Additivity of integral












2












$begingroup$



Let $a<c<b$. The function $f$ is integrable over $]a,b[ iff f$ is integrable over $]a,c[$ and $]c,b[$. We get: $int_a^bf=int_a^cf+int_c^bf $




In the proof of this theorem ($Leftarrow$), we take an arbitrary partition $pi_L$ of $]a,c[$ and a partition $pi_R$ of $]c,b[$. Then we consider the partition $pi := pi_L cup pi_R$ of $]a,b[$.



We get that $s_{pi_L}+s_{pi_R} = s_pi le underline{int_a^b} f$. Why does this equality hold here?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$



    Let $a<c<b$. The function $f$ is integrable over $]a,b[ iff f$ is integrable over $]a,c[$ and $]c,b[$. We get: $int_a^bf=int_a^cf+int_c^bf $




    In the proof of this theorem ($Leftarrow$), we take an arbitrary partition $pi_L$ of $]a,c[$ and a partition $pi_R$ of $]c,b[$. Then we consider the partition $pi := pi_L cup pi_R$ of $]a,b[$.



    We get that $s_{pi_L}+s_{pi_R} = s_pi le underline{int_a^b} f$. Why does this equality hold here?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$



      Let $a<c<b$. The function $f$ is integrable over $]a,b[ iff f$ is integrable over $]a,c[$ and $]c,b[$. We get: $int_a^bf=int_a^cf+int_c^bf $




      In the proof of this theorem ($Leftarrow$), we take an arbitrary partition $pi_L$ of $]a,c[$ and a partition $pi_R$ of $]c,b[$. Then we consider the partition $pi := pi_L cup pi_R$ of $]a,b[$.



      We get that $s_{pi_L}+s_{pi_R} = s_pi le underline{int_a^b} f$. Why does this equality hold here?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      Let $a<c<b$. The function $f$ is integrable over $]a,b[ iff f$ is integrable over $]a,c[$ and $]c,b[$. We get: $int_a^bf=int_a^cf+int_c^bf $




      In the proof of this theorem ($Leftarrow$), we take an arbitrary partition $pi_L$ of $]a,c[$ and a partition $pi_R$ of $]c,b[$. Then we consider the partition $pi := pi_L cup pi_R$ of $]a,b[$.



      We get that $s_{pi_L}+s_{pi_R} = s_pi le underline{int_a^b} f$. Why does this equality hold here?







      calculus






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 12 at 8:09









      ZacharyZachary

      3229




      3229






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The term $underline{int_a^b} f(x),dx$ is defined as the supremum of the set $s_{pi}$ where $pi$ is a generic partition of the interval $[a,b]$. In particular $pi_L cup pi_R$ is a partition of $[a,b]$ and
          $$s_{pi_L cup pi_R}leq underline{int_a^b} f(x),dx.$$
          Moreover, if $pi_L$ is $a=x_0<x_1<dots<x_n=c$ and $pi_R$ is $c=x_{n}<x_{n+1}<dots<x_{n+m}=b$ then $pi_L cup pi_R$ is $a=x_0<x_1<dots<x_{n+m}=b$ and
          $$s_{pi_L}+s_{pi_R}=sum_{k=1}^n m_k(x_k-x_{k-1})+sum_{k=n+1}^{n+m} m_k(x_k-x_{k-1})=sum_{k=1}^{n+m}m_k(x_k-x_{k-1}) =s_{pi_L cup pi_R}$$
          where $m_k=inf_{tin [x_{k-1},x_k]} f(t).$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            @Zachary Any further doubts?
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Jan 12 at 8:40










          • $begingroup$
            No, definitely not! Very clear explanation. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – Zachary
            Jan 12 at 8:44












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070693%2fadditivity-of-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          The term $underline{int_a^b} f(x),dx$ is defined as the supremum of the set $s_{pi}$ where $pi$ is a generic partition of the interval $[a,b]$. In particular $pi_L cup pi_R$ is a partition of $[a,b]$ and
          $$s_{pi_L cup pi_R}leq underline{int_a^b} f(x),dx.$$
          Moreover, if $pi_L$ is $a=x_0<x_1<dots<x_n=c$ and $pi_R$ is $c=x_{n}<x_{n+1}<dots<x_{n+m}=b$ then $pi_L cup pi_R$ is $a=x_0<x_1<dots<x_{n+m}=b$ and
          $$s_{pi_L}+s_{pi_R}=sum_{k=1}^n m_k(x_k-x_{k-1})+sum_{k=n+1}^{n+m} m_k(x_k-x_{k-1})=sum_{k=1}^{n+m}m_k(x_k-x_{k-1}) =s_{pi_L cup pi_R}$$
          where $m_k=inf_{tin [x_{k-1},x_k]} f(t).$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            @Zachary Any further doubts?
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Jan 12 at 8:40










