how to calculate $int_C frac{2xy^2dx-2yx^2dy}{x^2+y^2}$ using green theorm or directly












0












$begingroup$



Calculate $$int_C frac{2xy^2dx-2yx^2dy}{x^2+y^2},$$ where $C$ is the ellipse $3x^2 +5y^2 = 1$ taken in the positive direction.




I tried to calculate the integral using green theorm.



now i need to build enclosier that doesn't enclose $(0,0)$
i am having hard time guessing what to build.



a circle and ellipse might be perfect but then the domain is not easy to write. can i have hint please ?






multivariable-calculus greens-theorem







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure it is a minus between the two terms in the numerator? Green's theorem doesn't seem to work if it is a minus, since $$P_y=frac{4xy}{x^2+y^2}\Q_x=-frac{4xy}{x^2+y^2}$$So $P_yne Q_x$
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    Jan 7 at 22:19












  • $begingroup$
    oh right , anyway can i apply green therom here ? even if its not $0$ or the integral is too complex to calculate ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mather
    Jan 7 at 22:22












  • $begingroup$
    i have also tried to calculate it with basic parametrization of the ellipse but i got harsh integrand
    $endgroup$
    – Mather
    Jan 7 at 22:23












  • $begingroup$
    @JohnDoe are you sure? Shouldn't there be a $(x^2+y^2)^2$ in the denominator from quotient rule. I don't think it cancels.
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    Jan 7 at 22:24










  • $begingroup$
    @AHusain Oh whoops, I didn't differentiate that properly, you''re right! However, even if you do differentiate it properly, it still doesn't give $P_y=Q_x$, the minus sign will still mess this up
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    Jan 7 at 22:34


















0












$begingroup$



Calculate $$int_C frac{2xy^2dx-2yx^2dy}{x^2+y^2},$$ where $C$ is the ellipse $3x^2 +5y^2 = 1$ taken in the positive direction.




I tried to calculate the integral using green theorm.



now i need to build enclosier that doesn't enclose $(0,0)$
i am having hard time guessing what to build.



a circle and ellipse might be perfect but then the domain is not easy to write. can i have hint please ?






multivariable-calculus greens-theorem







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure it is a minus between the two terms in the numerator? Green's theorem doesn't seem to work if it is a minus, since $$P_y=frac{4xy}{x^2+y^2}\Q_x=-frac{4xy}{x^2+y^2}$$So $P_yne Q_x$
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    Jan 7 at 22:19












  • $begingroup$
    oh right , anyway can i apply green therom here ? even if its not $0$ or the integral is too complex to calculate ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mather
    Jan 7 at 22:22












  • $begingroup$
    i have also tried to calculate it with basic parametrization of the ellipse but i got harsh integrand
    $endgroup$
    – Mather
    Jan 7 at 22:23












  • $begingroup$
    @JohnDoe are you sure? Shouldn't there be a $(x^2+y^2)^2$ in the denominator from quotient rule. I don't think it cancels.
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    Jan 7 at 22:24










  • $begingroup$
    @AHusain Oh whoops, I didn't differentiate that properly, you''re right! However, even if you do differentiate it properly, it still doesn't give $P_y=Q_x$, the minus sign will still mess this up
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    Jan 7 at 22:34
















0












0








0





$begingroup$



Calculate $$int_C frac{2xy^2dx-2yx^2dy}{x^2+y^2},$$ where $C$ is the ellipse $3x^2 +5y^2 = 1$ taken in the positive direction.




I tried to calculate the integral using green theorm.



now i need to build enclosier that doesn't enclose $(0,0)$
i am having hard time guessing what to build.



a circle and ellipse might be perfect but then the domain is not easy to write. can i have hint please ?






multivariable-calculus greens-theorem







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Calculate $$int_C frac{2xy^2dx-2yx^2dy}{x^2+y^2},$$ where $C$ is the ellipse $3x^2 +5y^2 = 1$ taken in the positive direction.




I tried to calculate the integral using green theorm.



now i need to build enclosier that doesn't enclose $(0,0)$
i am having hard time guessing what to build.



a circle and ellipse might be perfect but then the domain is not easy to write. can i have hint please ?






multivariable-calculus greens-theorem




multivariable-calculus greens-theorem






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 7 at 22:27







Mather

















asked Jan 7 at 22:11









Mather Mather

4028




4028








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure it is a minus between the two terms in the numerator? Green's theorem doesn't seem to work if it is a minus, since $$P_y=frac{4xy}{x^2+y^2}\Q_x=-frac{4xy}{x^2+y^2}$$So $P_yne Q_x$
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    Jan 7 at 22:19












  • $begingroup$
    oh right , anyway can i apply green therom here ? even if its not $0$ or the integral is too complex to calculate ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mather
    Jan 7 at 22:22












  • $begingroup$
    i have also tried to calculate it with basic parametrization of the ellipse but i got harsh integrand
    $endgroup$
    – Mather
    Jan 7 at 22:23












  • $begingroup$
    @JohnDoe are you sure? Shouldn't there be a $(x^2+y^2)^2$ in the denominator from quotient rule. I don't think it cancels.
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    Jan 7 at 22:24










  • $begingroup$
    @AHusain Oh whoops, I didn't differentiate that properly, you''re right! However, even if you do differentiate it properly, it still doesn't give $P_y=Q_x$, the minus sign will still mess this up
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    Jan 7 at 22:34
















  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure it is a minus between the two terms in the numerator? Green's theorem doesn't seem to work if it is a minus, since $$P_y=frac{4xy}{x^2+y^2}\Q_x=-frac{4xy}{x^2+y^2}$$So $P_yne Q_x$
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    Jan 7 at 22:19












  • $begingroup$
    oh right , anyway can i apply green therom here ? even if its not $0$ or the integral is too complex to calculate ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mather
    Jan 7 at 22:22












  • $begingroup$
    i have also tried to calculate it with basic parametrization of the ellipse but i got harsh integrand
    $endgroup$
    – Mather
    Jan 7 at 22:23












  • $begingroup$
    @JohnDoe are you sure? Shouldn't there be a $(x^2+y^2)^2$ in the denominator from quotient rule. I don't think it cancels.
    $endgroup$
    – AHusain
    Jan 7 at 22:24










  • $begingroup$
    @AHusain Oh whoops, I didn't differentiate that properly, you''re right! However, even if you do differentiate it properly, it still doesn't give $P_y=Q_x$, the minus sign will still mess this up
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    Jan 7 at 22:34










3




3




$begingroup$
Are you sure it is a minus between the two terms in the numerator? Green's theorem doesn't seem to work if it is a minus, since $$P_y=frac{4xy}{x^2+y^2}\Q_x=-frac{4xy}{x^2+y^2}$$So $P_yne Q_x$
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Jan 7 at 22:19






$begingroup$
Are you sure it is a minus between the two terms in the numerator? Green's theorem doesn't seem to work if it is a minus, since $$P_y=frac{4xy}{x^2+y^2}\Q_x=-frac{4xy}{x^2+y^2}$$So $P_yne Q_x$
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Jan 7 at 22:19














$begingroup$
oh right , anyway can i apply green therom here ? even if its not $0$ or the integral is too complex to calculate ?
$endgroup$
– Mather
Jan 7 at 22:22






$begingroup$
oh right , anyway can i apply green therom here ? even if its not $0$ or the integral is too complex to calculate ?
$endgroup$
– Mather
Jan 7 at 22:22














$begingroup$
i have also tried to calculate it with basic parametrization of the ellipse but i got harsh integrand
$endgroup$
– Mather
Jan 7 at 22:23






$begingroup$
i have also tried to calculate it with basic parametrization of the ellipse but i got harsh integrand
$endgroup$
– Mather
Jan 7 at 22:23














$begingroup$
@JohnDoe are you sure? Shouldn't there be a $(x^2+y^2)^2$ in the denominator from quotient rule. I don't think it cancels.
$endgroup$
– AHusain
Jan 7 at 22:24




$begingroup$
@JohnDoe are you sure? Shouldn't there be a $(x^2+y^2)^2$ in the denominator from quotient rule. I don't think it cancels.
$endgroup$
– AHusain
Jan 7 at 22:24












$begingroup$
@AHusain Oh whoops, I didn't differentiate that properly, you''re right! However, even if you do differentiate it properly, it still doesn't give $P_y=Q_x$, the minus sign will still mess this up
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Jan 7 at 22:34






$begingroup$
@AHusain Oh whoops, I didn't differentiate that properly, you''re right! However, even if you do differentiate it properly, it still doesn't give $P_y=Q_x$, the minus sign will still mess this up
$endgroup$
– John Doe
Jan 7 at 22:34












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

We have



$$int_mathcal C frac{2xy^2mathrm dx-2x^2ymathrm dy}{x^2+y^2}=int_{3x^2+5y^2=1}frac{mathrm d(x^2)y^2-x^2mathrm d(y^2)}{x^2+y^2}tag1$$



Let $u=x^2, v=y^2$. Then we have



$$int_{3u+5v=1,quad u,vge0}left(frac{v}{u+v}mathrm du-frac{u}{u+v}mathrm dvright)tag2$$



We compute the first integral. The path is $3u+5v=1,quad u,vge0$, so $v=frac15-frac35 u$ and $uin[0,frac13]$.



$$int_mathcal Cfrac v{u+v}mathrm du=int_0^frac13frac{1-3u}{1+2u}=cdots=frac14left(5logfrac53-2right)$$



We compute the second integral. The path is $u=frac13-frac53 v$ with $vin[0,frac15]$.



$$int_mathcal Cfrac u{u+v}mathrm dv=int_0^frac15frac{1-5v}{1-2v}mathrm dv=cdots=frac14left(2-3logfrac53right)$$



Hence the amount that $(2)$ contributes to the total integral $(1)$ is$$frac14left(5logfrac53-2-2+3logfrac53right)=2logfrac53-1$$




Edit:



As pointed out in the comments, this change of co-ordinates was not a bijective map, so we have not included all the points on the ellipse by doing this calculation, we have only done it for $x,y>0$. For $x,y<0$, we would have the same path, but traversed backwards (i.e. the integration limits will be swapped), which would directly cancel out what we have computed here.



For $x>0,y<0$, we have the same path as in $(2)$, while for $x<0,y>0$, we have this path traversed backwards (you can see this by considering the ellipse traversed clockwise, seeing whether $x$, and correspondingly $u$, is increasing in magnitude or not). So again, these two contributions cancel. This is what gives $0$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    shouldn't it be $0$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mather
    Jan 8 at 9:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JohnDoe This isn't entirely correct. Your new coordinate system only maps a quarter of the ellipse. To go all the way around the ellipse, you must go forwards and backwards on the line in $(u,v)$ twice, making the integral $0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    Jan 8 at 12:38












  • $begingroup$
    @mather see the above comment ^ I'll edit my answer in a little while
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    Jan 8 at 13:20












  • $begingroup$
    @Dylan I have edited the question, thanks for pointing that out
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    Jan 8 at 15:40



















0












$begingroup$

You can evaluate the line integral directly by taking $mathbf r(t) = (cos(t)/sqrt 3, sin(t)/sqrt 5)$:
$$I = int_C mathbf F cdot dmathbf r =
-int_0^{2 pi} frac {sin 2 t} {4 + cos 2 t} dt =
-int_0^pi frac {sin 2 t} {4 + cos 2 t} +
int_0^pi frac {sin 2 t} {4 + cos 2 t} dt = 0.$$
Green's theorem still holds for $mathbf F$ even though $mathbf F$ doesn't have continuous partial derivatives at $(0, 0)$:
$$I = -iint_{3 x^2 + 5 y^2 leq 1} frac {4 x y} {x^2 + y^2} dx dy.$$
This form makes it clearer that the result is zero because of the symmetries wrt the coordinate axes.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065565%2fhow-to-calculate-int-c-frac2xy2dx-2yx2dyx2y2-using-green-theorm-or%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    We have



    $$int_mathcal C frac{2xy^2mathrm dx-2x^2ymathrm dy}{x^2+y^2}=int_{3x^2+5y^2=1}frac{mathrm d(x^2)y^2-x^2mathrm d(y^2)}{x^2+y^2}tag1$$



    Let $u=x^2, v=y^2$. Then we have



    $$int_{3u+5v=1,quad u,vge0}left(frac{v}{u+v}mathrm du-frac{u}{u+v}mathrm dvright)tag2$$



    We compute the first integral. The path is $3u+5v=1,quad u,vge0$, so $v=frac15-frac35 u$ and $uin[0,frac13]$.



    $$int_mathcal Cfrac v{u+v}mathrm du=int_0^frac13frac{1-3u}{1+2u}=cdots=frac14left(5logfrac53-2right)$$



    We compute the second integral. The path is $u=frac13-frac53 v$ with $vin[0,frac15]$.



    $$int_mathcal Cfrac u{u+v}mathrm dv=int_0^frac15frac{1-5v}{1-2v}mathrm dv=cdots=frac14left(2-3logfrac53right)$$



    Hence the amount that $(2)$ contributes to the total integral $(1)$ is$$frac14left(5logfrac53-2-2+3logfrac53right)=2logfrac53-1$$




    Edit:



    As pointed out in the comments, this change of co-ordinates was not a bijective map, so we have not included all the points on the ellipse by doing this calculation, we have only done it for $x,y>0$. For $x,y<0$, we would have the same path, but traversed backwards (i.e. the integration limits will be swapped), which would directly cancel out what we have computed here.



    For $x>0,y<0$, we have the same path as in $(2)$, while for $x<0,y>0$, we have this path traversed backwards (you can see this by considering the ellipse traversed clockwise, seeing whether $x$, and correspondingly $u$, is increasing in magnitude or not). So again, these two contributions cancel. This is what gives $0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      shouldn't it be $0$ ?
      $endgroup$
      – Mather
      Jan 8 at 9:40








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JohnDoe This isn't entirely correct. Your new coordinate system only maps a quarter of the ellipse. To go all the way around the ellipse, you must go forwards and backwards on the line in $(u,v)$ twice, making the integral $0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Dylan
      Jan 8 at 12:38












    • $begingroup$
      @mather see the above comment ^ I'll edit my answer in a little while
      $endgroup$
      – John Doe
      Jan 8 at 13:20












    • $begingroup$
      @Dylan I have edited the question, thanks for pointing that out
      $endgroup$
      – John Doe
      Jan 8 at 15:40
















    0












    $begingroup$

    We have



    $$int_mathcal C frac{2xy^2mathrm dx-2x^2ymathrm dy}{x^2+y^2}=int_{3x^2+5y^2=1}frac{mathrm d(x^2)y^2-x^2mathrm d(y^2)}{x^2+y^2}tag1$$



    Let $u=x^2, v=y^2$. Then we have



    $$int_{3u+5v=1,quad u,vge0}left(frac{v}{u+v}mathrm du-frac{u}{u+v}mathrm dvright)tag2$$



    We compute the first integral. The path is $3u+5v=1,quad u,vge0$, so $v=frac15-frac35 u$ and $uin[0,frac13]$.



    $$int_mathcal Cfrac v{u+v}mathrm du=int_0^frac13frac{1-3u}{1+2u}=cdots=frac14left(5logfrac53-2right)$$



    We compute the second integral. The path is $u=frac13-frac53 v$ with $vin[0,frac15]$.



    $$int_mathcal Cfrac u{u+v}mathrm dv=int_0^frac15frac{1-5v}{1-2v}mathrm dv=cdots=frac14left(2-3logfrac53right)$$



    Hence the amount that $(2)$ contributes to the total integral $(1)$ is$$frac14left(5logfrac53-2-2+3logfrac53right)=2logfrac53-1$$




    Edit:



    As pointed out in the comments, this change of co-ordinates was not a bijective map, so we have not included all the points on the ellipse by doing this calculation, we have only done it for $x,y>0$. For $x,y<0$, we would have the same path, but traversed backwards (i.e. the integration limits will be swapped), which would directly cancel out what we have computed here.



