Can old vintage quartz crystals handle more power?












2












$begingroup$


Old crystals are very large compared to present day devices. Vintage transmitter circuits did not have many valves in their line up.



I have seen a 2 valve 50 watt CW transmitter for 80 meters in a 1950s electronics magazine. When transistors arrived RF types were more expensive than the valves they replaced, so in the 1960s the number of transistors in the transmitter strip was kept to a minimum.



The transistors had less power gain than the valves, but it was normal to make a 5watt HF CW transmitter with only 2 transistors. The crystal oscillator in these cases is called upon to deliver significant power.



Surely the crystal drive power must be quite high.



Would new small crystals have a short life in these old circuits?



Would the frequency stability be bad when present day easy to find small crystals are used?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It's really down to the detail (not provided). Example circuits and data sheets are needed.
    $endgroup$
    – Andy aka
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:03


















2












$begingroup$


Old crystals are very large compared to present day devices. Vintage transmitter circuits did not have many valves in their line up.



I have seen a 2 valve 50 watt CW transmitter for 80 meters in a 1950s electronics magazine. When transistors arrived RF types were more expensive than the valves they replaced, so in the 1960s the number of transistors in the transmitter strip was kept to a minimum.



The transistors had less power gain than the valves, but it was normal to make a 5watt HF CW transmitter with only 2 transistors. The crystal oscillator in these cases is called upon to deliver significant power.



Surely the crystal drive power must be quite high.



Would new small crystals have a short life in these old circuits?



Would the frequency stability be bad when present day easy to find small crystals are used?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It's really down to the detail (not provided). Example circuits and data sheets are needed.
    $endgroup$
    – Andy aka
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:03
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


Old crystals are very large compared to present day devices. Vintage transmitter circuits did not have many valves in their line up.



I have seen a 2 valve 50 watt CW transmitter for 80 meters in a 1950s electronics magazine. When transistors arrived RF types were more expensive than the valves they replaced, so in the 1960s the number of transistors in the transmitter strip was kept to a minimum.



The transistors had less power gain than the valves, but it was normal to make a 5watt HF CW transmitter with only 2 transistors. The crystal oscillator in these cases is called upon to deliver significant power.



Surely the crystal drive power must be quite high.



Would new small crystals have a short life in these old circuits?



Would the frequency stability be bad when present day easy to find small crystals are used?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Old crystals are very large compared to present day devices. Vintage transmitter circuits did not have many valves in their line up.



I have seen a 2 valve 50 watt CW transmitter for 80 meters in a 1950s electronics magazine. When transistors arrived RF types were more expensive than the valves they replaced, so in the 1960s the number of transistors in the transmitter strip was kept to a minimum.



The transistors had less power gain than the valves, but it was normal to make a 5watt HF CW transmitter with only 2 transistors. The crystal oscillator in these cases is called upon to deliver significant power.



Surely the crystal drive power must be quite high.



Would new small crystals have a short life in these old circuits?



Would the frequency stability be bad when present day easy to find small crystals are used?







vintage






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 22 '18 at 13:59









JRE

21.5k43769




21.5k43769










asked Dec 22 '18 at 10:36









AutisticAutistic

7,38121532




7,38121532












  • $begingroup$
    It's really down to the detail (not provided). Example circuits and data sheets are needed.
    $endgroup$
    – Andy aka
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:03




















  • $begingroup$
    It's really down to the detail (not provided). Example circuits and data sheets are needed.
    $endgroup$
    – Andy aka
    Dec 22 '18 at 11:03


















$begingroup$
It's really down to the detail (not provided). Example circuits and data sheets are needed.
$endgroup$
– Andy aka
Dec 22 '18 at 11:03






$begingroup$
It's really down to the detail (not provided). Example circuits and data sheets are needed.
$endgroup$
– Andy aka
Dec 22 '18 at 11:03












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Power handling ability of a crystal seems to be directly related to size. The dissipation is related to the ESR though.



Small SMT crystals might be 100uW-500uW max. HC-49 crystals can handle around 1mW. Some older crystals can handle as much as 10mW.



See this 1972 crystal catalog.



Here is a chart from that document showing the typical drive power vs plate voltage:



enter image description here



Overdriving a crystal can lead to premature aging and even failure.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Amateur radio applications often push the parts harder than they would be in continuous commercial service, and so would wear out sooner. There's even a term for it in the older literature -- intermittent commercial amateur service (ICAS), if I remember correctly. So even if you use the crystals called out in the designs, don't be surprised if they die early deaths. You may want to sneak in a transistor oscillator, or use a low-level tube oscillator (some 7-pin pentode stage) ahead of the "oscillator" stage.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    Dec 22 '18 at 17:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @TimWescott good point. The ARRL Handbook probably has some good info.
    $endgroup$
    – Spehro Pefhany
    Dec 22 '18 at 18:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Good 1972 catalog .+1 .
    $endgroup$
    – Autistic
    Dec 22 '18 at 21:12











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f413436%2fcan-old-vintage-quartz-crystals-handle-more-power%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6












$begingroup$

Power handling ability of a crystal seems to be directly related to size. The dissipation is related to the ESR though.



Small SMT crystals might be 100uW-500uW max. HC-49 crystals can handle around 1mW. Some older crystals can handle as much as 10mW.



See this 1972 crystal catalog.



Here is a chart from that document showing the typical drive power vs plate voltage:



enter image description here



Overdriving a crystal can lead to premature aging and even failure.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Amateur radio applications often push the parts harder than they would be in continuous commercial service, and so would wear out sooner. There's even a term for it in the older literature -- intermittent commercial amateur service (ICAS), if I remember correctly. So even if you use the crystals called out in the designs, don't be surprised if they die early deaths. You may want to sneak in a transistor oscillator, or use a low-level tube oscillator (some 7-pin pentode stage) ahead of the "oscillator" stage.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    Dec 22 '18 at 17:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @TimWescott good point. The ARRL Handbook probably has some good info.
    $endgroup$
    – Spehro Pefhany
    Dec 22 '18 at 18:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Good 1972 catalog .+1 .
    $endgroup$
    – Autistic
    Dec 22 '18 at 21:12
















6












$begingroup$

Power handling ability of a crystal seems to be directly related to size. The dissipation is related to the ESR though.



Small SMT crystals might be 100uW-500uW max. HC-49 crystals can handle around 1mW. Some older crystals can handle as much as 10mW.



See this 1972 crystal catalog.



Here is a chart from that document showing the typical drive power vs plate voltage:



enter image description here



Overdriving a crystal can lead to premature aging and even failure.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Amateur radio applications often push the parts harder than they would be in continuous commercial service, and so would wear out sooner. There's even a term for it in the older literature -- intermittent commercial amateur service (ICAS), if I remember correctly. So even if you use the crystals called out in the designs, don't be surprised if they die early deaths. You may want to sneak in a transistor oscillator, or use a low-level tube oscillator (some 7-pin pentode stage) ahead of the "oscillator" stage.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    Dec 22 '18 at 17:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @TimWescott good point. The ARRL Handbook probably has some good info.
    $endgroup$
    – Spehro Pefhany
    Dec 22 '18 at 18:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Good 1972 catalog .+1 .
    $endgroup$
    – Autistic
    Dec 22 '18 at 21:12














6












6








6





$begingroup$

Power handling ability of a crystal seems to be directly related to size. The dissipation is related to the ESR though.



Small SMT crystals might be 100uW-500uW max. HC-49 crystals can handle around 1mW. Some older crystals can handle as much as 10mW.



See this 1972 crystal catalog.



Here is a chart from that document showing the typical drive power vs plate voltage:



enter image description here



Overdriving a crystal can lead to premature aging and even failure.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Power handling ability of a crystal seems to be directly related to size. The dissipation is related to the ESR though.



Small SMT crystals might be 100uW-500uW max. HC-49 crystals can handle around 1mW. Some older crystals can handle as much as 10mW.



See this 1972 crystal catalog.



Here is a chart from that document showing the typical drive power vs plate voltage:



enter image description here



Overdriving a crystal can lead to premature aging and even failure.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 22 '18 at 12:16









Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany

206k5156413




206k5156413








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Amateur radio applications often push the parts harder than they would be in continuous commercial service, and so would wear out sooner. There's even a term for it in the older literature -- intermittent commercial amateur service (ICAS), if I remember correctly. So even if you use the crystals called out in the designs, don't be surprised if they die early deaths. You may want to sneak in a transistor oscillator, or use a low-level tube oscillator (some 7-pin pentode stage) ahead of the "oscillator" stage.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    Dec 22 '18 at 17:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @TimWescott good point. The ARRL Handbook probably has some good info.
    $endgroup$
    – Spehro Pefhany
    Dec 22 '18 at 18:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Good 1972 catalog .+1 .
    $endgroup$
    – Autistic
    Dec 22 '18 at 21:12














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Amateur radio applications often push the parts harder than they would be in continuous commercial service, and so would wear out sooner. There's even a term for it in the older literature -- intermittent commercial amateur service (ICAS), if I remember correctly. So even if you use the crystals called out in the designs, don't be surprised if they die early deaths. You may want to sneak in a transistor oscillator, or use a low-level tube oscillator (some 7-pin pentode stage) ahead of the "oscillator" stage.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    Dec 22 '18 at 17:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @TimWescott good point. The ARRL Handbook probably has some good info.
    $endgroup$
    – Spehro Pefhany
    Dec 22 '18 at 18:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Good 1972 catalog .+1 .
    $endgroup$
    – Autistic
    Dec 22 '18 at 21:12








2




2




$begingroup$
Amateur radio applications often push the parts harder than they would be in continuous commercial service, and so would wear out sooner. There's even a term for it in the older literature -- intermittent commercial amateur service (ICAS), if I remember correctly. So even if you use the crystals called out in the designs, don't be surprised if they die early deaths. You may want to sneak in a transistor oscillator, or use a low-level tube oscillator (some 7-pin pentode stage) ahead of the "oscillator" stage.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
Dec 22 '18 at 17:08




$begingroup$
Amateur radio applications often push the parts harder than they would be in continuous commercial service, and so would wear out sooner. There's even a term for it in the older literature -- intermittent commercial amateur service (ICAS), if I remember correctly. So even if you use the crystals called out in the designs, don't be surprised if they die early deaths. You may want to sneak in a transistor oscillator, or use a low-level tube oscillator (some 7-pin pentode stage) ahead of the "oscillator" stage.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
Dec 22 '18 at 17:08




1




1




$begingroup$
@TimWescott good point. The ARRL Handbook probably has some good info.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Dec 22 '18 at 18:22




$begingroup$
@TimWescott good point. The ARRL Handbook probably has some good info.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Dec 22 '18 at 18:22




1




1




$begingroup$
Good 1972 catalog .+1 .
$endgroup$
– Autistic
Dec 22 '18 at 21:12




$begingroup$
Good 1972 catalog .+1 .
$endgroup$
– Autistic
Dec 22 '18 at 21:12


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f413436%2fcan-old-vintage-quartz-crystals-handle-more-power%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna