Find real part of messy complex fraction?
$begingroup$
I have this messy complex fraction, where the LHS is real. But how can I find the real part of the RHS?
$$
frac{R277-X115+i(R115+X277)}{R+277+i(115+X)}=300,
$$
where $R, Xin mathbb R$.
complex-numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have this messy complex fraction, where the LHS is real. But how can I find the real part of the RHS?
$$
frac{R277-X115+i(R115+X277)}{R+277+i(115+X)}=300,
$$
where $R, Xin mathbb R$.
complex-numbers
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Well, $Re(300)=300$
$endgroup$
– gammatester
Nov 13 '18 at 10:39
1
$begingroup$
Does $R277$ mean the same thing as $277R?$ In any event, can't you multiply numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Nov 13 '18 at 10:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have this messy complex fraction, where the LHS is real. But how can I find the real part of the RHS?
$$
frac{R277-X115+i(R115+X277)}{R+277+i(115+X)}=300,
$$
where $R, Xin mathbb R$.
complex-numbers
$endgroup$
I have this messy complex fraction, where the LHS is real. But how can I find the real part of the RHS?
$$
frac{R277-X115+i(R115+X277)}{R+277+i(115+X)}=300,
$$
where $R, Xin mathbb R$.
complex-numbers
complex-numbers
asked Nov 13 '18 at 10:36
JDoeDoeJDoeDoe
7721614
7721614
$begingroup$
Well, $Re(300)=300$
$endgroup$
– gammatester
Nov 13 '18 at 10:39
1
$begingroup$
Does $R277$ mean the same thing as $277R?$ In any event, can't you multiply numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Nov 13 '18 at 10:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well, $Re(300)=300$
$endgroup$
– gammatester
Nov 13 '18 at 10:39
1
$begingroup$
Does $R277$ mean the same thing as $277R?$ In any event, can't you multiply numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Nov 13 '18 at 10:43
$begingroup$
Well, $Re(300)=300$
$endgroup$
– gammatester
Nov 13 '18 at 10:39
$begingroup$
Well, $Re(300)=300$
$endgroup$
– gammatester
Nov 13 '18 at 10:39
1
1
$begingroup$
Does $R277$ mean the same thing as $277R?$ In any event, can't you multiply numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Nov 13 '18 at 10:43
$begingroup$
Does $R277$ mean the same thing as $277R?$ In any event, can't you multiply numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Nov 13 '18 at 10:43
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I believe that R=resistance and X=impedance.
So:
$R277−X115+i(R115+X277) = 300 (R+277+i(115+X))$
begin{cases}
R277−X115 = 300 (R+277) \
R115+X277 = 300 (115+X) \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
R277−X115 = 300R+300*277 \
R115+X277 = 300*115+300X \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
R277-300R-X115 = 300*277 \
R115+X277-300X = 300*115 \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
-23R-115X = 300*277 = 83100 \
115R+577X = 300*115 = 34500 \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
R=-1128613 \
X= 225000 \
end{cases}
But R is negative! Can anybody verify ?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm assuming that you flipped right and left (since the real part of $300$ is clearly $300$). In general, to put a complex fraction in standard $x+yi$ form, you can multiply both the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator (as saulspatz said in their comment) In symbols:
$$ frac{a+bi}{c+di} ~~=~~ frac{a+bi}{c+di} cdot frac{c-di}{c-di} ~~=~~ frac{ac+bd + (bc-ad)i}{c^2+d^2}.$$
Therefore, the real part of this fraction is
$$ frac{ac+bd}{c^2+d^2}. $$
In your case:
- $a=R277-X115$
- $b=R115+X277$
- $c=R+277$
- $d=X+115$
Plugging these into the formula above, we get
$$frac{[R^2277-RX115+R277^2-X(277cdot115)]+[RX115+X^2277+R115^2+X(277cdot115)]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$
Cancelling terms in the numerator gives
$$=frac{[R^2277+R277^2]+[X^2277+R115^2]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$
This is still a mess, but it doesn't seem like you can do much better except to write out some of the numbers e.g. $115^2=13225$, and so on.
In the other answer, cgiovanardi assumed that your ultimate goal was to solve this equation, in which case their idea is a lot better. Rather than getting an explicit form for the real and imaginary part of the LHS as a fraction, you can multiply the denominator through to both sides first.
The resulting system is best solved by machine: here's the computation in WolframAlpha.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2996581%2ffind-real-part-of-messy-complex-fraction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I believe that R=resistance and X=impedance.
So:
$R277−X115+i(R115+X277) = 300 (R+277+i(115+X))$
begin{cases}
R277−X115 = 300 (R+277) \
R115+X277 = 300 (115+X) \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
R277−X115 = 300R+300*277 \
R115+X277 = 300*115+300X \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
R277-300R-X115 = 300*277 \
R115+X277-300X = 300*115 \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
-23R-115X = 300*277 = 83100 \
115R+577X = 300*115 = 34500 \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
R=-1128613 \
X= 225000 \
end{cases}
But R is negative! Can anybody verify ?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I believe that R=resistance and X=impedance.
So:
$R277−X115+i(R115+X277) = 300 (R+277+i(115+X))$
begin{cases}
R277−X115 = 300 (R+277) \
R115+X277 = 300 (115+X) \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
R277−X115 = 300R+300*277 \
R115+X277 = 300*115+300X \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
R277-300R-X115 = 300*277 \
R115+X277-300X = 300*115 \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
-23R-115X = 300*277 = 83100 \
115R+577X = 300*115 = 34500 \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
R=-1128613 \
X= 225000 \
end{cases}
But R is negative! Can anybody verify ?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I believe that R=resistance and X=impedance.
So:
$R277−X115+i(R115+X277) = 300 (R+277+i(115+X))$
begin{cases}
R277−X115 = 300 (R+277) \
R115+X277 = 300 (115+X) \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
R277−X115 = 300R+300*277 \
R115+X277 = 300*115+300X \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
R277-300R-X115 = 300*277 \
R115+X277-300X = 300*115 \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
-23R-115X = 300*277 = 83100 \
115R+577X = 300*115 = 34500 \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
R=-1128613 \
X= 225000 \
end{cases}
But R is negative! Can anybody verify ?
$endgroup$
I believe that R=resistance and X=impedance.
So:
$R277−X115+i(R115+X277) = 300 (R+277+i(115+X))$
begin{cases}
R277−X115 = 300 (R+277) \
R115+X277 = 300 (115+X) \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
R277−X115 = 300R+300*277 \
R115+X277 = 300*115+300X \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
R277-300R-X115 = 300*277 \
R115+X277-300X = 300*115 \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
-23R-115X = 300*277 = 83100 \
115R+577X = 300*115 = 34500 \
end{cases}
begin{cases}
R=-1128613 \
X= 225000 \
end{cases}
But R is negative! Can anybody verify ?
answered Nov 22 '18 at 21:06
cgiovanardicgiovanardi
751411
751411
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm assuming that you flipped right and left (since the real part of $300$ is clearly $300$). In general, to put a complex fraction in standard $x+yi$ form, you can multiply both the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator (as saulspatz said in their comment) In symbols:
$$ frac{a+bi}{c+di} ~~=~~ frac{a+bi}{c+di} cdot frac{c-di}{c-di} ~~=~~ frac{ac+bd + (bc-ad)i}{c^2+d^2}.$$
Therefore, the real part of this fraction is
$$ frac{ac+bd}{c^2+d^2}. $$
In your case:
- $a=R277-X115$
- $b=R115+X277$
- $c=R+277$
- $d=X+115$
Plugging these into the formula above, we get
$$frac{[R^2277-RX115+R277^2-X(277cdot115)]+[RX115+X^2277+R115^2+X(277cdot115)]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$
Cancelling terms in the numerator gives
$$=frac{[R^2277+R277^2]+[X^2277+R115^2]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$
This is still a mess, but it doesn't seem like you can do much better except to write out some of the numbers e.g. $115^2=13225$, and so on.
In the other answer, cgiovanardi assumed that your ultimate goal was to solve this equation, in which case their idea is a lot better. Rather than getting an explicit form for the real and imaginary part of the LHS as a fraction, you can multiply the denominator through to both sides first.
The resulting system is best solved by machine: here's the computation in WolframAlpha.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm assuming that you flipped right and left (since the real part of $300$ is clearly $300$). In general, to put a complex fraction in standard $x+yi$ form, you can multiply both the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator (as saulspatz said in their comment) In symbols:
$$ frac{a+bi}{c+di} ~~=~~ frac{a+bi}{c+di} cdot frac{c-di}{c-di} ~~=~~ frac{ac+bd + (bc-ad)i}{c^2+d^2}.$$
Therefore, the real part of this fraction is
$$ frac{ac+bd}{c^2+d^2}. $$
In your case:
- $a=R277-X115$
- $b=R115+X277$
- $c=R+277$
- $d=X+115$
Plugging these into the formula above, we get
$$frac{[R^2277-RX115+R277^2-X(277cdot115)]+[RX115+X^2277+R115^2+X(277cdot115)]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$
Cancelling terms in the numerator gives
$$=frac{[R^2277+R277^2]+[X^2277+R115^2]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$
This is still a mess, but it doesn't seem like you can do much better except to write out some of the numbers e.g. $115^2=13225$, and so on.
In the other answer, cgiovanardi assumed that your ultimate goal was to solve this equation, in which case their idea is a lot better. Rather than getting an explicit form for the real and imaginary part of the LHS as a fraction, you can multiply the denominator through to both sides first.
The resulting system is best solved by machine: here's the computation in WolframAlpha.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm assuming that you flipped right and left (since the real part of $300$ is clearly $300$). In general, to put a complex fraction in standard $x+yi$ form, you can multiply both the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator (as saulspatz said in their comment) In symbols:
$$ frac{a+bi}{c+di} ~~=~~ frac{a+bi}{c+di} cdot frac{c-di}{c-di} ~~=~~ frac{ac+bd + (bc-ad)i}{c^2+d^2}.$$
Therefore, the real part of this fraction is
$$ frac{ac+bd}{c^2+d^2}. $$
In your case:
- $a=R277-X115$
- $b=R115+X277$
- $c=R+277$
- $d=X+115$
Plugging these into the formula above, we get
$$frac{[R^2277-RX115+R277^2-X(277cdot115)]+[RX115+X^2277+R115^2+X(277cdot115)]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$
Cancelling terms in the numerator gives
$$=frac{[R^2277+R277^2]+[X^2277+R115^2]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$
This is still a mess, but it doesn't seem like you can do much better except to write out some of the numbers e.g. $115^2=13225$, and so on.
In the other answer, cgiovanardi assumed that your ultimate goal was to solve this equation, in which case their idea is a lot better. Rather than getting an explicit form for the real and imaginary part of the LHS as a fraction, you can multiply the denominator through to both sides first.
The resulting system is best solved by machine: here's the computation in WolframAlpha.
$endgroup$
I'm assuming that you flipped right and left (since the real part of $300$ is clearly $300$). In general, to put a complex fraction in standard $x+yi$ form, you can multiply both the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator (as saulspatz said in their comment) In symbols:
$$ frac{a+bi}{c+di} ~~=~~ frac{a+bi}{c+di} cdot frac{c-di}{c-di} ~~=~~ frac{ac+bd + (bc-ad)i}{c^2+d^2}.$$
Therefore, the real part of this fraction is
$$ frac{ac+bd}{c^2+d^2}. $$
In your case:
- $a=R277-X115$
- $b=R115+X277$
- $c=R+277$
- $d=X+115$
Plugging these into the formula above, we get
$$frac{[R^2277-RX115+R277^2-X(277cdot115)]+[RX115+X^2277+R115^2+X(277cdot115)]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$
Cancelling terms in the numerator gives
$$=frac{[R^2277+R277^2]+[X^2277+R115^2]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$
This is still a mess, but it doesn't seem like you can do much better except to write out some of the numbers e.g. $115^2=13225$, and so on.
In the other answer, cgiovanardi assumed that your ultimate goal was to solve this equation, in which case their idea is a lot better. Rather than getting an explicit form for the real and imaginary part of the LHS as a fraction, you can multiply the denominator through to both sides first.
The resulting system is best solved by machine: here's the computation in WolframAlpha.
answered Dec 23 '18 at 4:57
aleph_twoaleph_two
24912
24912
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2996581%2ffind-real-part-of-messy-complex-fraction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Well, $Re(300)=300$
$endgroup$
– gammatester
Nov 13 '18 at 10:39
1
$begingroup$
Does $R277$ mean the same thing as $277R?$ In any event, can't you multiply numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Nov 13 '18 at 10:43