Proof verification that standard topology is a topology












1












$begingroup$



Let $beta$ be the collection of all open intervals $(a,b) subset mathbb{R}$, with $a,b in mathbb{R}$. Prove that the topology $tau_beta$ generated by $beta$ is in fact a topology. Observation:



$tau_beta = {U subset mathbb{R} vert forall x in U ,exists B in beta text{ such that } x in B subset U}$




My proof: $emptyset in tau_beta$ vacuously. Since for every $x in mathbb{R}$ and $varepsilon > 0$, we have that $x in (x-varepsilon, x+varepsilon) subset mathbb{R}$, then $mathbb{R} in tau_beta$. Now, given any arbitrary $x in A = displaystyle{bigcup_{j in J} U_j} $, where $U_j$ is an open set for each $j$, then $x in U_i$ for some $i in J$. Since $U_i $ is open, then there exists an interval $B$ such that $x in B subset U_i$. Finally, consider $W = U_1 bigcap U_2$, where $U_1$ and $U_2$ are open sets. Given any $x in W$, since $x in U_1$ and $x in U_2$, then there exist $B_1, B_2 in beta$ such that $x in B_1 subset U_1$ and $x in B_2 subset U_2$. Then $x in B_1 bigcap B_2 subset U_1 bigcap U_2$ and we're done (the rest is trivial by induction).



Are all my steps correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes it's correct. Maybe you should spell out the observation in the beginning..
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 7 at 22:48












  • $begingroup$
    Isn't the topology generated by a subset of $P(A)$ always a topology on $A$? (See @William Elliot's answer). Out of curiosity, where is this problem from?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Jan 8 at 3:42










  • $begingroup$
    This was an exercise given on my first day of a general topology summer course.
    $endgroup$
    – Matheus Andrade
    Jan 8 at 10:15










  • $begingroup$
    Ok. I guess it gets you to work through the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Jan 8 at 19:31
















1












$begingroup$



Let $beta$ be the collection of all open intervals $(a,b) subset mathbb{R}$, with $a,b in mathbb{R}$. Prove that the topology $tau_beta$ generated by $beta$ is in fact a topology. Observation:



$tau_beta = {U subset mathbb{R} vert forall x in U ,exists B in beta text{ such that } x in B subset U}$




My proof: $emptyset in tau_beta$ vacuously. Since for every $x in mathbb{R}$ and $varepsilon > 0$, we have that $x in (x-varepsilon, x+varepsilon) subset mathbb{R}$, then $mathbb{R} in tau_beta$. Now, given any arbitrary $x in A = displaystyle{bigcup_{j in J} U_j} $, where $U_j$ is an open set for each $j$, then $x in U_i$ for some $i in J$. Since $U_i $ is open, then there exists an interval $B$ such that $x in B subset U_i$. Finally, consider $W = U_1 bigcap U_2$, where $U_1$ and $U_2$ are open sets. Given any $x in W$, since $x in U_1$ and $x in U_2$, then there exist $B_1, B_2 in beta$ such that $x in B_1 subset U_1$ and $x in B_2 subset U_2$. Then $x in B_1 bigcap B_2 subset U_1 bigcap U_2$ and we're done (the rest is trivial by induction).



Are all my steps correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes it's correct. Maybe you should spell out the observation in the beginning..
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 7 at 22:48












  • $begingroup$
    Isn't the topology generated by a subset of $P(A)$ always a topology on $A$? (See @William Elliot's answer). Out of curiosity, where is this problem from?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Jan 8 at 3:42










  • $begingroup$
    This was an exercise given on my first day of a general topology summer course.
    $endgroup$
    – Matheus Andrade
    Jan 8 at 10:15










  • $begingroup$
    Ok. I guess it gets you to work through the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Jan 8 at 19:31














1












1








1





$begingroup$



Let $beta$ be the collection of all open intervals $(a,b) subset mathbb{R}$, with $a,b in mathbb{R}$. Prove that the topology $tau_beta$ generated by $beta$ is in fact a topology. Observation:



$tau_beta = {U subset mathbb{R} vert forall x in U ,exists B in beta text{ such that } x in B subset U}$




My proof: $emptyset in tau_beta$ vacuously. Since for every $x in mathbb{R}$ and $varepsilon > 0$, we have that $x in (x-varepsilon, x+varepsilon) subset mathbb{R}$, then $mathbb{R} in tau_beta$. Now, given any arbitrary $x in A = displaystyle{bigcup_{j in J} U_j} $, where $U_j$ is an open set for each $j$, then $x in U_i$ for some $i in J$. Since $U_i $ is open, then there exists an interval $B$ such that $x in B subset U_i$. Finally, consider $W = U_1 bigcap U_2$, where $U_1$ and $U_2$ are open sets. Given any $x in W$, since $x in U_1$ and $x in U_2$, then there exist $B_1, B_2 in beta$ such that $x in B_1 subset U_1$ and $x in B_2 subset U_2$. Then $x in B_1 bigcap B_2 subset U_1 bigcap U_2$ and we're done (the rest is trivial by induction).



Are all my steps correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Let $beta$ be the collection of all open intervals $(a,b) subset mathbb{R}$, with $a,b in mathbb{R}$. Prove that the topology $tau_beta$ generated by $beta$ is in fact a topology. Observation:



$tau_beta = {U subset mathbb{R} vert forall x in U ,exists B in beta text{ such that } x in B subset U}$




My proof: $emptyset in tau_beta$ vacuously. Since for every $x in mathbb{R}$ and $varepsilon > 0$, we have that $x in (x-varepsilon, x+varepsilon) subset mathbb{R}$, then $mathbb{R} in tau_beta$. Now, given any arbitrary $x in A = displaystyle{bigcup_{j in J} U_j} $, where $U_j$ is an open set for each $j$, then $x in U_i$ for some $i in J$. Since $U_i $ is open, then there exists an interval $B$ such that $x in B subset U_i$. Finally, consider $W = U_1 bigcap U_2$, where $U_1$ and $U_2$ are open sets. Given any $x in W$, since $x in U_1$ and $x in U_2$, then there exist $B_1, B_2 in beta$ such that $x in B_1 subset U_1$ and $x in B_2 subset U_2$. Then $x in B_1 bigcap B_2 subset U_1 bigcap U_2$ and we're done (the rest is trivial by induction).



Are all my steps correct?







general-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 7 at 22:24







Matheus Andrade

















asked Jan 7 at 22:11









Matheus AndradeMatheus Andrade

1,340418




1,340418








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes it's correct. Maybe you should spell out the observation in the beginning..
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 7 at 22:48












  • $begingroup$
    Isn't the topology generated by a subset of $P(A)$ always a topology on $A$? (See @William Elliot's answer). Out of curiosity, where is this problem from?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Jan 8 at 3:42










  • $begingroup$
    This was an exercise given on my first day of a general topology summer course.
    $endgroup$
    – Matheus Andrade
    Jan 8 at 10:15










  • $begingroup$
    Ok. I guess it gets you to work through the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Jan 8 at 19:31














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes it's correct. Maybe you should spell out the observation in the beginning..
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Jan 7 at 22:48












  • $begingroup$
    Isn't the topology generated by a subset of $P(A)$ always a topology on $A$? (See @William Elliot's answer). Out of curiosity, where is this problem from?
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Jan 8 at 3:42










  • $begingroup$
    This was an exercise given on my first day of a general topology summer course.
    $endgroup$
    – Matheus Andrade
    Jan 8 at 10:15










  • $begingroup$
    Ok. I guess it gets you to work through the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Jan 8 at 19:31








1




1




$begingroup$
Yes it's correct. Maybe you should spell out the observation in the beginning..
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 7 at 22:48






$begingroup$
Yes it's correct. Maybe you should spell out the observation in the beginning..
$endgroup$
– Berci
Jan 7 at 22:48














$begingroup$
Isn't the topology generated by a subset of $P(A)$ always a topology on $A$? (See @William Elliot's answer). Out of curiosity, where is this problem from?
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Jan 8 at 3:42




$begingroup$
Isn't the topology generated by a subset of $P(A)$ always a topology on $A$? (See @William Elliot's answer). Out of curiosity, where is this problem from?
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Jan 8 at 3:42












$begingroup$
This was an exercise given on my first day of a general topology summer course.
$endgroup$
– Matheus Andrade
Jan 8 at 10:15




$begingroup$
This was an exercise given on my first day of a general topology summer course.
$endgroup$
– Matheus Andrade
Jan 8 at 10:15












$begingroup$
Ok. I guess it gets you to work through the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Jan 8 at 19:31




$begingroup$
Ok. I guess it gets you to work through the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Jan 8 at 19:31










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

That is a vacuous problem because the topology generated by any subset K of P(X) is by definition a topology for X, the smallest topology for X containing K, the intersection of all topologies for X containing K.



Exercise. If T is a not empty collection of topologies for X,

show $cap$T is a topology for X.



Problem. Is there a topology for X that contains any subset of P(X)?

Why is this important?






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065562%2fproof-verification-that-standard-topology-is-a-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    That is a vacuous problem because the topology generated by any subset K of P(X) is by definition a topology for X, the smallest topology for X containing K, the intersection of all topologies for X containing K.



    Exercise. If T is a not empty collection of topologies for X,

    show $cap$T is a topology for X.



    Problem. Is there a topology for X that contains any subset of P(X)?

    Why is this important?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      That is a vacuous problem because the topology generated by any subset K of P(X) is by definition a topology for X, the smallest topology for X containing K, the intersection of all topologies for X containing K.



      Exercise. If T is a not empty collection of topologies for X,

      show $cap$T is a topology for X.



      Problem. Is there a topology for X that contains any subset of P(X)?

      Why is this important?






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        That is a vacuous problem because the topology generated by any subset K of P(X) is by definition a topology for X, the smallest topology for X containing K, the intersection of all topologies for X containing K.



        Exercise. If T is a not empty collection of topologies for X,

        show $cap$T is a topology for X.



        Problem. Is there a topology for X that contains any subset of P(X)?

        Why is this important?






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        That is a vacuous problem because the topology generated by any subset K of P(X) is by definition a topology for X, the smallest topology for X containing K, the intersection of all topologies for X containing K.



        Exercise. If T is a not empty collection of topologies for X,

        show $cap$T is a topology for X.



        Problem. Is there a topology for X that contains any subset of P(X)?

        Why is this important?







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 8 at 3:29

























        answered Jan 8 at 3:21









        William ElliotWilliam Elliot

        8,9132820




        8,9132820






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065562%2fproof-verification-that-standard-topology-is-a-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Cabo Verde

            Gyllenstierna