Can a MAX232 IC be used for RS-232C standard?
I have a GT01 Panasonic LCD which it's interface is RS-232C.
I have read that the difference between RS-232 and RS-232C is their voltage level which it's ±5 V in RS232C.
Can I use a MAX232 IC to communicate with this LCD?
I'm worried that MAX232'c Voltage level (±25 V) harms the LCD.
If not, would you please propose an IC which is capable with RS-232C?
lcd rs232 max232
add a comment |
I have a GT01 Panasonic LCD which it's interface is RS-232C.
I have read that the difference between RS-232 and RS-232C is their voltage level which it's ±5 V in RS232C.
Can I use a MAX232 IC to communicate with this LCD?
I'm worried that MAX232'c Voltage level (±25 V) harms the LCD.
If not, would you please propose an IC which is capable with RS-232C?
lcd rs232 max232
add a comment |
I have a GT01 Panasonic LCD which it's interface is RS-232C.
I have read that the difference between RS-232 and RS-232C is their voltage level which it's ±5 V in RS232C.
Can I use a MAX232 IC to communicate with this LCD?
I'm worried that MAX232'c Voltage level (±25 V) harms the LCD.
If not, would you please propose an IC which is capable with RS-232C?
lcd rs232 max232
I have a GT01 Panasonic LCD which it's interface is RS-232C.
I have read that the difference between RS-232 and RS-232C is their voltage level which it's ±5 V in RS232C.
Can I use a MAX232 IC to communicate with this LCD?
I'm worried that MAX232'c Voltage level (±25 V) harms the LCD.
If not, would you please propose an IC which is capable with RS-232C?
lcd rs232 max232
lcd rs232 max232
edited Dec 8 at 11:37
Michel Keijzers
5,67392561
5,67392561
asked Dec 8 at 6:55
Nima
355
355
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The "C" is a 1969 Specification Revision.
It does not dictate 25V but is compatible with that.
Today the Spec is Ref F to expand speed, timing and low voltage enhancements and is backwards compatible.
The standard has not changed with a threshold that is the same as TTL or 1.3V = Vbe*2 but all receivers handle a wide range of Tx bipolar voltages.
Can I use a MAX232 IC to communicate with this LCD?
Yes.
add a comment |
Figure 1. An oscilloscope trace of a byte transmitted by an RS232 link. Source: Wikipedia RS-232.
Note a few things:
- Logic is inverted. A '1' is a negative voltage and a '0' is a positive voltage.
- The grey area shows the valid logic level voltages. It is > 3 V for a '0' and < -3 V for a '1'.
I'm worried that MAX232'c Voltage level (±25) harms the LCD?
- The purpose of the MAX232 is to convert from the RS232 signal levels to the 5 V logic levels of your circuit. It is, in effect, a buffer between the two. Your LCD will never see the ±25 V.
- ±25 V was used to transmit over long distances at low baud rates. These days we're typically running at 9600 baud which has a limit of 15 m or so before cable capacitance becomes a problem. As a result we don't need the high voltages and if you check with a multimeter you'll find that you'll only see about ±5 to ±7 V on most devices. The reason? They're probably using the MAX232 as well.
You'll be fine if you follow the MAX232 recommended circuit and don't skip any of the decoupling capacitors, etc., recommended in their layouts.
You missed the point here. The question was if the RS232C input can handle RS232 levels. It was not about the LCD screen itself, he was asking about the LCD module if it can be damaged.
– Dorian
Dec 8 at 11:42
Thanks, @Dorian. I understood the question and I thought I had addressed it with my paragraph including "Your LCD will never see the ±25 V." In almost 40 years working with all sorts of industrial RS232 interfaces I've never seen more than 12 V and that was in the days when devices had +/-12 V supplies. Most of my answer was giving background to the protocol and the buffering as there seemed to be some confusion there.
– Transistor
Dec 8 at 15:36
I know that what is missing in your answer ( +-30V ipuut range for MAX232C) is in the tatasheet that OP has read but I would had a fortune if I had a penny for each call asking for something that is in the product datasheet. Make a small edit to take back my downvote.
– Dorian
Dec 9 at 13:02
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f411103%2fcan-a-max232-ic-be-used-for-rs-232c-standard%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The "C" is a 1969 Specification Revision.
It does not dictate 25V but is compatible with that.
Today the Spec is Ref F to expand speed, timing and low voltage enhancements and is backwards compatible.
The standard has not changed with a threshold that is the same as TTL or 1.3V = Vbe*2 but all receivers handle a wide range of Tx bipolar voltages.
Can I use a MAX232 IC to communicate with this LCD?
Yes.
add a comment |
The "C" is a 1969 Specification Revision.
It does not dictate 25V but is compatible with that.
Today the Spec is Ref F to expand speed, timing and low voltage enhancements and is backwards compatible.
The standard has not changed with a threshold that is the same as TTL or 1.3V = Vbe*2 but all receivers handle a wide range of Tx bipolar voltages.
Can I use a MAX232 IC to communicate with this LCD?
Yes.
add a comment |
The "C" is a 1969 Specification Revision.
It does not dictate 25V but is compatible with that.
Today the Spec is Ref F to expand speed, timing and low voltage enhancements and is backwards compatible.
The standard has not changed with a threshold that is the same as TTL or 1.3V = Vbe*2 but all receivers handle a wide range of Tx bipolar voltages.
Can I use a MAX232 IC to communicate with this LCD?
Yes.
The "C" is a 1969 Specification Revision.
It does not dictate 25V but is compatible with that.
Today the Spec is Ref F to expand speed, timing and low voltage enhancements and is backwards compatible.
The standard has not changed with a threshold that is the same as TTL or 1.3V = Vbe*2 but all receivers handle a wide range of Tx bipolar voltages.
Can I use a MAX232 IC to communicate with this LCD?
Yes.
edited Dec 8 at 20:37
answered Dec 8 at 8:17
Tony EE rocketscientist
61.6k22193
61.6k22193
add a comment |
add a comment |
Figure 1. An oscilloscope trace of a byte transmitted by an RS232 link. Source: Wikipedia RS-232.
Note a few things:
- Logic is inverted. A '1' is a negative voltage and a '0' is a positive voltage.
- The grey area shows the valid logic level voltages. It is > 3 V for a '0' and < -3 V for a '1'.
I'm worried that MAX232'c Voltage level (±25) harms the LCD?
- The purpose of the MAX232 is to convert from the RS232 signal levels to the 5 V logic levels of your circuit. It is, in effect, a buffer between the two. Your LCD will never see the ±25 V.
- ±25 V was used to transmit over long distances at low baud rates. These days we're typically running at 9600 baud which has a limit of 15 m or so before cable capacitance becomes a problem. As a result we don't need the high voltages and if you check with a multimeter you'll find that you'll only see about ±5 to ±7 V on most devices. The reason? They're probably using the MAX232 as well.
You'll be fine if you follow the MAX232 recommended circuit and don't skip any of the decoupling capacitors, etc., recommended in their layouts.
You missed the point here. The question was if the RS232C input can handle RS232 levels. It was not about the LCD screen itself, he was asking about the LCD module if it can be damaged.
– Dorian
Dec 8 at 11:42
Thanks, @Dorian. I understood the question and I thought I had addressed it with my paragraph including "Your LCD will never see the ±25 V." In almost 40 years working with all sorts of industrial RS232 interfaces I've never seen more than 12 V and that was in the days when devices had +/-12 V supplies. Most of my answer was giving background to the protocol and the buffering as there seemed to be some confusion there.
– Transistor
Dec 8 at 15:36
I know that what is missing in your answer ( +-30V ipuut range for MAX232C) is in the tatasheet that OP has read but I would had a fortune if I had a penny for each call asking for something that is in the product datasheet. Make a small edit to take back my downvote.
– Dorian
Dec 9 at 13:02
add a comment |
Figure 1. An oscilloscope trace of a byte transmitted by an RS232 link. Source: Wikipedia RS-232.
Note a few things:
- Logic is inverted. A '1' is a negative voltage and a '0' is a positive voltage.
- The grey area shows the valid logic level voltages. It is > 3 V for a '0' and < -3 V for a '1'.
I'm worried that MAX232'c Voltage level (±25) harms the LCD?
- The purpose of the MAX232 is to convert from the RS232 signal levels to the 5 V logic levels of your circuit. It is, in effect, a buffer between the two. Your LCD will never see the ±25 V.
- ±25 V was used to transmit over long distances at low baud rates. These days we're typically running at 9600 baud which has a limit of 15 m or so before cable capacitance becomes a problem. As a result we don't need the high voltages and if you check with a multimeter you'll find that you'll only see about ±5 to ±7 V on most devices. The reason? They're probably using the MAX232 as well.
You'll be fine if you follow the MAX232 recommended circuit and don't skip any of the decoupling capacitors, etc., recommended in their layouts.
You missed the point here. The question was if the RS232C input can handle RS232 levels. It was not about the LCD screen itself, he was asking about the LCD module if it can be damaged.
– Dorian
Dec 8 at 11:42
Thanks, @Dorian. I understood the question and I thought I had addressed it with my paragraph including "Your LCD will never see the ±25 V." In almost 40 years working with all sorts of industrial RS232 interfaces I've never seen more than 12 V and that was in the days when devices had +/-12 V supplies. Most of my answer was giving background to the protocol and the buffering as there seemed to be some confusion there.
– Transistor
Dec 8 at 15:36
I know that what is missing in your answer ( +-30V ipuut range for MAX232C) is in the tatasheet that OP has read but I would had a fortune if I had a penny for each call asking for something that is in the product datasheet. Make a small edit to take back my downvote.
– Dorian
Dec 9 at 13:02
add a comment |
Figure 1. An oscilloscope trace of a byte transmitted by an RS232 link. Source: Wikipedia RS-232.
Note a few things:
- Logic is inverted. A '1' is a negative voltage and a '0' is a positive voltage.
- The grey area shows the valid logic level voltages. It is > 3 V for a '0' and < -3 V for a '1'.
I'm worried that MAX232'c Voltage level (±25) harms the LCD?
- The purpose of the MAX232 is to convert from the RS232 signal levels to the 5 V logic levels of your circuit. It is, in effect, a buffer between the two. Your LCD will never see the ±25 V.
- ±25 V was used to transmit over long distances at low baud rates. These days we're typically running at 9600 baud which has a limit of 15 m or so before cable capacitance becomes a problem. As a result we don't need the high voltages and if you check with a multimeter you'll find that you'll only see about ±5 to ±7 V on most devices. The reason? They're probably using the MAX232 as well.
You'll be fine if you follow the MAX232 recommended circuit and don't skip any of the decoupling capacitors, etc., recommended in their layouts.
Figure 1. An oscilloscope trace of a byte transmitted by an RS232 link. Source: Wikipedia RS-232.
Note a few things:
- Logic is inverted. A '1' is a negative voltage and a '0' is a positive voltage.
- The grey area shows the valid logic level voltages. It is > 3 V for a '0' and < -3 V for a '1'.
I'm worried that MAX232'c Voltage level (±25) harms the LCD?
- The purpose of the MAX232 is to convert from the RS232 signal levels to the 5 V logic levels of your circuit. It is, in effect, a buffer between the two. Your LCD will never see the ±25 V.
- ±25 V was used to transmit over long distances at low baud rates. These days we're typically running at 9600 baud which has a limit of 15 m or so before cable capacitance becomes a problem. As a result we don't need the high voltages and if you check with a multimeter you'll find that you'll only see about ±5 to ±7 V on most devices. The reason? They're probably using the MAX232 as well.
You'll be fine if you follow the MAX232 recommended circuit and don't skip any of the decoupling capacitors, etc., recommended in their layouts.
answered Dec 8 at 8:32
Transistor
80.1k778173
80.1k778173
You missed the point here. The question was if the RS232C input can handle RS232 levels. It was not about the LCD screen itself, he was asking about the LCD module if it can be damaged.
– Dorian
Dec 8 at 11:42
Thanks, @Dorian. I understood the question and I thought I had addressed it with my paragraph including "Your LCD will never see the ±25 V." In almost 40 years working with all sorts of industrial RS232 interfaces I've never seen more than 12 V and that was in the days when devices had +/-12 V supplies. Most of my answer was giving background to the protocol and the buffering as there seemed to be some confusion there.
– Transistor
Dec 8 at 15:36
I know that what is missing in your answer ( +-30V ipuut range for MAX232C) is in the tatasheet that OP has read but I would had a fortune if I had a penny for each call asking for something that is in the product datasheet. Make a small edit to take back my downvote.
– Dorian
Dec 9 at 13:02
add a comment |
You missed the point here. The question was if the RS232C input can handle RS232 levels. It was not about the LCD screen itself, he was asking about the LCD module if it can be damaged.
– Dorian
Dec 8 at 11:42
Thanks, @Dorian. I understood the question and I thought I had addressed it with my paragraph including "Your LCD will never see the ±25 V." In almost 40 years working with all sorts of industrial RS232 interfaces I've never seen more than 12 V and that was in the days when devices had +/-12 V supplies. Most of my answer was giving background to the protocol and the buffering as there seemed to be some confusion there.
– Transistor
Dec 8 at 15:36
I know that what is missing in your answer ( +-30V ipuut range for MAX232C) is in the tatasheet that OP has read but I would had a fortune if I had a penny for each call asking for something that is in the product datasheet. Make a small edit to take back my downvote.
– Dorian
Dec 9 at 13:02
You missed the point here. The question was if the RS232C input can handle RS232 levels. It was not about the LCD screen itself, he was asking about the LCD module if it can be damaged.
– Dorian
Dec 8 at 11:42
You missed the point here. The question was if the RS232C input can handle RS232 levels. It was not about the LCD screen itself, he was asking about the LCD module if it can be damaged.
– Dorian
Dec 8 at 11:42
Thanks, @Dorian. I understood the question and I thought I had addressed it with my paragraph including "Your LCD will never see the ±25 V." In almost 40 years working with all sorts of industrial RS232 interfaces I've never seen more than 12 V and that was in the days when devices had +/-12 V supplies. Most of my answer was giving background to the protocol and the buffering as there seemed to be some confusion there.
– Transistor
Dec 8 at 15:36
Thanks, @Dorian. I understood the question and I thought I had addressed it with my paragraph including "Your LCD will never see the ±25 V." In almost 40 years working with all sorts of industrial RS232 interfaces I've never seen more than 12 V and that was in the days when devices had +/-12 V supplies. Most of my answer was giving background to the protocol and the buffering as there seemed to be some confusion there.
– Transistor
Dec 8 at 15:36
I know that what is missing in your answer ( +-30V ipuut range for MAX232C) is in the tatasheet that OP has read but I would had a fortune if I had a penny for each call asking for something that is in the product datasheet. Make a small edit to take back my downvote.
– Dorian
Dec 9 at 13:02
I know that what is missing in your answer ( +-30V ipuut range for MAX232C) is in the tatasheet that OP has read but I would had a fortune if I had a penny for each call asking for something that is in the product datasheet. Make a small edit to take back my downvote.
– Dorian
Dec 9 at 13:02
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f411103%2fcan-a-max232-ic-be-used-for-rs-232c-standard%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown