Does the damage of the Chaos Bolt spell against the first target resolve before it jumps to another creature?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
How is the damage of the chaos bolt spell (XGtE, p. 151; GGtR, p. 67) applied?
It may sound straight forward, but I've read the spell's description about twenty times now and it doesn't specifically say.
You hurl an undulating, warbling mass of chaotic energy at one creature in range. Make a ranged spell attack against the target. On a hit, the target takes 2d8 + 1d6 damage.
If you roll the same number on both d8s, the chaotic energy leaps from the target to a different creature of your choice within 30 feet of it. Make a new attack roll against the new target, and make a new damage roll, which could cause the chaotic energy to leap again.
A creature can be targeted only once by each casting of this spell.
You roll the attack, and let's say it hits. Then you roll 2d8+1d6, let's say both d8s are 5, meaning it would jump.
Here's the question. Does the damage resolve on the first target THEN attack the second and resolve on the second as well? Due to the "wild magic" perception of this spell, it would "hit" the first guy, but not damage him, instead moving to the second guy, until finally you stop rolling doubles.
Example:
I'm attacking Bob (because screw Bob), and he's got his buddies Ted and Dan. I roll to attack Bob, hit, roll damage: result is 8+8+6 (max damage, because Bob deserves that). That would mean it would jump to let's say Ted (because screw Ted).
- Would Bob take the 8+8+6, and then I would roll to hit and damage
Ted?
Or:
- Would the damage to Bob not happen, and instead I would roll to hit
and damage Ted?
dnd-5e spells damage
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How is the damage of the chaos bolt spell (XGtE, p. 151; GGtR, p. 67) applied?
It may sound straight forward, but I've read the spell's description about twenty times now and it doesn't specifically say.
You hurl an undulating, warbling mass of chaotic energy at one creature in range. Make a ranged spell attack against the target. On a hit, the target takes 2d8 + 1d6 damage.
If you roll the same number on both d8s, the chaotic energy leaps from the target to a different creature of your choice within 30 feet of it. Make a new attack roll against the new target, and make a new damage roll, which could cause the chaotic energy to leap again.
A creature can be targeted only once by each casting of this spell.
You roll the attack, and let's say it hits. Then you roll 2d8+1d6, let's say both d8s are 5, meaning it would jump.
Here's the question. Does the damage resolve on the first target THEN attack the second and resolve on the second as well? Due to the "wild magic" perception of this spell, it would "hit" the first guy, but not damage him, instead moving to the second guy, until finally you stop rolling doubles.
Example:
I'm attacking Bob (because screw Bob), and he's got his buddies Ted and Dan. I roll to attack Bob, hit, roll damage: result is 8+8+6 (max damage, because Bob deserves that). That would mean it would jump to let's say Ted (because screw Ted).
- Would Bob take the 8+8+6, and then I would roll to hit and damage
Ted?
Or:
- Would the damage to Bob not happen, and instead I would roll to hit
and damage Ted?
dnd-5e spells damage
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Great question! I feel like I know what it should be, but I can see where the language is confusing and could mean either. Hopefully a 5e guru will be around shortly to clear this up. While you wait, consider taking a quick tour of the site. There's some good information about what we do and how we do it.
$endgroup$
– Ifusaso
Jan 10 at 18:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How is the damage of the chaos bolt spell (XGtE, p. 151; GGtR, p. 67) applied?
It may sound straight forward, but I've read the spell's description about twenty times now and it doesn't specifically say.
You hurl an undulating, warbling mass of chaotic energy at one creature in range. Make a ranged spell attack against the target. On a hit, the target takes 2d8 + 1d6 damage.
If you roll the same number on both d8s, the chaotic energy leaps from the target to a different creature of your choice within 30 feet of it. Make a new attack roll against the new target, and make a new damage roll, which could cause the chaotic energy to leap again.
A creature can be targeted only once by each casting of this spell.
You roll the attack, and let's say it hits. Then you roll 2d8+1d6, let's say both d8s are 5, meaning it would jump.
Here's the question. Does the damage resolve on the first target THEN attack the second and resolve on the second as well? Due to the "wild magic" perception of this spell, it would "hit" the first guy, but not damage him, instead moving to the second guy, until finally you stop rolling doubles.
Example:
I'm attacking Bob (because screw Bob), and he's got his buddies Ted and Dan. I roll to attack Bob, hit, roll damage: result is 8+8+6 (max damage, because Bob deserves that). That would mean it would jump to let's say Ted (because screw Ted).
- Would Bob take the 8+8+6, and then I would roll to hit and damage
Ted?
Or:
- Would the damage to Bob not happen, and instead I would roll to hit
and damage Ted?
dnd-5e spells damage
$endgroup$
How is the damage of the chaos bolt spell (XGtE, p. 151; GGtR, p. 67) applied?
It may sound straight forward, but I've read the spell's description about twenty times now and it doesn't specifically say.
You hurl an undulating, warbling mass of chaotic energy at one creature in range. Make a ranged spell attack against the target. On a hit, the target takes 2d8 + 1d6 damage.
If you roll the same number on both d8s, the chaotic energy leaps from the target to a different creature of your choice within 30 feet of it. Make a new attack roll against the new target, and make a new damage roll, which could cause the chaotic energy to leap again.
A creature can be targeted only once by each casting of this spell.
You roll the attack, and let's say it hits. Then you roll 2d8+1d6, let's say both d8s are 5, meaning it would jump.
Here's the question. Does the damage resolve on the first target THEN attack the second and resolve on the second as well? Due to the "wild magic" perception of this spell, it would "hit" the first guy, but not damage him, instead moving to the second guy, until finally you stop rolling doubles.
Example:
I'm attacking Bob (because screw Bob), and he's got his buddies Ted and Dan. I roll to attack Bob, hit, roll damage: result is 8+8+6 (max damage, because Bob deserves that). That would mean it would jump to let's say Ted (because screw Ted).
- Would Bob take the 8+8+6, and then I would roll to hit and damage
Ted?
Or:
- Would the damage to Bob not happen, and instead I would roll to hit
and damage Ted?
dnd-5e spells damage
dnd-5e spells damage
edited Jan 10 at 20:01
V2Blast
26.3k591161
26.3k591161
asked Jan 10 at 18:19
Sorcerer_FarnsworthSorcerer_Farnsworth
1023
1023
1
$begingroup$
Great question! I feel like I know what it should be, but I can see where the language is confusing and could mean either. Hopefully a 5e guru will be around shortly to clear this up. While you wait, consider taking a quick tour of the site. There's some good information about what we do and how we do it.
$endgroup$
– Ifusaso
Jan 10 at 18:25
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Great question! I feel like I know what it should be, but I can see where the language is confusing and could mean either. Hopefully a 5e guru will be around shortly to clear this up. While you wait, consider taking a quick tour of the site. There's some good information about what we do and how we do it.
$endgroup$
– Ifusaso
Jan 10 at 18:25
1
1
$begingroup$
Great question! I feel like I know what it should be, but I can see where the language is confusing and could mean either. Hopefully a 5e guru will be around shortly to clear this up. While you wait, consider taking a quick tour of the site. There's some good information about what we do and how we do it.
$endgroup$
– Ifusaso
Jan 10 at 18:25
$begingroup$
Great question! I feel like I know what it should be, but I can see where the language is confusing and could mean either. Hopefully a 5e guru will be around shortly to clear this up. While you wait, consider taking a quick tour of the site. There's some good information about what we do and how we do it.
$endgroup$
– Ifusaso
Jan 10 at 18:25
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
On a hit, you deal damage
The spell states that, "on a hit, the target takes 2d8 + 1d6 damage". Nothing later in the spell contradicts this, so no matter what you roll on the dice, the target takes damage. Then you might make another attack roll etc., but that doesn't change the initial attack.
If the Bolt only bounces and doesn't deal damage, it is strictly inferior to Chromatic Orb
Chromatic Orb is another 1st level spell that Sorcerers get access to. It does 3d8 damage of the type you choose. If Chaos Bolt didn't do damage on a bounce, it would do less damage, have an uncontrollable type, and target unpredictably, making it worse in every way to Chromatic Orb. The fact that it can chain and do more damage to more targets is what makes it viable (and fun!).
The 5e developers generally don't make options that completely invalidate other options, and they wouldn't introduce one like Chaos Bolt in a supplemental book when Chromatic Orb was already in the PHB. They certainly make mistakes from time to time but this seems like an obvious one, and the fact that an un-chaining Chaos Bolt would be useless adds weight to the reasoning I used above.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh my gosh I can't believe I overlooked that ONE SPECIFIC thing. Thanks much. That helped a ton.
$endgroup$
– Sorcerer_Farnsworth
Jan 10 at 18:29
$begingroup$
@Sorcerer_Farnsworth You're welcome, that's why we're here.
$endgroup$
– GreySage
Jan 10 at 18:34
2
$begingroup$
Well, since Chromatic Orb requires costly component for a low level party, you can consider Chaos Bolt poor man's substitution of the former.
$endgroup$
– AntiDrondert
Jan 11 at 11:36
1
$begingroup$
I agree it is inferior, but not "strictly", chaos bolt could, in theory, hit a target further away with that reading.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
Jan 11 at 16:00
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138818%2fdoes-the-damage-of-the-chaos-bolt-spell-against-the-first-target-resolve-before%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
On a hit, you deal damage
The spell states that, "on a hit, the target takes 2d8 + 1d6 damage". Nothing later in the spell contradicts this, so no matter what you roll on the dice, the target takes damage. Then you might make another attack roll etc., but that doesn't change the initial attack.
If the Bolt only bounces and doesn't deal damage, it is strictly inferior to Chromatic Orb
Chromatic Orb is another 1st level spell that Sorcerers get access to. It does 3d8 damage of the type you choose. If Chaos Bolt didn't do damage on a bounce, it would do less damage, have an uncontrollable type, and target unpredictably, making it worse in every way to Chromatic Orb. The fact that it can chain and do more damage to more targets is what makes it viable (and fun!).
The 5e developers generally don't make options that completely invalidate other options, and they wouldn't introduce one like Chaos Bolt in a supplemental book when Chromatic Orb was already in the PHB. They certainly make mistakes from time to time but this seems like an obvious one, and the fact that an un-chaining Chaos Bolt would be useless adds weight to the reasoning I used above.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh my gosh I can't believe I overlooked that ONE SPECIFIC thing. Thanks much. That helped a ton.
$endgroup$
– Sorcerer_Farnsworth
Jan 10 at 18:29
$begingroup$
@Sorcerer_Farnsworth You're welcome, that's why we're here.
$endgroup$
– GreySage
Jan 10 at 18:34
2
$begingroup$
Well, since Chromatic Orb requires costly component for a low level party, you can consider Chaos Bolt poor man's substitution of the former.
$endgroup$
– AntiDrondert
Jan 11 at 11:36
1
$begingroup$
I agree it is inferior, but not "strictly", chaos bolt could, in theory, hit a target further away with that reading.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
Jan 11 at 16:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On a hit, you deal damage
The spell states that, "on a hit, the target takes 2d8 + 1d6 damage". Nothing later in the spell contradicts this, so no matter what you roll on the dice, the target takes damage. Then you might make another attack roll etc., but that doesn't change the initial attack.
If the Bolt only bounces and doesn't deal damage, it is strictly inferior to Chromatic Orb
Chromatic Orb is another 1st level spell that Sorcerers get access to. It does 3d8 damage of the type you choose. If Chaos Bolt didn't do damage on a bounce, it would do less damage, have an uncontrollable type, and target unpredictably, making it worse in every way to Chromatic Orb. The fact that it can chain and do more damage to more targets is what makes it viable (and fun!).
The 5e developers generally don't make options that completely invalidate other options, and they wouldn't introduce one like Chaos Bolt in a supplemental book when Chromatic Orb was already in the PHB. They certainly make mistakes from time to time but this seems like an obvious one, and the fact that an un-chaining Chaos Bolt would be useless adds weight to the reasoning I used above.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh my gosh I can't believe I overlooked that ONE SPECIFIC thing. Thanks much. That helped a ton.
$endgroup$
– Sorcerer_Farnsworth
Jan 10 at 18:29
$begingroup$
@Sorcerer_Farnsworth You're welcome, that's why we're here.
$endgroup$
– GreySage
Jan 10 at 18:34
2
$begingroup$
Well, since Chromatic Orb requires costly component for a low level party, you can consider Chaos Bolt poor man's substitution of the former.
$endgroup$
– AntiDrondert
Jan 11 at 11:36
1
$begingroup$
I agree it is inferior, but not "strictly", chaos bolt could, in theory, hit a target further away with that reading.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
Jan 11 at 16:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On a hit, you deal damage
The spell states that, "on a hit, the target takes 2d8 + 1d6 damage". Nothing later in the spell contradicts this, so no matter what you roll on the dice, the target takes damage. Then you might make another attack roll etc., but that doesn't change the initial attack.
If the Bolt only bounces and doesn't deal damage, it is strictly inferior to Chromatic Orb
Chromatic Orb is another 1st level spell that Sorcerers get access to. It does 3d8 damage of the type you choose. If Chaos Bolt didn't do damage on a bounce, it would do less damage, have an uncontrollable type, and target unpredictably, making it worse in every way to Chromatic Orb. The fact that it can chain and do more damage to more targets is what makes it viable (and fun!).
The 5e developers generally don't make options that completely invalidate other options, and they wouldn't introduce one like Chaos Bolt in a supplemental book when Chromatic Orb was already in the PHB. They certainly make mistakes from time to time but this seems like an obvious one, and the fact that an un-chaining Chaos Bolt would be useless adds weight to the reasoning I used above.
$endgroup$
On a hit, you deal damage
The spell states that, "on a hit, the target takes 2d8 + 1d6 damage". Nothing later in the spell contradicts this, so no matter what you roll on the dice, the target takes damage. Then you might make another attack roll etc., but that doesn't change the initial attack.
If the Bolt only bounces and doesn't deal damage, it is strictly inferior to Chromatic Orb
Chromatic Orb is another 1st level spell that Sorcerers get access to. It does 3d8 damage of the type you choose. If Chaos Bolt didn't do damage on a bounce, it would do less damage, have an uncontrollable type, and target unpredictably, making it worse in every way to Chromatic Orb. The fact that it can chain and do more damage to more targets is what makes it viable (and fun!).
The 5e developers generally don't make options that completely invalidate other options, and they wouldn't introduce one like Chaos Bolt in a supplemental book when Chromatic Orb was already in the PHB. They certainly make mistakes from time to time but this seems like an obvious one, and the fact that an un-chaining Chaos Bolt would be useless adds weight to the reasoning I used above.
edited Jan 10 at 18:31
answered Jan 10 at 18:25
GreySageGreySage
16.3k453100
16.3k453100
$begingroup$
Oh my gosh I can't believe I overlooked that ONE SPECIFIC thing. Thanks much. That helped a ton.
$endgroup$
– Sorcerer_Farnsworth
Jan 10 at 18:29
$begingroup$
@Sorcerer_Farnsworth You're welcome, that's why we're here.
$endgroup$
– GreySage
Jan 10 at 18:34
2
$begingroup$
Well, since Chromatic Orb requires costly component for a low level party, you can consider Chaos Bolt poor man's substitution of the former.
$endgroup$
– AntiDrondert
Jan 11 at 11:36
1
$begingroup$
I agree it is inferior, but not "strictly", chaos bolt could, in theory, hit a target further away with that reading.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
Jan 11 at 16:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Oh my gosh I can't believe I overlooked that ONE SPECIFIC thing. Thanks much. That helped a ton.
$endgroup$
– Sorcerer_Farnsworth
Jan 10 at 18:29
$begingroup$
@Sorcerer_Farnsworth You're welcome, that's why we're here.
$endgroup$
– GreySage
Jan 10 at 18:34
2
$begingroup$
Well, since Chromatic Orb requires costly component for a low level party, you can consider Chaos Bolt poor man's substitution of the former.
$endgroup$
– AntiDrondert
Jan 11 at 11:36
1
$begingroup$
I agree it is inferior, but not "strictly", chaos bolt could, in theory, hit a target further away with that reading.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
Jan 11 at 16:00
$begingroup$
Oh my gosh I can't believe I overlooked that ONE SPECIFIC thing. Thanks much. That helped a ton.
$endgroup$
– Sorcerer_Farnsworth
Jan 10 at 18:29
$begingroup$
Oh my gosh I can't believe I overlooked that ONE SPECIFIC thing. Thanks much. That helped a ton.
$endgroup$
– Sorcerer_Farnsworth
Jan 10 at 18:29
$begingroup$
@Sorcerer_Farnsworth You're welcome, that's why we're here.
$endgroup$
– GreySage
Jan 10 at 18:34
$begingroup$
@Sorcerer_Farnsworth You're welcome, that's why we're here.
$endgroup$
– GreySage
Jan 10 at 18:34
2
2
$begingroup$
Well, since Chromatic Orb requires costly component for a low level party, you can consider Chaos Bolt poor man's substitution of the former.
$endgroup$
– AntiDrondert
Jan 11 at 11:36
$begingroup$
Well, since Chromatic Orb requires costly component for a low level party, you can consider Chaos Bolt poor man's substitution of the former.
$endgroup$
– AntiDrondert
Jan 11 at 11:36
1
1
$begingroup$
I agree it is inferior, but not "strictly", chaos bolt could, in theory, hit a target further away with that reading.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
Jan 11 at 16:00
$begingroup$
I agree it is inferior, but not "strictly", chaos bolt could, in theory, hit a target further away with that reading.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
Jan 11 at 16:00
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138818%2fdoes-the-damage-of-the-chaos-bolt-spell-against-the-first-target-resolve-before%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Great question! I feel like I know what it should be, but I can see where the language is confusing and could mean either. Hopefully a 5e guru will be around shortly to clear this up. While you wait, consider taking a quick tour of the site. There's some good information about what we do and how we do it.
$endgroup$
– Ifusaso
Jan 10 at 18:25