Fourier transformation of $e^{-ax^2}$












-1














Find the Fourier transformation of $e^{-ax^2}$, for any constant $a>0$. In general, $$int frac{1}{sqrt{(2pi sigma^2)}}e^{-frac{(x-mu)^2}{2sigma^2}} e^{-iλx }dx = e^{-imuλ-frac{1}{2}sigma^2t^2 }$$ holds.



Apparently, the result can be used to solve the heat equation. I have tried to do it as below $$ frac {1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-ax^2}e^{iλx} dx $$ After some calculations, I got $frac {1}{sqrt{4pi a}}e^{-frac{λ^2}{4a}} $. But I looked up on the internet and there are some notes show that it should be $frac {1}{sqrt{2 a}}e^{-frac{λ^2}{4a}} $.



Edit: I found that the notes I saw on the internet use $ frac {1}{sqrt{2pi}} int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-ax^2}e^{iλx} dx $ instead of $ frac {1}{2pi} $. Maybe that's the reason. But why the notes provided by my lecturer used $ frac {1}{2pi} $? Are there no standard form?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 8 at 9:25










  • Your answer is not correct. If you show us your work we can show where the mistake is.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Dec 8 at 12:26










  • @Kavi Rama Murthy I made a typo, my calculations should start from $ frac{1}{2pi}$instead of $frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}$
    – user9287212
    Dec 8 at 12:58


















-1














Find the Fourier transformation of $e^{-ax^2}$, for any constant $a>0$. In general, $$int frac{1}{sqrt{(2pi sigma^2)}}e^{-frac{(x-mu)^2}{2sigma^2}} e^{-iλx }dx = e^{-imuλ-frac{1}{2}sigma^2t^2 }$$ holds.



Apparently, the result can be used to solve the heat equation. I have tried to do it as below $$ frac {1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-ax^2}e^{iλx} dx $$ After some calculations, I got $frac {1}{sqrt{4pi a}}e^{-frac{λ^2}{4a}} $. But I looked up on the internet and there are some notes show that it should be $frac {1}{sqrt{2 a}}e^{-frac{λ^2}{4a}} $.



Edit: I found that the notes I saw on the internet use $ frac {1}{sqrt{2pi}} int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-ax^2}e^{iλx} dx $ instead of $ frac {1}{2pi} $. Maybe that's the reason. But why the notes provided by my lecturer used $ frac {1}{2pi} $? Are there no standard form?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 8 at 9:25










  • Your answer is not correct. If you show us your work we can show where the mistake is.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Dec 8 at 12:26










  • @Kavi Rama Murthy I made a typo, my calculations should start from $ frac{1}{2pi}$instead of $frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}$
    – user9287212
    Dec 8 at 12:58
















-1












-1








-1







Find the Fourier transformation of $e^{-ax^2}$, for any constant $a>0$. In general, $$int frac{1}{sqrt{(2pi sigma^2)}}e^{-frac{(x-mu)^2}{2sigma^2}} e^{-iλx }dx = e^{-imuλ-frac{1}{2}sigma^2t^2 }$$ holds.



Apparently, the result can be used to solve the heat equation. I have tried to do it as below $$ frac {1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-ax^2}e^{iλx} dx $$ After some calculations, I got $frac {1}{sqrt{4pi a}}e^{-frac{λ^2}{4a}} $. But I looked up on the internet and there are some notes show that it should be $frac {1}{sqrt{2 a}}e^{-frac{λ^2}{4a}} $.



Edit: I found that the notes I saw on the internet use $ frac {1}{sqrt{2pi}} int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-ax^2}e^{iλx} dx $ instead of $ frac {1}{2pi} $. Maybe that's the reason. But why the notes provided by my lecturer used $ frac {1}{2pi} $? Are there no standard form?










share|cite|improve this question















Find the Fourier transformation of $e^{-ax^2}$, for any constant $a>0$. In general, $$int frac{1}{sqrt{(2pi sigma^2)}}e^{-frac{(x-mu)^2}{2sigma^2}} e^{-iλx }dx = e^{-imuλ-frac{1}{2}sigma^2t^2 }$$ holds.



Apparently, the result can be used to solve the heat equation. I have tried to do it as below $$ frac {1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-ax^2}e^{iλx} dx $$ After some calculations, I got $frac {1}{sqrt{4pi a}}e^{-frac{λ^2}{4a}} $. But I looked up on the internet and there are some notes show that it should be $frac {1}{sqrt{2 a}}e^{-frac{λ^2}{4a}} $.



