Comparing two MGFs
$begingroup$
Suppose I have two MGFs given by
$MGF_1 = e^{-2 (p-1) p x^2}$
and
$MGF_2 = e^{8 (p-1)^2 p^2 x^2}$.
Is there an accepted way to compare the corresponding probability distributions to obtain a metric for similarity?
(How similar are the probability distributions in this case?)
probability-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose I have two MGFs given by
$MGF_1 = e^{-2 (p-1) p x^2}$
and
$MGF_2 = e^{8 (p-1)^2 p^2 x^2}$.
Is there an accepted way to compare the corresponding probability distributions to obtain a metric for similarity?
(How similar are the probability distributions in this case?)
probability-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose I have two MGFs given by
$MGF_1 = e^{-2 (p-1) p x^2}$
and
$MGF_2 = e^{8 (p-1)^2 p^2 x^2}$.
Is there an accepted way to compare the corresponding probability distributions to obtain a metric for similarity?
(How similar are the probability distributions in this case?)
probability-theory
$endgroup$
Suppose I have two MGFs given by
$MGF_1 = e^{-2 (p-1) p x^2}$
and
$MGF_2 = e^{8 (p-1)^2 p^2 x^2}$.
Is there an accepted way to compare the corresponding probability distributions to obtain a metric for similarity?
(How similar are the probability distributions in this case?)
probability-theory
probability-theory
asked Dec 30 '18 at 0:03
user120911user120911
231110
231110
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Both of your MGF's indicate the underlying distributions are Gaussian, with mean $0$, and variance in terms of $p$ (lazy to check MGF table).
Once you do this, you'd have $P_1:N(0,sigma_1^2)$ and $P_2:N(0,sigma_2^2)$. Now, you can compare them, one metric would be to measure the total variation (TV divergence between them). Another, would be Kullback-Leibler. In general, you can use any $f$-divergence.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Are you sure they both are Gaussian?
$endgroup$
– user120911
Dec 30 '18 at 1:10
$begingroup$
If you don't like the table in wikipedia then how about Eq.(17) of Wolfram MathWorld? You can find this in most textbooks, or just calculate it yourself (it's pretty easy).
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Dec 30 '18 at 8:16
$begingroup$
@LeeDavidChungLin The two MGFs are equal when p = 0.5 and p = 1. If p sufficiently captured variance, and we are dealing with two Gaussians, then I would guess that other values of p would make these MGFs equal too. Can you explain that?
$endgroup$
– user120911
Dec 30 '18 at 8:32
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056384%2fcomparing-two-mgfs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Both of your MGF's indicate the underlying distributions are Gaussian, with mean $0$, and variance in terms of $p$ (lazy to check MGF table).
Once you do this, you'd have $P_1:N(0,sigma_1^2)$ and $P_2:N(0,sigma_2^2)$. Now, you can compare them, one metric would be to measure the total variation (TV divergence between them). Another, would be Kullback-Leibler. In general, you can use any $f$-divergence.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Are you sure they both are Gaussian?
$endgroup$
– user120911
Dec 30 '18 at 1:10
$begingroup$
If you don't like the table in wikipedia then how about Eq.(17) of Wolfram MathWorld? You can find this in most textbooks, or just calculate it yourself (it's pretty easy).
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Dec 30 '18 at 8:16
$begingroup$
@LeeDavidChungLin The two MGFs are equal when p = 0.5 and p = 1. If p sufficiently captured variance, and we are dealing with two Gaussians, then I would guess that other values of p would make these MGFs equal too. Can you explain that?
$endgroup$
– user120911
Dec 30 '18 at 8:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Both of your MGF's indicate the underlying distributions are Gaussian, with mean $0$, and variance in terms of $p$ (lazy to check MGF table).
Once you do this, you'd have $P_1:N(0,sigma_1^2)$ and $P_2:N(0,sigma_2^2)$. Now, you can compare them, one metric would be to measure the total variation (TV divergence between them). Another, would be Kullback-Leibler. In general, you can use any $f$-divergence.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Are you sure they both are Gaussian?
$endgroup$
– user120911
Dec 30 '18 at 1:10
$begingroup$
If you don't like the table in wikipedia then how about Eq.(17) of Wolfram MathWorld? You can find this in most textbooks, or just calculate it yourself (it's pretty easy).
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Dec 30 '18 at 8:16
$begingroup$
@LeeDavidChungLin The two MGFs are equal when p = 0.5 and p = 1. If p sufficiently captured variance, and we are dealing with two Gaussians, then I would guess that other values of p would make these MGFs equal too. Can you explain that?
$endgroup$
– user120911
Dec 30 '18 at 8:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Both of your MGF's indicate the underlying distributions are Gaussian, with mean $0$, and variance in terms of $p$ (lazy to check MGF table).
Once you do this, you'd have $P_1:N(0,sigma_1^2)$ and $P_2:N(0,sigma_2^2)$. Now, you can compare them, one metric would be to measure the total variation (TV divergence between them). Another, would be Kullback-Leibler. In general, you can use any $f$-divergence.
$endgroup$
Both of your MGF's indicate the underlying distributions are Gaussian, with mean $0$, and variance in terms of $p$ (lazy to check MGF table).
Once you do this, you'd have $P_1:N(0,sigma_1^2)$ and $P_2:N(0,sigma_2^2)$. Now, you can compare them, one metric would be to measure the total variation (TV divergence between them). Another, would be Kullback-Leibler. In general, you can use any $f$-divergence.
answered Dec 30 '18 at 0:28
AaronAaron
1,912415
1,912415
$begingroup$
Are you sure they both are Gaussian?
$endgroup$
– user120911
Dec 30 '18 at 1:10
$begingroup$
If you don't like the table in wikipedia then how about Eq.(17) of Wolfram MathWorld? You can find this in most textbooks, or just calculate it yourself (it's pretty easy).
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Dec 30 '18 at 8:16
$begingroup$
@LeeDavidChungLin The two MGFs are equal when p = 0.5 and p = 1. If p sufficiently captured variance, and we are dealing with two Gaussians, then I would guess that other values of p would make these MGFs equal too. Can you explain that?
$endgroup$
– user120911
Dec 30 '18 at 8:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Are you sure they both are Gaussian?
$endgroup$
– user120911
Dec 30 '18 at 1:10
$begingroup$
If you don't like the table in wikipedia then how about Eq.(17) of Wolfram MathWorld? You can find this in most textbooks, or just calculate it yourself (it's pretty easy).
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Dec 30 '18 at 8:16
$begingroup$
@LeeDavidChungLin The two MGFs are equal when p = 0.5 and p = 1. If p sufficiently captured variance, and we are dealing with two Gaussians, then I would guess that other values of p would make these MGFs equal too. Can you explain that?
$endgroup$
– user120911
Dec 30 '18 at 8:32
$begingroup$
Are you sure they both are Gaussian?
$endgroup$
– user120911
Dec 30 '18 at 1:10
$begingroup$
Are you sure they both are Gaussian?
$endgroup$
– user120911
Dec 30 '18 at 1:10
$begingroup$
If you don't like the table in wikipedia then how about Eq.(17) of Wolfram MathWorld? You can find this in most textbooks, or just calculate it yourself (it's pretty easy).
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Dec 30 '18 at 8:16
$begingroup$
If you don't like the table in wikipedia then how about Eq.(17) of Wolfram MathWorld? You can find this in most textbooks, or just calculate it yourself (it's pretty easy).
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Dec 30 '18 at 8:16
$begingroup$
@LeeDavidChungLin The two MGFs are equal when p = 0.5 and p = 1. If p sufficiently captured variance, and we are dealing with two Gaussians, then I would guess that other values of p would make these MGFs equal too. Can you explain that?
$endgroup$
– user120911
Dec 30 '18 at 8:32
$begingroup$
@LeeDavidChungLin The two MGFs are equal when p = 0.5 and p = 1. If p sufficiently captured variance, and we are dealing with two Gaussians, then I would guess that other values of p would make these MGFs equal too. Can you explain that?
$endgroup$
– user120911
Dec 30 '18 at 8:32
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056384%2fcomparing-two-mgfs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown