Predicate Logic Quantifiers Question











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm kinda confused regarding predicate quantifiers.



Firstly, what's the difference between



$forall x .Tourist(x)$ and $forall x in Tourists$



I mean I understand that the first is a predicate form and the second implies that it belongs in the Tourist set but is there a specific case I should be using each one?



Additionally is $forall x.Tourist(x).exists y.Country(y).Likes(x,y)$ the same as:



$forall xexists y.Tourist(x) land Country(y) implies Likes(x,y)$ ??



If not what's the difference?



I'm really struggling to understand these things.



Any help would be much appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question






















  • $∀x ∈ text {Tourists}$ is not predicate logic. In predicate logic we have predicate symbols, like $text {Tourists}(x)$ and quantifiers : $∀$ and $∃$. We quantify variables occurring in formulas with predicate symbols : $∀x text {Tourists}(x)$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:48












  • This according to the rules of the syntax. But "intuitively", they mean the same : "every object is a Tourist".
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:49










  • Regarding the formula, the "dot" is used as a parenthesis. Thus, again, the correct expression is the second one, with the $land$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:51










  • But in math shorthand, we are used to write something, like $forall n in mathbb N P(n)$. Here we use the set-name $mathbb N$ instead of a predicate symbol : $mathbb N(x)$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:52










  • Thus, the "rule" is : "to be consistent and clear". Either : $forall x in A P(x)$ or $forall x (A(x) to P(x))$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:53















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm kinda confused regarding predicate quantifiers.



Firstly, what's the difference between



$forall x .Tourist(x)$ and $forall x in Tourists$



I mean I understand that the first is a predicate form and the second implies that it belongs in the Tourist set but is there a specific case I should be using each one?



Additionally is $forall x.Tourist(x).exists y.Country(y).Likes(x,y)$ the same as:



$forall xexists y.Tourist(x) land Country(y) implies Likes(x,y)$ ??



If not what's the difference?



I'm really struggling to understand these things.



Any help would be much appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question






















  • $∀x ∈ text {Tourists}$ is not predicate logic. In predicate logic we have predicate symbols, like $text {Tourists}(x)$ and quantifiers : $∀$ and $∃$. We quantify variables occurring in formulas with predicate symbols : $∀x text {Tourists}(x)$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:48












  • This according to the rules of the syntax. But "intuitively", they mean the same : "every object is a Tourist".
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:49










  • Regarding the formula, the "dot" is used as a parenthesis. Thus, again, the correct expression is the second one, with the $land$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:51










  • But in math shorthand, we are used to write something, like $forall n in mathbb N P(n)$. Here we use the set-name $mathbb N$ instead of a predicate symbol : $mathbb N(x)$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:52










  • Thus, the "rule" is : "to be consistent and clear". Either : $forall x in A P(x)$ or $forall x (A(x) to P(x))$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:53













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'm kinda confused regarding predicate quantifiers.



Firstly, what's the difference between



$forall x .Tourist(x)$ and $forall x in Tourists$



I mean I understand that the first is a predicate form and the second implies that it belongs in the Tourist set but is there a specific case I should be using each one?



Additionally is $forall x.Tourist(x).exists y.Country(y).Likes(x,y)$ the same as:



$forall xexists y.Tourist(x) land Country(y) implies Likes(x,y)$ ??



If not what's the difference?



I'm really struggling to understand these things.



Any help would be much appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question













I'm kinda confused regarding predicate quantifiers.



Firstly, what's the difference between



$forall x .Tourist(x)$ and $forall x in Tourists$



I mean I understand that the first is a predicate form and the second implies that it belongs in the Tourist set but is there a specific case I should be using each one?



Additionally is $forall x.Tourist(x).exists y.Country(y).Likes(x,y)$ the same as:



$forall xexists y.Tourist(x) land Country(y) implies Likes(x,y)$ ??



If not what's the difference?



I'm really struggling to understand these things.



Any help would be much appreciated!







logic predicate-logic quantifiers






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 6 at 2:47









RottenJunkie555

1




1












  • $∀x ∈ text {Tourists}$ is not predicate logic. In predicate logic we have predicate symbols, like $text {Tourists}(x)$ and quantifiers : $∀$ and $∃$. We quantify variables occurring in formulas with predicate symbols : $∀x text {Tourists}(x)$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:48












  • This according to the rules of the syntax. But "intuitively", they mean the same : "every object is a Tourist".
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:49










  • Regarding the formula, the "dot" is used as a parenthesis. Thus, again, the correct expression is the second one, with the $land$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:51










  • But in math shorthand, we are used to write something, like $forall n in mathbb N P(n)$. Here we use the set-name $mathbb N$ instead of a predicate symbol : $mathbb N(x)$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:52










  • Thus, the "rule" is : "to be consistent and clear". Either : $forall x in A P(x)$ or $forall x (A(x) to P(x))$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:53


















  • $∀x ∈ text {Tourists}$ is not predicate logic. In predicate logic we have predicate symbols, like $text {Tourists}(x)$ and quantifiers : $∀$ and $∃$. We quantify variables occurring in formulas with predicate symbols : $∀x text {Tourists}(x)$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:48












  • This according to the rules of the syntax. But "intuitively", they mean the same : "every object is a Tourist".
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:49










  • Regarding the formula, the "dot" is used as a parenthesis. Thus, again, the correct expression is the second one, with the $land$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:51










  • But in math shorthand, we are used to write something, like $forall n in mathbb N P(n)$. Here we use the set-name $mathbb N$ instead of a predicate symbol : $mathbb N(x)$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:52










  • Thus, the "rule" is : "to be consistent and clear". Either : $forall x in A P(x)$ or $forall x (A(x) to P(x))$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Dec 6 at 7:53
















$∀x ∈ text {Tourists}$ is not predicate logic. In predicate logic we have predicate symbols, like $text {Tourists}(x)$ and quantifiers : $∀$ and $∃$. We quantify variables occurring in formulas with predicate symbols : $∀x text {Tourists}(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:48






$∀x ∈ text {Tourists}$ is not predicate logic. In predicate logic we have predicate symbols, like $text {Tourists}(x)$ and quantifiers : $∀$ and $∃$. We quantify variables occurring in formulas with predicate symbols : $∀x text {Tourists}(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:48














This according to the rules of the syntax. But "intuitively", they mean the same : "every object is a Tourist".
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:49




This according to the rules of the syntax. But "intuitively", they mean the same : "every object is a Tourist".
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:49












Regarding the formula, the "dot" is used as a parenthesis. Thus, again, the correct expression is the second one, with the $land$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:51




Regarding the formula, the "dot" is used as a parenthesis. Thus, again, the correct expression is the second one, with the $land$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:51












But in math shorthand, we are used to write something, like $forall n in mathbb N P(n)$. Here we use the set-name $mathbb N$ instead of a predicate symbol : $mathbb N(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:52




But in math shorthand, we are used to write something, like $forall n in mathbb N P(n)$. Here we use the set-name $mathbb N$ instead of a predicate symbol : $mathbb N(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:52












Thus, the "rule" is : "to be consistent and clear". Either : $forall x in A P(x)$ or $forall x (A(x) to P(x))$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:53




Thus, the "rule" is : "to be consistent and clear". Either : $forall x in A P(x)$ or $forall x (A(x) to P(x))$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:53















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027974%2fpredicate-logic-quantifiers-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027974%2fpredicate-logic-quantifiers-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna