PDE's: Analysis without solving explicitly the equation












2












$begingroup$


I have the following PDE'S
$$frac{partial}{partial t}u(t,r)=frac{partial}{partial r}big((r-1/2)u(t,r)big)$$
with $u(0, r)=u_0(r)$ compact supported in the interval $[0,1]$ and such that $int_0^1u_0(r)dr=1$.



I know the solution explicitly, Through the characteristic method we know that
that $$u(t,r)=u_0big((r-1/2)e^t+1/2big)e^t$$.



I am wondering about the $lim_{tto +infty}int_0^1u(t,r)G(r) dr$, with $Gin C([0,1], mathbb R)$ a test function.



Since I know the explicit solution it is easy to understand that
$$lim_{tto +infty}int_0^1u(t,r)G(r) dr=G(1/2)$$.



My question is, could I deduce something about the asymptotic behaviour without knowning the explicit solution but just looking at the expression of the PDE?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I think you want $G(1/2) int_{-infty}^infty u_0(s); ds$ rather than $G(1/2)$ on the right of your limit.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 10 at 20:55










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, I have the following hypotesis: $int_0^1u_0(r)dr=1$. I added it in the question. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – user268193
    Jan 10 at 21:20








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    One way to understand the result physically is to write it as $dot{rho} + nabla(rho v) = 0$ where the mass density $rho = u$ and the velocity $v=1/2-r$. This is the well-known continuity equation for a fluid describing conservation of mass: $M = int rho,{rm d}r = 1$ is conserved in time. If you look at the velocity field, this is such that matter flows towards $r=1/2$ from both sides. As time goes on we therefore expect all the mass to pile up at this point ($uto Mdelta(r-1/2)$). The integral is the mass-weighted average value of $G$ which will therefore just be $G$ at $1/2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Winther
    Jan 10 at 22:22


















2












$begingroup$


I have the following PDE'S
$$frac{partial}{partial t}u(t,r)=frac{partial}{partial r}big((r-1/2)u(t,r)big)$$
with $u(0, r)=u_0(r)$ compact supported in the interval $[0,1]$ and such that $int_0^1u_0(r)dr=1$.



I know the solution explicitly, Through the characteristic method we know that
that $$u(t,r)=u_0big((r-1/2)e^t+1/2big)e^t$$.



I am wondering about the $lim_{tto +infty}int_0^1u(t,r)G(r) dr$, with $Gin C([0,1], mathbb R)$ a test function.



Since I know the explicit solution it is easy to understand that
$$lim_{tto +infty}int_0^1u(t,r)G(r) dr=G(1/2)$$.



My question is, could I deduce something about the asymptotic behaviour without knowning the explicit solution but just looking at the expression of the PDE?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I think you want $G(1/2) int_{-infty}^infty u_0(s); ds$ rather than $G(1/2)$ on the right of your limit.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 10 at 20:55










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, I have the following hypotesis: $int_0^1u_0(r)dr=1$. I added it in the question. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – user268193
    Jan 10 at 21:20








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    One way to understand the result physically is to write it as $dot{rho} + nabla(rho v) = 0$ where the mass density $rho = u$ and the velocity $v=1/2-r$. This is the well-known continuity equation for a fluid describing conservation of mass: $M = int rho,{rm d}r = 1$ is conserved in time. If you look at the velocity field, this is such that matter flows towards $r=1/2$ from both sides. As time goes on we therefore expect all the mass to pile up at this point ($uto Mdelta(r-1/2)$). The integral is the mass-weighted average value of $G$ which will therefore just be $G$ at $1/2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Winther
    Jan 10 at 22:22
















2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


I have the following PDE'S
$$frac{partial}{partial t}u(t,r)=frac{partial}{partial r}big((r-1/2)u(t,r)big)$$
with $u(0, r)=u_0(r)$ compact supported in the interval $[0,1]$ and such that $int_0^1u_0(r)dr=1$.



I know the solution explicitly, Through the characteristic method we know that
that $$u(t,r)=u_0big((r-1/2)e^t+1/2big)e^t$$.



I am wondering about the $lim_{tto +infty}int_0^1u(t,r)G(r) dr$, with $Gin C([0,1], mathbb R)$ a test function.



Since I know the explicit solution it is easy to understand that
$$lim_{tto +infty}int_0^1u(t,r)G(r) dr=G(1/2)$$.



My question is, could I deduce something about the asymptotic behaviour without knowning the explicit solution but just looking at the expression of the PDE?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have the following PDE'S
$$frac{partial}{partial t}u(t,r)=frac{partial}{partial r}big((r-1/2)u(t,r)big)$$
with $u(0, r)=u_0(r)$ compact supported in the interval $[0,1]$ and such that $int_0^1u_0(r)dr=1$.



I know the solution explicitly, Through the characteristic method we know that
that $$u(t,r)=u_0big((r-1/2)e^t+1/2big)e^t$$.



I am wondering about the $lim_{tto +infty}int_0^1u(t,r)G(r) dr$, with $Gin C([0,1], mathbb R)$ a test function.



Since I know the explicit solution it is easy to understand that
$$lim_{tto +infty}int_0^1u(t,r)G(r) dr=G(1/2)$$.



My question is, could I deduce something about the asymptotic behaviour without knowning the explicit solution but just looking at the expression of the PDE?







real-analysis analysis pde asymptotics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 10 at 22:25







user268193

















asked Jan 10 at 20:30









user268193user268193

718




718












  • $begingroup$
    I think you want $G(1/2) int_{-infty}^infty u_0(s); ds$ rather than $G(1/2)$ on the right of your limit.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 10 at 20:55










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, I have the following hypotesis: $int_0^1u_0(r)dr=1$. I added it in the question. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – user268193
    Jan 10 at 21:20








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    One way to understand the result physically is to write it as $dot{rho} + nabla(rho v) = 0$ where the mass density $rho = u$ and the velocity $v=1/2-r$. This is the well-known continuity equation for a fluid describing conservation of mass: $M = int rho,{rm d}r = 1$ is conserved in time. If you look at the velocity field, this is such that matter flows towards $r=1/2$ from both sides. As time goes on we therefore expect all the mass to pile up at this point ($uto Mdelta(r-1/2)$). The integral is the mass-weighted average value of $G$ which will therefore just be $G$ at $1/2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Winther
    Jan 10 at 22:22




















  • $begingroup$
    I think you want $G(1/2) int_{-infty}^infty u_0(s); ds$ rather than $G(1/2)$ on the right of your limit.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 10 at 20:55










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, I have the following hypotesis: $int_0^1u_0(r)dr=1$. I added it in the question. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – user268193
    Jan 10 at 21:20








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    One way to understand the result physically is to write it as $dot{rho} + nabla(rho v) = 0$ where the mass density $rho = u$ and the velocity $v=1/2-r$. This is the well-known continuity equation for a fluid describing conservation of mass: $M = int rho,{rm d}r = 1$ is conserved in time. If you look at the velocity field, this is such that matter flows towards $r=1/2$ from both sides. As time goes on we therefore expect all the mass to pile up at this point ($uto Mdelta(r-1/2)$). The integral is the mass-weighted average value of $G$ which will therefore just be $G$ at $1/2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Winther
    Jan 10 at 22:22


















$begingroup$
I think you want $G(1/2) int_{-infty}^infty u_0(s); ds$ rather than $G(1/2)$ on the right of your limit.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 10 at 20:55




$begingroup$
I think you want $G(1/2) int_{-infty}^infty u_0(s); ds$ rather than $G(1/2)$ on the right of your limit.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 10 at 20:55












$begingroup$
You are right, I have the following hypotesis: $int_0^1u_0(r)dr=1$. I added it in the question. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– user268193
Jan 10 at 21:20






$begingroup$
You are right, I have the following hypotesis: $int_0^1u_0(r)dr=1$. I added it in the question. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– user268193
Jan 10 at 21:20






2




2




$begingroup$
One way to understand the result physically is to write it as $dot{rho} + nabla(rho v) = 0$ where the mass density $rho = u$ and the velocity $v=1/2-r$. This is the well-known continuity equation for a fluid describing conservation of mass: $M = int rho,{rm d}r = 1$ is conserved in time. If you look at the velocity field, this is such that matter flows towards $r=1/2$ from both sides. As time goes on we therefore expect all the mass to pile up at this point ($uto Mdelta(r-1/2)$). The integral is the mass-weighted average value of $G$ which will therefore just be $G$ at $1/2$.
$endgroup$
– Winther
Jan 10 at 22:22






$begingroup$
One way to understand the result physically is to write it as $dot{rho} + nabla(rho v) = 0$ where the mass density $rho = u$ and the velocity $v=1/2-r$. This is the well-known continuity equation for a fluid describing conservation of mass: $M = int rho,{rm d}r = 1$ is conserved in time. If you look at the velocity field, this is such that matter flows towards $r=1/2$ from both sides. As time goes on we therefore expect all the mass to pile up at this point ($uto Mdelta(r-1/2)$). The integral is the mass-weighted average value of $G$ which will therefore just be $G$ at $1/2$.
$endgroup$
– Winther
Jan 10 at 22:22












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

This is really closely related to the method of characteristics, but doesn't explicitly use the solution.



Consider $$J = J(a(t), b(t), t) = int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} u(t,r); dr $$
where $a(t)$ and $b(t)$ are continuously differentiable functions. By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus we have
$$ eqalign{dfrac{dJ}{dt} &= b'(t) u(t,b(t)) - a'(t) u(t,a(t)) + int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} dfrac{partial u}{partial t}(t,r) ; dr cr
&= b'(t) u(t,b(t)) - a'(t) u(t,a(t)) + int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} dfrac{partial}{partial t} left((r-1/2) u(t,r)right); dr cr
&= (b'(t) + b(t) - 1/2) u(t, b(t)) - (a'(t) + a(t) - 1/2) u(t, a(t))cr} $$

In particular, this is $0$ if $b(t)$ and $a(t)$ are solutions of the differential equation $x' + x - 1/2 = 0$. Those solutions all converge to $1/2$ as $t to infty$. Thus if $[a(0), b(0)]$ contains the support of $u_0$, for large $t$
the support of $u(t,cdot)$ is contained in the small interval $[a(t), b(t)]$ near
$1/2$, and $int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} u(t,r); dr = 1$. Take $epsilon > 0$. If the interval is small enough that $|G(r) - G(1/2)|< epsilon$,
we have



$$left|int_0^1 u(t,r) G(r); dr - G(1/2)right| = left|int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} u(t,r) (G(r) - G(1/2)); dr right| < epsilon int_{a(0)}^{b(0)} |u(t,r)|; dr $$



Thus we get $$ int_0^1 u(t,r) G(r); dr to G(1/2) text{as} t to infty$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069141%2fpdes-analysis-without-solving-explicitly-the-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    This is really closely related to the method of characteristics, but doesn't explicitly use the solution.



    Consider $$J = J(a(t), b(t), t) = int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} u(t,r); dr $$
    where $a(t)$ and $b(t)$ are continuously differentiable functions. By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus we have
    $$ eqalign{dfrac{dJ}{dt} &= b'(t) u(t,b(t)) - a'(t) u(t,a(t)) + int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} dfrac{partial u}{partial t}(t,r) ; dr cr
    &= b'(t) u(t,b(t)) - a'(t) u(t,a(t)) + int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} dfrac{partial}{partial t} left((r-1/2) u(t,r)right); dr cr
    &= (b'(t) + b(t) - 1/2) u(t, b(t)) - (a'(t) + a(t) - 1/2) u(t, a(t))cr} $$

    In particular, this is $0$ if $b(t)$ and $a(t)$ are solutions of the differential equation $x' + x - 1/2 = 0$. Those solutions all converge to $1/2$ as $t to infty$. Thus if $[a(0), b(0)]$ contains the support of $u_0$, for large $t$
    the support of $u(t,cdot)$ is contained in the small interval $[a(t), b(t)]$ near
    $1/2$, and $int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} u(t,r); dr = 1$. Take $epsilon > 0$. If the interval is small enough that $|G(r) - G(1/2)|< epsilon$,
    we have



    $$left|int_0^1 u(t,r) G(r); dr - G(1/2)right| = left|int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} u(t,r) (G(r) - G(1/2)); dr right| < epsilon int_{a(0)}^{b(0)} |u(t,r)|; dr $$



    Thus we get $$ int_0^1 u(t,r) G(r); dr to G(1/2) text{as} t to infty$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      This is really closely related to the method of characteristics, but doesn't explicitly use the solution.



      Consider $$J = J(a(t), b(t), t) = int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} u(t,r); dr $$
      where $a(t)$ and $b(t)$ are continuously differentiable functions. By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus we have
      $$ eqalign{dfrac{dJ}{dt} &= b'(t) u(t,b(t)) - a'(t) u(t,a(t)) + int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} dfrac{partial u}{partial t}(t,r) ; dr cr
      &= b'(t) u(t,b(t)) - a'(t) u(t,a(t)) + int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} dfrac{partial}{partial t} left((r-1/2) u(t,r)right); dr cr
      &= (b'(t) + b(t) - 1/2) u(t, b(t)) - (a'(t) + a(t) - 1/2) u(t, a(t))cr} $$

      In particular, this is $0$ if $b(t)$ and $a(t)$ are solutions of the differential equation $x' + x - 1/2 = 0$. Those solutions all converge to $1/2$ as $t to infty$. Thus if $[a(0), b(0)]$ contains the support of $u_0$, for large $t$
      the support of $u(t,cdot)$ is contained in the small interval $[a(t), b(t)]$ near
      $1/2$, and $int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} u(t,r); dr = 1$. Take $epsilon > 0$. If the interval is small enough that $|G(r) - G(1/2)|< epsilon$,
      we have



      $$left|int_0^1 u(t,r) G(r); dr - G(1/2)right| = left|int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} u(t,r) (G(r) - G(1/2)); dr right| < epsilon int_{a(0)}^{b(0)} |u(t,r)|; dr $$



      Thus we get $$ int_0^1 u(t,r) G(r); dr to G(1/2) text{as} t to infty$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        This is really closely related to the method of characteristics, but doesn't explicitly use the solution.



        Consider $$J = J(a(t), b(t), t) = int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} u(t,r); dr $$
        where $a(t)$ and $b(t)$ are continuously differentiable functions. By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus we have
        $$ eqalign{dfrac{dJ}{dt} &= b'(t) u(t,b(t)) - a'(t) u(t,a(t)) + int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} dfrac{partial u}{partial t}(t,r) ; dr cr
        &= b'(t) u(t,b(t)) - a'(t) u(t,a(t)) + int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} dfrac{partial}{partial t} left((r-1/2) u(t,r)right); dr cr
        &= (b'(t) + b(t) - 1/2) u(t, b(t)) - (a'(t) + a(t) - 1/2) u(t, a(t))cr} $$

        In particular, this is $0$ if $b(t)$ and $a(t)$ are solutions of the differential equation $x' + x - 1/2 = 0$. Those solutions all converge to $1/2$ as $t to infty$. Thus if $[a(0), b(0)]$ contains the support of $u_0$, for large $t$
        the support of $u(t,cdot)$ is contained in the small interval $[a(t), b(t)]$ near
        $1/2$, and $int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} u(t,r); dr = 1$. Take $epsilon > 0$. If the interval is small enough that $|G(r) - G(1/2)|< epsilon$,
        we have



        $$left|int_0^1 u(t,r) G(r); dr - G(1/2)right| = left|int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} u(t,r) (G(r) - G(1/2)); dr right| < epsilon int_{a(0)}^{b(0)} |u(t,r)|; dr $$



        Thus we get $$ int_0^1 u(t,r) G(r); dr to G(1/2) text{as} t to infty$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        This is really closely related to the method of characteristics, but doesn't explicitly use the solution.



        Consider $$J = J(a(t), b(t), t) = int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} u(t,r); dr $$
        where $a(t)$ and $b(t)$ are continuously differentiable functions. By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus we have
        $$ eqalign{dfrac{dJ}{dt} &= b'(t) u(t,b(t)) - a'(t) u(t,a(t)) + int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} dfrac{partial u}{partial t}(t,r) ; dr cr
        &= b'(t) u(t,b(t)) - a'(t) u(t,a(t)) + int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} dfrac{partial}{partial t} left((r-1/2) u(t,r)right); dr cr
        &= (b'(t) + b(t) - 1/2) u(t, b(t)) - (a'(t) + a(t) - 1/2) u(t, a(t))cr} $$

        In particular, this is $0$ if $b(t)$ and $a(t)$ are solutions of the differential equation $x' + x - 1/2 = 0$. Those solutions all converge to $1/2$ as $t to infty$. Thus if $[a(0), b(0)]$ contains the support of $u_0$, for large $t$
        the support of $u(t,cdot)$ is contained in the small interval $[a(t), b(t)]$ near
        $1/2$, and $int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} u(t,r); dr = 1$. Take $epsilon > 0$. If the interval is small enough that $|G(r) - G(1/2)|< epsilon$,
        we have



        $$left|int_0^1 u(t,r) G(r); dr - G(1/2)right| = left|int_{a(t)}^{b(t)} u(t,r) (G(r) - G(1/2)); dr right| < epsilon int_{a(0)}^{b(0)} |u(t,r)|; dr $$



        Thus we get $$ int_0^1 u(t,r) G(r); dr to G(1/2) text{as} t to infty$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 10 at 22:32









        Robert IsraelRobert Israel

        331k23220475




        331k23220475






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069141%2fpdes-analysis-without-solving-explicitly-the-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Cabo Verde

            Gyllenstierna