          • $begingroup$
            No, definitely not! Very clear explanation. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – Zachary
            Jan 12 at 8:44
















          1












          $begingroup$

          The term $underline{int_a^b} f(x),dx$ is defined as the supremum of the set $s_{pi}$ where $pi$ is a generic partition of the interval $[a,b]$. In particular $pi_L cup pi_R$ is a partition of $[a,b]$ and
          $$s_{pi_L cup pi_R}leq underline{int_a^b} f(x),dx.$$
          Moreover, if $pi_L$ is $a=x_0<x_1<dots<x_n=c$ and $pi_R$ is $c=x_{n}<x_{n+1}<dots<x_{n+m}=b$ then $pi_L cup pi_R$ is $a=x_0<x_1<dots<x_{n+m}=b$ and
          $$s_{pi_L}+s_{pi_R}=sum_{k=1}^n m_k(x_k-x_{k-1})+sum_{k=n+1}^{n+m} m_k(x_k-x_{k-1})=sum_{k=1}^{n+m}m_k(x_k-x_{k-1}) =s_{pi_L cup pi_R}$$
          where $m_k=inf_{tin [x_{k-1},x_k]} f(t).$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            @Zachary Any further doubts?
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Jan 12 at 8:40










          • $begingroup$
            No, definitely not! Very clear explanation. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – Zachary
            Jan 12 at 8:44














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          The term $underline{int_a^b} f(x),dx$ is defined as the supremum of the set $s_{pi}$ where $pi$ is a generic partition of the interval $[a,b]$. In particular $pi_L cup pi_R$ is a partition of $[a,b]$ and
          $$s_{pi_L cup pi_R}leq underline{int_a^b} f(x),dx.$$
          Moreover, if $pi_L$ is $a=x_0<x_1<dots<x_n=c$ and $pi_R$ is $c=x_{n}<x_{n+1}<dots<x_{n+m}=b$ then $pi_L cup pi_R$ is $a=x_0<x_1<dots<x_{n+m}=b$ and
          $$s_{pi_L}+s_{pi_R}=sum_{k=1}^n m_k(x_k-x_{k-1})+sum_{k=n+1}^{n+m} m_k(x_k-x_{k-1})=sum_{k=1}^{n+m}m_k(x_k-x_{k-1}) =s_{pi_L cup pi_R}$$
          where $m_k=inf_{tin [x_{k-1},x_k]} f(t).$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The term $underline{int_a^b} f(x),dx$ is defined as the supremum of the set $s_{pi}$ where $pi$ is a generic partition of the interval $[a,b]$. In particular $pi_L cup pi_R$ is a partition of $[a,b]$ and
          $$s_{pi_L cup pi_R}leq underline{int_a^b} f(x),dx.$$
          Moreover, if $pi_L$ is $a=x_0<x_1<dots<x_n=c$ and $pi_R$ is $c=x_{n}<x_{n+1}<dots<x_{n+m}=b$ then $pi_L cup pi_R$ is $a=x_0<x_1<dots<x_{n+m}=b$ and
          $$s_{pi_L}+s_{pi_R}=sum_{k=1}^n m_k(x_k-x_{k-1})+sum_{k=n+1}^{n+m} m_k(x_k-x_{k-1})=sum_{k=1}^{n+m}m_k(x_k-x_{k-1}) =s_{pi_L cup pi_R}$$
          where $m_k=inf_{tin [x_{k-1},x_k]} f(t).$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 12 at 8:29

























          answered Jan 12 at 8:20









          Robert ZRobert Z

          102k1072145




          102k1072145












          • $begingroup$
            @Zachary Any further doubts?
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Jan 12 at 8:40










          • $begingroup$
            No, definitely not! Very clear explanation. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – Zachary
            Jan 12 at 8:44


















          • $begingroup$
            @Zachary Any further doubts?
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Jan 12 at 8:40










          • $begingroup$
            No, definitely not! Very clear explanation. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – Zachary
            Jan 12 at 8:44
















          $begingroup$
          @Zachary Any further doubts?
          $endgroup$
          – Robert Z
          Jan 12 at 8:40




          $begingroup$
          @Zachary Any further doubts?
          $endgroup$
          – Robert Z
          Jan 12 at 8:40












          $begingroup$
          No, definitely not! Very clear explanation. Thank you!
          $endgroup$
          – Zachary
          Jan 12 at 8:44




          $begingroup$
          No, definitely not! Very clear explanation. Thank you!
          $endgroup$
          – Zachary
          Jan 12 at 8:44


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070693%2fadditivity-of-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Cabo Verde

          Gyllenstierna