Predicate Logic Quantifiers Question
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm kinda confused regarding predicate quantifiers.
Firstly, what's the difference between
$forall x .Tourist(x)$ and $forall x in Tourists$
I mean I understand that the first is a predicate form and the second implies that it belongs in the Tourist set but is there a specific case I should be using each one?
Additionally is $forall x.Tourist(x).exists y.Country(y).Likes(x,y)$ the same as:
$forall xexists y.Tourist(x) land Country(y) implies Likes(x,y)$ ??
If not what's the difference?
I'm really struggling to understand these things.
Any help would be much appreciated!
logic predicate-logic quantifiers
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm kinda confused regarding predicate quantifiers.
Firstly, what's the difference between
$forall x .Tourist(x)$ and $forall x in Tourists$
I mean I understand that the first is a predicate form and the second implies that it belongs in the Tourist set but is there a specific case I should be using each one?
Additionally is $forall x.Tourist(x).exists y.Country(y).Likes(x,y)$ the same as:
$forall xexists y.Tourist(x) land Country(y) implies Likes(x,y)$ ??
If not what's the difference?
I'm really struggling to understand these things.
Any help would be much appreciated!
logic predicate-logic quantifiers
$∀x ∈ text {Tourists}$ is not predicate logic. In predicate logic we have predicate symbols, like $text {Tourists}(x)$ and quantifiers : $∀$ and $∃$. We quantify variables occurring in formulas with predicate symbols : $∀x text {Tourists}(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:48
This according to the rules of the syntax. But "intuitively", they mean the same : "every object is a Tourist".
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:49
Regarding the formula, the "dot" is used as a parenthesis. Thus, again, the correct expression is the second one, with the $land$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:51
But in math shorthand, we are used to write something, like $forall n in mathbb N P(n)$. Here we use the set-name $mathbb N$ instead of a predicate symbol : $mathbb N(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:52
Thus, the "rule" is : "to be consistent and clear". Either : $forall x in A P(x)$ or $forall x (A(x) to P(x))$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:53
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm kinda confused regarding predicate quantifiers.
Firstly, what's the difference between
$forall x .Tourist(x)$ and $forall x in Tourists$
I mean I understand that the first is a predicate form and the second implies that it belongs in the Tourist set but is there a specific case I should be using each one?
Additionally is $forall x.Tourist(x).exists y.Country(y).Likes(x,y)$ the same as:
$forall xexists y.Tourist(x) land Country(y) implies Likes(x,y)$ ??
If not what's the difference?
I'm really struggling to understand these things.
Any help would be much appreciated!
logic predicate-logic quantifiers
I'm kinda confused regarding predicate quantifiers.
Firstly, what's the difference between
$forall x .Tourist(x)$ and $forall x in Tourists$
I mean I understand that the first is a predicate form and the second implies that it belongs in the Tourist set but is there a specific case I should be using each one?
Additionally is $forall x.Tourist(x).exists y.Country(y).Likes(x,y)$ the same as:
$forall xexists y.Tourist(x) land Country(y) implies Likes(x,y)$ ??
If not what's the difference?
I'm really struggling to understand these things.
Any help would be much appreciated!
logic predicate-logic quantifiers
logic predicate-logic quantifiers
asked Dec 6 at 2:47
RottenJunkie555
1
1
$∀x ∈ text {Tourists}$ is not predicate logic. In predicate logic we have predicate symbols, like $text {Tourists}(x)$ and quantifiers : $∀$ and $∃$. We quantify variables occurring in formulas with predicate symbols : $∀x text {Tourists}(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:48
This according to the rules of the syntax. But "intuitively", they mean the same : "every object is a Tourist".
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:49
Regarding the formula, the "dot" is used as a parenthesis. Thus, again, the correct expression is the second one, with the $land$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:51
But in math shorthand, we are used to write something, like $forall n in mathbb N P(n)$. Here we use the set-name $mathbb N$ instead of a predicate symbol : $mathbb N(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:52
Thus, the "rule" is : "to be consistent and clear". Either : $forall x in A P(x)$ or $forall x (A(x) to P(x))$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:53
add a comment |
$∀x ∈ text {Tourists}$ is not predicate logic. In predicate logic we have predicate symbols, like $text {Tourists}(x)$ and quantifiers : $∀$ and $∃$. We quantify variables occurring in formulas with predicate symbols : $∀x text {Tourists}(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:48
This according to the rules of the syntax. But "intuitively", they mean the same : "every object is a Tourist".
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:49
Regarding the formula, the "dot" is used as a parenthesis. Thus, again, the correct expression is the second one, with the $land$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:51
But in math shorthand, we are used to write something, like $forall n in mathbb N P(n)$. Here we use the set-name $mathbb N$ instead of a predicate symbol : $mathbb N(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:52
Thus, the "rule" is : "to be consistent and clear". Either : $forall x in A P(x)$ or $forall x (A(x) to P(x))$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:53
$∀x ∈ text {Tourists}$ is not predicate logic. In predicate logic we have predicate symbols, like $text {Tourists}(x)$ and quantifiers : $∀$ and $∃$. We quantify variables occurring in formulas with predicate symbols : $∀x text {Tourists}(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:48
$∀x ∈ text {Tourists}$ is not predicate logic. In predicate logic we have predicate symbols, like $text {Tourists}(x)$ and quantifiers : $∀$ and $∃$. We quantify variables occurring in formulas with predicate symbols : $∀x text {Tourists}(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:48
This according to the rules of the syntax. But "intuitively", they mean the same : "every object is a Tourist".
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:49
This according to the rules of the syntax. But "intuitively", they mean the same : "every object is a Tourist".
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:49
Regarding the formula, the "dot" is used as a parenthesis. Thus, again, the correct expression is the second one, with the $land$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:51
Regarding the formula, the "dot" is used as a parenthesis. Thus, again, the correct expression is the second one, with the $land$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:51
But in math shorthand, we are used to write something, like $forall n in mathbb N P(n)$. Here we use the set-name $mathbb N$ instead of a predicate symbol : $mathbb N(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:52
But in math shorthand, we are used to write something, like $forall n in mathbb N P(n)$. Here we use the set-name $mathbb N$ instead of a predicate symbol : $mathbb N(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:52
Thus, the "rule" is : "to be consistent and clear". Either : $forall x in A P(x)$ or $forall x (A(x) to P(x))$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:53
Thus, the "rule" is : "to be consistent and clear". Either : $forall x in A P(x)$ or $forall x (A(x) to P(x))$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:53
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027974%2fpredicate-logic-quantifiers-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027974%2fpredicate-logic-quantifiers-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$∀x ∈ text {Tourists}$ is not predicate logic. In predicate logic we have predicate symbols, like $text {Tourists}(x)$ and quantifiers : $∀$ and $∃$. We quantify variables occurring in formulas with predicate symbols : $∀x text {Tourists}(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:48
This according to the rules of the syntax. But "intuitively", they mean the same : "every object is a Tourist".
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:49
Regarding the formula, the "dot" is used as a parenthesis. Thus, again, the correct expression is the second one, with the $land$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:51
But in math shorthand, we are used to write something, like $forall n in mathbb N P(n)$. Here we use the set-name $mathbb N$ instead of a predicate symbol : $mathbb N(x)$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:52
Thus, the "rule" is : "to be consistent and clear". Either : $forall x in A P(x)$ or $forall x (A(x) to P(x))$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Dec 6 at 7:53