Solving Recurrence Relation for the number of n-letter words












0














Find and solve the recurrence relation for the number of n-letter words composed from letters A, B, C and D such that no A comes after any B.

What I learn in the class is,
$$ A = a_{n-1} $$
$$ B = 3^{n-1} $$
$$ C = a_{n-1} $$
$$ D = a_{n-1} $$


why B is different from other? Also how can I solve this one using recurrence relation? Thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question





























    0














    Find and solve the recurrence relation for the number of n-letter words composed from letters A, B, C and D such that no A comes after any B.

    What I learn in the class is,
    $$ A = a_{n-1} $$
    $$ B = 3^{n-1} $$
    $$ C = a_{n-1} $$
    $$ D = a_{n-1} $$


    why B is different from other? Also how can I solve this one using recurrence relation? Thanks in advance!










    share|cite|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0







      Find and solve the recurrence relation for the number of n-letter words composed from letters A, B, C and D such that no A comes after any B.

      What I learn in the class is,
      $$ A = a_{n-1} $$
      $$ B = 3^{n-1} $$
      $$ C = a_{n-1} $$
      $$ D = a_{n-1} $$


      why B is different from other? Also how can I solve this one using recurrence relation? Thanks in advance!










      share|cite|improve this question















      Find and solve the recurrence relation for the number of n-letter words composed from letters A, B, C and D such that no A comes after any B.

      What I learn in the class is,
      $$ A = a_{n-1} $$
      $$ B = 3^{n-1} $$
      $$ C = a_{n-1} $$
      $$ D = a_{n-1} $$


      why B is different from other? Also how can I solve this one using recurrence relation? Thanks in advance!







      discrete-mathematics recurrence-relations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 9 '18 at 20:52

























      asked Dec 9 '18 at 20:37









      jaykodeveloper

      1258




      1258






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          The difference for $B$ is because once we use a $B$, we can't have any $A$'s in the rest of the string (if we start with any other letter, then any good string works). I'm assuming the third line should be $C =a_{n-1}$, and that this means "the number of $n$-letter good strings starting with $C$ is $a_{n-1}$." This justification comes from the fact that, if we start with $C$ (or $A$ or $D$), then to make a good string, we just add on another good string of length $n-1$. But if we start with $B$, then we can't just add on a shorter good string because that might contain $A$; instead, we just want to count how many strings we can make that don't use $A$; this is just $3^{n-1}$.



          Summing over all cases gives the recurrence relation $a_n = 3a_{n-1} + 3^{n-1}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032964%2fsolving-recurrence-relation-for-the-number-of-n-letter-words%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            The difference for $B$ is because once we use a $B$, we can't have any $A$'s in the rest of the string (if we start with any other letter, then any good string works). I'm assuming the third line should be $C =a_{n-1}$, and that this means "the number of $n$-letter good strings starting with $C$ is $a_{n-1}$." This justification comes from the fact that, if we start with $C$ (or $A$ or $D$), then to make a good string, we just add on another good string of length $n-1$. But if we start with $B$, then we can't just add on a shorter good string because that might contain $A$; instead, we just want to count how many strings we can make that don't use $A$; this is just $3^{n-1}$.



            Summing over all cases gives the recurrence relation $a_n = 3a_{n-1} + 3^{n-1}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              1














              The difference for $B$ is because once we use a $B$, we can't have any $A$'s in the rest of the string (if we start with any other letter, then any good string works). I'm assuming the third line should be $C =a_{n-1}$, and that this means "the number of $n$-letter good strings starting with $C$ is $a_{n-1}$." This justification comes from the fact that, if we start with $C$ (or $A$ or $D$), then to make a good string, we just add on another good string of length $n-1$. But if we start with $B$, then we can't just add on a shorter good string because that might contain $A$; instead, we just want to count how many strings we can make that don't use $A$; this is just $3^{n-1}$.



              Summing over all cases gives the recurrence relation $a_n = 3a_{n-1} + 3^{n-1}$.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                1












                1








                1






                The difference for $B$ is because once we use a $B$, we can't have any $A$'s in the rest of the string (if we start with any other letter, then any good string works). I'm assuming the third line should be $C =a_{n-1}$, and that this means "the number of $n$-letter good strings starting with $C$ is $a_{n-1}$." This justification comes from the fact that, if we start with $C$ (or $A$ or $D$), then to make a good string, we just add on another good string of length $n-1$. But if we start with $B$, then we can't just add on a shorter good string because that might contain $A$; instead, we just want to count how many strings we can make that don't use $A$; this is just $3^{n-1}$.



                Summing over all cases gives the recurrence relation $a_n = 3a_{n-1} + 3^{n-1}$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                The difference for $B$ is because once we use a $B$, we can't have any $A$'s in the rest of the string (if we start with any other letter, then any good string works). I'm assuming the third line should be $C =a_{n-1}$, and that this means "the number of $n$-letter good strings starting with $C$ is $a_{n-1}$." This justification comes from the fact that, if we start with $C$ (or $A$ or $D$), then to make a good string, we just add on another good string of length $n-1$. But if we start with $B$, then we can't just add on a shorter good string because that might contain $A$; instead, we just want to count how many strings we can make that don't use $A$; this is just $3^{n-1}$.



                Summing over all cases gives the recurrence relation $a_n = 3a_{n-1} + 3^{n-1}$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 9 '18 at 20:42









                platty

                3,360320




                3,360320






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032964%2fsolving-recurrence-relation-for-the-number-of-n-letter-words%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Cabo Verde

                    Gyllenstierna