Geometrical interpretation of differentiability
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We check the differentiability of $f(x) = xleft| x right| $ at $x=0$.
Evaluating derivatives from first principles, we find that the left hand and right hand derivatives both equate to $0$, which in principle proves that the function is differentiable at that point.
Now, let us try to interpret this geometrically.
More generally, if $x_{0}$ is a point in the domain of a function $f$, then $f$ is said to be differentiable at ${x}_{0}$ if the derivative $f ′(x_{0})$ exists. This means that the graph of $f$ has a non-vertical tangent line at the point $(x_{0}, f(x_{0}))$.
Source: Wikipedia
If so, where is the so-called unique tangent at $x=0$?
Source: WolframAlpha
Please find flaws in my interpretation, if any.
Thank you.
calculus derivatives
asked Jun 2 at 10:55
Swapnil Das
624517
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We check the differentiability of $f(x) = xleft| x right| $ at $x=0$.
Evaluating derivatives from first principles, we find that the left hand and right hand derivatives both equate to $0$, which in principle proves that the function is differentiable at that point.
Now, let us try to interpret this geometrically.
More generally, if $x_{0}$ is a point in the domain of a function $f$, then $f$ is said to be differentiable at ${x}_{0}$ if the derivative $f ′(x_{0})$ exists. This means that the graph of $f$ has a non-vertical tangent line at the point $(x_{0}, f(x_{0}))$.
Source: Wikipedia
If so, where is the so-called unique tangent at $x=0$?
Source: WolframAlpha
Please find flaws in my interpretation, if any.
Thank you.
calculus derivatives
asked Jun 2 at 10:55
Swapnil Das
624517
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
We check the differentiability of $f(x) = xleft| x right| $ at $x=0$.
Evaluating derivatives from first principles, we find that the left hand and right hand derivatives both equate to $0$, which in principle proves that the function is differentiable at that point.
Now, let us try to interpret this geometrically.
More generally, if $x_{0}$ is a point in the domain of a function $f$, then $f$ is said to be differentiable at ${x}_{0}$ if the derivative $f ′(x_{0})$ exists. This means that the graph of $f$ has a non-vertical tangent line at the point $(x_{0}, f(x_{0}))$.
Source: Wikipedia
If so, where is the so-called unique tangent at $x=0$?
Source: WolframAlpha
Please find flaws in my interpretation, if any.
Thank you.
calculus derivatives
asked Jun 2 at 10:55
Swapnil Das
624517
We check the differentiability of $f(x) = xleft| x right| $ at $x=0$.
Evaluating derivatives from first principles, we find that the left hand and right hand derivatives both equate to $0$, which in principle proves that the function is differentiable at that point.
Now, let us try to interpret this geometrically.
More generally, if $x_{0}$ is a point in the domain of a function $f$, then $f$ is said to be differentiable at ${x}_{0}$ if the derivative $f ′(x_{0})$ exists. This means that the graph of $f$ has a non-vertical tangent line at the point $(x_{0}, f(x_{0}))$.
Source: Wikipedia
If so, where is the so-called unique tangent at $x=0$?
Source: WolframAlpha
Please find flaws in my interpretation, if any.
Thank you.
calculus derivatives
calculus derivatives
asked Jun 2 at 10:55
Swapnil Das
624517
asked Jun 2 at 10:55
Swapnil Das
624517
asked Jun 2 at 10:55
Swapnil Das
624517
asked Jun 2 at 10:55
Swapnil Das
624517
asked Jun 2 at 10:55
Swapnil Das
624517
624517
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Geometrically the derivative at a point can be interpreted for strictly convex or strictly concave graphs easily: the derivative at a point $(c,f(c))$ of a strictly convex (or strictly concave) graph exists if there is a unique straight line $g(x):= ax+b$ that intersect the graph of $f$ at the point $(c,f(c))$ such that $f(x)ge g(x)$ for all $x$ if $f$ is convex, or $f(x)le g(x)$ for all $x$ when $f$ is concave. Then we says that $a$ is the derivative of $f$ at $c$, that is, that $f'(c)=a$.
For other functions, not necessarily strictly concave or strictly convex, the geometric interpretation is not so clear because there are infinite straight lines that can cut the graph of a function uniquely at a point as in the function of your picture.
But the geometric definition of the derivative at points of strictly convex or strictly concave graphs define analitically the derivative through a limit, and we can extend this definition to other cases not necessarily strictly concave or strictly convex.
Note that there are strictly convex and strictly concave graphs of functions that doesn't have derivative at some points, because such straight line doesn't exists or because there are more than one straight line that intersect the graph of the function uniquely in some point.
answered Jun 2 at 11:12
Masacroso
12.8k41746
Nice answer. Can you provide us some examples of those 'patological' cases, please?
– Dog_69
Jun 2 at 16:34
2
@Dog_69 sorry, my previous comment was wrong :P. The function $$f(x):=begin{cases}x^2,&x<0\(x+1)^2-1,&xge 0end{cases}$$ is strictly convex but is not differentiable at zero because both straight lines $g_1(x):=0$ and $g_2(x):=2x$ cut the graph uniquely at the point $(0,0)$. Indeed any straight line of the form $g(x):=kx$ for $kin[0,2]$ does.
– Masacroso
Jun 2 at 17:05
don't worry. Thanks for the example.
– Dog_69
Jun 2 at 18:15
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you want to see the tangent at x=0, go to a graph plotter app (DESMOS), plot your graph (eg. x^3) and zoom it at x=0. Zoom upto that extent until the line becomes horizontal. This acts as the tangent at that point.
Isn't it amazing that a curve becomes parallel if zoomed to a large extent. Think it in a sense that Earth appears to be flat (because we are so small that Earth appears to be zoomed), but actually its not. So the flat surface acts as a tangent at any point where you are standing.
Hope you are clear with the geometrical approach.
answered Jun 2 at 11:20
Yash Mittal
1
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2805305%2fgeometrical-interpretation-of-differentiability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Geometrically the derivative at a point can be interpreted for strictly convex or strictly concave graphs easily: the derivative at a point $(c,f(c))$ of a strictly convex (or strictly concave) graph exists if there is a unique straight line $g(x):= ax+b$ that intersect the graph of $f$ at the point $(c,f(c))$ such that $f(x)ge g(x)$ for all $x$ if $f$ is convex, or $f(x)le g(x)$ for all $x$ when $f$ is concave. Then we says that $a$ is the derivative of $f$ at $c$, that is, that $f'(c)=a$.
For other functions, not necessarily strictly concave or strictly convex, the geometric interpretation is not so clear because there are infinite straight lines that can cut the graph of a function uniquely at a point as in the function of your picture.
But the geometric definition of the derivative at points of strictly convex or strictly concave graphs define analitically the derivative through a limit, and we can extend this definition to other cases not necessarily strictly concave or strictly convex.
Note that there are strictly convex and strictly concave graphs of functions that doesn't have derivative at some points, because such straight line doesn't exists or because there are more than one straight line that intersect the graph of the function uniquely in some point.
answered Jun 2 at 11:12
Masacroso
12.8k41746
Nice answer. Can you provide us some examples of those 'patological' cases, please?
– Dog_69
Jun 2 at 16:34
2
@Dog_69 sorry, my previous comment was wrong :P. The function $$f(x):=begin{cases}x^2,&x<0\(x+1)^2-1,&xge 0end{cases}$$ is strictly convex but is not differentiable at zero because both straight lines $g_1(x):=0$ and $g_2(x):=2x$ cut the graph uniquely at the point $(0,0)$. Indeed any straight line of the form $g(x):=kx$ for $kin[0,2]$ does.
– Masacroso
Jun 2 at 17:05
don't worry. Thanks for the example.
– Dog_69
Jun 2 at 18:15
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Geometrically the derivative at a point can be interpreted for strictly convex or strictly concave graphs easily: the derivative at a point $(c,f(c))$ of a strictly convex (or strictly concave) graph exists if there is a unique straight line $g(x):= ax+b$ that intersect the graph of $f$ at the point $(c,f(c))$ such that $f(x)ge g(x)$ for all $x$ if $f$ is convex, or $f(x)le g(x)$ for all $x$ when $f$ is concave. Then we says that $a$ is the derivative of $f$ at $c$, that is, that $f'(c)=a$.
For other functions, not necessarily strictly concave or strictly convex, the geometric interpretation is not so clear because there are infinite straight lines that can cut the graph of a function uniquely at a point as in the function of your picture.
But the geometric definition of the derivative at points of strictly convex or strictly concave graphs define analitically the derivative through a limit, and we can extend this definition to other cases not necessarily strictly concave or strictly convex.
Note that there are strictly convex and strictly concave graphs of functions that doesn't have derivative at some points, because such straight line doesn't exists or because there are more than one straight line that intersect the graph of the function uniquely in some point.
answered Jun 2 at 11:12
Masacroso
12.8k41746
Nice answer. Can you provide us some examples of those 'patological' cases, please?
– Dog_69
Jun 2 at 16:34
2
@Dog_69 sorry, my previous comment was wrong :P. The function $$f(x):=begin{cases}x^2,&x<0\(x+1)^2-1,&xge 0end{cases}$$ is strictly convex but is not differentiable at zero because both straight lines $g_1(x):=0$ and $g_2(x):=2x$ cut the graph uniquely at the point $(0,0)$. Indeed any straight line of the form $g(x):=kx$ for $kin[0,2]$ does.
– Masacroso
Jun 2 at 17:05
don't worry. Thanks for the example.
– Dog_69
Jun 2 at 18:15
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
Geometrically the derivative at a point can be interpreted for strictly convex or strictly concave graphs easily: the derivative at a point $(c,f(c))$ of a strictly convex (or strictly concave) graph exists if there is a unique straight line $g(x):= ax+b$ that intersect the graph of $f$ at the point $(c,f(c))$ such that $f(x)ge g(x)$ for all $x$ if $f$ is convex, or $f(x)le g(x)$ for all $x$ when $f$ is concave. Then we says that $a$ is the derivative of $f$ at $c$, that is, that $f'(c)=a$.
For other functions, not necessarily strictly concave or strictly convex, the geometric interpretation is not so clear because there are infinite straight lines that can cut the graph of a function uniquely at a point as in the function of your picture.
But the geometric definition of the derivative at points of strictly convex or strictly concave graphs define analitically the derivative through a limit, and we can extend this definition to other cases not necessarily strictly concave or strictly convex.
Note that there are strictly convex and strictly concave graphs of functions that doesn't have derivative at some points, because such straight line doesn't exists or because there are more than one straight line that intersect the graph of the function uniquely in some point.
answered Jun 2 at 11:12
Masacroso
12.8k41746
Geometrically the derivative at a point can be interpreted for strictly convex or strictly concave graphs easily: the derivative at a point $(c,f(c))$ of a strictly convex (or strictly concave) graph exists if there is a unique straight line $g(x):= ax+b$ that intersect the graph of $f$ at the point $(c,f(c))$ such that $f(x)ge g(x)$ for all $x$ if $f$ is convex, or $f(x)le g(x)$ for all $x$ when $f$ is concave. Then we says that $a$ is the derivative of $f$ at $c$, that is, that $f'(c)=a$.
For other functions, not necessarily strictly concave or strictly convex, the geometric interpretation is not so clear because there are infinite straight lines that can cut the graph of a function uniquely at a point as in the function of your picture.
But the geometric definition of the derivative at points of strictly convex or strictly concave graphs define analitically the derivative through a limit, and we can extend this definition to other cases not necessarily strictly concave or strictly convex.
Note that there are strictly convex and strictly concave graphs of functions that doesn't have derivative at some points, because such straight line doesn't exists or because there are more than one straight line that intersect the graph of the function uniquely in some point.
answered Jun 2 at 11:12
Masacroso
12.8k41746
edited Dec 6 at 2:27
answered Jun 2 at 11:12
Masacroso
12.8k41746
answered Jun 2 at 11:12
Masacroso
12.8k41746
answered Jun 2 at 11:12
Masacroso
12.8k41746
12.8k41746
Nice answer. Can you provide us some examples of those 'patological' cases, please?
– Dog_69
Jun 2 at 16:34
2
@Dog_69 sorry, my previous comment was wrong :P. The function $$f(x):=begin{cases}x^2,&x<0\(x+1)^2-1,&xge 0end{cases}$$ is strictly convex but is not differentiable at zero because both straight lines $g_1(x):=0$ and $g_2(x):=2x$ cut the graph uniquely at the point $(0,0)$. Indeed any straight line of the form $g(x):=kx$ for $kin[0,2]$ does.
– Masacroso
Jun 2 at 17:05
don't worry. Thanks for the example.
– Dog_69
Jun 2 at 18:15
add a comment |
Nice answer. Can you provide us some examples of those 'patological' cases, please?
– Dog_69
Jun 2 at 16:34
2
@Dog_69 sorry, my previous comment was wrong :P. The function $$f(x):=begin{cases}x^2,&x<0\(x+1)^2-1,&xge 0end{cases}$$ is strictly convex but is not differentiable at zero because both straight lines $g_1(x):=0$ and $g_2(x):=2x$ cut the graph uniquely at the point $(0,0)$. Indeed any straight line of the form $g(x):=kx$ for $kin[0,2]$ does.
– Masacroso
Jun 2 at 17:05
don't worry. Thanks for the example.
– Dog_69
Jun 2 at 18:15
Nice answer. Can you provide us some examples of those 'patological' cases, please?
– Dog_69
Jun 2 at 16:34
Nice answer. Can you provide us some examples of those 'patological' cases, please?
– Dog_69
Jun 2 at 16:34
2
2
@Dog_69 sorry, my previous comment was wrong :P. The function $$f(x):=begin{cases}x^2,&x<0\(x+1)^2-1,&xge 0end{cases}$$ is strictly convex but is not differentiable at zero because both straight lines $g_1(x):=0$ and $g_2(x):=2x$ cut the graph uniquely at the point $(0,0)$. Indeed any straight line of the form $g(x):=kx$ for $kin[0,2]$ does.
– Masacroso
Jun 2 at 17:05
@Dog_69 sorry, my previous comment was wrong :P. The function $$f(x):=begin{cases}x^2,&x<0\(x+1)^2-1,&xge 0end{cases}$$ is strictly convex but is not differentiable at zero because both straight lines $g_1(x):=0$ and $g_2(x):=2x$ cut the graph uniquely at the point $(0,0)$. Indeed any straight line of the form $g(x):=kx$ for $kin[0,2]$ does.
– Masacroso
Jun 2 at 17:05
don't worry. Thanks for the example.
– Dog_69
Jun 2 at 18:15
don't worry. Thanks for the example.
– Dog_69
Jun 2 at 18:15
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you want to see the tangent at x=0, go to a graph plotter app (DESMOS), plot your graph (eg. x^3) and zoom it at x=0. Zoom upto that extent until the line becomes horizontal. This acts as the tangent at that point.
Isn't it amazing that a curve becomes parallel if zoomed to a large extent. Think it in a sense that Earth appears to be flat (because we are so small that Earth appears to be zoomed), but actually its not. So the flat surface acts as a tangent at any point where you are standing.
Hope you are clear with the geometrical approach.
answered Jun 2 at 11:20
Yash Mittal
1
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
If you want to see the tangent at x=0, go to a graph plotter app (DESMOS), plot your graph (eg. x^3) and zoom it at x=0. Zoom upto that extent until the line becomes horizontal. This acts as the tangent at that point.
Isn't it amazing that a curve becomes parallel if zoomed to a large extent. Think it in a sense that Earth appears to be flat (because we are so small that Earth appears to be zoomed), but actually its not. So the flat surface acts as a tangent at any point where you are standing.
Hope you are clear with the geometrical approach.
answered Jun 2 at 11:20
Yash Mittal
1
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
If you want to see the tangent at x=0, go to a graph plotter app (DESMOS), plot your graph (eg. x^3) and zoom it at x=0. Zoom upto that extent until the line becomes horizontal. This acts as the tangent at that point.
Isn't it amazing that a curve becomes parallel if zoomed to a large extent. Think it in a sense that Earth appears to be flat (because we are so small that Earth appears to be zoomed), but actually its not. So the flat surface acts as a tangent at any point where you are standing.
Hope you are clear with the geometrical approach.
answered Jun 2 at 11:20
Yash Mittal
1
If you want to see the tangent at x=0, go to a graph plotter app (DESMOS), plot your graph (eg. x^3) and zoom it at x=0. Zoom upto that extent until the line becomes horizontal. This acts as the tangent at that point.
Isn't it amazing that a curve becomes parallel if zoomed to a large extent. Think it in a sense that Earth appears to be flat (because we are so small that Earth appears to be zoomed), but actually its not. So the flat surface acts as a tangent at any point where you are standing.
Hope you are clear with the geometrical approach.
answered Jun 2 at 11:20
Yash Mittal
1
answered Jun 2 at 11:20
Yash Mittal
1
answered Jun 2 at 11:20
Yash Mittal
1
answered Jun 2 at 11:20
Yash Mittal
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2805305%2fgeometrical-interpretation-of-differentiability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
