Dimension of an irreducible representation and the index of the group's center












1












$begingroup$


Let $(pi,V_pi)$ be an irreducible representation of finite group $G$, over algebraically closed field $F$ s.t. $char(F)$ is coprime to $|G|$ (for example $mathbb{C}$).



Prove that $dim(pi)^2 le [G:Z(G)]$ where $Z(G)$ is the group's center.




My thoughts so far: let us recall that there exists a character of G (i.e. 1-dim representation) of the center: $omega _pi : Z(G) to F^*$ such that for every $zin Z(G): pi(z) = omega_pi (z) Id_{V_pi}$. also we know $dim(Ind_{Z(G)}^G (omega _pi )) = [G:Z(G)]$, i'm not sure how to continue or even if my intuition so far is correct.




thanks ahead










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I know a way to prove that $dim(pi)^2 mid [G: Z(G)]|G|$ but I don't know the result you mention; I'd be interested in seeing a proof
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 12 at 12:59
















1












$begingroup$


Let $(pi,V_pi)$ be an irreducible representation of finite group $G$, over algebraically closed field $F$ s.t. $char(F)$ is coprime to $|G|$ (for example $mathbb{C}$).



Prove that $dim(pi)^2 le [G:Z(G)]$ where $Z(G)$ is the group's center.




My thoughts so far: let us recall that there exists a character of G (i.e. 1-dim representation) of the center: $omega _pi : Z(G) to F^*$ such that for every $zin Z(G): pi(z) = omega_pi (z) Id_{V_pi}$. also we know $dim(Ind_{Z(G)}^G (omega _pi )) = [G:Z(G)]$, i'm not sure how to continue or even if my intuition so far is correct.




thanks ahead










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I know a way to prove that $dim(pi)^2 mid [G: Z(G)]|G|$ but I don't know the result you mention; I'd be interested in seeing a proof
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 12 at 12:59














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Let $(pi,V_pi)$ be an irreducible representation of finite group $G$, over algebraically closed field $F$ s.t. $char(F)$ is coprime to $|G|$ (for example $mathbb{C}$).



Prove that $dim(pi)^2 le [G:Z(G)]$ where $Z(G)$ is the group's center.




My thoughts so far: let us recall that there exists a character of G (i.e. 1-dim representation) of the center: $omega _pi : Z(G) to F^*$ such that for every $zin Z(G): pi(z) = omega_pi (z) Id_{V_pi}$. also we know $dim(Ind_{Z(G)}^G (omega _pi )) = [G:Z(G)]$, i'm not sure how to continue or even if my intuition so far is correct.




thanks ahead










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $(pi,V_pi)$ be an irreducible representation of finite group $G$, over algebraically closed field $F$ s.t. $char(F)$ is coprime to $|G|$ (for example $mathbb{C}$).



Prove that $dim(pi)^2 le [G:Z(G)]$ where $Z(G)$ is the group's center.




My thoughts so far: let us recall that there exists a character of G (i.e. 1-dim representation) of the center: $omega _pi : Z(G) to F^*$ such that for every $zin Z(G): pi(z) = omega_pi (z) Id_{V_pi}$. also we know $dim(Ind_{Z(G)}^G (omega _pi )) = [G:Z(G)]$, i'm not sure how to continue or even if my intuition so far is correct.




thanks ahead







finite-groups representation-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 12 at 9:05









ned grekerzbergned grekerzberg

494318




494318












  • $begingroup$
    I know a way to prove that $dim(pi)^2 mid [G: Z(G)]|G|$ but I don't know the result you mention; I'd be interested in seeing a proof
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 12 at 12:59


















  • $begingroup$
    I know a way to prove that $dim(pi)^2 mid [G: Z(G)]|G|$ but I don't know the result you mention; I'd be interested in seeing a proof
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 12 at 12:59
















$begingroup$
I know a way to prove that $dim(pi)^2 mid [G: Z(G)]|G|$ but I don't know the result you mention; I'd be interested in seeing a proof
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 12 at 12:59




$begingroup$
I know a way to prove that $dim(pi)^2 mid [G: Z(G)]|G|$ but I don't know the result you mention; I'd be interested in seeing a proof
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 12 at 12:59










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

First, note that $pi|_{Z(G)}=dim(pi)omega_pi$ and $pi$ is a summand of $mathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi$. The inequality now follows since $dimmathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi=[G:Z(G)]$.



EDIT: To see that $pi$ is a direct summand of $mathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi$, use Frobenius reciprocity:
$$langlemathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi,pirangle_G=langleomega_pi,mathrm{Res}^G_{Z(G)}pirangle_{Z(G)}=langle omega_pi,dim(pi)omega_pirangle_{Z(G)}=dimpi.$$
In fact, this means that $pi$ appears with multiplicity $dim(pi)$ in $mathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    would you be willing to explain why $pi$ is a summand of $Ind_{Z(G)}^G omega _ pi$?
    $endgroup$
    – ned grekerzberg
    Jan 15 at 9:10












  • $begingroup$
    You only get $dim (pi) leq [G:Z(G)]$, not $dim (pi)^2$; or am I missing something ?
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 16 at 18:46










  • $begingroup$
    The Frobenius Reciprocity argument implies that $pi$ appears $dimpi$ times in $Indomega_pi$.
    $endgroup$
    – David Hill
    Jan 16 at 18:59












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070722%2fdimension-of-an-irreducible-representation-and-the-index-of-the-groups-center%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

First, note that $pi|_{Z(G)}=dim(pi)omega_pi$ and $pi$ is a summand of $mathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi$. The inequality now follows since $dimmathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi=[G:Z(G)]$.



EDIT: To see that $pi$ is a direct summand of $mathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi$, use Frobenius reciprocity:
$$langlemathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi,pirangle_G=langleomega_pi,mathrm{Res}^G_{Z(G)}pirangle_{Z(G)}=langle omega_pi,dim(pi)omega_pirangle_{Z(G)}=dimpi.$$
In fact, this means that $pi$ appears with multiplicity $dim(pi)$ in $mathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    would you be willing to explain why $pi$ is a summand of $Ind_{Z(G)}^G omega _ pi$?
    $endgroup$
    – ned grekerzberg
    Jan 15 at 9:10












  • $begingroup$
    You only get $dim (pi) leq [G:Z(G)]$, not $dim (pi)^2$; or am I missing something ?
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 16 at 18:46










  • $begingroup$
    The Frobenius Reciprocity argument implies that $pi$ appears $dimpi$ times in $Indomega_pi$.
    $endgroup$
    – David Hill
    Jan 16 at 18:59
















1












$begingroup$

First, note that $pi|_{Z(G)}=dim(pi)omega_pi$ and $pi$ is a summand of $mathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi$. The inequality now follows since $dimmathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi=[G:Z(G)]$.



EDIT: To see that $pi$ is a direct summand of $mathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi$, use Frobenius reciprocity:
$$langlemathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi,pirangle_G=langleomega_pi,mathrm{Res}^G_{Z(G)}pirangle_{Z(G)}=langle omega_pi,dim(pi)omega_pirangle_{Z(G)}=dimpi.$$
In fact, this means that $pi$ appears with multiplicity $dim(pi)$ in $mathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    would you be willing to explain why $pi$ is a summand of $Ind_{Z(G)}^G omega _ pi$?
    $endgroup$
    – ned grekerzberg
    Jan 15 at 9:10












  • $begingroup$
    You only get $dim (pi) leq [G:Z(G)]$, not $dim (pi)^2$; or am I missing something ?
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 16 at 18:46










  • $begingroup$
    The Frobenius Reciprocity argument implies that $pi$ appears $dimpi$ times in $Indomega_pi$.
    $endgroup$
    – David Hill
    Jan 16 at 18:59














1












1








1





$begingroup$

First, note that $pi|_{Z(G)}=dim(pi)omega_pi$ and $pi$ is a summand of $mathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi$. The inequality now follows since $dimmathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi=[G:Z(G)]$.



EDIT: To see that $pi$ is a direct summand of $mathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi$, use Frobenius reciprocity:
$$langlemathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi,pirangle_G=langleomega_pi,mathrm{Res}^G_{Z(G)}pirangle_{Z(G)}=langle omega_pi,dim(pi)omega_pirangle_{Z(G)}=dimpi.$$
In fact, this means that $pi$ appears with multiplicity $dim(pi)$ in $mathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



First, note that $pi|_{Z(G)}=dim(pi)omega_pi$ and $pi$ is a summand of $mathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi$. The inequality now follows since $dimmathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi=[G:Z(G)]$.



EDIT: To see that $pi$ is a direct summand of $mathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi$, use Frobenius reciprocity:
$$langlemathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi,pirangle_G=langleomega_pi,mathrm{Res}^G_{Z(G)}pirangle_{Z(G)}=langle omega_pi,dim(pi)omega_pirangle_{Z(G)}=dimpi.$$
In fact, this means that $pi$ appears with multiplicity $dim(pi)$ in $mathrm{Ind}_{Z(G)}^Gomega_pi$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 16 at 18:57

























answered Jan 14 at 21:28









David HillDavid Hill

9,5761619




9,5761619












  • $begingroup$
    would you be willing to explain why $pi$ is a summand of $Ind_{Z(G)}^G omega _ pi$?
    $endgroup$
    – ned grekerzberg
    Jan 15 at 9:10












  • $begingroup$
    You only get $dim (pi) leq [G:Z(G)]$, not $dim (pi)^2$; or am I missing something ?
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 16 at 18:46










  • $begingroup$
    The Frobenius Reciprocity argument implies that $pi$ appears $dimpi$ times in $Indomega_pi$.
    $endgroup$
    – David Hill
    Jan 16 at 18:59


















  • $begingroup$
    would you be willing to explain why $pi$ is a summand of $Ind_{Z(G)}^G omega _ pi$?
    $endgroup$
    – ned grekerzberg
    Jan 15 at 9:10












  • $begingroup$
    You only get $dim (pi) leq [G:Z(G)]$, not $dim (pi)^2$; or am I missing something ?
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 16 at 18:46










  • $begingroup$
    The Frobenius Reciprocity argument implies that $pi$ appears $dimpi$ times in $Indomega_pi$.
    $endgroup$
    – David Hill
    Jan 16 at 18:59
















$begingroup$
would you be willing to explain why $pi$ is a summand of $Ind_{Z(G)}^G omega _ pi$?
$endgroup$
– ned grekerzberg
Jan 15 at 9:10






$begingroup$
would you be willing to explain why $pi$ is a summand of $Ind_{Z(G)}^G omega _ pi$?
$endgroup$
– ned grekerzberg
Jan 15 at 9:10














$begingroup$
You only get $dim (pi) leq [G:Z(G)]$, not $dim (pi)^2$; or am I missing something ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 16 at 18:46




$begingroup$
You only get $dim (pi) leq [G:Z(G)]$, not $dim (pi)^2$; or am I missing something ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 16 at 18:46












$begingroup$
The Frobenius Reciprocity argument implies that $pi$ appears $dimpi$ times in $Indomega_pi$.
$endgroup$
– David Hill
Jan 16 at 18:59




$begingroup$
The Frobenius Reciprocity argument implies that $pi$ appears $dimpi$ times in $Indomega_pi$.
$endgroup$
– David Hill
Jan 16 at 18:59


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070722%2fdimension-of-an-irreducible-representation-and-the-index-of-the-groups-center%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna