Is the following true: A distribution does not have a well defined mean iff its mean comes out as $pminfty?$












1












$begingroup$


I often heard that some probability distributions do not have a mean. However, the mean is just the expectation value of the distribution's random variable:



$mu = leftlangle xf_{theta}(x) rightrangle$.



Here, $theta$ is the distribution's parameter, and $x$ is the random variable.



For any probability density function this is an integral which I can compute. So saying that an integral like the above expression is not well defined is basically equivalent to saying that it diverges.



Is this correct, or are there other ways in which a distribution can not have a well-defined mean?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I often heard that some probability distributions do not have a mean. However, the mean is just the expectation value of the distribution's random variable:



    $mu = leftlangle xf_{theta}(x) rightrangle$.



    Here, $theta$ is the distribution's parameter, and $x$ is the random variable.



    For any probability density function this is an integral which I can compute. So saying that an integral like the above expression is not well defined is basically equivalent to saying that it diverges.



    Is this correct, or are there other ways in which a distribution can not have a well-defined mean?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I often heard that some probability distributions do not have a mean. However, the mean is just the expectation value of the distribution's random variable:



      $mu = leftlangle xf_{theta}(x) rightrangle$.



      Here, $theta$ is the distribution's parameter, and $x$ is the random variable.



      For any probability density function this is an integral which I can compute. So saying that an integral like the above expression is not well defined is basically equivalent to saying that it diverges.



      Is this correct, or are there other ways in which a distribution can not have a well-defined mean?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I often heard that some probability distributions do not have a mean. However, the mean is just the expectation value of the distribution's random variable:



      $mu = leftlangle xf_{theta}(x) rightrangle$.



      Here, $theta$ is the distribution's parameter, and $x$ is the random variable.



      For any probability density function this is an integral which I can compute. So saying that an integral like the above expression is not well defined is basically equivalent to saying that it diverges.



      Is this correct, or are there other ways in which a distribution can not have a well-defined mean?







      probability-theory probability-distributions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 11 at 14:54









      Adrian Keister

      5,28471933




      5,28471933










      asked Jan 11 at 14:32









      AlphaOmegaAlphaOmega

      227210




      227210






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The Cauchy distribution has an undefined mean, but not because if you tried to compute it, it would come out as $pminfty$. The necessary integral, $displaystyleint_{-infty}^{infty}x f(x),dx, $ to compute is an improper one of the "form" $infty-infty$, and gets different values depending on how you approach the mode. The Cauchy Principal Value of the mean integral for the standard Cauchy distribution is zero, and if you were to look at a plot of the Cauchy distribution, you would never say that the mean is $pminfty$.



          In summary, there are multiple ways an integral can be ill-defined; going to $pminfty$ is one way. Having different values depending on how you approach $0$, in this case, is another.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            There are cases with $int_{-infty}^0 xf_X(x)dx=-infty$ and $int_0^{infty}xf_X(x)dx=+infty$.



            (Where $f_X$ denotes the PDF of a random variable $X$)



            This excludes the existence of a suitable definition of $int_{-infty}^{infty}xf_X(x)dx$.



            In cases like this you cannot speak of an integral that you "can compute".



            Then random variable $X$ has no (properly defined) mean.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$














              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069898%2fis-the-following-true-a-distribution-does-not-have-a-well-defined-mean-iff-its%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              The Cauchy distribution has an undefined mean, but not because if you tried to compute it, it would come out as $pminfty$. The necessary integral, $displaystyleint_{-infty}^{infty}x f(x),dx, $ to compute is an improper one of the "form" $infty-infty$, and gets different values depending on how you approach the mode. The Cauchy Principal Value of the mean integral for the standard Cauchy distribution is zero, and if you were to look at a plot of the Cauchy distribution, you would never say that the mean is $pminfty$.



              In summary, there are multiple ways an integral can be ill-defined; going to $pminfty$ is one way. Having different values depending on how you approach $0$, in this case, is another.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                The Cauchy distribution has an undefined mean, but not because if you tried to compute it, it would come out as $pminfty$. The necessary integral, $displaystyleint_{-infty}^{infty}x f(x),dx, $ to compute is an improper one of the "form" $infty-infty$, and gets different values depending on how you approach the mode. The Cauchy Principal Value of the mean integral for the standard Cauchy distribution is zero, and if you were to look at a plot of the Cauchy distribution, you would never say that the mean is $pminfty$.



                In summary, there are multiple ways an integral can be ill-defined; going to $pminfty$ is one way. Having different values depending on how you approach $0$, in this case, is another.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  The Cauchy distribution has an undefined mean, but not because if you tried to compute it, it would come out as $pminfty$. The necessary integral, $displaystyleint_{-infty}^{infty}x f(x),dx, $ to compute is an improper one of the "form" $infty-infty$, and gets different values depending on how you approach the mode. The Cauchy Principal Value of the mean integral for the standard Cauchy distribution is zero, and if you were to look at a plot of the Cauchy distribution, you would never say that the mean is $pminfty$.



                  In summary, there are multiple ways an integral can be ill-defined; going to $pminfty$ is one way. Having different values depending on how you approach $0$, in this case, is another.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  The Cauchy distribution has an undefined mean, but not because if you tried to compute it, it would come out as $pminfty$. The necessary integral, $displaystyleint_{-infty}^{infty}x f(x),dx, $ to compute is an improper one of the "form" $infty-infty$, and gets different values depending on how you approach the mode. The Cauchy Principal Value of the mean integral for the standard Cauchy distribution is zero, and if you were to look at a plot of the Cauchy distribution, you would never say that the mean is $pminfty$.



                  In summary, there are multiple ways an integral can be ill-defined; going to $pminfty$ is one way. Having different values depending on how you approach $0$, in this case, is another.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 11 at 14:49









                  Adrian KeisterAdrian Keister

                  5,28471933




                  5,28471933























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      There are cases with $int_{-infty}^0 xf_X(x)dx=-infty$ and $int_0^{infty}xf_X(x)dx=+infty$.



                      (Where $f_X$ denotes the PDF of a random variable $X$)



                      This excludes the existence of a suitable definition of $int_{-infty}^{infty}xf_X(x)dx$.



                      In cases like this you cannot speak of an integral that you "can compute".



                      Then random variable $X$ has no (properly defined) mean.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$


















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        There are cases with $int_{-infty}^0 xf_X(x)dx=-infty$ and $int_0^{infty}xf_X(x)dx=+infty$.



                        (Where $f_X$ denotes the PDF of a random variable $X$)



                        This excludes the existence of a suitable definition of $int_{-infty}^{infty}xf_X(x)dx$.



                        In cases like this you cannot speak of an integral that you "can compute".



                        Then random variable $X$ has no (properly defined) mean.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$
















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          There are cases with $int_{-infty}^0 xf_X(x)dx=-infty$ and $int_0^{infty}xf_X(x)dx=+infty$.



                          (Where $f_X$ denotes the PDF of a random variable $X$)



                          This excludes the existence of a suitable definition of $int_{-infty}^{infty}xf_X(x)dx$.



                          In cases like this you cannot speak of an integral that you "can compute".



                          Then random variable $X$ has no (properly defined) mean.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          There are cases with $int_{-infty}^0 xf_X(x)dx=-infty$ and $int_0^{infty}xf_X(x)dx=+infty$.



                          (Where $f_X$ denotes the PDF of a random variable $X$)



                          This excludes the existence of a suitable definition of $int_{-infty}^{infty}xf_X(x)dx$.



                          In cases like this you cannot speak of an integral that you "can compute".



                          Then random variable $X$ has no (properly defined) mean.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Jan 11 at 19:49

























                          answered Jan 11 at 14:50









                          drhabdrhab

                          104k545136




                          104k545136






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069898%2fis-the-following-true-a-distribution-does-not-have-a-well-defined-mean-iff-its%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Bressuire

                              Cabo Verde

                              Gyllenstierna