Edit: I found that the notes I saw on the internet use $ frac {1}{sqrt{2pi}} int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-ax^2}e^{iλx} dx $ instead of $ frac {1}{2pi} $. Maybe that's the reason. But why the notes provided by my lecturer used $ frac {1}{2pi} $? Are there no standard form?







fourier-transform heat-equation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 8 at 12:56

























asked Dec 8 at 9:21









user9287212

11




11












  • Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 8 at 9:25










  • Your answer is not correct. If you show us your work we can show where the mistake is.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Dec 8 at 12:26










  • @Kavi Rama Murthy I made a typo, my calculations should start from $ frac{1}{2pi}$instead of $frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}$
    – user9287212
    Dec 8 at 12:58




















  • Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 8 at 9:25










  • Your answer is not correct. If you show us your work we can show where the mistake is.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Dec 8 at 12:26










  • @Kavi Rama Murthy I made a typo, my calculations should start from $ frac{1}{2pi}$instead of $frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}$
    – user9287212
    Dec 8 at 12:58


















Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 8 at 9:25




Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 8 at 9:25












Your answer is not correct. If you show us your work we can show where the mistake is.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 8 at 12:26




Your answer is not correct. If you show us your work we can show where the mistake is.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 8 at 12:26












@Kavi Rama Murthy I made a typo, my calculations should start from $ frac{1}{2pi}$instead of $frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}$
– user9287212
Dec 8 at 12:58






@Kavi Rama Murthy I made a typo, my calculations should start from $ frac{1}{2pi}$instead of $frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}$
– user9287212
Dec 8 at 12:58












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














By linear transformations it's sufficient to check the case $mu=0,,sigma=1$, so we want to prove $$phi(t):=int_{Bbb R}frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}expbigg(-frac{x^2}{2}+itxbigg)dx=exp-frac{t^2}{2}.$$By inspection $phi(0)=1$, so it suffices to prove the following is $0$: $$frac{dphi}{dt}+tphi(t)=int_{Bbb R}frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}(ix+t)expbigg(-frac{x^2}{2}+itxbigg)dx=Bigg[-frac{i}{sqrt{2pi}}expbigg(-frac{x^2}{2}+itxbigg)Bigg]_{-infty}^infty.$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030868%2ffourier-transformation-of-e-ax2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    By linear transformations it's sufficient to check the case $mu=0,,sigma=1$, so we want to prove $$phi(t):=int_{Bbb R}frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}expbigg(-frac{x^2}{2}+itxbigg)dx=exp-frac{t^2}{2}.$$By inspection $phi(0)=1$, so it suffices to prove the following is $0$: $$frac{dphi}{dt}+tphi(t)=int_{Bbb R}frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}(ix+t)expbigg(-frac{x^2}{2}+itxbigg)dx=Bigg[-frac{i}{sqrt{2pi}}expbigg(-frac{x^2}{2}+itxbigg)Bigg]_{-infty}^infty.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      0














      By linear transformations it's sufficient to check the case $mu=0,,sigma=1$, so we want to prove $$phi(t):=int_{Bbb R}frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}expbigg(-frac{x^2}{2}+itxbigg)dx=exp-frac{t^2}{2}.$$By inspection $phi(0)=1$, so it suffices to prove the following is $0$: $$frac{dphi}{dt}+tphi(t)=int_{Bbb R}frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}(ix+t)expbigg(-frac{x^2}{2}+itxbigg)dx=Bigg[-frac{i}{sqrt{2pi}}expbigg(-frac{x^2}{2}+itxbigg)Bigg]_{-infty}^infty.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        By linear transformations it's sufficient to check the case $mu=0,,sigma=1$, so we want to prove $$phi(t):=int_{Bbb R}frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}expbigg(-frac{x^2}{2}+itxbigg)dx=exp-frac{t^2}{2}.$$By inspection $phi(0)=1$, so it suffices to prove the following is $0$: $$frac{dphi}{dt}+tphi(t)=int_{Bbb R}frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}(ix+t)expbigg(-frac{x^2}{2}+itxbigg)dx=Bigg[-frac{i}{sqrt{2pi}}expbigg(-frac{x^2}{2}+itxbigg)Bigg]_{-infty}^infty.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        By linear transformations it's sufficient to check the case $mu=0,,sigma=1$, so we want to prove $$phi(t):=int_{Bbb R}frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}expbigg(-frac{x^2}{2}+itxbigg)dx=exp-frac{t^2}{2}.$$By inspection $phi(0)=1$, so it suffices to prove the following is $0$: $$frac{dphi}{dt}+tphi(t)=int_{Bbb R}frac{1}{sqrt{2pi}}(ix+t)expbigg(-frac{x^2}{2}+itxbigg)dx=Bigg[-frac{i}{sqrt{2pi}}expbigg(-frac{x^2}{2}+itxbigg)Bigg]_{-infty}^infty.$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 8 at 9:28









        J.G.

        22.3k22034




        22.3k22034






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030868%2ffourier-transformation-of-e-ax2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Cabo Verde

            Gyllenstierna