If $sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n$ converges, does $sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{a_n}$ diverge?












-2












$begingroup$


If a series $sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n$ converges, does $sum_{n=1}^{infty} dfrac{1}{a_n}$ diverge to infinity?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It can oscillate, take $a_n=frac {(-1)^n}n$ for example.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    Does $sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n n$ converge?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Andrei Does it diverge to $infty$?
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:48
















-2












$begingroup$


If a series $sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n$ converges, does $sum_{n=1}^{infty} dfrac{1}{a_n}$ diverge to infinity?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It can oscillate, take $a_n=frac {(-1)^n}n$ for example.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    Does $sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n n$ converge?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Andrei Does it diverge to $infty$?
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:48














-2












-2








-2





$begingroup$


If a series $sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n$ converges, does $sum_{n=1}^{infty} dfrac{1}{a_n}$ diverge to infinity?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




If a series $sum_{n=1}^{infty} a_n$ converges, does $sum_{n=1}^{infty} dfrac{1}{a_n}$ diverge to infinity?







sequences-and-series convergence divergent-series






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 27 '18 at 15:39









Blue

48.5k870154




48.5k870154










asked Dec 27 '18 at 15:30









mrMoonpenguinmrMoonpenguin

153




153








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It can oscillate, take $a_n=frac {(-1)^n}n$ for example.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    Does $sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n n$ converge?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Andrei Does it diverge to $infty$?
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:48














  • 4




    $begingroup$
    It can oscillate, take $a_n=frac {(-1)^n}n$ for example.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    Does $sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n n$ converge?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrei
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Andrei Does it diverge to $infty$?
    $endgroup$
    – N. S.
    Dec 27 '18 at 15:48








4




4




$begingroup$
It can oscillate, take $a_n=frac {(-1)^n}n$ for example.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 27 '18 at 15:32




$begingroup$
It can oscillate, take $a_n=frac {(-1)^n}n$ for example.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 27 '18 at 15:32












$begingroup$
Does $sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n n$ converge?
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Dec 27 '18 at 15:35




$begingroup$
Does $sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^n n$ converge?
$endgroup$
– Andrei
Dec 27 '18 at 15:35




1




1




$begingroup$
@Andrei Does it diverge to $infty$?
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 27 '18 at 15:48




$begingroup$
@Andrei Does it diverge to $infty$?
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Dec 27 '18 at 15:48










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

It depends on your definition of "diverge". Some take it as "have a $pminfty$ limit" other take it as "non convergent"



I'll stick with the wikipedia definition (emphasys mine)




In mathematics, a divergent series is an infinite series that is not convergent, meaning that the infinite sequence of the partial sums of the series does not have a finite limit.



If a series converges, the individual terms of the series must approach zero. Thus any series in which the individual terms do not approach zero diverges.




According to this definition, $sum_{n}frac{1}{a_n}$ clearly diverge if $sum_{n}a_n$ converge. Because $a_n$ and $frac{1}{a_n}$ can't both have $0$ as a limit.



But that doesn't mean that $sum_{n}a_n$ as an infinite limit. The series can have no limit at all, as per @lulu example in the comments:



$$a_n = frac{{(-1)}^n}{n}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    A series converges if and only if the $lim_{n to infty} a(n) = 0$. Therefore, $lim_{n to infty} {1over a(n)} = infty$. Clearly, $lvert a(n)rvert < lvert a(n+1)rvert$. Because each term is larger (in the absolute sense) than the previous, it diverges to either $+infty$, $-infty$, or oscillates between both.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      No. In fact, given that $sum a_n$ converges, $sumfrac{1}{a_n}toinfty$ if and only if there is some $N in mathbb{N}$ such that for all $n > N$, we have $a_n > 0$ and $a_n neq 0$ for all $n$.



      Proof:



      In the forwards direction, since $sum frac{1}{a_n}toinfty$, there is, in particular, some $N inmathbb{N}$ such that for all $n > N$, we have $frac{1}{a_n} > 0$, hence $a_n > 0$. In the reverse direction, the necessity of $a_n neq 0$ is obvious. For any $C > 0$, it is also true that $frac{1}{C} > 0$, and $(a_n)$ is null (since $sum a_n$ converges), so there is some $Minmathbb{N}$ such that for all $n > M$, $|a_n| < frac{1}{C}$. Thus, taking $L = max(N,M)$, for any $n > L$, we have $0 < a_n < frac{1}{C}$, so $frac{1}{a_n} > C$, hence (up to a constant that you can feel free to get rid of for yourself), $sumfrac{1}{a_n} > C$, hence the result.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054057%2fif-sum-n-1-infty-a-n-converges-does-sum-n-1-infty-frac1a-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        1












        $begingroup$

        It depends on your definition of "diverge". Some take it as "have a $pminfty$ limit" other take it as "non convergent"



        I'll stick with the wikipedia definition (emphasys mine)




        In mathematics, a divergent series is an infinite series that is not convergent, meaning that the infinite sequence of the partial sums of the series does not have a finite limit.



        If a series converges, the individual terms of the series must approach zero. Thus any series in which the individual terms do not approach zero diverges.




        According to this definition, $sum_{n}frac{1}{a_n}$ clearly diverge if $sum_{n}a_n$ converge. Because $a_n$ and $frac{1}{a_n}$ can't both have $0$ as a limit.



        But that doesn't mean that $sum_{n}a_n$ as an infinite limit. The series can have no limit at all, as per @lulu example in the comments:



        $$a_n = frac{{(-1)}^n}{n}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          1












          $begingroup$

          It depends on your definition of "diverge". Some take it as "have a $pminfty$ limit" other take it as "non convergent"



          I'll stick with the wikipedia definition (emphasys mine)




          In mathematics, a divergent series is an infinite series that is not convergent, meaning that the infinite sequence of the partial sums of the series does not have a finite limit.



          If a series converges, the individual terms of the series must approach zero. Thus any series in which the individual terms do not approach zero diverges.




          According to this definition, $sum_{n}frac{1}{a_n}$ clearly diverge if $sum_{n}a_n$ converge. Because $a_n$ and $frac{1}{a_n}$ can't both have $0$ as a limit.



          But that doesn't mean that $sum_{n}a_n$ as an infinite limit. The series can have no limit at all, as per @lulu example in the comments:



          $$a_n = frac{{(-1)}^n}{n}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            It depends on your definition of "diverge". Some take it as "have a $pminfty$ limit" other take it as "non convergent"



            I'll stick with the wikipedia definition (emphasys mine)




            In mathematics, a divergent series is an infinite series that is not convergent, meaning that the infinite sequence of the partial sums of the series does not have a finite limit.



            If a series converges, the individual terms of the series must approach zero. Thus any series in which the individual terms do not approach zero diverges.




            According to this definition, $sum_{n}frac{1}{a_n}$ clearly diverge if $sum_{n}a_n$ converge. Because $a_n$ and $frac{1}{a_n}$ can't both have $0$ as a limit.



            But that doesn't mean that $sum_{n}a_n$ as an infinite limit. The series can have no limit at all, as per @lulu example in the comments:



            $$a_n = frac{{(-1)}^n}{n}$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            It depends on your definition of "diverge". Some take it as "have a $pminfty$ limit" other take it as "non convergent"



            I'll stick with the wikipedia definition (emphasys mine)




            In mathematics, a divergent series is an infinite series that is not convergent, meaning that the infinite sequence of the partial sums of the series does not have a finite limit.



            If a series converges, the individual terms of the series must approach zero. Thus any series in which the individual terms do not approach zero diverges.




            According to this definition, $sum_{n}frac{1}{a_n}$ clearly diverge if $sum_{n}a_n$ converge. Because $a_n$ and $frac{1}{a_n}$ can't both have $0$ as a limit.



            But that doesn't mean that $sum_{n}a_n$ as an infinite limit. The series can have no limit at all, as per @lulu example in the comments:



            $$a_n = frac{{(-1)}^n}{n}$$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 27 '18 at 15:44









            F.CaretteF.Carette

            1,21612




            1,21612























                0












                $begingroup$

                A series converges if and only if the $lim_{n to infty} a(n) = 0$. Therefore, $lim_{n to infty} {1over a(n)} = infty$. Clearly, $lvert a(n)rvert < lvert a(n+1)rvert$. Because each term is larger (in the absolute sense) than the previous, it diverges to either $+infty$, $-infty$, or oscillates between both.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  A series converges if and only if the $lim_{n to infty} a(n) = 0$. Therefore, $lim_{n to infty} {1over a(n)} = infty$. Clearly, $lvert a(n)rvert < lvert a(n+1)rvert$. Because each term is larger (in the absolute sense) than the previous, it diverges to either $+infty$, $-infty$, or oscillates between both.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    A series converges if and only if the $lim_{n to infty} a(n) = 0$. Therefore, $lim_{n to infty} {1over a(n)} = infty$. Clearly, $lvert a(n)rvert < lvert a(n+1)rvert$. Because each term is larger (in the absolute sense) than the previous, it diverges to either $+infty$, $-infty$, or oscillates between both.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    A series converges if and only if the $lim_{n to infty} a(n) = 0$. Therefore, $lim_{n to infty} {1over a(n)} = infty$. Clearly, $lvert a(n)rvert < lvert a(n+1)rvert$. Because each term is larger (in the absolute sense) than the previous, it diverges to either $+infty$, $-infty$, or oscillates between both.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Dec 27 '18 at 15:48









                    William GrannisWilliam Grannis

                    991521




                    991521























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        No. In fact, given that $sum a_n$ converges, $sumfrac{1}{a_n}toinfty$ if and only if there is some $N in mathbb{N}$ such that for all $n > N$, we have $a_n > 0$ and $a_n neq 0$ for all $n$.



                        Proof:



                        In the forwards direction, since $sum frac{1}{a_n}toinfty$, there is, in particular, some $N inmathbb{N}$ such that for all $n > N$, we have $frac{1}{a_n} > 0$, hence $a_n > 0$. In the reverse direction, the necessity of $a_n neq 0$ is obvious. For any $C > 0$, it is also true that $frac{1}{C} > 0$, and $(a_n)$ is null (since $sum a_n$ converges), so there is some $Minmathbb{N}$ such that for all $n > M$, $|a_n| < frac{1}{C}$. Thus, taking $L = max(N,M)$, for any $n > L$, we have $0 < a_n < frac{1}{C}$, so $frac{1}{a_n} > C$, hence (up to a constant that you can feel free to get rid of for yourself), $sumfrac{1}{a_n} > C$, hence the result.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          No. In fact, given that $sum a_n$ converges, $sumfrac{1}{a_n}toinfty$ if and only if there is some $N in mathbb{N}$ such that for all $n > N$, we have $a_n > 0$ and $a_n neq 0$ for all $n$.



                          Proof:



                          In the forwards direction, since $sum frac{1}{a_n}toinfty$, there is, in particular, some $N inmathbb{N}$ such that for all $n > N$, we have $frac{1}{a_n} > 0$, hence $a_n > 0$. In the reverse direction, the necessity of $a_n neq 0$ is obvious. For any $C > 0$, it is also true that $frac{1}{C} > 0$, and $(a_n)$ is null (since $sum a_n$ converges), so there is some $Minmathbb{N}$ such that for all $n > M$, $|a_n| < frac{1}{C}$. Thus, taking $L = max(N,M)$, for any $n > L$, we have $0 < a_n < frac{1}{C}$, so $frac{1}{a_n} > C$, hence (up to a constant that you can feel free to get rid of for yourself), $sumfrac{1}{a_n} > C$, hence the result.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            No. In fact, given that $sum a_n$ converges, $sumfrac{1}{a_n}toinfty$ if and only if there is some $N in mathbb{N}$ such that for all $n > N$, we have $a_n > 0$ and $a_n neq 0$ for all $n$.



                            Proof:



                            In the forwards direction, since $sum frac{1}{a_n}toinfty$, there is, in particular, some $N inmathbb{N}$ such that for all $n > N$, we have $frac{1}{a_n} > 0$, hence $a_n > 0$. In the reverse direction, the necessity of $a_n neq 0$ is obvious. For any $C > 0$, it is also true that $frac{1}{C} > 0$, and $(a_n)$ is null (since $sum a_n$ converges), so there is some $Minmathbb{N}$ such that for all $n > M$, $|a_n| < frac{1}{C}$. Thus, taking $L = max(N,M)$, for any $n > L$, we have $0 < a_n < frac{1}{C}$, so $frac{1}{a_n} > C$, hence (up to a constant that you can feel free to get rid of for yourself), $sumfrac{1}{a_n} > C$, hence the result.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            No. In fact, given that $sum a_n$ converges, $sumfrac{1}{a_n}toinfty$ if and only if there is some $N in mathbb{N}$ such that for all $n > N$, we have $a_n > 0$ and $a_n neq 0$ for all $n$.



                            Proof:



                            In the forwards direction, since $sum frac{1}{a_n}toinfty$, there is, in particular, some $N inmathbb{N}$ such that for all $n > N$, we have $frac{1}{a_n} > 0$, hence $a_n > 0$. In the reverse direction, the necessity of $a_n neq 0$ is obvious. For any $C > 0$, it is also true that $frac{1}{C} > 0$, and $(a_n)$ is null (since $sum a_n$ converges), so there is some $Minmathbb{N}$ such that for all $n > M$, $|a_n| < frac{1}{C}$. Thus, taking $L = max(N,M)$, for any $n > L$, we have $0 < a_n < frac{1}{C}$, so $frac{1}{a_n} > C$, hence (up to a constant that you can feel free to get rid of for yourself), $sumfrac{1}{a_n} > C$, hence the result.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Dec 27 '18 at 15:49









                            user3482749user3482749

                            4,266919




                            4,266919






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054057%2fif-sum-n-1-infty-a-n-converges-does-sum-n-1-infty-frac1a-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Bressuire

                                Cabo Verde

                                Gyllenstierna