,e_i⟩|^2.$$



      Since $| x |$ is a finite quantity, it follows that the tail $∑_{i=N}^∞|⟨x,e_i⟩|^2 to 0$ as $Nto infty$. You can then choose $N$ so that the tail is small, say $∑_{i=N}^∞|⟨x,e_i⟩|^2 < epsilon_1$ and approximate the first $N$ coordinates by $q_1, dots, q_N in mathbb Q$ the same way that you would in the proof that $mathbb Q^N$ is dense in $mathbb R^N$.



      Write that approximation as $x' = ∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_i$. We know that $x'$ is an element of $ Y_N$, so that it is contained in the proposed subset $Y$. Suppose we choose $q_1, dots q_N$ in such a way that
      $$left|∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_i - ∑_{i=1}^N ⟨x,e_i⟩e_iright| < epsilon_2.$$
      Then the distance $|x - x'|$ between $x$ and $x'$ will be



      $$ left|∑_{i=1}^infty ⟨x,e_i⟩e_i - ∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_iright| leq \ left|∑_{i=1}^N ⟨x,e_i⟩e_i - ∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_i right| + left|∑_{i=N}^infty ⟨x,e_i⟩right| < epsilon_2 + sqrt epsilon_1$$



      (using the triangle inequality of the norm). As $epsilon_1$ and $epsilon_2$ are free to choose, given any $epsilon > 0$ you can do so in such a way that $sqrtepsilon_1 + epsilon_2 < epsilon$.



      It seems that you know how to prove that $Y$ is countable, so I'll leave that to you.






      share|cite|improve this answer




























        2














        I'm assuming that this is a real Hilbert space. Following the definition, $H$ is separable if it contains a countable dense subset.



        You already found $Ysubset H$; there only remains to prove that it is countable and dense in $H$.



        In order to prove the latter, you already noticed that any element $x$ of your Hilbert space may be written as a combination $x=∑_{i=1}^∞⟨x,e_i⟩e_i$. The other important observation is that Parseval's Identity holds, namely $$| x |^2=∑_{i=1}^∞|⟨x,e_i⟩|^2.$$



        Since $| x |$ is a finite quantity, it follows that the tail $∑_{i=N}^∞|⟨x,e_i⟩|^2 to 0$ as $Nto infty$. You can then choose $N$ so that the tail is small, say $∑_{i=N}^∞|⟨x,e_i⟩|^2 < epsilon_1$ and approximate the first $N$ coordinates by $q_1, dots, q_N in mathbb Q$ the same way that you would in the proof that $mathbb Q^N$ is dense in $mathbb R^N$.



        Write that approximation as $x' = ∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_i$. We know that $x'$ is an element of $ Y_N$, so that it is contained in the proposed subset $Y$. Suppose we choose $q_1, dots q_N$ in such a way that
        $$left|∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_i - ∑_{i=1}^N ⟨x,e_i⟩e_iright| < epsilon_2.$$
        Then the distance $|x - x'|$ between $x$ and $x'$ will be



        $$ left|∑_{i=1}^infty ⟨x,e_i⟩e_i - ∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_iright| leq \ left|∑_{i=1}^N ⟨x,e_i⟩e_i - ∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_i right| + left|∑_{i=N}^infty ⟨x,e_i⟩right| < epsilon_2 + sqrt epsilon_1$$



        (using the triangle inequality of the norm). As $epsilon_1$ and $epsilon_2$ are free to choose, given any $epsilon > 0$ you can do so in such a way that $sqrtepsilon_1 + epsilon_2 < epsilon$.



        It seems that you know how to prove that $Y$ is countable, so I'll leave that to you.






        share|cite|improve this answer


























          2












          2








          2






          I'm assuming that this is a real Hilbert space. Following the definition, $H$ is separable if it contains a countable dense subset.



          You already found $Ysubset H$; there only remains to prove that it is countable and dense in $H$.



          In order to prove the latter, you already noticed that any element $x$ of your Hilbert space may be written as a combination $x=∑_{i=1}^∞⟨x,e_i⟩e_i$. The other important observation is that Parseval's Identity holds, namely $$| x |^2=∑_{i=1}^∞|⟨x,e_i⟩|^2.$$



          Since $| x |$ is a finite quantity, it follows that the tail $∑_{i=N}^∞|⟨x,e_i⟩|^2 to 0$ as $Nto infty$. You can then choose $N$ so that the tail is small, say $∑_{i=N}^∞|⟨x,e_i⟩|^2 < epsilon_1$ and approximate the first $N$ coordinates by $q_1, dots, q_N in mathbb Q$ the same way that you would in the proof that $mathbb Q^N$ is dense in $mathbb R^N$.



          Write that approximation as $x' = ∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_i$. We know that $x'$ is an element of $ Y_N$, so that it is contained in the proposed subset $Y$. Suppose we choose $q_1, dots q_N$ in such a way that
          $$left|∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_i - ∑_{i=1}^N ⟨x,e_i⟩e_iright| < epsilon_2.$$
          Then the distance $|x - x'|$ between $x$ and $x'$ will be



          $$ left|∑_{i=1}^infty ⟨x,e_i⟩e_i - ∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_iright| leq \ left|∑_{i=1}^N ⟨x,e_i⟩e_i - ∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_i right| + left|∑_{i=N}^infty ⟨x,e_i⟩right| < epsilon_2 + sqrt epsilon_1$$



          (using the triangle inequality of the norm). As $epsilon_1$ and $epsilon_2$ are free to choose, given any $epsilon > 0$ you can do so in such a way that $sqrtepsilon_1 + epsilon_2 < epsilon$.



          It seems that you know how to prove that $Y$ is countable, so I'll leave that to you.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          I'm assuming that this is a real Hilbert space. Following the definition, $H$ is separable if it contains a countable dense subset.



          You already found $Ysubset H$; there only remains to prove that it is countable and dense in $H$.



          In order to prove the latter, you already noticed that any element $x$ of your Hilbert space may be written as a combination $x=∑_{i=1}^∞⟨x,e_i⟩e_i$. The other important observation is that Parseval's Identity holds, namely $$| x |^2=∑_{i=1}^∞|⟨x,e_i⟩|^2.$$



          Since $| x |$ is a finite quantity, it follows that the tail $∑_{i=N}^∞|⟨x,e_i⟩|^2 to 0$ as $Nto infty$. You can then choose $N$ so that the tail is small, say $∑_{i=N}^∞|⟨x,e_i⟩|^2 < epsilon_1$ and approximate the first $N$ coordinates by $q_1, dots, q_N in mathbb Q$ the same way that you would in the proof that $mathbb Q^N$ is dense in $mathbb R^N$.



          Write that approximation as $x' = ∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_i$. We know that $x'$ is an element of $ Y_N$, so that it is contained in the proposed subset $Y$. Suppose we choose $q_1, dots q_N$ in such a way that
          $$left|∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_i - ∑_{i=1}^N ⟨x,e_i⟩e_iright| < epsilon_2.$$
          Then the distance $|x - x'|$ between $x$ and $x'$ will be



          $$ left|∑_{i=1}^infty ⟨x,e_i⟩e_i - ∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_iright| leq \ left|∑_{i=1}^N ⟨x,e_i⟩e_i - ∑_{i=1}^N q_i e_i right| + left|∑_{i=N}^infty ⟨x,e_i⟩right| < epsilon_2 + sqrt epsilon_1$$



          (using the triangle inequality of the norm). As $epsilon_1$ and $epsilon_2$ are free to choose, given any $epsilon > 0$ you can do so in such a way that $sqrtepsilon_1 + epsilon_2 < epsilon$.



          It seems that you know how to prove that $Y$ is countable, so I'll leave that to you.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 11 '18 at 13:41

























          answered Dec 10 '18 at 20:26









          dafinguzman

          2,6541926




          2,6541926























              1














              Actually the correct word here is not 'measurable' but 'countable'! A separable space is one which has a countable dense subset. I assume here you have a real Hilbert space.



              As for the proof, given $ epsilon > 0 $, and knowing that the series of squares of coefficients $ sum_{i=1}^{infty} |langle x, e_i rangle|^2 $ converges, there is an $ N $ such that $$ sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} |langle x, e_i rangle|^2 < frac{epsilon}{2} $$ Now we can choose $ y in Y_N $ such that $ || sum_{i=1}^{N} langle x, e_i rangle e_i - y || < frac{epsilon}{2} $. (Simply choose appropriate rational numbers close to the finitely many coefficients $ langle x, e_i rangle , i = 1, 2, cdots, N $). We claim that this $ y $ works because we have $$ || x - y || = || (sum_{i=1}^{N} langle x, e_i rangle e_i - y) + sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} langle x, e_i rangle e_i || le || (sum_{i=1}^{N} langle x, e_i rangle e_i - y) || + || sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} langle x, e_i rangle e_i || $$ $$ < frac{epsilon}{2} + sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} |langle x, e_i rangle|^2 < epsilon $$
              This completes the proof.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                1














                Actually the correct word here is not 'measurable' but 'countable'! A separable space is one which has a countable dense subset. I assume here you have a real Hilbert space.



                As for the proof, given $ epsilon > 0 $, and knowing that the series of squares of coefficients $ sum_{i=1}^{infty} |langle x, e_i rangle|^2 $ converges, there is an $ N $ such that $$ sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} |langle x, e_i rangle|^2 < frac{epsilon}{2} $$ Now we can choose $ y in Y_N $ such that $ || sum_{i=1}^{N} langle x, e_i rangle e_i - y || < frac{epsilon}{2} $. (Simply choose appropriate rational numbers close to the finitely many coefficients $ langle x, e_i rangle , i = 1, 2, cdots, N $). We claim that this $ y $ works because we have $$ || x - y || = || (sum_{i=1}^{N} langle x, e_i rangle e_i - y) + sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} langle x, e_i rangle e_i || le || (sum_{i=1}^{N} langle x, e_i rangle e_i - y) || + || sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} langle x, e_i rangle e_i || $$ $$ < frac{epsilon}{2} + sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} |langle x, e_i rangle|^2 < epsilon $$
                This completes the proof.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  1












                  1








                  1






                  Actually the correct word here is not 'measurable' but 'countable'! A separable space is one which has a countable dense subset. I assume here you have a real Hilbert space.



                  As for the proof, given $ epsilon > 0 $, and knowing that the series of squares of coefficients $ sum_{i=1}^{infty} |langle x, e_i rangle|^2 $ converges, there is an $ N $ such that $$ sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} |langle x, e_i rangle|^2 < frac{epsilon}{2} $$ Now we can choose $ y in Y_N $ such that $ || sum_{i=1}^{N} langle x, e_i rangle e_i - y || < frac{epsilon}{2} $. (Simply choose appropriate rational numbers close to the finitely many coefficients $ langle x, e_i rangle , i = 1, 2, cdots, N $). We claim that this $ y $ works because we have $$ || x - y || = || (sum_{i=1}^{N} langle x, e_i rangle e_i - y) + sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} langle x, e_i rangle e_i || le || (sum_{i=1}^{N} langle x, e_i rangle e_i - y) || + || sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} langle x, e_i rangle e_i || $$ $$ < frac{epsilon}{2} + sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} |langle x, e_i rangle|^2 < epsilon $$
                  This completes the proof.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Actually the correct word here is not 'measurable' but 'countable'! A separable space is one which has a countable dense subset. I assume here you have a real Hilbert space.



                  As for the proof, given $ epsilon > 0 $, and knowing that the series of squares of coefficients $ sum_{i=1}^{infty} |langle x, e_i rangle|^2 $ converges, there is an $ N $ such that $$ sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} |langle x, e_i rangle|^2 < frac{epsilon}{2} $$ Now we can choose $ y in Y_N $ such that $ || sum_{i=1}^{N} langle x, e_i rangle e_i - y || < frac{epsilon}{2} $. (Simply choose appropriate rational numbers close to the finitely many coefficients $ langle x, e_i rangle , i = 1, 2, cdots, N $). We claim that this $ y $ works because we have $$ || x - y || = || (sum_{i=1}^{N} langle x, e_i rangle e_i - y) + sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} langle x, e_i rangle e_i || le || (sum_{i=1}^{N} langle x, e_i rangle e_i - y) || + || sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} langle x, e_i rangle e_i || $$ $$ < frac{epsilon}{2} + sum_{i=N+1}^{infty} |langle x, e_i rangle|^2 < epsilon $$
                  This completes the proof.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 10 '18 at 20:15









                  hellHound

                  48328




                  48328






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034398%2fshowing-that-y-cup-n-1-infty-y-n-is-dense-over-the-hilbert-h%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bressuire

                      Cabo Verde

                      Gyllenstierna