    For $x>0,y<0$, we have the same path as in $(2)$, while for $x<0,y>0$, we have this path traversed backwards (you can see this by considering the ellipse traversed clockwise, seeing whether $x$, and correspondingly $u$, is increasing in magnitude or not). So again, these two contributions cancel. This is what gives $0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      shouldn't it be $0$ ?
      $endgroup$
      – Mather
      Jan 8 at 9:40








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JohnDoe This isn't entirely correct. Your new coordinate system only maps a quarter of the ellipse. To go all the way around the ellipse, you must go forwards and backwards on the line in $(u,v)$ twice, making the integral $0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Dylan
      Jan 8 at 12:38












    • $begingroup$
      @mather see the above comment ^ I'll edit my answer in a little while
      $endgroup$
      – John Doe
      Jan 8 at 13:20












    • $begingroup$
      @Dylan I have edited the question, thanks for pointing that out
      $endgroup$
      – John Doe
      Jan 8 at 15:40














    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    We have



    $$int_mathcal C frac{2xy^2mathrm dx-2x^2ymathrm dy}{x^2+y^2}=int_{3x^2+5y^2=1}frac{mathrm d(x^2)y^2-x^2mathrm d(y^2)}{x^2+y^2}tag1$$



    Let $u=x^2, v=y^2$. Then we have



    $$int_{3u+5v=1,quad u,vge0}left(frac{v}{u+v}mathrm du-frac{u}{u+v}mathrm dvright)tag2$$



    We compute the first integral. The path is $3u+5v=1,quad u,vge0$, so $v=frac15-frac35 u$ and $uin[0,frac13]$.



    $$int_mathcal Cfrac v{u+v}mathrm du=int_0^frac13frac{1-3u}{1+2u}=cdots=frac14left(5logfrac53-2right)$$



    We compute the second integral. The path is $u=frac13-frac53 v$ with $vin[0,frac15]$.



    $$int_mathcal Cfrac u{u+v}mathrm dv=int_0^frac15frac{1-5v}{1-2v}mathrm dv=cdots=frac14left(2-3logfrac53right)$$



    Hence the amount that $(2)$ contributes to the total integral $(1)$ is$$frac14left(5logfrac53-2-2+3logfrac53right)=2logfrac53-1$$




    Edit:



    As pointed out in the comments, this change of co-ordinates was not a bijective map, so we have not included all the points on the ellipse by doing this calculation, we have only done it for $x,y>0$. For $x,y<0$, we would have the same path, but traversed backwards (i.e. the integration limits will be swapped), which would directly cancel out what we have computed here.



    For $x>0,y<0$, we have the same path as in $(2)$, while for $x<0,y>0$, we have this path traversed backwards (you can see this by considering the ellipse traversed clockwise, seeing whether $x$, and correspondingly $u$, is increasing in magnitude or not). So again, these two contributions cancel. This is what gives $0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    We have



    $$int_mathcal C frac{2xy^2mathrm dx-2x^2ymathrm dy}{x^2+y^2}=int_{3x^2+5y^2=1}frac{mathrm d(x^2)y^2-x^2mathrm d(y^2)}{x^2+y^2}tag1$$



    Let $u=x^2, v=y^2$. Then we have



    $$int_{3u+5v=1,quad u,vge0}left(frac{v}{u+v}mathrm du-frac{u}{u+v}mathrm dvright)tag2$$



    We compute the first integral. The path is $3u+5v=1,quad u,vge0$, so $v=frac15-frac35 u$ and $uin[0,frac13]$.



    $$int_mathcal Cfrac v{u+v}mathrm du=int_0^frac13frac{1-3u}{1+2u}=cdots=frac14left(5logfrac53-2right)$$



    We compute the second integral. The path is $u=frac13-frac53 v$ with $vin[0,frac15]$.



    $$int_mathcal Cfrac u{u+v}mathrm dv=int_0^frac15frac{1-5v}{1-2v}mathrm dv=cdots=frac14left(2-3logfrac53right)$$



    Hence the amount that $(2)$ contributes to the total integral $(1)$ is$$frac14left(5logfrac53-2-2+3logfrac53right)=2logfrac53-1$$




    Edit:



    As pointed out in the comments, this change of co-ordinates was not a bijective map, so we have not included all the points on the ellipse by doing this calculation, we have only done it for $x,y>0$. For $x,y<0$, we would have the same path, but traversed backwards (i.e. the integration limits will be swapped), which would directly cancel out what we have computed here.



    For $x>0,y<0$, we have the same path as in $(2)$, while for $x<0,y>0$, we have this path traversed backwards (you can see this by considering the ellipse traversed clockwise, seeing whether $x$, and correspondingly $u$, is increasing in magnitude or not). So again, these two contributions cancel. This is what gives $0$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Jan 8 at 15:39

























    answered Jan 7 at 22:55









    John DoeJohn Doe

    11.3k11239




    11.3k11239












    • $begingroup$
      shouldn't it be $0$ ?
      $endgroup$
      – Mather
      Jan 8 at 9:40








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JohnDoe This isn't entirely correct. Your new coordinate system only maps a quarter of the ellipse. To go all the way around the ellipse, you must go forwards and backwards on the line in $(u,v)$ twice, making the integral $0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Dylan
      Jan 8 at 12:38












    • $begingroup$
      @mather see the above comment ^ I'll edit my answer in a little while
      $endgroup$
      – John Doe
      Jan 8 at 13:20












    • $begingroup$
      @Dylan I have edited the question, thanks for pointing that out
      $endgroup$
      – John Doe
      Jan 8 at 15:40


















    • $begingroup$
      shouldn't it be $0$ ?
      $endgroup$
      – Mather
      Jan 8 at 9:40








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JohnDoe This isn't entirely correct. Your new coordinate system only maps a quarter of the ellipse. To go all the way around the ellipse, you must go forwards and backwards on the line in $(u,v)$ twice, making the integral $0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Dylan
      Jan 8 at 12:38












    • $begingroup$
      @mather see the above comment ^ I'll edit my answer in a little while
      $endgroup$
      – John Doe
      Jan 8 at 13:20












    • $begingroup$
      @Dylan I have edited the question, thanks for pointing that out
      $endgroup$
      – John Doe
      Jan 8 at 15:40
















    $begingroup$
    shouldn't it be $0$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mather
    Jan 8 at 9:40






    $begingroup$
    shouldn't it be $0$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Mather
    Jan 8 at 9:40






    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @JohnDoe This isn't entirely correct. Your new coordinate system only maps a quarter of the ellipse. To go all the way around the ellipse, you must go forwards and backwards on the line in $(u,v)$ twice, making the integral $0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    Jan 8 at 12:38






    $begingroup$
    @JohnDoe This isn't entirely correct. Your new coordinate system only maps a quarter of the ellipse. To go all the way around the ellipse, you must go forwards and backwards on the line in $(u,v)$ twice, making the integral $0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    Jan 8 at 12:38














    $begingroup$
    @mather see the above comment ^ I'll edit my answer in a little while
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    Jan 8 at 13:20






    $begingroup$
    @mather see the above comment ^ I'll edit my answer in a little while
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    Jan 8 at 13:20














    $begingroup$
    @Dylan I have edited the question, thanks for pointing that out
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    Jan 8 at 15:40




    $begingroup$
    @Dylan I have edited the question, thanks for pointing that out
    $endgroup$
    – John Doe
    Jan 8 at 15:40











    0












    $begingroup$

    You can evaluate the line integral directly by taking $mathbf r(t) = (cos(t)/sqrt 3, sin(t)/sqrt 5)$:
    $$I = int_C mathbf F cdot dmathbf r =
    -int_0^{2 pi} frac {sin 2 t} {4 + cos 2 t} dt =
    -int_0^pi frac {sin 2 t} {4 + cos 2 t} +
    int_0^pi frac {sin 2 t} {4 + cos 2 t} dt = 0.$$
    Green's theorem still holds for $mathbf F$ even though $mathbf F$ doesn't have continuous partial derivatives at $(0, 0)$:
    $$I = -iint_{3 x^2 + 5 y^2 leq 1} frac {4 x y} {x^2 + y^2} dx dy.$$
    This form makes it clearer that the result is zero because of the symmetries wrt the coordinate axes.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      You can evaluate the line integral directly by taking $mathbf r(t) = (cos(t)/sqrt 3, sin(t)/sqrt 5)$:
      $$I = int_C mathbf F cdot dmathbf r =
      -int_0^{2 pi} frac {sin 2 t} {4 + cos 2 t} dt =
      -int_0^pi frac {sin 2 t} {4 + cos 2 t} +
      int_0^pi frac {sin 2 t} {4 + cos 2 t} dt = 0.$$
      Green's theorem still holds for $mathbf F$ even though $mathbf F$ doesn't have continuous partial derivatives at $(0, 0)$:
      $$I = -iint_{3 x^2 + 5 y^2 leq 1} frac {4 x y} {x^2 + y^2} dx dy.$$
      This form makes it clearer that the result is zero because of the symmetries wrt the coordinate axes.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        You can evaluate the line integral directly by taking $mathbf r(t) = (cos(t)/sqrt 3, sin(t)/sqrt 5)$:
        $$I = int_C mathbf F cdot dmathbf r =
        -int_0^{2 pi} frac {sin 2 t} {4 + cos 2 t} dt =
        -int_0^pi frac {sin 2 t} {4 + cos 2 t} +
        int_0^pi frac {sin 2 t} {4 + cos 2 t} dt = 0.$$
        Green's theorem still holds for $mathbf F$ even though $mathbf F$ doesn't have continuous partial derivatives at $(0, 0)$:
        $$I = -iint_{3 x^2 + 5 y^2 leq 1} frac {4 x y} {x^2 + y^2} dx dy.$$
        This form makes it clearer that the result is zero because of the symmetries wrt the coordinate axes.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        You can evaluate the line integral directly by taking $mathbf r(t) = (cos(t)/sqrt 3, sin(t)/sqrt 5)$:
        $$I = int_C mathbf F cdot dmathbf r =
        -int_0^{2 pi} frac {sin 2 t} {4 + cos 2 t} dt =
        -int_0^pi frac {sin 2 t} {4 + cos 2 t} +
        int_0^pi frac {sin 2 t} {4 + cos 2 t} dt = 0.$$
        Green's theorem still holds for $mathbf F$ even though $mathbf F$ doesn't have continuous partial derivatives at $(0, 0)$:
        $$I = -iint_{3 x^2 + 5 y^2 leq 1} frac {4 x y} {x^2 + y^2} dx dy.$$
        This form makes it clearer that the result is zero because of the symmetries wrt the coordinate axes.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 8 at 18:52

























        answered Jan 8 at 18:43









        MaximMaxim

        6,0631221




        6,0631221






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065565%2fhow-to-calculate-int-c-frac2xy2dx-2yx2dyx2y2-using-green-theorm-or%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Image
            .mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid
            Read more

            Cabo Verde

            Image
              Nota: Cabo-verdiano redireciona para este artigo. Para a língua falada em Cabo Verde, veja crioulo cabo-verdiano. Para outros significados, veja Cabo Verde (desambiguação). Coordenadas: 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cabo Verde República de Cabo Verde Bandeira Brasão de Armas Lema: Unidade, Trabalho, Progresso Hino nacional: Cântico da Liberdade Gentílico: cabo-verdiano [ 1 ] Capital Praia 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cidade mais populosa Praia Língua oficial Português Governo República unitária semipresidencialista [ 2 ]  - Presidente Jorge Carlos Fonseca  - Primeiro-ministro Ulisses Correia e Silva História    - Descoberta 1460   - Independência 00 • de Portugal 5 de Julho de 1975   - Multipartidarismo 13 de Janeiro de 1990  Área    - Total 4 033 km² (146.º)  - Água (%) 0,08 População    - Estimativa para 2017 560 899 [ 3 ] hab. (173.º)
            Read more

            Gyllenstierna

            Image
            .mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid
            Read more