Computing $operatorname{Tor}_*^{R}(mathbb{Z},mathbb{Z})$ for $R=mathbb Z[C_n]$.
$begingroup$
I would like to compute $operatorname{Tor}_k^{R}(mathbb{Z},mathbb{Z})$, where $R = mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n -1)=mathbb Z[X]$.
I think I am near to do so, but I can not figure out the last step.
I started looking for a free resolution of $mathbb{Z}$ as an $R$-module, and found that
$$cdotslongrightarrow R longrightarrow R longrightarrow mathbb{Z} longrightarrow 0$$
where $d_0: Rlongrightarrow mathbb{Z}: f(X) mapsto f(1)$, and for $igeqslant 1$, $d_{2i-1}: Rlongrightarrow R$ is multiplication by $X-1$ and $d_{2i}: Rlongrightarrow R$ by $1+X+cdots+X^{n-1}$
In this way I have a free resolution of $mathbb{Z}$ as an $R$-module. Now I can apply the functor $ * otimes mathbb{Z}$ to the free resolution (projective too):
$$C^*:cdots longrightarrow R otimes mathbb{Z} longrightarrow R otimes mathbb{Z} longrightarrow 0$$
where the functions defined above do the same in the first component and apply identity in the second component. Now I know that there is an isomorphism between $R otimes N$ and $N$ if $N$ is an $R$-module. Then I would obtain something like
$$cdots longrightarrow mathbb{Z} longrightarrow mathbb{Z} longrightarrow 0$$
which it may looks easier to find the $n$-th cohomology object of the cochain complex. But I do not know how to find $ker(d_notimes 1)$ neither $operatorname{im}(d_notimes 1)$.
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra homological-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would like to compute $operatorname{Tor}_k^{R}(mathbb{Z},mathbb{Z})$, where $R = mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n -1)=mathbb Z[X]$.
I think I am near to do so, but I can not figure out the last step.
I started looking for a free resolution of $mathbb{Z}$ as an $R$-module, and found that
$$cdotslongrightarrow R longrightarrow R longrightarrow mathbb{Z} longrightarrow 0$$
where $d_0: Rlongrightarrow mathbb{Z}: f(X) mapsto f(1)$, and for $igeqslant 1$, $d_{2i-1}: Rlongrightarrow R$ is multiplication by $X-1$ and $d_{2i}: Rlongrightarrow R$ by $1+X+cdots+X^{n-1}$
In this way I have a free resolution of $mathbb{Z}$ as an $R$-module. Now I can apply the functor $ * otimes mathbb{Z}$ to the free resolution (projective too):
$$C^*:cdots longrightarrow R otimes mathbb{Z} longrightarrow R otimes mathbb{Z} longrightarrow 0$$
where the functions defined above do the same in the first component and apply identity in the second component. Now I know that there is an isomorphism between $R otimes N$ and $N$ if $N$ is an $R$-module. Then I would obtain something like
$$cdots longrightarrow mathbb{Z} longrightarrow mathbb{Z} longrightarrow 0$$
which it may looks easier to find the $n$-th cohomology object of the cochain complex. But I do not know how to find $ker(d_notimes 1)$ neither $operatorname{im}(d_notimes 1)$.
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra homological-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would like to compute $operatorname{Tor}_k^{R}(mathbb{Z},mathbb{Z})$, where $R = mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n -1)=mathbb Z[X]$.
I think I am near to do so, but I can not figure out the last step.
I started looking for a free resolution of $mathbb{Z}$ as an $R$-module, and found that
$$cdotslongrightarrow R longrightarrow R longrightarrow mathbb{Z} longrightarrow 0$$
where $d_0: Rlongrightarrow mathbb{Z}: f(X) mapsto f(1)$, and for $igeqslant 1$, $d_{2i-1}: Rlongrightarrow R$ is multiplication by $X-1$ and $d_{2i}: Rlongrightarrow R$ by $1+X+cdots+X^{n-1}$
In this way I have a free resolution of $mathbb{Z}$ as an $R$-module. Now I can apply the functor $ * otimes mathbb{Z}$ to the free resolution (projective too):
$$C^*:cdots longrightarrow R otimes mathbb{Z} longrightarrow R otimes mathbb{Z} longrightarrow 0$$
where the functions defined above do the same in the first component and apply identity in the second component. Now I know that there is an isomorphism between $R otimes N$ and $N$ if $N$ is an $R$-module. Then I would obtain something like
$$cdots longrightarrow mathbb{Z} longrightarrow mathbb{Z} longrightarrow 0$$
which it may looks easier to find the $n$-th cohomology object of the cochain complex. But I do not know how to find $ker(d_notimes 1)$ neither $operatorname{im}(d_notimes 1)$.
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra homological-algebra
$endgroup$
I would like to compute $operatorname{Tor}_k^{R}(mathbb{Z},mathbb{Z})$, where $R = mathbb{Z}[x]/(x^n -1)=mathbb Z[X]$.
I think I am near to do so, but I can not figure out the last step.
I started looking for a free resolution of $mathbb{Z}$ as an $R$-module, and found that
$$cdotslongrightarrow R longrightarrow R longrightarrow mathbb{Z} longrightarrow 0$$
where $d_0: Rlongrightarrow mathbb{Z}: f(X) mapsto f(1)$, and for $igeqslant 1$, $d_{2i-1}: Rlongrightarrow R$ is multiplication by $X-1$ and $d_{2i}: Rlongrightarrow R$ by $1+X+cdots+X^{n-1}$
In this way I have a free resolution of $mathbb{Z}$ as an $R$-module. Now I can apply the functor $ * otimes mathbb{Z}$ to the free resolution (projective too):
$$C^*:cdots longrightarrow R otimes mathbb{Z} longrightarrow R otimes mathbb{Z} longrightarrow 0$$
where the functions defined above do the same in the first component and apply identity in the second component. Now I know that there is an isomorphism between $R otimes N$ and $N$ if $N$ is an $R$-module. Then I would obtain something like
$$cdots longrightarrow mathbb{Z} longrightarrow mathbb{Z} longrightarrow 0$$
which it may looks easier to find the $n$-th cohomology object of the cochain complex. But I do not know how to find $ker(d_notimes 1)$ neither $operatorname{im}(d_notimes 1)$.
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra homological-algebra
abstract-algebra commutative-algebra homological-algebra
edited Dec 27 '18 at 16:39
user26857
39.3k124183
39.3k124183
asked Dec 27 '18 at 15:23
idriskameniidriskameni
642319
642319
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that the isomorphism $Rotimes_R mathbb Zto mathbb Z $ is induced from the left action, so that it sends $rotimes nto rn$. If $r$ is a polynomial, then the action is given by evaluation at $1$, that is, $rn = r(1)n$. Under this map, multiplication by $x-1$ goes to the zero map $0:mathbb Ztomathbb Z$, while multiplication by $1+cdots+x^{n-1}$ goes to multiplication by $n:mathbb Ztomathbb Z$. Can you continue?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Nice! Then, from what I have understood, for $d_k otimes 1$ where $k$ is odd, $Im(d_kotimes 1)=mathbb{Z}$ and $ker(d_k otimes 1)={0}$. And for the even should be the other way. Am I right?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 27 '18 at 15:43
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni The image of multiplication by $n$ is $nmathbb Z$, not $mathbb Z$. It kernel is zero. The image of the zero map is zero, of course, and the kernel is $mathbb Z$. So you get $0$ and $mathbb Z/nmathbb Z$ repeated with period 2.
$endgroup$
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Dec 27 '18 at 15:47
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054043%2fcomputing-operatornametor-r-mathbbz-mathbbz-for-r-mathbb-zc-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that the isomorphism $Rotimes_R mathbb Zto mathbb Z $ is induced from the left action, so that it sends $rotimes nto rn$. If $r$ is a polynomial, then the action is given by evaluation at $1$, that is, $rn = r(1)n$. Under this map, multiplication by $x-1$ goes to the zero map $0:mathbb Ztomathbb Z$, while multiplication by $1+cdots+x^{n-1}$ goes to multiplication by $n:mathbb Ztomathbb Z$. Can you continue?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Nice! Then, from what I have understood, for $d_k otimes 1$ where $k$ is odd, $Im(d_kotimes 1)=mathbb{Z}$ and $ker(d_k otimes 1)={0}$. And for the even should be the other way. Am I right?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 27 '18 at 15:43
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni The image of multiplication by $n$ is $nmathbb Z$, not $mathbb Z$. It kernel is zero. The image of the zero map is zero, of course, and the kernel is $mathbb Z$. So you get $0$ and $mathbb Z/nmathbb Z$ repeated with period 2.
$endgroup$
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Dec 27 '18 at 15:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that the isomorphism $Rotimes_R mathbb Zto mathbb Z $ is induced from the left action, so that it sends $rotimes nto rn$. If $r$ is a polynomial, then the action is given by evaluation at $1$, that is, $rn = r(1)n$. Under this map, multiplication by $x-1$ goes to the zero map $0:mathbb Ztomathbb Z$, while multiplication by $1+cdots+x^{n-1}$ goes to multiplication by $n:mathbb Ztomathbb Z$. Can you continue?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Nice! Then, from what I have understood, for $d_k otimes 1$ where $k$ is odd, $Im(d_kotimes 1)=mathbb{Z}$ and $ker(d_k otimes 1)={0}$. And for the even should be the other way. Am I right?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 27 '18 at 15:43
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni The image of multiplication by $n$ is $nmathbb Z$, not $mathbb Z$. It kernel is zero. The image of the zero map is zero, of course, and the kernel is $mathbb Z$. So you get $0$ and $mathbb Z/nmathbb Z$ repeated with period 2.
$endgroup$
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Dec 27 '18 at 15:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that the isomorphism $Rotimes_R mathbb Zto mathbb Z $ is induced from the left action, so that it sends $rotimes nto rn$. If $r$ is a polynomial, then the action is given by evaluation at $1$, that is, $rn = r(1)n$. Under this map, multiplication by $x-1$ goes to the zero map $0:mathbb Ztomathbb Z$, while multiplication by $1+cdots+x^{n-1}$ goes to multiplication by $n:mathbb Ztomathbb Z$. Can you continue?
$endgroup$
Note that the isomorphism $Rotimes_R mathbb Zto mathbb Z $ is induced from the left action, so that it sends $rotimes nto rn$. If $r$ is a polynomial, then the action is given by evaluation at $1$, that is, $rn = r(1)n$. Under this map, multiplication by $x-1$ goes to the zero map $0:mathbb Ztomathbb Z$, while multiplication by $1+cdots+x^{n-1}$ goes to multiplication by $n:mathbb Ztomathbb Z$. Can you continue?
answered Dec 27 '18 at 15:29
Pedro Tamaroff♦Pedro Tamaroff
96.9k10153297
96.9k10153297
$begingroup$
Nice! Then, from what I have understood, for $d_k otimes 1$ where $k$ is odd, $Im(d_kotimes 1)=mathbb{Z}$ and $ker(d_k otimes 1)={0}$. And for the even should be the other way. Am I right?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 27 '18 at 15:43
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni The image of multiplication by $n$ is $nmathbb Z$, not $mathbb Z$. It kernel is zero. The image of the zero map is zero, of course, and the kernel is $mathbb Z$. So you get $0$ and $mathbb Z/nmathbb Z$ repeated with period 2.
$endgroup$
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Dec 27 '18 at 15:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Nice! Then, from what I have understood, for $d_k otimes 1$ where $k$ is odd, $Im(d_kotimes 1)=mathbb{Z}$ and $ker(d_k otimes 1)={0}$. And for the even should be the other way. Am I right?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 27 '18 at 15:43
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni The image of multiplication by $n$ is $nmathbb Z$, not $mathbb Z$. It kernel is zero. The image of the zero map is zero, of course, and the kernel is $mathbb Z$. So you get $0$ and $mathbb Z/nmathbb Z$ repeated with period 2.
$endgroup$
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Dec 27 '18 at 15:47
$begingroup$
Nice! Then, from what I have understood, for $d_k otimes 1$ where $k$ is odd, $Im(d_kotimes 1)=mathbb{Z}$ and $ker(d_k otimes 1)={0}$. And for the even should be the other way. Am I right?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 27 '18 at 15:43
$begingroup$
Nice! Then, from what I have understood, for $d_k otimes 1$ where $k$ is odd, $Im(d_kotimes 1)=mathbb{Z}$ and $ker(d_k otimes 1)={0}$. And for the even should be the other way. Am I right?
$endgroup$
– idriskameni
Dec 27 '18 at 15:43
1
1
$begingroup$
@idriskameni The image of multiplication by $n$ is $nmathbb Z$, not $mathbb Z$. It kernel is zero. The image of the zero map is zero, of course, and the kernel is $mathbb Z$. So you get $0$ and $mathbb Z/nmathbb Z$ repeated with period 2.
$endgroup$
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Dec 27 '18 at 15:47
$begingroup$
@idriskameni The image of multiplication by $n$ is $nmathbb Z$, not $mathbb Z$. It kernel is zero. The image of the zero map is zero, of course, and the kernel is $mathbb Z$. So you get $0$ and $mathbb Z/nmathbb Z$ repeated with period 2.
$endgroup$
– Pedro Tamaroff♦
Dec 27 '18 at 15:47
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054043%2fcomputing-operatornametor-r-mathbbz-mathbbz-for-r-mathbb-zc-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown