Group of order greater than 8 doesn't decompose into a direct product and Sylow 2-subgroup isomorphic...












-1














Is there a group of order greater than 8 that does not decompose into a direct product such that its Sylow 2-subgroup isomorphic quaternion group $Q_8$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my question, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
    – Shaun
    Dec 8 at 10:45
















-1














Is there a group of order greater than 8 that does not decompose into a direct product such that its Sylow 2-subgroup isomorphic quaternion group $Q_8$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my question, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
    – Shaun
    Dec 8 at 10:45














-1












-1








-1







Is there a group of order greater than 8 that does not decompose into a direct product such that its Sylow 2-subgroup isomorphic quaternion group $Q_8$?










share|cite|improve this question















Is there a group of order greater than 8 that does not decompose into a direct product such that its Sylow 2-subgroup isomorphic quaternion group $Q_8$?







group-theory sylow-theory direct-product






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 8 at 10:47









Shaun

8,507113580




8,507113580










asked Dec 8 at 10:35









DumbSimon

163




163












  • You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my question, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
    – Shaun
    Dec 8 at 10:45


















  • You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my question, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
    – Shaun
    Dec 8 at 10:45
















You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my question, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
– Shaun
Dec 8 at 10:45




You'll find that simple "Here's the statement of my question, solve it for me" posts will be poorly received. What is better is for you to add context (with an edit): What you understand about the problem, what you've tried so far, etc.; something both to show you are part of the learning experience and to help us guide you to the appropriate help. You can consult this link for further guidance.
– Shaun
Dec 8 at 10:45










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Hint: $SL(2,3)$ of order $24$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks for answer. 24 it is order of $S_4$, then 2-sylow subgroup exits. It seems to be isomorphic to $Q_8$. But how to prove it?
    – DumbSimon
    Dec 8 at 15:37










  • A Sylow $2$-subgroup of $S_4 $ is isomorphic to $D_4$ the dihedral group of $8$ elements (which is not isomorphic to $Q_8$). More precisely, $langle (24),(1234)rangle$ is a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $S_4$.
    – Nicky Hekster
    Dec 8 at 18:09













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030941%2fgroup-of-order-greater-than-8-doesnt-decompose-into-a-direct-product-and-sylow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














Hint: $SL(2,3)$ of order $24$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks for answer. 24 it is order of $S_4$, then 2-sylow subgroup exits. It seems to be isomorphic to $Q_8$. But how to prove it?
    – DumbSimon
    Dec 8 at 15:37










  • A Sylow $2$-subgroup of $S_4 $ is isomorphic to $D_4$ the dihedral group of $8$ elements (which is not isomorphic to $Q_8$). More precisely, $langle (24),(1234)rangle$ is a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $S_4$.
    – Nicky Hekster
    Dec 8 at 18:09


















0














Hint: $SL(2,3)$ of order $24$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks for answer. 24 it is order of $S_4$, then 2-sylow subgroup exits. It seems to be isomorphic to $Q_8$. But how to prove it?
    – DumbSimon
    Dec 8 at 15:37










  • A Sylow $2$-subgroup of $S_4 $ is isomorphic to $D_4$ the dihedral group of $8$ elements (which is not isomorphic to $Q_8$). More precisely, $langle (24),(1234)rangle$ is a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $S_4$.
    – Nicky Hekster
    Dec 8 at 18:09
















0












0








0






Hint: $SL(2,3)$ of order $24$.






share|cite|improve this answer












Hint: $SL(2,3)$ of order $24$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 8 at 14:55









Nicky Hekster

28.2k53456




28.2k53456












  • Thanks for answer. 24 it is order of $S_4$, then 2-sylow subgroup exits. It seems to be isomorphic to $Q_8$. But how to prove it?
    – DumbSimon
    Dec 8 at 15:37










  • A Sylow $2$-subgroup of $S_4 $ is isomorphic to $D_4$ the dihedral group of $8$ elements (which is not isomorphic to $Q_8$). More precisely, $langle (24),(1234)rangle$ is a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $S_4$.
    – Nicky Hekster
    Dec 8 at 18:09




















  • Thanks for answer. 24 it is order of $S_4$, then 2-sylow subgroup exits. It seems to be isomorphic to $Q_8$. But how to prove it?
    – DumbSimon
    Dec 8 at 15:37










  • A Sylow $2$-subgroup of $S_4 $ is isomorphic to $D_4$ the dihedral group of $8$ elements (which is not isomorphic to $Q_8$). More precisely, $langle (24),(1234)rangle$ is a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $S_4$.
    – Nicky Hekster
    Dec 8 at 18:09


















Thanks for answer. 24 it is order of $S_4$, then 2-sylow subgroup exits. It seems to be isomorphic to $Q_8$. But how to prove it?
– DumbSimon
Dec 8 at 15:37




Thanks for answer. 24 it is order of $S_4$, then 2-sylow subgroup exits. It seems to be isomorphic to $Q_8$. But how to prove it?
– DumbSimon
Dec 8 at 15:37












A Sylow $2$-subgroup of $S_4 $ is isomorphic to $D_4$ the dihedral group of $8$ elements (which is not isomorphic to $Q_8$). More precisely, $langle (24),(1234)rangle$ is a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $S_4$.
– Nicky Hekster
Dec 8 at 18:09






A Sylow $2$-subgroup of $S_4 $ is isomorphic to $D_4$ the dihedral group of $8$ elements (which is not isomorphic to $Q_8$). More precisely, $langle (24),(1234)rangle$ is a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $S_4$.
– Nicky Hekster
Dec 8 at 18:09




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030941%2fgroup-of-order-greater-than-8-doesnt-decompose-into-a-direct-product-and-sylow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna