Taylor expansion on PRML(5.28)
$begingroup$
I'm reading PRML and I have a question,don't solve by myself.
So, please anyone help me.
PRML
Q:Why following third time is not multiplied with $E(boldsymbol{hat{w}})$
$cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}})$
$E(boldsymbol{w}) simeq E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) + ( boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{b} + cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}}) cdots(5.28) $
$ boldsymbol{b} equiv nabla E ,|_{w=hat{w}} , cdots(5.29)$
Taylor series
$f(boldsymbol{x}) approx f(boldsymbol{a}) + Df(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})
+ frac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})^T Hf(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a}).$
optimization machine-learning hessian-matrix
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I'm reading PRML and I have a question,don't solve by myself.
So, please anyone help me.
PRML
Q:Why following third time is not multiplied with $E(boldsymbol{hat{w}})$
$cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}})$
$E(boldsymbol{w}) simeq E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) + ( boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{b} + cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}}) cdots(5.28) $
$ boldsymbol{b} equiv nabla E ,|_{w=hat{w}} , cdots(5.29)$
Taylor series
$f(boldsymbol{x}) approx f(boldsymbol{a}) + Df(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})
+ frac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})^T Hf(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a}).$
optimization machine-learning hessian-matrix
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A) For all we know $E(hat w)$ might be zero, rendering that term useless. B) Why should it be multiplied? The only effect would be a rescaling of the matrix $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:00
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the usual (=single variable) Taylor series? With several variable Taylor series the vector $mathbf{b}$ consists of the first order partial derivatives, the matrix $H$ contains the second order partial derivatives etc.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:01
$begingroup$
Thank you for your comment.
$endgroup$
– Eiji
Dec 22 '18 at 8:45
$begingroup$
That $Hf(a)$ is NOT a matrix $H$ multiplied by $f(a)$. It is the Hessian of the function $f$ evaluated at the point $a$. It is probably better to typeset it differently. Like $H(f)(a)$ or $H_f(a)$. Possibly $(Hf)(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:48
$begingroup$
Anyway, it looks like the author of the text abbreviated $H(E)$ to just $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:51
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I'm reading PRML and I have a question,don't solve by myself.
So, please anyone help me.
PRML
Q:Why following third time is not multiplied with $E(boldsymbol{hat{w}})$
$cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}})$
$E(boldsymbol{w}) simeq E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) + ( boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{b} + cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}}) cdots(5.28) $
$ boldsymbol{b} equiv nabla E ,|_{w=hat{w}} , cdots(5.29)$
Taylor series
$f(boldsymbol{x}) approx f(boldsymbol{a}) + Df(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})
+ frac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})^T Hf(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a}).$
optimization machine-learning hessian-matrix
$endgroup$
I'm reading PRML and I have a question,don't solve by myself.
So, please anyone help me.
PRML
Q:Why following third time is not multiplied with $E(boldsymbol{hat{w}})$
$cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}})$
$E(boldsymbol{w}) simeq E(boldsymbol{hat{w}}) + ( boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{b} + cfrac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}} )^mathrm{T} boldsymbol{H}(boldsymbol{w} - boldsymbol{hat{w}}) cdots(5.28) $
$ boldsymbol{b} equiv nabla E ,|_{w=hat{w}} , cdots(5.29)$
Taylor series
$f(boldsymbol{x}) approx f(boldsymbol{a}) + Df(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})
+ frac{1}{2} (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a})^T Hf(boldsymbol{a}) (boldsymbol{x}-boldsymbol{a}).$
optimization machine-learning hessian-matrix
optimization machine-learning hessian-matrix
edited Dec 22 '18 at 8:36
Eiji
asked Dec 22 '18 at 7:29
EijiEiji
11
11
$begingroup$
A) For all we know $E(hat w)$ might be zero, rendering that term useless. B) Why should it be multiplied? The only effect would be a rescaling of the matrix $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:00
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the usual (=single variable) Taylor series? With several variable Taylor series the vector $mathbf{b}$ consists of the first order partial derivatives, the matrix $H$ contains the second order partial derivatives etc.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:01
$begingroup$
Thank you for your comment.
$endgroup$
– Eiji
Dec 22 '18 at 8:45
$begingroup$
That $Hf(a)$ is NOT a matrix $H$ multiplied by $f(a)$. It is the Hessian of the function $f$ evaluated at the point $a$. It is probably better to typeset it differently. Like $H(f)(a)$ or $H_f(a)$. Possibly $(Hf)(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:48
$begingroup$
Anyway, it looks like the author of the text abbreviated $H(E)$ to just $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:51
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
A) For all we know $E(hat w)$ might be zero, rendering that term useless. B) Why should it be multiplied? The only effect would be a rescaling of the matrix $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:00
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the usual (=single variable) Taylor series? With several variable Taylor series the vector $mathbf{b}$ consists of the first order partial derivatives, the matrix $H$ contains the second order partial derivatives etc.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:01
$begingroup$
Thank you for your comment.
$endgroup$
– Eiji
Dec 22 '18 at 8:45
$begingroup$
That $Hf(a)$ is NOT a matrix $H$ multiplied by $f(a)$. It is the Hessian of the function $f$ evaluated at the point $a$. It is probably better to typeset it differently. Like $H(f)(a)$ or $H_f(a)$. Possibly $(Hf)(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:48
$begingroup$
Anyway, it looks like the author of the text abbreviated $H(E)$ to just $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:51
$begingroup$
A) For all we know $E(hat w)$ might be zero, rendering that term useless. B) Why should it be multiplied? The only effect would be a rescaling of the matrix $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:00
$begingroup$
A) For all we know $E(hat w)$ might be zero, rendering that term useless. B) Why should it be multiplied? The only effect would be a rescaling of the matrix $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:00
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the usual (=single variable) Taylor series? With several variable Taylor series the vector $mathbf{b}$ consists of the first order partial derivatives, the matrix $H$ contains the second order partial derivatives etc.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:01
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the usual (=single variable) Taylor series? With several variable Taylor series the vector $mathbf{b}$ consists of the first order partial derivatives, the matrix $H$ contains the second order partial derivatives etc.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:01
$begingroup$
Thank you for your comment.
$endgroup$
– Eiji
Dec 22 '18 at 8:45
$begingroup$
Thank you for your comment.
$endgroup$
– Eiji
Dec 22 '18 at 8:45
$begingroup$
That $Hf(a)$ is NOT a matrix $H$ multiplied by $f(a)$. It is the Hessian of the function $f$ evaluated at the point $a$. It is probably better to typeset it differently. Like $H(f)(a)$ or $H_f(a)$. Possibly $(Hf)(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:48
$begingroup$
That $Hf(a)$ is NOT a matrix $H$ multiplied by $f(a)$. It is the Hessian of the function $f$ evaluated at the point $a$. It is probably better to typeset it differently. Like $H(f)(a)$ or $H_f(a)$. Possibly $(Hf)(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:48
$begingroup$
Anyway, it looks like the author of the text abbreviated $H(E)$ to just $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:51
$begingroup$
Anyway, it looks like the author of the text abbreviated $H(E)$ to just $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:51
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049194%2ftaylor-expansion-on-prml5-28%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3049194%2ftaylor-expansion-on-prml5-28%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
A) For all we know $E(hat w)$ might be zero, rendering that term useless. B) Why should it be multiplied? The only effect would be a rescaling of the matrix $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:00
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the usual (=single variable) Taylor series? With several variable Taylor series the vector $mathbf{b}$ consists of the first order partial derivatives, the matrix $H$ contains the second order partial derivatives etc.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:01
$begingroup$
Thank you for your comment.
$endgroup$
– Eiji
Dec 22 '18 at 8:45
$begingroup$
That $Hf(a)$ is NOT a matrix $H$ multiplied by $f(a)$. It is the Hessian of the function $f$ evaluated at the point $a$. It is probably better to typeset it differently. Like $H(f)(a)$ or $H_f(a)$. Possibly $(Hf)(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:48
$begingroup$
Anyway, it looks like the author of the text abbreviated $H(E)$ to just $H$.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 22 '18 at 8:51